Tag: strait of hormuz
Trump in USA hat

Why Don't Rising Gas Prices Trouble Trump? He's Banking Millions, Chump

Honestly, it really isn’t surprising at this point to learn that President Donald Trump is making mad money off of his dumb war with Iran, because Trump doesn’t do anything right now that doesn’t line his pockets.

So while Trump is out there stumping for GOP candidates with the very unusual approach of saying that it’s totes cool you’re paying more for gas because oil companies are making big money from it, he skipped over the fact that he personally is making big money from it.

At the end of 2025, Trump’s oil and gas holdings were worth somewhere between $12.6 million and $46 million. Now? Between $22.5 million and $81.6 million. Yes, that’s a huge range, thanks to the very loose vibes of financial disclosure requirements.

A report from Democrats on the Congressional Joint Economic Committee found that 94% of Trump’s 2026 oil and gas stock purchases occurred after his war began.

Besides holding significant stock in the biggies like Exxon and Chevron, Trump also has shares in dozens of other oil and gas companies. Gotta keep that stock portfolio diverse, right? The president is making bank while Americans have paid an additional $101 billion for gas since he started his war. Talk about market manipulation.

It turns out the patented Trump trick of declaring a ceasefire to juice the stock market and bring down oil prices is very, very good for Trump’s pocketbook. Nobody could have expected.

Trump keeps insisting all of his trades are done without his knowledge. It’s just a wild coincidence that his independent money managers always know just a wee bit more than the rest of the market and time their trades accordingly, which, LOL, LMAO.

Part of why this assertion is so laughable is that we learned in September that Trump has made more trades than all of Congress combined. He racked up a staggering 28,700 trades in 17 months from his inauguration to the end of June 2026. In that same time span, the whole of Congress only made 22,000 trades.

Meanwhile, the House GOP is talking tough about Congress trading stocks, offering a bill that would ban trading by members of Congress and their families. That bill would, however, conveniently exclude Trump.

Unsurprisingly, Trump has enthusiastically endorsed the bill, saying that it must be passed so Congress “cannot corruptly profit from using insider information.”

Well, yeah. That’s just common sense. Only Trump is supposed to corruptly profit from insider information.

Okay, that’s not totally fair. Traders who are willing to pony up about $10,000/month to get early access to Trump’s Truth Social posts, where he overtly moves markets, will also get to corruptly profit from insider information.

In more proof that his brain is made of nothing but pudding now, while he is personally making huge cash off of the high prices of oil and gas, Trump is whining about how it is Iran’s fault that the prices are so high: “Iran is doing everything they can to drive up the price of Oil prior to the U.S. Midterm Election.”

How are they doing this, exactly? Apparently because they are totally lying about the war: “They are even making up fake hits, mines, and everything else, because more Oil is coming through the Hormuz Strait now than it did even prior to the beginning of the Conflict.” Wouldn’t we be able to tell if Iran was making up strikes? Wouldn’t we be able to tell if the Strait of Hormuz really is open?

Look, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is as dumb as a bag of hair weave, but somehow it strains credulity that the military somehow is being fooled by Iran simply declaring they’ve struck something they really didn’t.

But of course it can’t be Trump’s fault that the Strait remains closed, so it must magically actually be open. And it can’t be Trump’s fault that gas prices are high, so it must magically be Iran’s fault.

Meanwhile consumers keep getting screwed, but Trump doesn’t care. He’s getting his, and that’s all that matters.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Donald Trump tariffs

Trumpflation Is Here! (A Truly Legitimate Naming Opportunity)

Donald Trump loves to put his name on things, and when it comes to the recent burst of inflation, it’s totally deserved. Trump and Republican politicians are doing their best to try to make a simple story complicated. But there is no doubt that Trump is the lead and almost sole author of the inflation we are now seeing.

Just to quickly clear away the stupid, we did have a large burst of inflation under Biden, just like the rest of the world. We were hit with a worldwide pandemic in Trump’s first term, which he apparently can’t remember. The pandemic led to a massive fall in output in 2020, while Trump was president.

When Biden took office in January of 2021, we were still down more than 10 million jobs from the pre-pandemic level. Biden’s recovery package quickly got back the lost jobs and got the unemployment rate down to 4.0 percent by the end of the year, far faster than anyone expected.

The reopening of the economy from the pandemic recession led to a burst of inflation in the United States, as it did in Germany, France, and everywhere else. Suddenly people were buying lots of things, and it took a while for businesses to ramp up production.

If Biden had cared less about getting people back to work, the recovery package could have been smaller, and the peak inflation rate might have been one or two percentage points lower. But the important part of the story is that inflation quickly came down.

