Tag: tariffs inflation
$20 Trillion Investment? Searching For Trump's Imaginary Economic Boom

$20 Trillion Investment? Searching For Trump's Imaginary Economic Boom

I suppose it is not nice to make fun of a 79-year-old man suffering from mental decline. But when that person is president and threatening to throw millions of people in jail and/or deport them, and also threatening war on countries around the world, their age and mental infirmity does not shield them from criticism. Just as he claims to have settled wars that either never existed or have not been settled, Trump keeps insisting he has created an unprecedented economic boom that is not visible anywhere in the data.

Most immediately, Trump boasts about his accomplishments in improving affordability by bringing prices down. He can take credit that the price of gas is down by around two percent, or six cents a gallon, from its year ago level, but that still leaves it just under $3.00 a gallon. It is not at the $2.00 a gallon he boasts about anywhere in the country. Rather than going down, food prices are up 2.7 percent from a year ago, with items like beef and coffee scoring double-digit increases.

Trump’s big thing is the $20 trillion in investment that he imagines is coming into the country. This sum is equal to two thirds of annual GDP and almost seven times the current annual level of investment. But there is zero evidence of it anywhere in the data.

Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis via FRED/St. Louis Federal Reserve

After an unprecedented boom under Biden, investment in factory construction has trended downward under Trump. It’s hard to imagine some huge explosion of investment that won’t involve building some new factories or renovating existing ones.

There also is no evidence of Trump’s investment boom in new orders for capital goods. This series fluctuates a great deal, as orders, especially of airplanes, tend to clump together. But the average for the third quarter of this year was just 12.0 percent above the average for the last quarter of the Biden administration, before adjusting for inflation. That’s not bad, but hardly a huge boom. In fact, it’s still down by 1.4 percent from the last quarter of 2023, again before adjusting for inflation.

The story doesn’t look any better from the standpoint of manufacturing employment, which Trump has put at the center of his economic agenda. Manufacturing employment is down by 49,000 from when Trump took office in January. Employment had already been falling in 2024, but manufacturing jobs are still going in the wrong direction.

Even Trump’s claims of trillions coming into the Treasury from his import taxes (tariffs) is also a delusion. In October, the most recent month for which we have data, the Treasury collected $31 billion in tariff revenue, roughly $24 billion more than it raised last year. That amounts to a massive tax increase of almost $300 billion a year, or $2,400 per household.

This does not come close to balancing the budget, and we certainly aren’t paying down the debt, as our deluded president claims. However, the tariffs are the major cause of the higher inflation households have seen since Trump took office, in addition to the higher costs imposed by deporting much of the immigrant labor force.

In fact, because of increased spending, the deficit was higher in October of 2025 than it was last October. In addition to normal increases in spending due to higher payments for programs like Social Security and Medicare, it also costs money to have thousands of ICE agents terrorizing people in major cities and to send the military to blow up small ships in the Caribbean with advanced weaponry.

In short, when it comes to Donald Trump’s boasts about the economy, it is all delusion. Psychologists or people who have read his MRI may be able to determine the extent to which Trump is telling deliberate lies, as opposed to really living in his world of make believe. But for those viewing from a distance, the important thing to know is that it is all nonsense.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Dean Baker.


GOP Insiders Fear Trump Economy Is 'Ticking Timebomb' For Midterm

GOP Insiders Fear Trump Economy Is 'Ticking Timebomb' For Midterm

During the 2024 presidential race, Donald Trump used his own variation of Democratic strategist James Carville's famous 1992 line, "It's the economy, stupid." Trump hammered then-President Joe Biden and then-Vice President Kamala Harris relentlessly on the economy — namely, inflation. And Trump's allies repeatedly claimed that while Democrats were obsessing over pronouns, he was worried about affordability.

It was a close election, but Trump's messaging on the economy helped him get past the finish line and win the popular vote by roughly 1.5 percent. But now, seven months into Trump's second presidency, some Republicans are, according to Wired, expressing their fears about the U.S. economy and the 2026 midterms behind closed doors.

In an article published on August 20, Wired's Jake Lahut reports that publicly, members of the Trump Administration are saying "no panicans" — meaning, stay the course, and don't panic over economic news. But privately, Lahut stresses, GOP insiders are worried.

