Tag: islamophobia
Bari Weiss

Bari Weiss' CBS News Frames El-Sayed With Islamophobic 9/11 'Analysis'

CBS News published an August 31 article linking Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed with the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the latest example of the news organization’s rightward shift under editor-in-chief Bari Weiss. In reality, El-Sayed's comments, which he made on social media, were sober and well within the bounds of typical political discourse.

The piece’s headline appeared designed to suggest that El-Sayed, who is Muslim, had disrespected the victims of the attacks or had somehow justified them. Even by CBS News' account, El-Sayed simply invoked the 9/11 death toll while discussing surging deaths during the pandemic and hoped for a strong response across the country to help Americans.

In one of the posts reported by CBS, El-Sayed “compared the nearly 3,000 Americans killed on Sept. 11 to the mounting COVID-19 death toll and argued for a response commensurate with the nation's post-9/11 mobilization.” A different post similarly called for the United States to “spend the next ten years fighting a war for public health & against poverty” in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In another, El-Sayed mourned the loss of life on 9/11 and in the United States’ reaction to the attacks, which devastated countries across the Middle East.

Contrary to CBS News’ innuendo, many public figures compared the death tolls of COVID and 9/11.

  • In April 2020, President Donald Trump’s surgeon general said the pandemic would be “our Pearl Harbor moment, our 9/11 moment.”
  • Andrew Cuomo, then governor of New York, said in March 2020 that COVID “reminds me of 9/11 where one moment, which was inconceivable, just changed everything.”
  • In May 2020, Trump said: “This is worse than Pearl Harbor, this is worse than the World Trade Center. There's never been an attack like this.”
  • In January 2021, Dr. Robert Redfield, then the outgoing director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said “that we were going to be in for day after day after day — back in early December, of losing more people than we lost in Pearl Harbor and 9/11 every day.”
  • Fox News’ Neil Cavuto: “Yesterday, we had a record number of deaths in this country, more than died on 9/11.”
  • Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld: “In that case, this virus is much like 9/11. … So we have to think about this the same way we think about terrorism and thinking about 9/11.”
  • Like El-Sayed, comedian Chris Rock hoped that the government would respond forcefully to the pandemic. “I just hope that all that’s happened, that this whole year was not in vain, and that people and the government doesn’t just go back to business as usual,” he said in December 2020. “Like, basically, there’s a 9/11 every day.”

CBS News’ Islamophobic framing comes amid a rising wave of anti-Muslim animus in right-wing media, and illustrates how that kind of bigotry can easily migrate to once-respected media organizations. The outlet has lurched to the right under its new owner, David Ellison, and Weiss, a conservative journalist with no experience in broadcast news.

The Ellison-Weiss smash-and-grab has resulted in low morale at CBS News and several high-profile resignations, including veteran journalist Scott Pelley from 60 Minutes. In an interview with The New York Times, Pelley claimed that Weiss had asked him to revise a February segment on demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s deadly crackdown in Minneapolis to “make the protesters look more violent.” Weiss had previously spiked a segment on the notorious CECOT prison in El Salvador in a move many interpreted as her attempt to kill a story that made the Trump administration look bad. (The segment eventually aired in early 2026.)

Ellison’s company, Paramount Skydance, is currently attempting to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent company of CNN. Should the deal eventually go through, there is every reason to believe Ellison would introduce the kind of chaos and political bias at CNN that he and his deputies have brought to CBS News.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Hegseth For President? It's A Laughable Idea That Must Be Taken Seriously

Hegseth For President? It's A Laughable Idea That Must Be Taken Seriously

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth may be contemplating a promotion. His Monday trip to campaign with Republican congressional candidates in Iowa, home of the first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses, spurred a Washington Post report that the visit is consistent with the belief among “officials familiar with Hegseth’s thinking” that he “is considering a run for president or some other political office after his time in the Trump administration is over.”

Hegseth, a bombastic former Fox News weekend host who spent years speaking directly to the Republican base through that MAGA propaganda network, may be uniquely attuned to the right's attention economy. He could become the presidential candidate of the right-wing media’s id, running a furious culture war campaign fixated on domestic political enemies that checks all the boxes for authoritarian-minded pundits indifferent to traditional policy issues.

