Tag: leonard leo
Declaring War Against Abortion Pills, Kennedy Jeopardizes Women's Health

Declaring War Against Abortion Pills, Kennedy Jeopardizes Women's Health

If you thought that Donald Trump and his Republican enablers were finished with with their attacks on abortion now that 18 Red states have extreme abortion bans with no exceptions for rape or incest, you would be wrong.

Anti-abortion organizations which funnel big bucks to Republican campaigns are furious that strict abortion bans have not stopped American women from making their own decisions about if and when they want children.

That’s why Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s health and human services secretary, has taken his first shot in what will be a war against the pill, mifepristone, which is an essential drug in the safe and effective two-pill medication abortion regimen.

He announced that he would be doing a “complete review” of the “safety”of mifepristone during a Senate committee hearing in May.

He is basing his review, which he ordered his FDA Commissioner Marty Makary to undertake after publication of a recenr study by the Ethics & Public Policy Center ( the EPPC), which claimed that almost ‘11% of the patients who took mifepristone ‘ experienced a severe adverse event.’

That’s way out of wack with dozens of other studies which show that serious complications from mifepristone occur just 1% of the time and in general, a pregnancy ending in any abortion is 14 times less likely to result in a mother dying, than in actual childbirth.

Neverthess, the politically -motivated Kennedy, who wants to stay in line with Trump’s anti-abortion goals, told the Senate committee that he found the EPPC study, called ‘The Abortion Pill Harms Women’, “alarming.”

Furious and frustrated women’s reproductive health experts have strenuously disputed the results of that study which Kennedy now using for the basis of his review of mifepristone.

They have condemned this study as “flawed”, the data “distorted”, “junk science”and have called out the source of the data used in the study as not “transparent.”

It’s important to know that the organization which produced the report, the Ethics & Public Policy Center ( EPPC) isn’t any disinterested, non partisan player in the anti-abortion battles.

It’s a right-wing think tank which lists its top priority on its website as: “Pushing back against the extreme progressive agenda while building a consensus for conservatives.”

And guess what, one of its board members is the infamous reactionary and anti abortion activist Leonard Leo, who is co-chairman of the Federalist Society’s board of directors.

The Federalist Society, an exceedingly conservative legal group, just happened to have recommended Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to Donald Trump as potential justices for the Supreme Court.

Those three Trump nominees were confirmed to the Supreme Court along with Federalist Society members Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito and they overturned Roe v Wade along with Chief Justice John Roberts in June 2022.

Mission accomplished by the Federalist Society.

So this ‘study’ was produced by an organization with ties to Leonard Leo, who has led a decades- long campaign to roll back women’s reproductive rights and to shut down Planned Parenthood.

Based on the EPPC study, just recently this September, Kennedy and Makary wrote a letter to 22 Republican state attorneys general announcing that the FDA is conducting its own review of mifepristone claiming that the Trump administration ”will ensure that women’s health is properly protected.”

Proof that Trump and Kennedy don't give a rat's ass about women's health

However this is total B.S. The Trump administration, including HHS Secretary Kennedy, don’t really give a rat’s ass about the health of American women.

This is the same administration that deliberately decided by passing Trump’s Big ‘Ugly’ Bill, not to ensure that women’s health is being properly protected when it comes to childbirth.

He and the Congressional Republicans massively cut funding for Medicaid which covers the cost of childbirth for 41 percent of women in the U.S.. Yes, that’s what’s in the so-called ‘Big Beautiful Bill.’

Now 41 percent of the women in this country will be lucky to be admitted to a hospital’s emergency department to give birth but will then be handed a bill for thousands of dollars. If they can’t afford that, they will be giving birth in hospital parking lots all over America.

So yah, Kennedy and his ilk are not investigating mifepristone because they claim that they want to ‘protect’ all of America’s delicate womenfolk.

On top of this, Trump’s administration is putting the reproductive health of 24 million American women who rely on Medicaid for their birth control, cancer screening, and vaccinations in jeopardy, according to a ‘Women’s Health and Reproductive Care’ study by the Commonwealth Fund in 2024.

American obstetricians and gynecologists now fear that Kennedy's “review” could be the first step in a plan to withdraw mifepristone from use in the U.S.

After all, Project 2025 calls for eliminating all access to mifepristone as a key step in its overall plan to obliterate access to all abortions in the U.S. And Donald Trump has been quickly implementing a multitude of Project 2025’s proposals.

