Tag: letitia james
Bill Pulte

The Real Scandal? Bill Pulte's Unethical 'Investigations' Of Trump Opponents

Bill Pulte, the head of Federal Housing Financial Authority, the agency that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has been in the news recently over his allegations that prominent opponents of President Trump had committed mortgage fraud. Most recently Pulte has put Federal Reserve Board Governor Lisa Cook in his crosshairs, claiming that she listed two homes as principal residences on mortgage applications.

Trump immediately used this allegation as a basis for trying to fire Cook, even though the Fed is supposed to be an independent agency, outside of the president’s control. Governor Cook sued Trump over his firing effort and the courts will ultimately decide whether this is within his power.

At this point, it is important to remember that Cook has not even been indicted for anything, much less convicted. We only have an allegation from Mr. Pulte.

It is also worth noting the irony of Trump, who was convicted in a civil trial for putting false information on loan forms, trying to fire someone for listing two homes as principal residences. Among the items that Trump put on his loan form was the claim that his 10,000 square foot condo was actually 32,000 square feet. Perhaps President Trump is offended by the pettiness of Cook’s alleged crime.

While the validity of Pulte’s allegations will have to be determined by the courts, the real scandal is Pulte himself. He is supposed to be running the agency that oversees the processing of tens of millions of mortgages by two huge quasi-public agencies. We are not supposed to be paying him to rifle through mortgage documents to find and disclose dirt that Trump can use against his political opponents.

The media really need to be directing some serious questions in Pulte’s direction. First and foremost, how did he happen to discover the mortgage abuses that he alleges were committed by New York Attorney General Letitia James, Senator Adam Schiff, and now Governor Lisa Cook. Were these “discoveries” the result of random inspections done by agency staff?

Furthermore, was he looking through non-public mortgage files to gather this information? Also, why did he make this information public when he uncovered it, instead of going through normal channels? If he had followed established procedures, he would have turned over the information to the agency’s inspector general, who would then turn if over to the Justice Department, if they determined it was appropriate. The first time the public would hear about it was when an indictment was issued.

What reason does Pulte have for not following normal procedures? He really needs to come clean on this.

He should also come clean on his holdings of Pulte Group stock, the huge housing construction company started by his grandfather. It may be the case that conflicts of interest are almost a job requirement in the Trump administration, but many of us still think that government officials should be working for the public, not trying to fatten their pocketbook.

If Pulte helps Trump get his wish and a Trump-controlled Fed lowers interest rates, it would provide a big boost to the Pulte Group’s profits. That hope would give Pulte a strong motivation to try to hasten the day when Trump appointees dominate the Fed’s Open Market Committee that sets interest rates.

Anyhow, there is definitely a big scandal here, but it involves Bill Pulte, not Lisa Cook. The media really need to take notice.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack site.

Reprinted with permission from Substack.

Donald Trump

Trump Begs For Cash To Keep Properties Out Of Letitia James' 'Filthy Hands'

Former President Donald Trump is on the verge of losing two of his valued real estate assets, and the alleged billionaire is now panhandling the public for small-dollar donations to hang onto his wealth.

The Guardian reported that Trump's 2024 campaign is sending emails to supporters specifically asking for their financial support to help pay the $464 million in judgment penalties and interest he owes for defrauding the State of New York. Attorney General Letitia James has already started the process of seizing the real estate tycoon's assets to cover the judgment, including one of his golf courses in Westchester County. She also said she looks at Trump's 40 Wall Street property "each and every day."

"Insane radical Democrat AG Letitia James wants to SEIZE my properties in New York. This includes the iconic Trump Tower," the ex-president wrote in an email with the subject line "Keep your filthy hands off Trump tower!"

"Democrats think that this will intimidate me. They think that if they take my cash to stifle my campaign, that I’ll GIVE UP!" The email continued. "But worst of all? They think that YOU will abandon me, and that you will GIVE UP on our country. Here’s one thing they don’t know: WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER!"

Trump's legal costs are likely far too large to be crowdfunded. A GoFundMe campaign to pay his New York civil fraud judgment that's still online as of this writing has only raised $1.6 million out of a $355 million goal (fundraisers to pay legal restitution are prohibited under GoFundMe's terms and conditions). It's not known yet how much Trump will raise from his email appeal, but the amount raised may not even cover the estimated $111,000 in interest his judgment accumulates with each passing day.

And of course, the civil fraud judgment isn't the only financial blow to Trump's empire. Former Elle columnist E. Jean Carroll successfully sued Trump for both sexual abuse and defamation, winning judgments of $5 million and $83.3 million, respectively. The former president posted a $90 million bond guaranteed by insurance giant Chubb Group earlier this month, which includes both the judgment and interest necessary to appeal civil judgments in the Empire State. However, his legal team has complained that obtaining a bond to cover the fraud judgment is a "practical impossibility."

"A bond of this size is rarely if ever seen. In the unusual circumstance that a bond of this size is issued, it is provided to the largest public companies in the world, not to individuals or privately held businesses," said Gary Giulietti of brokerage firm Lockton Companies. Giuletti — whom Trump hired to help him obtain a bond — added that for nine-figure judgments like Trump's, most guarantors won't accept real estate assets as collateral and would only agree to cash or cash equivalent assets, like securities.

