Tag: maga media
Trump Binkie: Natalie Harp's Rise Began With This Appearance On 'Fox & Friends'

Trump Binkie: Natalie Harp's Rise Began With This Appearance On 'Fox & Friends'

Natalie Harp, who serves as President Donald Trump’s executive secretary, has been at the center of a media firestorm since Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) invoked her name during a speech last Sunday, saying: “And while the sailors on the Lincoln fight his war, while he fruitlessly drains our munitions and oil reserves, the president sleeps through his meetings. He golfs and trades stocks. See, he doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar.”

While right-wing pundits feigned outrage over the reference to Harp, reporters at mainstream outlets used the opportunity to empty their notebooks on the heretofore little-discussed White House aide. Harp, readers learned, is Trump’s gatekeeper and social media posting partner, someone so zealously committed to the president that she writes him devotional letters and once jumped into the trunk of an SUV to ensure she could accompany him to a courthouse. Trump’s other aides have nicknamed her “the human printer” because part of her job entails printing out articles for him, and she has been termed Trump’s “binkie” by New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman, the paper’s longtime Trump beat reporter.

Harp’s story, as with so much of the saga surrounding Trump and his orbit, would have been impossible without Fox News, the MAGA propaganda outlet with a central role in shaping the president’s worldview.

Trump was first introduced to Harp through a June 14, 2019, segment on Fox & Friends, the sycophantic morning show that helped launch his political career. During that segment, the hosts tried to parry then-Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s promise to “cure cancer” if elected by lifting up Harp, who in a LinkedIn essay had credited the “Right to Try” law Trump signed in May 2018 for saving her life from terminal cancer.

Harp punctuated the interview with praise for the president. “I’m not dying from cancer anymore, thanks to President Trump, I’m living with cancer,” she said. “I’m walking, I’m healthy. I am living the quality of life that I always wanted to have that it took me four years to find because I wasn’t offered it here. It took President Trump going to Washington to be able to get that for me.”

(After Harp repeated these claims during a speech at the 2020 Republican National Convention, The Washington Post reported that experts “point out that Harp’s description of the treatment she received and her timeline for receiving it make it unlikely Trump had any effect on her case”).

“Thank you so much, and happy birthday, President Trump,” Harp interjected at the conclusion of the interview. “He’s hearing you, he’s on in an hour and a half,” co-host Brian Kilmeade replied.

Kilmeade was right: Trump was watching Harp’s interview, and — as he did hundreds of times during his first term via the process I’ve termed the Fox-Trump feedback loop — soon responded on social media to what he had seen on TV.

“Natalie Harp fighting Stage 2 Cancer and doing really well was a GREAT guest on @foxandfriends,” he posted shortly after the segment aired. “Right To Try is producing some truly spectacular results. Proud of Natalie!”

Trump also brought up the “young, beautiful woman” unprompted during his own Fox & Friends interview after Kilmeade mentioned an Esquire report that claimed Trump “hates the job” of president.

“No, I love the job. Well, it’s the fake media. You know, they’re just so fake, you don’t even respond to them anymore,” Trump said. “I love it because I don’t think anybody’s accomplished so much in two and a half years, what we’ve done. You know, I watched Natalie Harp, that young, beautiful woman, who was — they made some kind of a medical mistake a long time ago and she’s lived a tough time. And I watched her. I think she’s one of the best guests you’ve ever had. … Her spirit was so incredible.”

Trump later added, “There’s so many people like Natalie, but I thought she was just an incredible person.”

Less than two weeks later, Trump declared during a speech at the right-wing Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference that Harp had “lit up the television screen like very few people I’ve ever seen do it,” before inviting her to join him onstage and tell her story.

From there, Harp would rise through the MAGA ranks. She spent two years as a host for the far-right One America News Network, where she drew attention for her notably obsequious treatment of Trump and her hardcore election denial, before taking a job working for Trump in 2022 and, after his 2024 election, joining his White House.

