Tag: kristi noem
Will Firing More Cabinet Members Improve Trump's Sagging Approval Numbers?

Will Firing More Cabinet Members Improve Trump's Sagging Approval Numbers?

A Reuters report on Saturday claimed President Donald Trump was weighing a “reset” in his administration to arrest what he considered “unfair” media coverage over his Iran fiasco. That one sentence undersells just how unhinged this is.

U.S. President Donald Trump is considering a broader cabinet shake-up in the wake of Attorney General Pam Bondi's removal this week, as he grows increasingly frustrated with the political fallout from the war with Iran, five people familiar with internal White House discussions said.

Of course he’s frustrated. He created this mess himself, and this time he can’t declare bankruptcy, stiff his creditors, or sic lawyers on the problem until it disappears. He promised “no wars,” and now he owns one. There’s no easy exit.

Any potential reshuffling could serve as a reset for the White House as it confronts a politically challenging stretch: The five-week-old war has driven up gas prices, dragged down Trump's approval ratings and intensified anxiety about the consequences for Republicans heading into November's midterm elections.

That’s the reality. Republicans tied themselves to Trump, and now they’re stuck with the consequences. The problem is the rest of the country and the world is stuck with him, too.

Some allies said his televised speech to the nation on Wednesday - which one senior White House official described as an attempt to project a sense of control and confidence about the direction of the war - fell flat, adding to the sense that changes in messaging or personnel were needed.

There was never a scenario where another rambling Trump speech was going to reassure anyone. If anything, it was always going to make things worse. People are done with him. They gave him a second chance, and he’s screwed it up beyond recognition. No one outside the MAGA deplorables is giving him the benefit of the doubt, ever again.

Several of the sources said Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are among those potentially on the chopping block, after Trump ousted Bondi and Homeland Security ⁠Secretary Kristi Noem in recent weeks.Trump has in recent months expressed displeasure with Gabbard, said one senior White House official. Another source with direct knowledge of the matter said Trump had asked allies about their thoughts on potential replacements for his intelligence chief

Gabbard is awful, but funny how his immediate hit list is all the women in his Cabinet. That’s not a coincidence.

The same report notes that Trump himself isn’t particularly bothered by Lutnick. The discomfort is coming from others in his orbit over Lutnick’s ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump’s own history there speaks for itself.

Trump could ultimately decide, however, not to make any changes to his administration's senior ranks. Several others close to Trump have said the ⁠president is reluctant to overhaul his cabinet too frequently, after recurrent staffing changes during his first term dominated headlines and created the impression of chaos at the White House.

Nothing about this is about governing. He assembled a Cabinet of loyalists with little regard for competence, and now that his administration is trapped in a public opinion death spiral, his instinct is to reshuffle the deck rather than change course. The people he’s thinking about firing didn’t create the underlying problem.

Still, after his disappointing speech on Wednesday, doing nothing could be just as politically dangerous as making a significant change that, for better or for worse, would dominate news headlines, one White House official said.

Actually, doing nothing for the next three years would quite literally be the best political move Trump could do.

Trump worked with his speechwriting team and top advisers on this week's prime-time address, one official said, after aides had urged him for weeks to speak directly to the nation about the U.S. role in Iran [...]"The speech did not accomplish what it was supposed to," the official said, adding that while Trump's core supporters still backed him on the war, they are broadly under economic strain.

Even that framing misses the point. The issue isn’t presentation. It’s the substance.

Two ⁠of the White House officials said Trump is extremely frustrated with what he perceives to be unfair media coverage of the war in Iran, and he has made clear to his team he wants more positive news accounts. He has not indicated, however, that he is interested in adjusting his own messaging strategy.

There is no “messaging strategy” to adjust. The behavior is the problem. Demanding better coverage while continuing the same actions that caused the backlash is not a plan.

If Trump wants more positive news coverage, there is one obvious option: step aside.

Still, the sources said the possibility of a shake-up had grown decidedly more serious in recent weeks. One senior White House source said Trump wants to make any big changes now, well ahead of the midterms.

Quite literally every single one of his Cabinet members deserves to be fired, and every single possible replacement would look the same: loyalists first, competence optional.

We are stuck in a political nightmare. The only silver lining is that Trump, himself, is as well.

Markos Moulitsas is founder and editor of the blogging website Daily Kos and author of three books.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

MAGA Cronies Reaped Millions In Commissions From Dubious DHS Ad Buy

MAGA Cronies Reaped Millions In Commissions From Dubious DHS Ad Buy

Kristi Noem, the now-former secretary of homeland security, recently had the dubious honor of being the first member of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet to get fired, though she did score the consolation prize of becoming the “special envoy for the Shield of the Americas,” whatever that is.

But Noem shouldn’t shoulder all of the blame for the $220 million Department of Homeland Security ad campaign at the center of her downfall. While her pals did rake in the dollars from that nonsense, some Trump-connected companies did as well.

Over $22 million, according to Politico. And honestly, we should have known that folks connected to Trump would get paid—they always do.