If James did move to seize 40 Wall Street, she may be able to obtain as much as $220 million according to a 2012 appraisal. Trump Tower — the ex-president's signature Fifth Avenue property — was valued at $117 million by Forbes in 2017. His Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida could garner close to $20 million, and his Seven Springs property could bring in close to $57 million.

The 45th president of the United States may have a way out of losing his assets depending on how his Truth Social platform's initial public offering (IPO) performs in financial markets after its expected debut next week. The ex-president is expected to make $3 billion off of his stake in the company, which would be more than enough to cover the fraud judgment and his judgments in both E. Jean Carroll lawsuits.

Trump has continued to use Truth Social to attack both James and Judge Arthur Engoron, who handed down the $355 million verdict in the bench trial. He recently called the penalty "CRAZY" and referred to the judgment as "ELECTION INTERFERENCE."

"If I sold assets, and then won the Appeal, the assets would be forever gone," Trump wrote on Thursday. "Also, putting up money before an Appeal is VERY EXPENSIVE. When I win the Appeal, all of that money is gone, and I would have done nothing wrong."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

New York Jury Issues $5M Fraud Verdict Against NRA Chief LaPierre

New York Jury Issues $5M Fraud Verdict Against NRA Chief LaPierre

A New York jury has reached a verdict against former National Rifle Association (NRA) CEO Wayne LaPierre, finding him guilty of corruption and defrauding the organization of more than $5 million.

Courthouse News reporter Erik Ueblacker tweeted the verdict on Friday, which found that the NRA sustained $5,400,000 in financial harm as a result of LaPierre's actions. However, the jury also agreed that LaPierre had already paid back $1,048,769.98 to the organization, meaning he's still on the hook for more than $4.35 million.

According to ABC News, the jury also found that the NRA was liable for financial mismanagement, and ruled that NRA corporate secretary and general counsel John Frazer and former NRA treasurer and CFO Wilson "Woody" Phillips violated their statutory obligations to discharge the duties of their positions in good faith.

LaPierre's attorney called the lawsuit — which was filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James in 2020 — politically motivated, and argued that his client "acted in good faith and with honesty, sincerity and intention." LaPierre resigned from his position atop the NRA just before the seven-week trial began for health reasons.

The central allegations of the trial focused on LaPierre's stacking of organizational leadership with loyalists who would enable and green-light his misuse of organizational funds. The New York Times reported that James' office accused LaPierre of "diverting millions of dollars in NRA funding toward personal use," which included hair and makeup for his wife, speaking fees for board members, contracts with favored vendors willing to pay kickbacks and luxurious private jet excursions to exclusive locations.

Prior to the start of the trial, James secured a guilty plea from the NRA's former chief operations officer, Joshua Powell. ABC reported that as part of his settlement, he agreed that he "breached his fiduciary duties of care, loyalty and obedience by using the NRA's charitable assets for his own benefit and the benefit of his family," and that he "failed to administer the charitable assets entrusted to his care properly."

The NRA's membership has been steadily declining, with The Trace reporting that the organization's membership dipped from 4.9 million to 4.3 million between April of 2021 and January of 2023, which aligns with the time frame of the corruption lawsuit.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Trump Faces Huge Potential Damages In January 6 Civil Lawsuits

Trump Faces Huge Potential Damages In January 6 Civil Lawsuits

Before Justice Arthur Engoron released his verdict in New York Attorney General Letitia James' civil fraud case, many legal experts predicted that Trump would get clobbered financially. And that's exactly what happened.

On Friday afternoon, February 16, Engoron ordered Trump to pay almost $355 million. But when interest in factored in, that figure increases to $450 million.

Engoron's decision comes after two separate civil defamation lawsuits by former Elle Magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll.

Trump was ordered to pay Carroll $5 million in damages in her first lawsuit against him and $83.3 million in the second one. Between James' case (including the interest) and the damages in Carroll's lawsuits, Trump owes over $535 million.

According to Forbes' Alison Durkee, those aren't the only civil cases that Trump needs to be worried about.

In an article published on February 19, Durkee explains, "Former President Donald Trump now owes more than $440 million before interest in civil court fines after being ordered to pay more than $354 million Friday in the civil fraud case against him and his company — and it's possible more damages awards could be coming as the ex-president faces more civil cases seeking to hold him liable for the January 6 riot. Trump still faces multiple civil lawsuits — which have largely been consolidated in court — brought by Democratic lawmakers and Capitol police officers, which seek to hold Trump personally liable for the January 6 riot."

Durkee adds, "Those cases are now moving forward after federal district and appeals courts refused to throw them out, rejecting Trump's argument that he has 'immunity' because the allegations stem from actions he took as president."

Durkee notes that the "January 6 civil cases" are "moving forward again in federal district court after appeals courts refused to throw them out." A hearing, according to Durkee, has been scheduled for this Friday, February 23.

"Trump has denied the allegations against him in the civil January 6 lawsuits, accusing Democratic lawmakers in his motion to dismiss of 'attempting to undermine the First Amendment by bringing this lawsuit, based on their longstanding and public grudges against President Trump,'" Durkee reports. "The lawmakers 'fail to plausibly plead any viable conspiracy theory against President Trump,' Trump's attorneys wrote…. The ex-president has continued to insist ex-presidents have 'absolute immunity' even as courts have rejected his arguments, claiming such immunity is necessary even when their actions 'cross the line.'"

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World