But as with the careers of numerous Trump administration aides and several of the president’s major initiatives in office, it all started with Trump liking what he saw on Fox.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Trump

Pause From Doomscrolling -- And Be Hopeful As MAGA And Trump Swirl The Toilet

I’m content to doom scroll with anyone who wants to go there. This country is obviously in a lot of trouble, as this corrupt, self-dealing, unchecked president is barely half-way through a term that’s unleashed murderous xenophobia, war, and—a key subject of this ‘Stack—terrible economic policy.

But I’m not immune to hope, which I keep seeing in a variety of places. In a word, that terrible policy record has not gone unnoticed by the majority of the American people/electorate. Ergo, Trump’s approval rating is tanking. Here’s a good summary.


Yes, he’ll always have MAGA, but the New York Times tells us that, at least in terms of media interest, they too may be lagging.

For the record, I wouldn’t make too much of this. Given the strength of their psychological bond (discussed below), I would never count on MAGA turning on Trump. But, electorally speaking, MAGA’s too small to do much by itself. At least in a national sense, and increasingly at the state level too, it needs the numbers from the larger swing coalition that’s largely motivated by affordability concerns and is happy to cycle through incumbents until someone actually helps them.

Bottom line, even with Trump off the ballot, the Rs have a midterm problem. And, if that holds, it’s just plain good news for America.

Then there’s the fact that some spineless Rs, like Sen. Cornyn, now that they’re out of the running, are standing up to some of Trump’s most egregious actions and nominations. FTR, I have zero sympathy for these lame ducks. They repeatedly betrayed their oaths to enforce the Constitution, until doing so become costless. And Cornyn, e.g., has an awful record: anti-choice, tax cuts for the rich, terrible SCOTUS votes, etc.

My point, however, is that he’s just the typical establishment R that proliferated before Trump took over, and as soon as that constraint was lifted, he snapped back to his old self. And I doubt he’s alone. That’s not particularly comforting, I grant you, but it signals that Trumpian damage—his “ownership of the party”—though it will absolutely postdate Trump, is not permanent.

Will the Ds be the beneficiaries of this discontent with Trump and the Rs? Certainly in the narrow midterm sense of the incumbent party doing badly, especially when the country’s dominant mood is this negative, and, at least as far as winning back the House is concerned, polling and betting markets suggest those odds are favorable.

But there’s a big difference between benefitting from anti-incumbency and lasting, foundational support. That requires delivering. And here’s where I think some of the Democratic Socialist (DSA) candidates have an interesting edge (“some” is doing important lifting here—the DSA candidates more focused on tearing down the establishment than helping constituents could prove to be electorally problematic in many districts).

Polls show voters expressing more favorable views re socialism. As I’ve written before, there are many reasons for that, largely born of a sense that establishment Ds have failed to deliver or to hold Israel to account for its actions in Gaza. In essence, people are looking for a new political force that looks like it might genuinely fight on their behalf, while reinstituting basic human rights that have long been violated. That certainly defines Mayor Mamdani’s success, and the fact that he’s starting to deliver further seals the deal.

There was a time when Trump and MAGA played this role (the fight-for-you part, not the human rights part, of course), but that was never going to work. Trump’s a fraud who never intended to deliver on his affordability promises. I’ll admit to being surprised that he’s so energetically turned that dial the wrong way—his policies are currently adding at least a point to inflation!—but as his polling shows, a lot of people looking for economic relief realize they bet on the wrong pony.

But second, MAGA and DSA motivations are fundamentally different. MAGA is, at root, a psychological movement, motivated by retribution against a world that’s always looked down on them. This is why Trump is such an effective standard bearer for them. He links to them though a titanium-strength chain of genuine empathy, because he too resents the fact that he’s always been viewed as a carnival-barking fool by elites.

DSA—and I’d put the labor-oriented Ds of old in the same bucket—is at root motivated by economic justice. Their theory of the case is not anti-market, which is why I don’t think the commie spitballs will stick. It’s that the benefits of market outcomes are not reaching enough of the folks who generated those outcomes. The bakers aren’t getting a fair slice of the pie they’re helping to bake (technically, this shows up as imbalanced factor shares—labor share down, profit share up).