"The (Trump) Administration's areas of focus — deporting immigrants whose labor powers key sectors like agriculture and construction, levying tariffs, and cutting social services among them — have done more than simply increase uncertainty," Lahut explains. "Hiring and tourism have already slowed dramatically in major U.S. cities from Las Vegas to New York in the first half of the year, and Trump has put almost all the ingredients in place for slow growth amid high unemployment and inflation, the potent combination known as stagflation. Behind the scenes, as more tariffs begin to kick in and punted deadlines approach — particularly a tariff hike on Chinese goods, now set to jump from 30 percent to 80 percent by November 10 — some Republicans in Trumpworld's orbit are bracing for impact."

According to Lahut, GOP insiders interviewed by Wired are "growing a little bit anxious about where the economy is heading."

Trump's tariffs, Lahut notes, "could be a ticking timebomb" for Republicans if prices soar and voters blame Republicans.

A GOP strategist, interviewed on condition of anonymity, told Wired, "I'm probably surprised that there has not been more concern. I think the reality is that we’re at that sort of inflection point, where retailers were reluctant to raise prices because they feared retaliation from the (Trump) Administration. Now, the reality is setting in that these are not transitory. There are going to be economic consequences."

Another GOP strategist, also quoted anonymously, told Wired, "If this experiment fails, it’s gonna fail horribly, and I think we’ll begin to see the impacts of that sooner than later."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Inflation Surge

Tariffs Spike Inflation -- And A Cut In Workers' Real Wages

It no longer is deniable that we are seeing a surge in inflation due to Trump’s tariffs. Last fall the Fed was projecting that inflation would be back close to its 2.0 percent target in 2025. It now looks like we will be above 3.0 percent, and possibly considerably higher.

This realization has shifted the debate from whether we will see tariff-induced inflation to how enduring the uptick will be. Trump supporters are assuring us that the rise in inflation will be transitory, with inflation settling back down to its pre-tariff pace after a period of time. On the other hand, we have the possibility that we will see a persistently higher rate of inflation, and possibly even an inflationary spiral.

As a card-carrying member of Team Transitory a few years back, I think it is worth distinguishing what “transitory” means in the context of tariff driven inflation, as opposed to inflation driven by supply-chain bottlenecks.

The big factor in determining whether inflation is transitory or enduring is whether it leads to a faster path of nominal wage growth. If the pace of wage growth increases in response to higher inflation, the more rapid rate of inflation is likely to persist. The higher wages will then get passed on in higher prices, and this continues until something like a recession and a big jump in unemployment breaks the pattern.

When the Trump crew tells us that their tariff-induced inflation is transitory, they are saying that there will be no pick-up in wage growth. In effect workers will be forced to eat the tariffs in the form of less purchasing power for their paychecks.

If we get an uptick in the inflation rate of 1.0 percentage point for two years, they are looking at a 2.0 percent drop in their real wage. If the uptick averages 1.5 percentage points, that would mean a drop of 3.0 percent in purchasing power. For a worker making the median wage of roughly $25 an hour, this would mean a cut of between $1,000 and $1,500 a year in their real wage.

By contrast, the claim of Team Transitory during the supply chain inflation was that the bottlenecks driving up prices would be resolved and that prices of the affected goods would stop rising and possibly even fall back toward their pre-pandemic level. In that story, workers would not see an enduring cut in their real wages.

The transitory story on supply-chain inflation turned out to be largely correct. It took longer for the bottlenecks to resolve themselves than most of us expected. This was primarily because subsequent waves of Covid both disrupted shipping, and continued to steer consumption from services to goods, as people continued to be scared of going to restaurants and movies, and other forms of service consumption. In any case, we clearly didn’t see the inflationary spiral that some feared, nor did we need a big jump in unemployment to push inflation back down.

The story of Trump’s Team Transitory (TTT) is far less benign. It’s a story where workers have permanently lower real wages and living standards than they would have in the absence of the tariffs. That might be good news on the inflation front, but it is not especially good news for the people who depend on their paycheck for their livelihood.

Dean Baker is an economist, author, and co-founder of the Center for Economic Policy and Research. His writing has appeared in many major publications, including The Atlantic, The Washington Post, and The Financial Times.

Reprinted with permission from Substack.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World