There’s no question that a $220 million ad campaign that was ostensibly about DHS but was really about taking pictures of Noem on horsies was always a bad idea. Not because it was an absurd, corrupt waste of money, but because it highlighted Noem.

That was made all the worse when she shifted some of the blame to Trump, saying he signed off on the staggering sum, as she tried to wriggle out from under Senate questions about the contract.

For his part, inevitably, Trump threw Noem to the wolves, saying he’d never signed onto anything of the sort.

Now, we’ll never know if that’s true. The government is now operated in secret, with huge contracts being handed out like candy to favored vendors. The normal process of transparent, competitive contracting is gone.

What we do know, though, is that two companies run by political operatives connected to Trump were some of those favored vendors for this ad campaign, per Politico.

Safe America Media, run by two operatives connected to a company that handled media buys during Trump’s 2024 campaign, got $15.2 million to work on the $220 million contract. That company was incorporated just days before getting those millions, and it won a no-bid contract totalling $143 million.

It isn’t clear how that $143 million contract award netted Safe America only $15.2 million in the end, but it isn’t the only Trump-connected slimeball company here.

People Who Think—the dumbest name imaginable—also got at least $7.7 million as part of a commission on the $220 million ad campaign. Why on earth the government would be paying for such a thing is a mystery. That group was founded by Jay Connaughton, who worked on Trump’s 2016 campaign. Neat how that works.

This fiasco was hung around Noem’s neck, with much initial reporting focused on the Noem-tied Strategy Group’s role in the campaign. However, other fly-by-night conservative grifters were also making bank. And why shouldn’t that include some Trump connections?

DHS is awash in cash, which always meant it would be awash in corruption. But that isn’t just Noem’s fault. Trump is ultimately responsible for creating the culture of corruption and grift that animates his administration, and everyone he knows is definitely going to get paid—with your tax dollars, natch.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Now That White House Has Finally Booted Noem, Will Bondi Be Next?

Now That White House Has Finally Booted Noem, Will Bondi Be Next?

President Donald Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday — and, according to a prominent columnist, Attorney General Pam Bondi ought to be next.

“Back in Trump 1.0, Noem’s firing would have been just another Thursday,” wrote The Guardian’s Arwa Mahdawi on Saturday, pointing out that Trump frequently fired advisers and cabinet secretaries during that administration. Yet Mahdawi argued Noem’s firing may indicate a reversal of that trend, given that there is “currently a target on attorney general Pam Bondi’s back.” Five House Republicans joined their Democratic colleagues on Wednesday to subpoena Bondi to learn more about her controversial handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. One day later, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI) filed articles of impeachment against Bondi.

“While the Bondi subpoena is unlikely to result in justice for Epstein’s victims anytime soon, it is nevertheless a welcome development,” Mahdawi wrote. “Unlike her televised testimony before the House judiciary committee in February, this will be a closed-door hearing where she will be under oath and subject to perjury laws. This means she may be forced to answer questions more directly instead of just talking about the stock market.” The columnist added that forcing Bondi to testify keeps the Epstein files in the news despite the president’s attempts at distraction.

Mahdawi also drew attention to the contents of recently-released Epstein files that the Justice Department had previously withheld involving a woman making sexual assault accusations against Trump.

“These accusations have not been verified and the Guardian reported last week that some of the claims appear to contradict what is known about Epstein’s life in the early 1980s,” Mahdawi reported. “Nevertheless, there are a lot of questions currently being asked as to what other documents the justice department may have ‘accidentally’ not released. No doubt Bondi will soon be able to give us all some non-answers.”

When Bondi testified before the House regarding the Epstein files, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) asked Bondi to apologize to the survivors for how the incomplete way in which the Epstein files have been released up to this point.

"Attorney General Bondi, you apologized to the survivors in your opening statement for what they went through at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Will you turn to them now and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information?" Jayapal asked Bondi. She refused to reply, instead criticizing former Attorney General Merrick Garland.

"I will reclaim my time because I asked a specific question that I would like you to answer," Jayapal repeated. "Will you turn to the survivors? This is not about anybody who came before you. It's about you taking responsibility for your Department of Justice and the harm that it has done to the survivors who are standing right behind you and are waiting for you to turn to them and apologize for what your Department of Justice —"

Bondi also controversially deflected a question about the Epstein files by demanding that Trump receive credit for then-recent gains in the stock market. When Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) seemed to laugh at Bondi's evasion of the question, she said "I don't know why you're laughing, I hear you're a great stock trader.” Other Democrats could be heard shouting, "What does the stock market have to do with it?"

Bondi has also failed to successfully pursue Trump’s political enemies as the former president wanted. Conservative commentator Tim Miller wrote in The Bulwark earlier this week that “another big loss for the Trump Justice Department in their Keystone Cop efforts to go after their political foes. For all of you know, the awful fascist advances of this administration, the one thing that continues to bring us joy is just the utter incompetence and failure in their effort to weaponize the Justice Department to get revenge against their political foes.”

