Tag: lindsey graham
As Redistricting Fiasco Unfolds, Raging Republicans Blame Everyone But Trump

As Redistricting Fiasco Unfolds, Raging Republicans Blame Everyone But Trump

Republicans were in full-on meltdown mode this week after they lost a redistricting ballot measure in Virginia that will axe as many as four GOP lawmakers from their congressional delegation.

And the finger-pointing was out in full force, with conservatives blaming the Virginia Republican Party, the Republican National Committee, former GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin, and especially Democrats, who they called power-hungry cheaters while keeping a straight face.

But there was one person Republicans didn’t blame, even though he is squarely at fault for any House losses they suffer as a result of this race to the bottom that he started in the first place: their Dear Leader, Donald Trump.

If Trump had never pushed red states to redraw their congressional maps mid-decade in Texas and elsewhere, then Democrats never would have redrawn the maps in Virginia or California.Indeed, Trump likely thought that Democrats wouldn’t have the ability, nor the stomach, to engage in the kind of partisan gerrymandering that rule-followers usually hate.

But he underestimated Democratic leaders, who showed they had a spine and the guts to stand up and refuse to fight with one hand tied behind their back.

Still, Republicans couldn’t bring themselves to name Trump personally for the miscalculation.

Let’s take a look at some unhinged GOP reactions, shall we?

Republican Rep. Rich McCormick of Georgia proposed legislation that would redraw Virginia state lines, giving the Democratic-heavy Northern Virginia suburbs back to the District of Columbia.

“DC Bureaucrats hijacked Virginia… but we will restore it,” McCormick wrote in a post on X. “Arlington and Alexandria were always meant to be a part of DC. That’s why I introduced the Make DC Square Again Act, because it’s a simple concept: DC = [square].”

Of course, changing state lines would require the Virginia Legislature to agree—which it won’t, given that it’s controlled by Democrats.

Also, the Virginia redistricting ballot measure would have passed even without the Democratic strongholds in NoVA, so good try bro. Even more ironic is that McCormick is only in Congress because Georgia Republicans gerrymandered their House maps to make his seat easier for him to win. Funny that he wasn’t anti-gerrymandering then.

GOP Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina reacted by calling on his state to gerrymander in response to Virginia’s gerrymander.

“After the Virginia Democrats’ efforts to redistrict in order to increase Democrat seats in the House of Representatives, South Carolina should consider fighting fire with fire,” Graham wrote in a post on X, even though this whole ordeal was started by Trump and not Democrats. “I would encourage South Carolina’s next Republican governor and the Republican legislature to seriously look at what our state’s response should be to Democrats in Virginia. Republicans in South Carolina should consider being bold and fighting back.”

Note: The filing deadline for candidates in South Carolina already passed and the primaries are in a little over seven weeks, so even if they do redraw their maps, that wouldn’t take effect this year.

National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Richard Hudson slammed Democrats for the Virginia redraw, and said that the narrow margin the ballot measure passed by is proof that the redraw is bad.

“Virginia Democrats can’t redraw reality. This close margin reinforces that Virginia is a purple state that shouldn’t be represented by a severe partisan gerrymander,” Hudson said in a statement.

You’ll be shocked to know he didn’t raise any objections when Republicans in his state redrew their maps to give the GOP as many as 11 of the state’s 14 House seats—despite the fact that Trump only won the Tar Heel State by four points.

Other GOP lawmakers used ridiculous hyperbole and lies to slam the maps, yet refused to say Trump needed to take any accountability for the mess he created.

“The Marxists want to destroy this country,” Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas told Fox Business. “That’s what [House Minority Leader] Hakeem Jeffries literally admitted yesterday. … We need the Virginia Supreme Court to hopefully save us by striking down this ridiculous redistricting map.”

Ultimately, Democrats finally fought back against Trump-fueled GOP power grabs—and Republicans can’t handle it.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

'Draft Lindsey Graham!' MAGA War Opponents Troll America's Loudest Hawk

'Draft Lindsey Graham!' MAGA War Opponents Troll America's Loudest Hawk

Conservative Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is not only a supporter of President Donald Trump's war against Iran — he also favors an expansion of U.S. troops in that conflict. But he is getting some pushback from other parts of the right.

In Montana, Tom Jandron, a Libertarian candidate running for the U.S. Senate, proposes subjecting the 70-year-old Graham to the military draft. Jandron, in a March 25 post on X, formerly Twitter, wrote, "I'm running for US Senate. If elected, the first bill I introduce will draft Lindsey Graham into any conflict he publicly supports while in office."

Republican opponents of the Iran war are speaking out against Graham as well.

On X, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), tweeted, "Washington's war machine is hard at work. They are try to drag us into Iran to make it another Iraq. We can't let them."