The American College of Obstetricians ( ACOG ) fired back at Kennedy’s review of ‘mifepristone,’ issuing a statement that “mifepristone is safe, effective and an integral part of the medical care that our members provide to their patients.”

“We urge availability of mifepristone that is equitable, is free from needlessly burdensome restrictions and that reflects the full body of reputable, peer-reviewed, and scientifically valid medical literature demonstrating that mifepristone is an incredibly safe medication.”

Mifepristone was approved in the United States for use in abortions in 2000 and studies have shown it to be safer than penicillin and Viagra.

The doctors that I interviewed had even stronger words for Kennedy than ACOG.

.“This ( the study) is meant to take things away from us purely for political reasons,” charged Dr. Kristin Lyerly, a Wisconsin obstetrician-gynecologist, who practices across the state border in rural Minnesota. “Mifepristone is incredibly safe, incredibly well studied. We have years and years of data from the US and and beyond.”

“There’s even more data from outside the United States where they don’t have this political interference. Mifepristone is safe, it’s effective. It is necessary and RFK Jr has no business re-examining this data just to take away effective treatment from my patients.”

Dr. Alhambra Frarey, the chief medical officer of Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania, asserts that it is “absolutely clear that RFK Jr. is not interested in promoting the health and safety of Americans.”

“Instead he is trying to promote the anti abortion agenda to continue to threaten access to what is in fact life saving, safe and effective medications for abortion.”

Doctors fire back at plans to ban abortion and the most effective contraceptives

Dr. Lou Rubino agrees.”It’s not out of the realm of possibility that he will do what he does with other things, which is ignore the science,” says Rubino, the medical director of the Meadow Reproductive Health and Wellness clinic in Virginia.

“That seems to be something this administration does repeatedly”, she adds about Kennedy and Trump, who just asserted without any scientific evidence that autism is caused by acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol.

Dr. Lyerly is disgusted and contends that Kennedy “is not a scientist and is entirely political." She says, “ it’s hard to watch someone with such an important role in this country, who is in charge of some of the most vulnerable people in this country, have a complete lack of respect for the things they hold dear.”

“Their healthcare, their lives and their families. And here he is as the nation’s highest health officer.”

Kennedy and his FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, who has a history of spouting abortion disinformation on Fox News, are no doubt under intense pressure by anti-abortion groups that are on a crusade to roll back access to abortion pills.

In 2024, two years after Roe v Wade was overturned, the number of abortions in the U.S. actually increased to 1.14 million up from 1.05 million in 2023, despite the extreme state bans. Included in that were the number of pregnant women who crossed state lines for an abortion -- 155,000 in 2024, double the number since 2020.

Not only that, abortions using the FDA approved two-pill regimen to terminate pregnancies, have increased in states that have banned abortions.

In fact, there are now three times as many medication abortions using the two drugs, mifepristone and misoprostol, in states that have tried to prevent women from having abortions by enacting strict bans, according to a study by the University of Texas at Austin.

Sixty- three per cent of the abortions in the country are now done by women in the privacy of their own homes using the two-pill regimen. That’s up from 53 percent in 2020.

That’s why infuriated Republican legislators in Texas just passed the first law - HB7 - in the country, banning abortion pills from even entering their state.

They had a “temper tantrum” because they have not been able to stop Texas women from using abortion pills which they have been able to access through doctors in abortion-legal states, says Nimra Chowdhry, a senior state legislative counsel with the Center For Reproductive rights.

Now South Caroline Republicans are also trying to push through a cruel anti abortion bill -- Senate Bill 323 -- which would make it illegal to possess abortion pills in that state.

Not only that, Senate Bill 323, if passed, would also be the most extreme ban in the country and the first to criminally prosecute women who have an abortion as committing the felony of murder.

Women could be executed for having an illegal abortion since South Carolina law carries the death penalty for murder. If they escape the death sentence, they would still face 30 years in prison for that crime.

So much for Republicans desperately trying to ‘protect’ women. They are itching to kill them.

They are also itching to get them pregnant with lots of unwanted pregnancies. The proposed South Carolina law would also ban most forms of contraception and in vitro fertilization (IVF).

If RFK Jr decides after his “safety review to make abortion pills difficult or impossible to access, doctors Rubino, Frarey and Lyerly, say that they and other OBGYNs will be prevented from providing necessary reproductive healthcare to American women.

Women living in states with abortion bans will be forced to travel hundreds of miles for a surgical abortion at a clinic in a state where abortion is still legal.