Bottom line, this is all pretty simple. A decisive group of swing voters that tend to determine many electoral outcomes these days is looking for economic help from whomever they believe will deliver it. Trump has failed to do so, so they’re looking elsewhere. Half the battle for the Ds is convincing them they can make a positive difference in their lives. The other half is doing so.

Megyn Kelly and Trump

As Midterms Approach, MAGA Influencers See Their Audiences Shrinking Rapidly

With the midterms so close they’re effectively “happening now,” the “MAGA media machine” that carried President Donald Trump into office is falling apart. According to a new report by the New York Times released Friday, while they were once united in their support for Trump, “right-wing influencers are embroiled in feuds and losing viewers, creating a problem for Republicans in the midterm elections.

“The vote is in November, but the heart of the midterms is happening now,” said Ryan Broderick, the founder of Garbage Day, a newsletter about online culture and influence. “A lot of the propaganda that they’re pushing out just isn’t really connecting the way it would have even three or four years ago.”

As the Times details, much of that “propaganda” used to come via an army of online influencers, like Benny Johnson, Dan Bongino, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, Ben Shapiro, and more, the majority of whom have seen their audiences shrink dramatically over the course of Trump’s second term. Per the Times, “The shifts add to a growing body of evidence that suggests the audience for pro-Trump content has fallen from its heights and, for some creators, has reached new lows. Views are dropping for many of Mr. Trump’s greatest allies, while some figures on the right who have taken to criticizing Mr. Trump are showing uneven gains.”

This situation has threatened the media messaging ecosystem that the Republican Party depends on. According to the Times, of the dozen leading MAGA content creators analyzed, “Only a few saw their audiences grow since Mr. Trump’s inauguration, while many more have seen their viewerships decline. Some creators, like Ms. Owens drew new audiences by posting about a broader range of topics.”

Experts attribute the shift to a number of factors, “including the difficulty in stoking political outrage while Republicans control Washington, along with a quieter midterm season. All content creators are also subject to the whims of algorithms, like on X, which can change without explanation and impact their reach. A fresh generation of influencers, such as Clavicular and the YouTube creator Asmongold, have also siphoned away viewers by speaking about politics alongside other topics like gaming and relationships.”

“It seems that everyone in the space is experiencing a drop-off in views from 2025,” wrote Nick Fuentes, a white nationalist influencer who was once an avid Trump supporter but has become deeply critical of the president. “Seems as though 2025 was the anomaly either due to organic interest or potentially artificial boosting.”

In fact, after a period of declining viewership, both Fuentes and Owens have seen their audiences grow more recently as they’ve begun criticizing Trump. According to the Times, “The success of disaffected Trump supporters like Mr. Fuentes and Ms. Owens suggests they will play a larger role in the future of right-wing content online.”

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

Orwell Vindicated: Under Totalitarian Trump, Reality Itself Is A Communist Plot

Orwell Vindicated: Under Totalitarian Trump, Reality Itself Is A Communist Plot

The Covid vaccine didn’t work, and vaccines cause autism. But hydroxychloroquine worked, and so did ivermectin. Anthony Fauci killed millions of people.

Climate change is a hoax. Wind power caused a massive TV blackout during the Trump-Biden debate. Solar power is useless because the sun doesn’t shine at night, and batteries don’t exist. Smoke blanketed North America, not because of climate change, but because Canada didn’t rake its two million square miles of boreal forest.

We’ve destroyed Iran’s military, and the Iranian regime is begging for a deal. Also, the U.S. isn’t running out of precision weapons as a result of the Iran war, and furthermore the shortage is Joe Biden’s fault.

The economy is in a “golden age.” Prices are down. And Trump has a 59 percent approval rating.

Trump won the 2020 election.

Communism is the greatest threat facing America.

The modern American right is very good at hating. MAGA hates immigrants (unless they’re white South Africans); it hates liberals; it hates scientists.