The Hill's Sarah Fortinsky, in an article published on March 30, reports, "Graham, a longtime war hawk and close Trump ally, has drawn sharp criticism in recent weeks from fellow Republicans for urging the administration to ramp up military pressure on Iran and send more troops overseas…. Earlier this month, in an interview on Fox News' 'Hannity,' Graham floated sending more troops overseas as he urged U.S. allies in the Middle East to step up support."

Graham's "longstanding support for overthrowing the Iranian regime," according to Fortinsky, has "fueled backlash among an anti-interventionist wing of the GOP that is wary of a widening conflict and the scope of Graham's influence over Trump Administration policy."

On social media, GOP activist Meghan McCain — the late Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) daughter — said of Graham, "Nothing like a single, childless, septuagenarian telling American mothers to send their children to go possibly die in a war."

On X, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) posted, "There are some in the Senate that advocate for war everywhere. Lindsey Graham is one of them. He does NOT tell the President what to do, nor does he control Congress. I have spoken with the administration a number of times, as well as other members of Congress over the last week or so, and nothing has changed regarding boots on the ground."

Luna also wrote that there should be "NO BOOTS on the ground" in Iran and that if Graham "wants to go fight in a foreign conflict, let him be the first to volunteer."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet


Greene Stokes MAGA's 'America First' Outrage Over Trump's Iran Strikes

Greene Stokes MAGA's 'America First' Outrage Over Trump's Iran Strikes

When former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) announced that she was resigning from Congress, she wasn't shy about expressing her disappointment with President Donald Trump — who, in her view, has betrayed his America First agenda with an aggressively interventionist foreign policy. Now, the MAGA Republican and former Trump ally is vehemently criticizing Trump's military strikes against Iran. And she isn't the only person in the MAGA movement who wants Trump to stay out of that country.

Washington Post reporters Emily Davies and Hannah Knowles, in an article published on March 1, explain, "President Donald Trump's major attack on Iran has rattled parts of the coalition that twice delivered him the White House, a fracture that could spell trouble for a divided GOP as the midterm elections approach. The strikes, which killed Iran's supreme leader, followed a visible buildup of U.S. forces in the Middle East. But Trump's decision to carry them out nonetheless surprised some of his supporters, who had expected the self-described anti-interventionist president to stop short of a direct attack."

Greene attacked Trump's Iran policy in a lengthy March 1 rant on X, formerly Twitter.

The far-right congresswomen tweeted, "We said 'No More Foreign Wars, No More Regime Change!' We said it on rally stage after rally stage, speech after speech. Trump, Vance, basically the entire admin campaigned on it and promised to put America FIRST and Make America Great Again. My generation has been let down, abused, and used by our government our entire adult lives and our children's generation is literally being abandoned. Thousands and thousands of Americans from my generation have been killed and injured in never ending pointless foreign wars and we said no more. But we are freeing the Iranian people. Please."

Greene continued, "There are 93 million people in Iran, let them liberate themselves. But Iran is on the verge of having nuclear weapons. Yeah sure. We have been spoon fed that line for decades and Trump told us all that his bombing this past summer completely wiped it all out. It’s always a lie and it’s always America Last. But it feels like the worst betrayal this time because it comes from the very man and the admin who we all believed was different and said no more."

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is praising Trump's Iran operation. But MAGA Republican Blake Neff, known for producing The Charlie Kirk Show, expressed strong reservations about the Iran strikes.

In a February 28 post on X, Neff wrote, "Charlie was opposed to a regime-change war with Iran, as was I. Wars by their nature are expensive and unpredictable. They endanger American lives and can last far, far longer than anyone anticipates. Nevertheless, President Trump has elected for regime change in Iran. As an American patriot I must hope for the best. Trump's instinct is to avoid prolonged fighting and boots on the ground. We must simply trust that he has a strategy that will prevent both."

Neff continued, "Right now some of my right-leaning friends are messaging me: 'F*** this.' 'This is extremely depressing.' 'Never voting in a national election again'…. If this war is a swift, easy, and decisive victory, most of them will get over it. But if the war is anything else, there will be a lot of anger."

Davies and Knowles note, however, that so far, "MAGA allies long skeptical of foreign intervention" have "largely stuck by the president."

"Trump officials cast the strikes on Iran last summer as a limited intervention meant to take out a nuclear threat — and pushback within his coalition faded as the conflict ended without morphing into a broader war," the Post reporters observe. "But each conflict has threatened more entanglement abroad than the last, testing the movement's tolerance.

Natalie Winters, a co-host for Steve Bannon's War Room podcast, believes that Trump needs to do a better job explaining the Iran strikes to his MAGA base.

Winters told the Post, "The messaging, much like the Epstein files, is all over the place. I would think they would know their base better. Some of his donors are probably happy so congratulations to them."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Danziger Draws

Danziger Draws

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City and Vermont. He is a long time cartoonist for The Rutland Herald and is represented by Counterpoint Syndicate. He is a recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons, a novel and a memoir. Visit him at jeffdanziger.com.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World