Miscarriages will become deadly if mifepristone is banned

However, many pregnant women won’t be able to afford to travel to a clinic hundreds of miles away, something which can cost thousands of dollars, points out Dr Rubino. They may be forced to give birth to a baby that they can’t afford to care for or be mentally prepared to raise.

“We know that people who want to access an abortion and are not able to, consistently have worse outcomes over the rest of their lives,” says Dr. Rubino. “Worse outcomes in terms of their health - mental and physical - and these people over time will do worse economically.”

“We know that these people will have fewer opportunities over the rest of their lives.”

Restricting access to mifepristone won’t just harm women who need abortions, it will also make far more miscarriages dangerous and painful, points out Dr.Frarey.

That’s because doctors prescribe the same two pill regimen used in abortions - mifepristone and misoprostol - to help women safely manage miscarriages.

Without mifepristone and just using misoprostol, it means more bleeding and cramping for miscarrying women, she explains . It also means there’s a greater potential for tissue from the pregnancy being retained in the uterus, instead of expelled.

That puts women at much greater risk of developing an infection inside their uteruses, even a life-threatening case of sepsis.

Three women have already been documented to have died in Texas hospitals when they retained pregnancy tissue in their uteruses and developed deadly sepsis infections or they hemorrhaged and hospitals waited far too long to treat them.

Have I made my case, that if RFK Jr bans mifepristone, it’s absolutely has zero to do with ‘protecting’ the health of women? That’s the very least of their concerns.

It makes no sense to ban mifepristone, which is so safe and effective, points out Dr. Lyerly. “The data tells us that the chance of a serious complication is much less than one percent and that’s been my personal experience as well with patients.”

“If we can’t provide the most effective treatment for our patients ( who need abortions or miscarriage care ) that’s frankly, just a crime”, she asserts.

Kennedy, Donald Trump, and Republican lawmakers have no business interfering in women’s reproductive healthcare, agrees Dr. Frarey.

“Reproductive healthcare needs to be determined by patients and their doctors,” she insists. ”Patients don’t need politicians presenting more barriers and more legislation on how to manage something that should be bread and butter OBGYN miscarriage management.”

“You can’t legislate healthcare. It is more nuanced and complicated than that.This is why people die when you place bans and restrictions around lifesaving care.”

Yes, that is true , but sadly it won’t stop Trump or RFK Jr from doing the work demanded by their billionaire anti abortion donors and the powerful anti abortion organizations, who also fill Republican campaign coffers!

Only you can stop them by voting all Republicans out of office at your local, county, state and also federal elections, because they are uniformly anti-abortion and now anti-birth control, on top of it all.

If your live in Virginia or New Jersey or in New York City, make sure you vote early or get out and vote on Election Day, November 4, for the Democratic candidates running for office. Your uterus will thank you!

Bonnie Fuller is the former CEO and editor-in-chief of HollywoodLife.com and former editor-in-chief of Glamour, Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, and USWeekly.

Reprinted with permission from Your Body, Your Choice Substack. Please consider subscribing.

Leonard Leo

It's Just His Nature: Scorpion Trump Stings Frog Leo In Lawless Rage

Leonard Leo, the bête noire of liberals who curated Trump’s first-term judicial appointments, including his three Supreme Court justices, has gone from Trump's shortlist to his shit list. As is his wont, Trump turned on his loyal servant with particular savagery, calling him a “sleazebag” who had rendered bad advice on a series of judicial nominations.

Leo responded with comparative good grace, along with a pointed, if diplomatic, defense of his influential work: "I'm very grateful for President Trump transforming the Federal Courts…[T]he Federal Judiciary is better than it's ever been in modern history, and that will be President Trump's most important legacy."

The genesis of the fallout speaks volumes about Trump's view of the role of the federal judiciary, and of his own inner circle.

Trump's ire was sparked by the Court of International Trade’s recent opinion striking down his broad tariffs because they unlawfully usurped Congress’s powers and relied on supposed “emergency” powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) that the Act does not provide.

This legal failing is a cross-cutting theme of Trump's indiscriminate power grabs. Similar to a number of modern would-be authoritarians, Trump has repeatedly tried to steamroll basic legislative authority by characterizing everyday political issues as emergencies requiring a strongman’s intervention.

The opinion was a unanimous per curiam (i.e., no single author was identified) by three members of the Court of International Trade: a Reagan appointee, an Obama appointee, and a first-term Trump appointee. Moreover, the Trump appointee, Timothy Reif, is—as Trump appointees go—unusually well qualified, having previously served as general counsel in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in the Executive Office of the President and then senior counsellor to the U.S. Trade Representative.

