Tag: lie
Donnie’s Little Lies are Huuuuuge

Donnie’s Little Lies are Huuuuuge

An old saying asserts that falsehoods come in three escalating levels: “Lies, damn lies, and statistics.” Now, however, we’ve been given an even-higher level of intentional deception: Policy speeches by Donald Trump.

Take his recent highly publicized address outlining specific economic policies he would push to benefit hard-hit working families. It’s an almost-hilarious compilation of Trumpian fabrications, including his bold, statesmanlike discourse on the rank unfairness of the estate tax: “No family will have to pay the death tax,” he solemnly pledged, adopting the right-wing pejorative for a tax assessed on certain properties of the dearly departed. Fine, but next came his slick prevarication: “American workers have paid taxes their whole lives, and they should not be taxed again at death.” Workers? The tax exempts the first $5.4 million of any deceased person’s estate, meaning 99.8 percent of Americans pay absolutely nothing. So Trump is trying to deceive real workers into thinking he’s standing for them, when in fact it’s his own wealth he’s protecting.

What a maverick! What a shake-’em-up outsider! What an anti-establishment fighter for working stiffs!

Oh, and don’t forget this: What a phony!

Sure, The Donald sounds like a populist on the stump, bellowing that the systems been jerry-rigged by and for the corporate and political elites, which is killing the middle class. Well, he’s right about that, but what’s he going to do? Don’t worry, he says smugly, I’ll fix it, I’ll make the system honest again — trust me!

As Groucho Marx said, “To know if a man is honest, ask him — if he says he is, he’s a crook.” Or, in the case of this phony populist, just look at the specific policies he laid out as his fixes for our economy. Trumpeting the package as his blueprint for the “economic renewal” of America’s working class.

But Trump’s idea of “working class turns out to be millionaires and billionaires, for that’s who would get the bulk of benefits from his agenda — rewarding the very corporate chieftains he denounces in his blustery speeches for knocking down middle-income families and grabbing all of the new wealth our economy is creating. His proposed tax cuts, for example, don’t benefit low-wage workers at all and provide only a pittance of gain for those with middle-class paychecks, but corporations are given a huuuuuuuge windfall with over a 50 percent cut in their rate. His tax giveaway will also take $240 billion a year out of our public treasury — money desperately needed for such basics as expanding educational opportunities and restoring our nation’s dilapidated infrastructure.

In his policy speech, he offered a new tax break to help hard working people reduce their cost of child care “by allowing parents to fully deduct [such] spending from their taxes.” Trump even gave this push a personal touch, saying his daughter Ivanka urged him to provide a helping hand to working parents because “she feels so strongly about this.” Before you tear up over their show of dad and daughter working-class empathy, however, note that 70 percent of American households don’t make enough to warrant itemizing tax deductions. Thus, the big majority of Americans that are most in need of child care help get nothing from Trump’s melodramatic gesture. Once again, his generosity is for his own elite class, for the tax benefits would flow uphill to wealthy families like his who can purchase the platinum packages of care for their children.

What we have here is the same old failed, establishmentarian, economic elitist hokum that Republicans have been peddling for decades, only bigger and more extreme. Rhetoric aside, the reality of Trump’s plan is to replace Ronald Reagan’s trickle-down theory with his own arrogant, anti-worker scheme of tinkle-down economics. As an early 19th Century labor leader noted, “Figures don’t lie, but liars do figure.” That fits The Donald perfectly.

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.

Trump Could Use Donations To Pay Back ‘Self-Funding’ Loans, Campaign Says

Trump Could Use Donations To Pay Back ‘Self-Funding’ Loans, Campaign Says

Update, May 13, 2016, 12:29 pm: Ari Melber reports that Donald Trump has released the following statement: “I have absolutely no intention of paying myself back for the nearly $50 million dollars [sic] I have loaned to the campaign. This money is a contribution made in order to ‘Make America Great Again.'” To which I say: Surely, we have no reason to doubt Donald Trump’s integrity.

In March, I began reporting on a routine aspect of campaign finance law that, while perfectly boring in most election cycles, could make for some big news this time around. Back then, Donald Trump said he was “self-funding” his campaign, writing himself big checks so that he could avoid the corruptive influence of establishment fundraisers.

