Tag: steve scalise
Steve Scalise

Terrified By Iran War's Impact On Gas Prices, Republicans Try Blaming Democrats

Gas prices surged this week amid oil scarcity and investors’ realization that the Strait of Hormuz is not close to reopening.

“If it feels like gas prices are suddenly jumping everywhere, you’re not imagining it—and in parts of the country, the increases have been nothing short of explosive,” Patrick De Haan, a gas price expert with Gas Buddy, wrote in a post on X. “As of Friday, the national average price of gasoline has surged to $4.42 per gallon, the highest level since summer 2022. Diesel prices are climbing even faster, now at $5.56 per gallon, within striking distance of their all-time high.”

Republicans are panicked, knowing that high gas prices will sink them in November’s midterm elections. And those prices rest solely at the feet of President Donald Trump. He launched a war of choice that led Iran to close the critical Strait of Hormuz waterway, which has shocked oil markets and continues to threaten the global economy.

Yet, rather than push Trump to fix the problem he started, they made an embarrassing attempt to gaslight America about high fuel prices and to concoct far-fetched scapegoats, including former President Joe Biden, oil companies, and Democrats.

Republican Rep. Buddy Carter of Georgia, who is running for his party’s Senate nomination and auditioning for Trump’s endorsement, blamed the nebulous “Democrats” for surging gas prices, even though Democrats are against the war causing those price hikes.

“Remember, President Trump promised he’d make us safer and more prosperous. … Now yes, we’ve seen some gas prices fluctuation. Gas prices will go back down. Remember—high gas prices are the work of the Democrats,” Carter told Fox Business, reminding viewers of high gas prices during 2022, which were falling until Trump’s war.

That talking point was obviously sent around to Republicans. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise made a similarly ridiculous plea for voters to remember 2022.

“People will remember, you go back two years ago, we were paying almost $6 a gallon for gasoline,” Scalise said Thursday. “Right now, it’s in the 3s.”

Even conservative CNBC host Joe Kernen pointed out that Scalise was making up numbers. Gas was not $6 a gallon when Biden left office in January 2025, and on the day Scalise made that comment, AAA reported the national average was $4.30 a gallon.

Other Republicans came up with dumber scapegoats.

“It has to do with the greed of the oil companies,” Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee told reporters on Capitol Hill. “And I blame Congress because every dadgum time we do this, ‘Oh, we’re going to bring the oil executives down here,’ and they shake the money tree, and every time I say this, my contributions from the oil distributors goes down.”

Rep. Burchett (R-TN) refuses to put any blame on Trump for high gas prices.Burchett: It has to do with the greed of the oil companies. We buy zero oil from Iran. 90% of their oil they sell to China. They're just gouging us. And I blame Congress.

[image or embed]
— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) April 30, 2026 at 11:04 AM

De Haan said Burchett fundamentally doesn’t understand the laws of supply and demand with that comment.

“That’s not how oil markets work,” De Haan said of Burchett’s assertion. “Prices are driven by global supply and demand—not just what we import or who we buy from. comments like this ignore basic economics. the rep badly badly needs an economics refresher class.”

Rep. Rich McCormick, Republican of Georgia, made a similarly dumb statement, claiming that the U.S. doesn’t get oil from the Strait of Hormuz. But McCormick added a bonus scapegoat, blaming the price jump on Biden for not building a pipeline.

“Remember, the United States is not as dependent on foreign oil as everybody else,” he said. “We do it just because it’s a quicker track, but we don’t have to do that. If we had the pipeline that we didn’t complete thanks to the Biden administration for so long, we’d be in a much better position.”

Rep. McCormick (R-GA) says he doesn’t worry about high gas prices because we don’t rely on oil from the Strait of Hormuz, and blames Biden.McCormick: If we had the pipeline that we didn't complete thanks to the Biden administration for so long, we'd be in a much better position

[image or embed]
— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) April 30, 2026 at 11:38 AM

Of course, the Keystone XL Pipeline would have little to alleviate the situation we are in. That’s because about a third of global oil supply goes through the Strait of Hormuz, and that traffic has plummeted since the start of the Iran war. That has created a shortage and driven up prices. And the Keystone XL Pipeline would have merely transported oil from Canada to the United States, not increased supply.