Year-over-year inflation peaked at 9.0 percent in June of 2022. A year later, it was down to 3.1 percent. It was down to 2.6 percent by the election in November of 2024. Inflation was generally expected to continue to fall and to be at or near the Fed’s 2.0 percent target by the end of 2025.

But then Trump turned everything around. Inflation began to rise even before he took office, as households and businesses stocked up on imported goods in anticipation of Trump tariffs. Durable goods prices, which had been falling since early 2023, stopped falling and began to rise. The Consumer Price Index also stopped falling and started to rise. Year-over-year inflation hit 3.0 percent in September 2025 but then slowed to 2.7 percent by the end of the year.

It likely would have continued to slow through 2026. After all, Trump’s tariffs were primarily a one-time event. If he didn’t keep imposing new ones (a big “if”), it was reasonable to think that inflation would settle back down to its pre-tariff pace.

But we never got to test that story. Trump decided to go to war with Iran at the end of February. As we all know, the stated rationale was crazy. Iran was not close to having nuclear weapons, and Trump himself had boasted about destroying the country’s nuclear program in a bombing strike the prior summer.

Logic doesn’t mean much to Donald Trump. He and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wanted to attack Iran, and whatever story they came up with was secondary.

Anyhow, regardless of their motives, they apparently did not expect that the Iranian government would both survive and retaliate by blocking oil from going through the Strait of Hormuz. This sent oil prices soaring, which is the biggest element in the current burst of inflation. However, since oil is not just gas for our cars, but diesel, which is needed for transporting just about everything, the price hikes are spreading throughout the economy. Also, since much of the world’s fertilizer production takes place in the Gulf countries, fertilizer prices are also soaring. This had some effect on crops already but will be a much bigger deal next year.

The broad impact of Trump’s war on inflation can be clearly seen in the Producer Price Index. The latest year-over-year figure was 6.3 percent for September. Since this is inflation at the wholesale level, it will be showing up at the consumer level in the next few months. To be clear, the impact is not one-to-one, so this doesn’t mean that consumer inflation will be rising to 6.3 percent, but it means that the direction of change in future months will likely be higher, not lower.

This is very far from a number consistent with the Fed’s two percent target. And this is all Trump’s doing. One important difference from the 1970s inflation is that, unlike the 1970s, wages are not rising in step with inflation. The pace of wage growth slowed from 4.0% in 2023 and 2024 to 3.0 percent in the most recent data. This means that workers are falling further behind as prices accelerate. The higher prices are going to profits, not covering higher labor costs. That might be good news for Trump’s billionaire donors, but not for the rest of us.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack, from which this is reprinted with permission.

Hannity Resumes Coverage Of Iran War -- And Urges More 'Credit' For Trump

Hannity Resumes Coverage Of Iran War -- And Urges More 'Credit' For Trump

Sean Hannity, an avid hawk and sycophant to President Donald Trump, had largely abandoned discussions of the floundering Iran war in recent weeks. But on Wednesday night, he engaged with the conflict on his Fox primetime show for the first time since late July — and lamented that Trump is not getting sufficient “credit” for his purported success there.

Trump’s administration has spent the past several months in negotiations premised around the U.S. giving Iran sufficient economic benefits to convince them to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, with the Iranian nuclear program that was theoretically the crux of Trump’s decision to launch the war in the first place relegated to nebulous future discussions. With those negotiations apparently going nowhere and Trump himself moving on from them, Hannity has decided to move straight to celebrating Trump’s purported victory.

“Under President Trump’s strong leadership, America is once again leading on the world stage,” Hannity introduced the segment. “By the way, it never gets credit — Iran will never have a nuclear weapon thanks to Donald Trump. Does anyone ever give him credit for that?” (Then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard submitted testimony in March that Iran had no nuclear enrichment capability, and a U.S. intelligence assessment reportedly found in May that the war had not affected “the time Iran would need to build a nuclear weapon.”)

Hannity claimed that “Iran has suffered yet another economic setback” via the United Arab Emirates’ announcement that it was cutting off trade ties, saying that Trump “expressed optimism over the situation with Iran” earlier that day. He then aired a clip in which Trump responded to a question about whether he planned to reopen stalled negotiations with Iran by saying: “Maybe at some point, but right now, I think the situation is so good, but maybe at some point. Look, it's very simple.”

The Fox host added, “They are breaking financially. But Iran is not the only regime that the president is holding to account. As he indicated, a meeting with North Korean supreme leader — he's back — little rocket man, Kim Jong-un could come later this year.”

Hannity did not explain how Trump was “holding to account” the North Korean regime by gifting its dictator with a personal meeting after ordering the curtailment of planned U.S.-South Korean joint naval exercises on the grounds that those exercises were “very insulting” to Kim, who the president said “likes me.”