What the ongoing show trial of Fauci — which motivated this post — has really driven home, however, is that what Trump and his supporters hate most of all is reality. They know what they want to believe. They fly into paroxysms of rage whenever someone points out that the world isn’t what they want it to be. And they always want to shoot the messenger.

Of course, motivated reasoning isn’t confined to the right. Some people on the left insist that zoning restrictions have no role in causing high housing prices, that it’s all about Wall Street greed. Many centrists insist that being in the middle on a left-right scale — which isn’t even how most voters think about politics — is the secret to electoral victory. And so on.

I’m not immune to the temptation to believe what I want to be true. I try to fight it, but don’t always succeed. Still, I try to acknowledge and admit it when I have let wishful thinking warp my judgement.

But what we’re seeing now isn’t run-of-the-mill motivated reasoning. It’s something far more extreme.

If believing something suits MAGA’s prejudices and interests, they don’t hesitate: they simply insist that it’s true. They routinely dismiss scientific and statistical evidence, but they don’t stop there. They’re perfectly willing to deny reality even if the truth is staring them in the face.

Thus, Trump urged Americans to remember that 2024 TV blackout, which nobody remembers because it didn’t happen. He insists that California has “blackouts and brownouts every weekend,” when the state’s 39 million residents can tell you it doesn’t. He says that you must show ID to buy groceries, which everyone who buys their own food knows isn’t so.

Do Trump and his followers actually believe these things? As I see it, that’s a category error, starting from the presumption that they even accept that objective facts exist. All the evidence (Hah! “Evidence!”) says that they don’t.

George Orwell, whose work seems more relevant by the day, knew all about this mindset. In his essay “Looking back on the Spanish war” he wrote about how the rise of totalitarianism had changed the rules:

In the past people deliberately lied, or they unconsciously coloured what they wrote, or they struggled after the truth, well knowing that they must make many mistakes; but in each case they believed that ‘the facts’ existed and were more or less discoverable. And in practice there was always a considerable body of fact which would have been agreed to by almost everyone.

Totalitarians, however, denied that objective facts existed. Furthermore, reality is mutable, changing with the leader’s whims:

If the Leader says of such and such an event, ‘It never happened’ – well, it never happened. If he says that two and two are five – well, two and two are five.

If you find the assertion that MAGA has a totalitarian mindset over the top, all I can ask is, have you been following the news?

What’s remarkable is the extent to which Republican politicians act as if they are living in a totalitarian state, when they aren’t — not yet, anyway. ICE would clearly like to be an American Stasi, policing any deviation from the party line, but it’s not able, so far, to arrest members of Congress who express skepticism about the president’s claims. And many Republican politicians still, I believe, know the difference between fantasy and reality.

But they behave as if they were courtiers to Kim Jong Un. Trump speeches are sometimes followed by “endless applause moments,” because none of Trump’s loyalists wants to be seen as the first person to stop clapping.

The susceptibility of the GOP to this totalitarian mindset has come as a surprise even to cynics. I have some idea of how this happened: It involves a confluence of big-money corruption, crony capitalism, religious fanaticism, and the ever-present forces of racism and sexism. But that’s a subject to be delved into another day.

What’s clear is that the war on reality is exacting a high price on America as a whole.

Remember, 1.2 million Americans died from Covid — a number that would have been much lower if MAGA misinformation hadn’t caused so many people to refuse vaccination. Now we’re seeing a frightening rise in measles and other infectious diseases, and God help us if another pandemic strikes with Trump or his successor still in charge.

Climate denial and hostility to renewable energy will mean more pollution even as it consigns the U.S. to energy and economic backwardness.

And the Iran war — which Trump started and now refuses to end because he won’t accept reality — has destroyed America’s credibility and depleted our weapon stocks with stunning speed.

But anyone pointing out the obvious is, of course, a Communist.

Paul Krugman is a Nobel Prize-winning economist and former professor at MIT and Princeton who now teaches at the City University of New York's Graduate Center. From 2000 to 2024, he wrote a column for The New York Times. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Paul Krugman.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World