Ultimately, gas prices are high because of the war Trump started. Full stop.

The majority of voters are well aware of that, too.
Republicans can try to gaslight all they want. But they are to blame for this mess, and they will pay the price for it at the ballot box in November.

Speaker Johnson Faces Possible Ouster As Jordan Jockeys For Takeover

Speaker Johnson Faces Possible Ouster As Jordan Jockeys For Takeover

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) appears ready to make his move to take over as Speaker of the House after Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) is expected to make his move after the GOP loses control of Congress.

NOTUS reported Monday that Republican lawmakers believe Jordan is preparing to take over and that he's raising and donating large sums of campaign cash to incumbents.

The House isn't expected to remain Republican in the November election. It is typical for the president's party to lose seats in the first midterms. However, Trump's poll numbers are so bad when it comes to the economy and starting an unpopular war in Iran that the GOP looks increasingly likely to lose control of Congress and possibly the Senate.

Jordan tried to beat Johnson when the Republicans ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) in 2023, but ultimately failed to garner a majority. Over two dozen "lawmakers, congressional aides, outside advisors and lobbyists" told NOTUS that they see signs Jordan is preparing to make his move.

Jordan, a far-right extremist, has been trying to make inroads with the shrinking moderate and establishment wing of the party, the report explained.

“He’s done a really good job kind of broadening his base of support,” one moderate told NOTUS. “He’s gone out of his way to help people and build relationships.”

Jordan has spent years trying to overcome a scandal involving his awareness of sexual abuse at Ohio State University when he was an assistant wrestling coach. There are at least 177 sexual abuse cases involving Dr. Richard Strauss, the New York Times reported in 2021.

When Jordan ran, he faced a lot of questions about why he couldn't win in 2023. One member asked why, after years of refusing to raise money for those he disagreed with, he would suddenly decide they were on the same side. A key piece of the job in leadership is protecting incumbents and helping raise money for their reelections.

Jordan's excuse was, “It wasn’t my job to help you then."

One ally tried to explain that Jordan was instead focused on protecting Trump from impeachment.

“Jim completely changed his tack,” one senior Republican lawmaker told NOTUS after opposing Jordan in 2023. “He knew that for any chance for him to ascend to a top leadership role, or any leadership role for that matter, he was going to have to shed the wrestler Jim and become a little bit more congenial, workable, friendly, and civil.”

While he's been making inroads with moderates, he may still have to work to convince even those in his own wing of the GOP.

“Some of his angling is frustrating to some on the right,” said a Freedom Caucus member.

Jordan will likely have to face off against Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA).

When asked about it, Jordan said he was “focused on helping our team keep the majority,” and he is “not at all” looking to a leadership race if the GOP moves into the minority.

The response perfectly encapsulated why so many of his colleagues resisted; he simply wasn't a team player.

Jordan is perhaps most known for using the Judiciary Committee to try to bring down former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential run.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

GOP Sycophants Rush To Praise Trump's Gaudy $300M Ballroom Project

GOP Sycophants Rush To Praise Trump's Gaudy $300M Ballroom Project

Congressional Republicans bent over backward to defend President Donald Trump's unilateral decision to raze the entire East Wing of the White House to make way for his hideously gaudy $300 million ballroom.

Republicans mocked Democrats, who are outraged that Trump decided to demolish an entire segment of the White House to build a ballroom corruptly funded by donors who have business before the federal government.

"He put up some of his own money," House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) said of the project, even though we have no idea how much Trump—who notoriously stiffs his contractors—actually gave to the project. "You would think, 'Well gee whiz, at least they could agree to that, it's not even taxpayer money, it's gonna be a permanent renovation that will enhance the White House for all future presidents."

- YouTube youtu.be

Unfortunately for Scalise, Americans do not agree with that assessment, with just 23 percent of adults saying they think the ballroom will have a positive impact on the White House, according to a YouGov survey.

But Scalise continued his whiny tirade.

"They say no to everything he does," Scalise said. "Because they just are angry about the results of the election from last year."