Miller then pointed out that both Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, had promised to prosecute former President Joe Biden for using an autopen and stealing the 2020 presidential election (which he did not do).

“Remember all those? Has anybody gone to jail for any of those yet?” Miller asked. “Supposedly Joe Biden stole the election in 2020. It's interesting that some of the biggest proponents of that case — Donald Trump, [FBI Director] Kash Patel, Pam Bondi — haven't been able to find any of the ‘perpetrators.’ So nobody's in jail for that."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet



In Wartime, Trump's National Security Clown Show Endangers Us All

In Wartime, Trump's National Security Clown Show Endangers Us All

The belated dismissal of Kristi Noem – Trump’s woefully unqualified and performatively ridiculous custodian of homeland security --- highlights the perils now faced by all Americans in an increasingly perilous world. Now that the United States is at war with a regime notorious for terror tactics, it is no longer possible to ignore the frightening incompetence of a government that is expected to keep us from harm.

Noem cut an especially clownish figure at the Department of Homeland Security -- with her constant costume changes, soap opera escapades, corrupt expenditures, and abuse of Coast Guard aviation and residential facilities – but the MAGA style of governance is all too visible across our national security agencies.

While it was apparent from the day of her appointment that Noem had no relevant experience or knowledge, she and her “special employee” Corey Lewandowski brought extreme levels of chaos and disrepute to the agencies they oversaw. Like other Trump officials, she imposed senseless waves of cuts, mass firings of veteran officials, useless expenditures, and measures such as polygraph tests that destroyed morale.

And in her zeal to enforce the administration’s absurd deportation schedule, Noem fomented a confrontation with Congress and indeed the entire country that has resulted in the DHS shutdown. With most of its staff forced to work unpaid, all of its security functions are now subject to staffing shortages, rising absences, and declining resolve.

It’s not a good time for that to be going on: The Iranian regime, along with allies in Hezbollah and kindred terror groups, is assuredly seeking means of revenge for the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the wider war. Given Iran’s known capabilities in cyber warfare, the reduced defensive capacity of the DHS-based Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency is troubling.

Yet the president has replaced Noem with another politician whose Fox News appearances he enjoys, rather than a serious figure with military, intelligence or even government experience. Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin may be popular among his peers, but his resume for this position is thinner than paper.

As Kevin Carroll, a former senior DHS official, told CNN on Thursday, ““I'm not sure that Senator Mullin is really qualified. I mean, most of the other secretaries of Homeland Security have had substantial experience in federal law enforcement or the military, or have held senior executive positions… He was a successful, small businessman. But we're in a severe threat environment right now [with the invasion of Iran]. It’s probably the highest threat environment since 9/11 … I really don't think it's time for him to be in his first national security position or his first executive position.”

That disturbing vacuum of professional leadership and skill is reflected throughout Trump’s government, with potentially ruinous consequences. It is especially glaring at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, where the comedy team of Director Kash Patel and former Deputy Director Dan Bongino achieved so much destruction in the span of a few months. Their dismantling of FBI divisions tasked with protecting the country showed a reckless enthusiasm that must have excited our foreign enemies.

Patel has done grave harm to the bureau’s national security branch, which encompasses its divisions of counterterrorism, intelligence and counterintelligence, and its special directorate for weapons of mass destruction – all vital to protecting us at this moment of heightened threats. The FBI cyber division, like CISA at DHS, has likewise suffered from the firings and fear that have destroyed confidence among agents in Washington and in FBI offices around the country and abroad.

The impact of Patel’s recurrent displays of idiocy, arrogance, and abuse are felt far beyond our borders – although the damage has become obvious in major, highly publicized cases like the Brown University murders and the Guthrie abduction. Early in his tenure, at the request of the head of the United Kingdom’s MI5 intelligence agency, Patel agreed to maintain a London FBI station where both countries monitor adversary activities. He violated the pledge almost immediately, earning distrust among the “Five Eyes” intelligence consortium, which includes Australia, Canada, and New Zealand as well as the US and UK and is critical to our counterterrorism effort.

The barely disguised contempt for Patel (and Bongino, whose position was crucial to everyday operations) among foreign security officials is a serious hindrance to the bureau’s international operations division – which depends on our foreign allies to provide actionable information about threats originating overseas.

So toxic is Patel’s presence in the FBI that the bureau may be better off with him spending most of his time far from headquarters, whether at his home in Las Vegas, with his country-singer girlfriend on a government jet, or at the Olympics, car races or other sporting events where he weirdly shows up.

The pattern of dubious political appointees extends into the top levels of every sector, from Tulsi Gabbard at the Directorate of National Intelligence – whom even Trump no longer pretends to respect – to Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon, where security breaches and outright lies have become routine.

Will we pay a hideous price for the misconduct of all these MAGA bozos? In Trump’s second term, America has so far escaped the sort of deadly disaster that arises from stupid, amateurish government -- whether in an intelligence snafu like 9/11 or a botched pandemic response like Covid-19. By now we should know that our luck won't hold forever.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World