Anti-Muslim. Hegseth has much to offer the MAGA pundits who casually declare that “Islam is here to kill us and convert us” and call for “using military force to start raiding mosques and removing these people from our country.” At home, he has decried the “Muslims’ birth rates” in multiple states and fearmongered about the success of Muslim political candidates, warning that “Islamists” are trying “to seed the West with as many Muslims as possible.” And abroad, he has written that “just like the Christian crusaders who pushed back the Muslim hordes in the twelfth century, American Crusaders will need to muster the same courage against Islamists today” — then literally overseen U.S. forces bombing Muslims in Iran and Yemen as defense secretary.

Anti-DEI. At Fox, Hegseth was at the forefront of the right’s assault on policy initiatives promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI, warning that such policies had weakened the military and calling for “a new commander in chief that’s going to get rid of all of this CRT, DEI nonsense, all the gender nonsense.” He’s now put that into practice at the Pentagon, firing or canceling the promotions of numerous Black and female senior officers, overseeing the banning and attempted expulsion of trans service members, and launching a study that seems engineered to ban women from serving in combat roles.

Anti-press. Right-wing media hate the traditional press, and Hegseth, who urged readers of his 2020 book to “disdain, despise, detest, [and] distrust” the news media, never misses an opportunity to demonstrate his contempt for mainstream reporters. He’s smeared news outlets as unpatriotic for not running headlines like “Iran increasingly desperate,” and mocked and derided individual reporters, even denouncing his former Fox colleague Jennifer Griffin as “the one who misrepresents the most intentionally.” Under his leadership, the Pentagon rolled out a stringent new set of rules for reporters and, when journalists at major news outlets turned in their press passes rather than signing them, replaced those reporters with right-wing influencers and staffers from MAGA outlets.

Anti-immigrant. Perhaps no current issue unites the right-wing commentariat like virulent attacks on immigrants — and Hegseth’s rhetoric aligns perfectly with them. “When you import the Third World, you get Third World hierarchy, values, and chaos,” he said in a November 2024 Fox segment, adding: “Your quality of life is going down. You feel less safe. Your resources are being drained. ... But don't speak up about that. If you do, you're the racist.” As defense secretary, he used a speech in France marking the anniversary of D-Day to attack the “invasion” of migrants hitting European beaches, asking, “When will European capitals do something about that invasion?”

Pro-war crimes. It’s not an overstatement to say that Hegseth has his current position because the president appreciated his Fox advocacy on behalf of U.S. service members accused or convicted of war crimes, which he seems to reject as a legitimate category. He wrote in 2024: “Should we follow the Geneva Conventions? What if we treated the enemy the way they treated us? Would that not be an incentive for the other side to reconsider their barbarism?” At the Pentagon, Hegseth “has fired and reassigned uniformed lawyers and dismantled many of the offices set up to prevent the targeting of civilians and related sites,” focused his public statements on the need for “lethality,” and carried out operations in the Middle East, Indian Ocean, eastern Pacific Ocean, and Caribbean Sea that experts say could include war crimes, as The New York Times reported.

Pro-Christian nationalism. Hegseth has “invok[ed] Christian theology in public statements about the war with Iran,” including urging the American public to pray “every day, on bended knee” for a military victory in the Middle East “in the name of Jesus Christ,” and told a conference of defense ministers from the Western Hemisphere that “our nations” are “Christian nations under God,” the Times reported. He invited Pastor Doug Wilson, “a self-described Christian nationalist who wants to repeal a woman's right to vote, has defended slavery and believes homosexuality should be a crime,” to give a sermon at the Pentagon earlier this year.

Together with his abject loyalty to Donald Trump, those positions make Hegseth a plausible candidate for the GOP ticket. That could come in the form of a 2028 primary battle against Vice President JD Vance, who has fallen out of favor with much of the right-wing media. But the former Fox & Friends Weekend co-host is also just 46 years old — if Vance wins the nomination but loses the general election that year, Hegseth could easily spend a few years returning to the network as a contributor or hosting a podcast, sitting on defense industry boards, and campaigning for Republicans before running for the 2032 nomination.

Hegseth was manifestly unqualified for his current position, his stewardship of the Pentagon has been a series of rolling disasters, and he is among the most unpopular members of Trump’s widely reviled administration. But in a world in which the former host of The Apprentice is currently serving his second term in the Oval Office, it is worth taking Hegseth’s potential candidacy seriously.

Kevin DeAnna and Uwe Boll

On Media Tour, 'Citizen Vigilante' Director Appears On White Nationalist Shows

Uwe Boll, the director of Citizen Vigilante, went on white nationalist Kevin DeAnna’s program and criticized “Islamistic migrants” amid a media tour that included multiple right-wing shows from late June into early July — saying “they don’t adjust” and “instead, they want to take over, and they want to make everybody … Muslim or whatever.” During the tour, Boll also claimed migrants “don’t really learn, and they don’t really work” — and he promoted his new film, which reportedly “repeats the baseless great replacement conspiracy theory that Muslim immigrants have overrun” Europe.