Yes, we are angry. But it's because every day Trump does something so egregiously corrupt and illegal that it’s leading this country into banana republic territory.

"Presidents have routinely renovated and expanded the White House over the last century. The faux outrage from the Left is a deflection from the Schumer Shutdown," Trump bootlicker Rep. Andy Biggs wrote in a post on X. "Leftists are severely afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome," the Arizona Republican claimed.

Of course, those projects had approval from Congress, input from historic preservation boards, and were not funded by a corrupt pay-to-play scheme. But okay.

Sen. Mike Lee of Utah also mocked Democrats' outrage.

"I’m shaking right now. The humanity!" he wrote in a sarcastic post on X that featured images from past White House renovations.

And in his haste to defend Trump, Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee wrote an idiotic post on X in which he posted an image of the White House being demolished along with the text, "Someone needs to stop the @realDonaldTrump administration from destroying the @WhiteHouse. Oh wait this was during the basketball court construction during the Obama administration. #nevermind"

Of course, the photo Burchett posted was NOT from Obama's basketball court "construction"—which actually wasn't construction at all but rather converting an existing tennis court so that he could shoot some hoops while Republicans painted him as the antichrist because his skin wasn't white.

Burchett ultimately deleted the post and put in the correct time the photo took place, which was during the Truman administration. But that still doesn't make the point he thinks he's making, as Truman had to renovate the White House because it was structurally unsound. And he did so in conjunction with historic preservation boards that worked to reuse existing decorative elements in the new building, and with congressional approval and funding.

According to the Truman presidential library, "The Truman renovation retained the original walls, the third floor and the roof, while removing, and then reinstalling, the interiors within a skeleton of steel structural beams on a new concrete foundation."

Trump, meanwhile, took a literal excavator to the structure—and is now blocking the press from seeing the destruction as it unfolds.

Only one Republican had the sense to say that, actually, razing a major portion of the White House to build a gilded ballroom amid a shutdown when many federal workers aren't getting paid is not a great look.

“We’re in the middle of a shutdown," North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis said. "Got a couple of other things going on that we should probably focus on ahead of a building project.”

Of course, Tillis is retiring, so he no longer has to lick Trump's boots like his fellow GOP colleagues, who are afraid that speaking out against Dear Leader will cost them their seats in Congress—or worse.

Because, say it with me now: They're all cowards.

Mike Johnson

Republicans Still Yearn To Kill Obamacare, But Fear 'Political Disaster' If They Do

The standoff over the federal shutdown has exposed deep fractures within the GOP, particularly around health care — a longstanding vulnerability for Republicans.

The New York Times highlighted in a report Sunday that while Democrats insist they will not support a spending deal without extending the expiring tax credits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that safeguard coverage for millions, Republicans are split between ideology and electoral reality.

On one end, hard-line conservatives still press to eliminate the ACA outright; on the other, pragmatists recognize that wiping it out without a credible replacement could inflict “a political disaster” on their party, per the report.

The shutdown has forced the GOP into a public tug-of-war over what to do with a law they largely oppose but cannot realistically undo without major risk.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) insisted the dispute is not about health care, calling Democrats’ insistence on subsidies a “red herring” that distracts from the funding fight.

At the same time, top Republicans such as House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) pledged to vote against extending the credits, arguing they would “bail out insurance companies,” even as many recipients live in GOP-held districts.

At least 14 House Republicans and several senators signaled they would support a renewal of the credits through 2027, recognizing what some advisers called “a potential political catastrophe for the G.O.P.” if coverage were lost.

The report noted that the broader dynamic reveals why the party remains stuck. Even though Republicans have long pledged to “repeal and replace” the ACA, they have repeatedly failed to articulate what “replace” means in practice. The 2017 Senate health care bill collapsed amid conservative-moderate splits, leaving GOP leaders without an alternative mapped out.

According to the report, Democrats "have forced the G.O.P. to wrestle publicly with its divisions about what to do with the health care law, which most Republicans revile but many recognize would be impossible to unravel without bringing political disaster to their party.”

Reprinted with permission from Alternet


Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World