The panel, including Reif, held that the IEEPA—the text of which doesn't even contain the word emergency—could not support Trump’s outlandish and all-too-familiar claims that the sky is falling. At the same time, the court noted the possibility of statutory sources of authority other than the one Trump invoked.

In response to the administration’s predictable motion for emergency relief, the Federal Circuit—the Court of Appeals for the specialized Court of International Trade—has imposed an administrative stay that tells us nothing about whether it will affirm the lower court on the merits.

Trump's temper tantrum is ironic, if not absurd, given Leonard Leo’s record as the administration’s judicial nominee whisperer. By any measure—on the left or the right, and whether provoking aversion or elation—Leo has compiled a phenomenally successful record in the service of Trump and the conservative judicial movement in general.

He follows in the footsteps of advisors to other Republican administrations since Reagan, who have adopted a single-minded focus on judicial appointees and have dramatically transformed the makeup of the federal judiciary. In Leo’s case, that includes Trump's three Supreme Court nominees: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.

Conservative Trump supporters have generally taken those appointees—which have established an über-majority conservative Court likely to last for a generation or more—as back-to-back-to-back home runs.

Just for starters, all three of them voted to overrule Roe v. Wade, probably the number one goal of judicial conservatives for a generation, and a (dubious) achievement that for many years looked impossible. In terms of the personal bounty for Trump, all joined the outlandish 2024 immunity opinion that continues to provide him comfort on a regular basis—for example, just last week, with the pardon for Paul Walczak in the wake of a $1 million solicited donation by Walczak’s mother that fits the criminal elements of bribery to a T.

The larger lesson in Trump's excoriation of Leo is what it shows about Trump’s expectations of the purpose of screening his nominees.

Leo has served up a long series of candidates who talk the talk about conservative jurisprudence, including the newfangled articles of faith like robust Second Amendment interpretation, solicitude for religious-based intolerance, and the Supreme Court’s less-than-fully-coherent history-and-tradition test.

That doesn't cut it for Trump. One important opinion against him—plainly on the basis of well-established legal principles that any judicial conservative should embrace—and Leo gets moved to the other list, with a heavy dose of Trump’s obloquy for good measure. For Trump, there's only one test of judicial qualifications: ruling for Trump, whatever the law provides. Leo failed in his presumed duty to find absolute Trump toadies, or to quietly inculcate the potential toadies he did find.

Leo joins a very long list of former insiders whom Trump has abruptly cast out and vilified. Central advisers such as Mike Pence, Chris Christie, Anthony Scaramucci, Kayleigh McEnany, Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton, and many others have all tasted Trump’s poison, some for reasons that are minor or even mysterious. The fact is, there's no rhyme or reason to Trump's spurning of former close associates. It rather just seems to be a way of demonstrating domination and superiority to any advisor, however valuable.

Trump is like the scorpion in the fable of the scorpion and the frog. Not able to swim to cross the river, the scorpion asks a frog for a ride on his back. Knowing the scorpion’s dangerous sting, the frog hesitates: “How do I know you won’t sting me?” The scorpion replies, “Because if I sting you, we’ll both drown.” So, the frog agrees to ferry the scorpion across the river. Halfway there, the scorpion stings the frog, who with his dying words asks, “Why did you do that? Now we’re both going to die.”

“I couldn’t help it,” the scorpion replies. “It’s in my nature.”

Trump is a legal ignoramus indifferent to the Constitution and the role of law. His only interest is domination. He turns on those who served him faithfully because it’s in his nature.

The general agenda of Trump 2.0—outlined by the long blueprint of Project 2025—is to put in place a series of measures that grossly, and unconstitutionally, aggrandize Trump's personal power, rejecting any vestiges of restraint and lawfulness that stymied him the first time around.

Transposed to the federal judiciary, that means a careful search for judges like Aileen Cannon or Matt Kacsmaryk who—not to put too fine a point on it—are utterly in the tank for the president who appointed them and who could yet elevate them to higher judicial service.

So far, the Trump 2.0 judicial nomination process has little to show for itself; the Senate has confirmed none of his 11 federal court nominees this year.

Leo’s casting out thus portends a series of nominees carefully chosen to cross fingers behind their backs when they swear, as the law requires, to “administer justice without respect to persons.” Call it the attempted Cannonization of the federal judiciary—and, to the extent Trump can secure Senate confirmations, one more sharp departure from the rule of law.