The tour consisted of appearances on Newsmax and One America News Network and at least seven online shows, including DeAnna’s podcast, Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec, The Anthony Rogers Show, Piers Morgan Uncensored, PBD Podcast, Lauren Chen’s show, and Mario Nawfal’s podcast.

Media Matters found full episodes of these online shows featuring Boll earned over 900,000 combined views on YouTube and Rumble, with PBD Podcast and Piers Morgan Uncensored accounting for more than 260,000 views and over 570,000 views, respectively.

According to WIRED, actor Armie Hammer plays a character in Boll’s new film who is “angered by what he sees as a Muslim takeover of the continent” and “embarks on an extrajudicial killing spree of migrants, youths, and judges he views as complicit.” The movie, which “was released in June just weeks after anti-immigrant riots roiled the UK and Northern Ireland,” has been “widely panned by critics who called it ‘astonishingly bad’ and ‘racist, xenophobic, ethnocentrist, alt-right agitprop.’” Since the film’s release, “white supremacists and other extremists have praised the movie’s message and claimed that it can act like a playbook to follow in real life,” and “some far-right groups have been holding live screenings of the film online.”

During his media tour, Boll claimed that his film is about “so many cases of random rapes, random stabbings, random violence” that have “happened based on mass migration, period”; that it is “completely unacceptable that this mass migration is still happening”; and that migration is “shuffl[ing] your own grave.”

On July 2, Boll told Piers Morgan that he opposes “this uncontrolled migration,” explaining, “I think these people need to get properly integrated and not like, OK, we let them in and then all the communities are completely overloaded with them and it all ends in a disaster.” On July 7, he told PBD Podcast host Patrick Bet-David that “as more illegal migration comes … they don't bring value to the society.”

On July 8, Boll appeared on DeAnna's Identity Politics podcast. As reported by journalist Christopher Mathias for MS NOW, DeAnna is “a prominent white nationalist,” who in 2012 wrote an article titled “White Nationalist Memo to White Male Republicans” encouraging white American men to “fight for a country of your own.”

During the interview, Boll told DeAnna that “it was clear for me that there will be people supporting [the movie] more from the conservative people, you know, and who knows the problems are real.” And while he discussed migrants in Europe with DeAnna, Boll said, “It’s all fake with political asylum,” and, “They’re just coming to be in the social services, basically, to get money,” adding that “they don’t really adjust, they don’t really learn, and they don’t really work.” He also told DeAnna that “media in Europe, and in the U.S., actually, tries to sugarcoat this fundamental different, like, ways of life of, for example, Islamistic migrants have, and then they're coming into the country and they don't adjust” and instead “take over.”

KEVIN DEANNA (HOST): Congratulations on the success of the movie. I mean, this has got to be way beyond your initial expectations. Or did you expect this all along?

UWE BOLL (DIRECTOR OF CITIZEN VIGILANTE): I mean, I expected that a lot of discussion will happen, and I didn’t expect that the audience will react so positive and overwhelming. You know, I got thousands of messages. People saying, “Finally, a movie presenting our point of view,” and so on. And that makes me happy. You know, I was aware that the established media will condemn it and flip completely out about it.

DEANNA: Was it something where — what really prompted this? Because obviously, it’s a hugely controversial topic and everything else, but — and you tell it straight and at the end, there’s a dedication to all the people who’ve been let down by the legal system. What made you decide on this, knowing that you might get in trouble for something like this, particularly with the way the situation is in Germany?

BOLL: I’m kind of a troublemaker, right? So I like to stir the pot.

...

So here, I was just, like, looking at the way — how the media in Europe, and in the U.S., actually, tries to sugarcoat this fundamental different, like, ways of life of, for example, Islamistic migrants have, and then they’re coming into the country and they don’t adjust. Instead, they want to take over, and they want to make everybody, like, now Muslim or whatever. You know? And that’s — they do crimes, then the crime’s getting downplayed. You know, then they’re getting, like, German passports, for example.

So then that’s like, “No. They didn't any crimes.” Right? So because now only Germans did the crime, as an example. So there was — there is so much tricks and trying to water down the real situation that I felt, you know, I cannot watch this anymore and I have to make a movie what comes like a sledgehammer. You know, like far above —

DEANNA: Right.