Of course, “self-funding” means a lot of things, and none of them applied to Donald Trump, then or now: he was accepting money in the form of small and large contributions from his supporters, he sold thousands of hats and other merchandise for a profit, and he even occasionally took money from super PACs. He also was forced to pay his own companies — his plane operator, and a few of his properties — back for services they provided his campaign.

Importantly, though, Donald Trump was loaning himself the money that he said was being used to “self-fund” his campaign. So far, Trump has loaned his campaign $36 million.

Most legitimately rich candidates for president do this: Mitt Romney loaned his campaign $44 million, in addition to taking campaign donations and help from outside groups, but he ultimately wrote off the loans, turning them into real donations to his campaign.

But Donald Trump is a con man, and something didn’t smell right. He would use his supporters’ donations, I posited at the time, to pay back the loans he had given his campaign.

Today, NBC’s Ari Melber is reporting that may end up being the case:

Asked about Trump’s loans in March, during the primaries, campaign manager Corey Lewandowski told the A.P. “he is not going to repay himself.”

That was months before the campaign decided to take this outside money for the general election, however, opening up a vast new source of campaign funds.

Now, as Donald Trump adjusts his campaign funding plans as the nominee, some campaign officials are striking a more circumspect note.

Paul Manafort, Trump’s convention manager, told MSNBC it is not the campaign’s “intention right now” to use fundraising to pay back the loans.

Asked if the option is off the table, Manafort says he has not discussed the idea with Trump, and the campaign’s focus is on spending for the future.

Another campaign aide tells MSNBC the possibility of Trump using donations to pay back his loans “is not being discussed or considered.” The aide declined to say the option is definitively off the table.

It’s already established that Trump lied about “self-funding” his campaign in another way: he recently announced that he hired some big shot Wall Street Republican fundraisers to raise money for his campaign, and for the Republican National Committee, with whom he recently signed a cooperative fundraising agreement whereby Trump would, he says, fundraise for other candidates, and he in turn would have access to funds raised by the RNC.

But now, it’s even clearer that Trump may break with precedent and pay back his loans to himself — with money from donors. That’s not self-funding.

In fact, considering the billions of dollars of free media Trump has earned so far this campaign, and the hundreds of thousands he has paid his own organizations for services they’ve provided his campaign, this something else entirely: profiting off of an election.

WATCH: Latest Obamacare Lie Already Appearing In GOP Attack Ads

WATCH: Latest Obamacare Lie Already Appearing In GOP Attack Ads

Just two days after a Congressional Budget Office report launched the latest false attack against the Affordable Care Act — that the law will kill 2 million jobs — the spurious claim has already made its way into a 2014 campaign ad.

In a web video released Thursday, Thom Tillis — the Speaker of North Carolina’s House of Representatives, and a top contender for the Republican nomination to oppose incumbent Senator Kay Hagan (D-NC) in November — became the first Republican candidate to utilize the CBO report in an attack ad.

“Kay Hagan votes with Barack Obama 96 percent of the time. What will it take to change her mind?” the ad’s narrator asks darkly. “How many families will have to lose good health coverage? How many workers will have to lose their jobs?”

As the narrator asks that second question, the ad shows a shuttered factory, with text on the screen reading “Congressional Budget Office estimates 2 million lost jobs due to Obamacare.”

In addition to the web ad, the National Republican Senatorial Committee sent out a press release on Thursday morning, citing a study from Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform that estimates that the Affordable Care Act will cost North Carolina the equivalent of over 74,000 jobs.

“So many of the promises Kay Hagan repeatedly made about Obamacare have turned out to be false, and as a result thousands fewer will be employed,” NRSC Press Secretary Brook Hougesen says in the release.

Despite the Republicans’ spirited attacks, the “Obamacare the jobkiller” charge has already been thoroughly debunked. Among many others, Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler awarded the claim used in Tillis’ ad Three Pinocchios, while CBO director Douglas Elmendorf confirmed that the law will actually reduce unemployment.

It’s no surprise that Hagan has become the first victim of the misinformation campaign. Widely considered to be among the most vulnerable Democratic incumbents in the nation, Hagan has become the primary target for Republican attacks by a wide margin in the early stages of the 2014 campaign. While the attacks against Hagan have not yet become as vicious as they were in her 2008 campaign — when Republican Elizabeth Dole infamously suggested that Hagan is an enemy of God — Tillis’ new ad suggests that the new charges will be no less misleading.

H/t:Politico