Harry Litman is a former United States Attorney and the executive producer and host of the Talking Feds podcast. He has taught law at UCLA, Berkeley, and Georgetown and served as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Clinton Administration. Please consider subscribing to Talking Feds on Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Substack.

With Francis Gone, The Hard Right Is Coming For The Vatican

With Francis Gone, The Hard Right Is Coming For The Vatican

On Roman streets and the worldwide web, a half-joke was making the rounds yesterday: Catholic convert JD Vance, emissary of America’s empathy-challenged hard right, was the last visitor to Pope Francis before he died and somehow… did him in.

Here at the Freakshow, we disregard conspiracy theories like these until shown hard proof. But it is a fact that a cabal of powerful right-wing American Catholics is not at all sorry to see Francis pass away – on Easter Monday, no less. These men have been licking their chops for more than a decade for a chance to conclave and install a man more of their ilk, someone who might help persuade millions of Catholics that Jesus was really a social Darwinist.

“The ultra-conservative wing of the US Catholic Church – a group made up of cardinals, bishops, priests and wealthy individuals – has spent years preparing for this precise moment,” says British investigative journalist Gareth Gore, who last year published a book on the strange and secretive Opus Dei cult, including its growing power in the heart of Washington. (I covered it for New York Magazine).

Pope Francis was one of the more progressive church leaders in recent Catholic church history. He acknowledged the effects of manmade climate change and made small – but, to the far right, significant and alarming – statements about market capitalism and the poor. Those positions are clearly aligned with Jesus’ actual teachings, but ultra conservatives have abandoned them in favor of the prosperity gospel and drill baby drill.

Francis’s support of social justice made him anathema to hard-right American Catholics like Leonard Leo and billionaires like California real estate attorney Tim Busch. Busch’s Trinitas Cellars produces red wines named after the Virgin Mary. Many Opus Dei-affiliated and other hard-right Catholics in Washington (JD Vance and Leonard Leo among them) have boarded jets west to attend gatherings at Busch’s Napa Institute School of Business.

Last year, Busch hosted a conference on “woke capitalism,” and in the past, he’s invited speakers questioning the authenticity of the civil rights movement. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops cut ties with Busch’s Napa School in part because event agendas include praying the Patriotic Rosary, a devotion invoking divine “continuance on our cause and our people” using the words of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee – that specific cause, of course, being the perpetuation of slavery.

In addition to annoying rich MAGA extremists, Francis had asked church officials to live more modestly. “We pastors must not be men with a ‘princely mindset.’” he once said. This did not sit well with rightist clergy who live for cosplaying royalty. American Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke was among them. He insisted on continuing to wear trains of watered silk, scarlet gloves, and jeweled red hats – all while calling gay marriage Satanic and accusing Obama of being a totalitarian because of the ACA.

Some of the kookiest hard-right Catholic clergy are American or are operating in this country. Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the former pontifical vicar to the U.S. under the arch-conservative Pope Benedict XVI, wrote a wildly nutty letter in support of Trump in 2020, calling the election a battle between the forces of light and darkness. He also publicly called Pope Francis a “false prophet” and a “servant of Satan.”

Cardinal Burke, discussed above, defied the Pope and refused to give communion to divorced and remarried Catholics. He had considered serving as honorary president of a “gladiator school” for white religious nationalists that Steve Bannon was building in Europe. (He backed off when Bannon said he might make a documentary about pedophile priests.)

During his tenure, Francis demoted Opus Dei and expelled some of the more extreme bishops aligned with Christian nationalism and alt-right conspiracy theorists. Last year, the Pope excommunicated Vigano for “schism” citing his "refusal to recognize and submit to the Supreme Pontiff.” Francis had removed Burke from the Vatican’s highest court and then revoked his salary and Vatican quarters.

Gareth Gore has reported that a secret cabal long schemed to get rid of Pope Francis. They used some of the same opposition research tactics to investigate rising left-leaning leaders within the church that (Opus Dei-affiliated Catholic) Leonard Leo and his Judicial Crisis Network have applied in media and influence campaigns to stack the Supreme Court with far-right Catholics.

“While Francis was alive, the [right-wing Catholic billionaires and clergy] actively sought to discredit his papacy with smear campaigns, leaking unfounded accusations that the late Pope had covered up cases of sexual abuse – and then using the right-wing Catholic media to spread those rumours far and wide,” Gareth Gore told me. “At the same time, they were financing a campaign to influence the next Conclave, hiring former CIA and FBI agents to dig up kompromat on liberal cardinals who might follow him. Their aim was clear: to discredit Francis and his progressive agenda, and to ensure that the next Pope is a man aligned with their world view - someone who agrees with their ultra-conservative reading of the Bible. That plan is now cranking into action.”