BOLL: — what they would ever green light, far above what they would ever think somebody would do actually.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

False Charges Of Islamophobia Expose 'Woke' Intolerance In Academia

False Charges Of Islamophobia Expose 'Woke' Intolerance In Academia

Chances are, your humble, obedient servant here will never be invited to teach at Hamline University, a Methodist school in St. Paul, Minnesota. For one thing, I’m almost old enough to be president of the United States — that is, well beyond my professorial sell-by date.

For another, administrative jellyfish who cave to self-dramatizing undergraduates demanding to dictate on religious grounds what can and cannot be taught in the institution’s classrooms fill me with disdain. I’d be almost certain to end up embroiled in some soul-deadening, comic opera dispute like the one roiling Hamline’s campus over the past several months.

Been there, done that. Never again.

The Hamline controversy began when Erika Lopez Prater, an adjunct lecturer, showed her art history class a slide of a 14th-century Persian painting depicting the angel Gabriel delivering a revelation to the Prophet Muhammad. The image derives from an early Islamic history of the world, A Compendium of Chronicles, written by Rashid al-Din (1247-1318).

Conceived and executed as a devotional work, the image is regarded by art historians as “a masterpiece of Persian manuscript painting,” in the words of Christiane Gruber, a professor of Islamic art at the University of Michigan. She added that studying Islamic art without the Compendium of Chronicles image “would be like not teaching Michelangelo’s David.”

Aware that many contemporary understandings of Islam regard visual depictions of the prophet as heretical (lest the faithful confuse Muhammad with God and fall into idolatry), the Hamline instructor handed out a course syllabus cautioning students that paintings depicting Jesus, Buddha and Muhammad would be studied.

Before showing the Persian painting, she gave her class a verbal caution, saying that anybody reluctant to view it was encouraged to leave the classroom. Nobody did. After class, however, Aram Wedatalla, a senior business major and president of the university’s Muslim Student Association, stayed to complain. In subsequent public forums, according to The New York Times, the student described herself as having been “blindsided” by the disturbing image.

“I’m like, ‘This can’t be real,”’ said Wedatalla, who described herself as Sudanese. “As a Muslim and a Black person, I don’t feel like I belong, and I don’t think I’ll ever belong in a community where they don’t value me as a member and they don’t show the same respect that I show them.”

As I am of a low and suspicious nature, it’s occurred to me that the complaining student enrolled in the class precisely to be offended.

Evidently, she chose the right school. Hamline administrators first expressed shame, and then groveled into action. First, the dean of the college informed Lopez Prater that showing the artwork was exactly like using a racial slur toward Black students. Next, the “vice president for inclusive excellence” sent a campus-wide email describing the art teacher’s actions as “undeniably inconsiderate, disrespectful and Islamophobic.”

Essentially charged with blasphemy, Lopez Prater was soon informed that her services were no longer required. Hamline canceled her contract. The institution’s president, Fayneese S. Miller, delivered herself of a statement arguing that respect for the Muslim students “should have superseded academic freedom.”

“To look upon an image of the Prophet Muhammad, for many Muslims, is against their faith,” the president explained in a subsequent statement, adding, “It was important that our Muslim students, as well as all other students, feel safe, supported and respected both in and out of our classrooms.”

In short, as Jill Filipovic wrote in Slate, “the extremely delicate sensibilities of a handful of little religious tyrants (and their apparent inability to read a syllabus or listen to the professor’s words) ‘should have superseded academic freedom.”’

Young Wedatalla wasn’t arguing that she shouldn’t have been forced to look at the offending art; clearly, she wasn’t.

Instead, she was in effect arguing that students at Hamline shouldn’t be allowed to study images that offended her religious views. Perhaps she should transfer to a university in Saudi Arabia. There, her views would prevail. Better to avoid Iran, however, where Persian art is venerated.

Alas, the state’s chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations has issued a statement to the effect that “displaying the image of the Prophet is intended to communicate hate.” The national organization, however, has sanely concluded that it sees no evidence that Lopez Prater “acted with Islamophobic intent or engaged in conduct that meets our definition of Islamophobia.”

Nor any sensible person’s.

Meanwhile, Hamline alumni and trustees should recognize that adult supervision on the campus is definitely required. PEN America has described the episode as “one of the most egregious violations of academic freedom in recent memory.”

While there have been many Hamline faculty and students who have resisted substituting identity politics and theocracy for academic inquiry, the college appears to have an utterly spineless administration.

Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of “The Hunting of the President.”

Reprinted with permission from Suntimes.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World