The host then turned to Kevin Corke — who is nominally a news correspondent — to deliver an upbeat report on Trump’s “busy” foreign policy with Iran, North Korea, and Canada. Corke concluded: “And I want you to consider this, Sean, consider all of that that I just shared and compare it to the previous president. And it is unmistakable that we have a president now who is clearly very hard at work for all of us, Sean.”

Hannity’s on-air push to attack Iran reportedly helped sway Trump’s decision to launch the war in February. The Fox host had promised his audience that the fight would be quick and easy, predicting on his March 30 radio show that “it’s going to be on the verge of wrapping up no later than three weeks from today.”

But since July 23, when Hannity predicted Trump was about to order a massive assault on Iran — only for Trump to pull back — the host had pulled back his coverage of the war. Hannity’s only extensive discussion of the Iran war on his Fox show between that segment and Wednesday’s show came during an interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu he aired on July 28, according to a review of the Nexis database.

While Hannity was addressing the ongoing war in the Middle East only in passing mentions on his Fox show, Trump again threatened a massive attack before again backing down; transits through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital channel for global trade, remained limited; Iran and Oman closed in on a deal that would impose transit fees for passage through the strait; and reports circulated about poor living conditions on a U.S. aircraft carrier that were due in part to successful Iranian strikes on a U.S. base in Bahrain.

Meanwhile, Fox's Hannity devoted 11 segments and 46 minutes of coverage to the WNBA between July 28 and August 19, according to a Media Matters review.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Is The Trump Administration Using Media Leaks To Manipulate Oil Markets?

Is The Trump Administration Using Media Leaks To Manipulate Oil Markets?

The Trump administration on Wednesday appears to have leaked a story to its favorite Iran war stenographer at Axios that the military has created a secret shipping corridor out of the Strait of Hormuz, helping to escort 15 to 20 oil tankers through the narrow passageway per day.

Axios’ Barak Ravid reported: “The U.S.-led operation is mitigating one of the most painful aspects of the war: the disruption to oil supplies that sent crude prices soaring. While the amount of oil coming out of the strait is still below pre-war levels, it is making a discernible difference in global supplies, officials say.”

U.S. officials claimed to Axios that the operation was allowing the movement of “[a]bout 10 million barrels of oil a day.”

Commodity experts, however, are more than skeptical that this secretive operation has taken place, and wonder if this—like apparent past attempts by the Trump administration—is just an effort to manipulate oil prices to try to bring down the cost of gasoline.

“That’s a lot of oil, and much more than we’re currently seeing,” oil commodity expert Rory Johnson wrote in a post on X on Wednesday, adding that oil trackers have only seen 5 million barrels of oil leaving the strait per day, half of what the government claimed to Axios.

“We’re likely undercounting actual transits, but it feels like a stretch that they’re managing to get *double* that volume out entirely undetected—no sign of loadings, or where these ships may be landing on the other end,” he continued.

Tanker Trackers, a maritime intelligence firm that analyzes the amount of oil being shipped globally, also cast doubt on the Axios report.

“Maybe U.S. officials mean ten million barrels per convoy transfer and not per day. Industry consensus is much lower than that,” the company wrote in a post on X, giving the Trump administration the benefit of the doubt that they do not deserve.

If the Trump administration were using Axios to manipulate the oil markets, it wouldn’t be the first time.

Early on in the war, Ravid frequently reported right before oil futures markets opened that a peace deal was imminent, which would lead oil commodity prices to fall. However, they’d typically spike right back up when it became clear that there was no peace deal to be had.

Nearly six months later, there is still no resolution to the war, with Iranian leaders continuing to use the Strait of Hormuz to inflict pain on the global economy in the hopes they can get Trump to fold on his demands that they drop their nuclear ambitions.

Indeed, as the persistently high price of fuel is spiking inflation, Trump’s approval rating has fallen and is threatening his Republican Party with massive midterm losses.

Even Trump is showing public signs of frustration, threatening to “bomb the shit out of” countries that cross him.

What’s different about Axios’ report now is that it seems traders have wised up to the apparent manipulation efforts.

Oil prices rose again on Thursday. The average price per gallon of gasoline in the U.S. is now at $4.10, according to AAA—up nearly $1 per gallon from a year ago.

Johnson, the oil commodity expert, revisited Axios’ story again on Thursday morning, saying he is even more convinced now that the report isn’t accurate.

“What’s fascinating is just how aligned ~every ship tracker is right now on Hormuz exit flow,” Johnson wrote in a post on X. “There’s a *strong* incentive for someone to break from the pack and to be the tracker who confirms the WH numbers. And yet.”

And yet, indeed.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos




Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World