These same men are busy today and in the weeks to come, plotting to ensure the Catholic Church gets back to the business of the Inquisition and witch burning.

Ok, I jest.

But the Catholic hard right and their allies in Washington are not too sad today. They have waited a while for this opportunity. When Gore interviewed Tim Busch for his book, the Californian was explicit about the far right outliving a progressive Pope. “I think something important is happening, something not so good,” Busch said. “I think he’s tightening the noose, but I don’t think he’s going to have enough time.”

But Gore also believes the rightists face an uphill struggle. “The ultra-conservatives, while wealthy and powerful, are a tiny proportion of the 1.4 billion Catholics around the world,” he told me. “The Conclave to elect the next Pope will be largely made up of cardinals appointed by Francis himself. While they may not necessarily share all of his views, they will see the positive impact that his progressive agenda has had on the Church, and will likely want to build on his legacy.”

Nina Burleigh is a a journalist, author, documentary producer and adjunct professor at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. She has written eight books including her recently published novel, Zero Visibility Possible.

Reprinted with permission from COURIER's American Freakshow.



Leonard Leo

GOP Lashes Out At D.C. Attorney General Probing Extremist Profiteer Leo

GOP activist Leonard Leo is co-chair of the influential Federalist Society, which has produced all six of the Supreme Court of the United States' (SCOTUS) conservative jurists — including Chief Justice John Roberts. And ever since the office of Washington, DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb started investigating the Federalist Society for alleged violations of its nonprofit status, Leo's allies have been attacking him every step of the way.

Politico reporter Heidi Przybyla wrote Saturday that Schwalb has been steadily battling an onslaught of GOP attacks that include conservative media, 12 Republican state attorneys general and even Congressional committee chairs. This assault began last August, after Schwalb announced he was investigating the Federalist Society for alleged self-dealing. Leo is accused of using millions of dollars in tax-exempt organization funds to prop up his private consulting firm, CRC Advisors.

According to the outlet, both Reps. James Comer (R-KY) and Jim Jordan (R-OH), who chair the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, respectively, announced their own investigations into Schwalb on October 30 — shortly after Schwalb announced his own investigation into Leo's group. One of Leo's organizations is the Concord Fund (previously known as the Judicial Crisis Network), which has donated $20 million to the Republican Attorneys General Association since 2014. And Przybyla noted that 10 days before Comer and Jordan announced their investigation, Concord hired a Virginia-based lobbying firm to handle issues relating to "law enforcement" and "oversight."

"The decision to launch a probe was not influenced by the lobbying firm," a spokesperson for the House Judiciary Committee told Politico. "Any suggestion that it was is lazy, in bad faith, and completely ridiculous. It’s well-known that this probe is part of a broader portfolio the congressmen are pursuing related to the weaponization of the federal government."

While the suggestion that Leo's money and connections are influencing the attacks on the man investigating him makes Republicans bristle, it's difficult to ignore the timing of large sums of money changing hands. Just one day after both Comer and Jordan threatened to subpoena Schwalb, a House Republican leadership-aligned political action committee received a $250,000 contribution from the Concord Fund. Politico reported that it was Concord's first donation to a federal PAC in nine years.

Republicans' ferocity in attacking Schwalb could be attributed to Leo's outsized influence over today's GOP — particularly as it concerns the GOP's efforts to cement a conservative SCOTUS majority for decades.

"[Leo] has been called former President Donald Trump’s 'court whisperer' for helping to choose and advocate for his Supreme Court nominees," Przybyla wrote. "His aligned network of tax-exempt nonprofits is also a major contributor to Project 2025, an initiative seeking to create a 'government in waiting' for another Trump term."

Caroline Ciccone, who is president of anti-corruption watchdog group Accountability.US, directly attributed the various attacks on Schwalb to Leo's far-right organizational muscle.

"Leonard Leo is working to implement policies with a vision that’s far too extreme for most Americans," Ciccone said. "Now, members of Congress have weaponized their government power against his critics."

In addition to being investigated for self-dealing by Schwalb's office, Leo's group is also being investigated by the Senate Judiciary Committee for its alleged facilitation of lavish gifts to far-right justices like Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. In late November, the committee sent subpoenas to both Leo and billionaire business magnate Harlan Crow, who took Justice Thomas and his family on several exceedingly expensive getaways.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World