Tag: tommy tuberville
Fauci

How A Far Right Witchhunt Forced Fauci To Invoke The Fifth Amendment

One hundred and eleven times. That's how many times Dr. Anthony Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid falling into the perjury trap Sen. Rand Paul was setting for him. Dr. Fauci was not brought in to testify because they needed to know more about what he had said and done in the past. No, he has not only testified multiple times about all of these issues in the past, but they are covered by the broad pardon of him that President Joe Biden granted before he left office.

The purpose here was the trap. Sen. Paul was open about it. He told reporters before the hearing that any statement made by Dr. Fauci at the hearing would not be protected by the presidential pardon — so if there were any inconsistency between what Dr. Fauci said now and then, no matter how small or insignificant, it could be the basis of a perjury charge. Paul has made no bones about his desire to see Dr. Fauci behind bars. Not that he can single-handedly succeed at doing so, but he got a gaggle of Republican senators who should have known better to follow his lead.

It is the purpose of the Fifth Amendment to prevent such persecutions. That's what this was, pure and simple, and thankfully we have a Constitution to invoke to stop it.

Not that Fauci was able to escape entirely unscathed. His lawyer — who happens to have a stellar reputation in Washington — got thrown out of the hearing. Some attorney general from the South threatened to prosecute him. For what? Invoking the Fifth. Paul wants to hold him in contempt for that. Again, I ask, for what? Since when is rightly invoking the Fifth because you rightly fear investigation and persecution, if not lawful prosecution, an offense that can land you behind bars? Punishing constitutionally protected activity as a crime?

Of course, there will always be people who say that only the guilty invoke the Fifth, and that's what they're saying about Dr. Fauci. When you're the target of a witch hunt, invoking the Fifth is an act of courage, calling your persecutors on their case.

Paul tried to smear Dr. Fauci by releasing excerpts from his diary in advance of the hearing. Some of his comments about the president were insulting. Big surprise. Not a crime. He was, it appears, impressed and taken by all the media attention he was receiving. A "narcissist," one of the Republican senators called him. Since when is that a crime in Washington?

For me, Dr. Fauci will always be a dedicated public servant who spent his life saving lives. There is no full accounting I've seen of the millions of lives he saved in the AIDS and COVID epidemics. Did his agency fund research at the lab in Wuhan that Paul is so sure was the source of a "lab leak"? It did, but as countless experts have tried to explain to Paul, it was not the kind of research that could have led to the COVID leak. What do you do with a man who prefers spite over science?

You ignore him, which is what the Senate, and the public, should do with Rand Paul.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.


Facing Our True History May Be Inconvenient Or Uncomfortable, But It Can Be Liberating

Facing Our True History May Be Inconvenient Or Uncomfortable, But It Can Be Liberating

Closed eyes and minds seem to be a requirement for positions of leadership, as though merely acknowledging facts makes you un-American.

That’s the opposite of the truth.

During a recent visit to Montgomery, Alabama, I experienced the whiplash of competing histories. A state that still insists on pairing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. with Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee for its official holiday and that honors secessionists on capital grounds is also home to civil rights history presented in precise and moving detail.

I wondered as I experienced the collections in the Equal Justice Initiative’s Legacy Sites, why are some people so afraid of the truths revealed and shared in the Legacy Museum, the National Memorial for Peace and Justice and Freedom Monument Sculpture Park?

Moving personal stories, narratives written and shared by men, women, and children who suffered violence and every indignity, yet dared to live and love, are part of the soil and the soul of our nation. Not all survived the journey, but they, too, are honored in what can only be described as sacred spaces.

Exploring the recently opened Montgomery Square, it’s thrilling to learn more about 1955-65 — from the Montgomery Bus Boycott to the marches that led to the passage of the Voting Rights Act — “the decade that changed the world.” Names and faces that might be unfamiliar to most are honored for their bravery and resilience.

All of these Americans made the country better. They deserve to be seen and heard; their perseverance could be key to solutions in a country that appears deadlocked and divided.

I wished that Sen. Tommy Tuberville, the Republican hoping to be the next governor of Alabama, were at my side. If the schoolchildren of every race who surrounded me could take — and take in — the exhibits, certainly Tuberville is man enough to do the same.

After all, it’s his state, his people, and his capital city.

Bryan Stevenson, founder and executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative, a human rights organization based in Montgomery, led the creation of the sites. He put the lessons the museums hold in perspective as he spoke to my conference group.

Stevenson might be best known for his work reforming America’s criminal justice system, winning legal challenges and, as his bio says, “eliminating excessive and unfair sentencing, exonerating innocent death row prisoners, confronting abuse of the incarcerated and the mentally ill, and aiding children prosecuted as adults.”

Stevenson said it was necessary to create a false narrative of white supremacy to justify the evil of generations of slavery so the perpetrators and enablers could conveniently consider themselves Christian and moral and decent.

That’s one legacy that has continued — or as Stevenson said, “The South won the narrative war.”

Tuberville himself has equated the descendants of enslaved people to “criminals.”

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has brought his pastor, Doug Wilson, into the Pentagon to deliver what amount to religious sermons that obliterate the separation of church and state. Wilson co-authored “Southern Slavery, As It Was,” which described slavery in the South as “a relationship based on mutual affection and confidence.”

We are a country that passes laws to charge children as adults, as deserving of being locked up in a prison of grown men. Some of these children are Stevenson’s clients, their stories heartbreaking if you see them as human beings rather than “predators.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can be confirmed and supported as Health and Human Services secretary after saying in the past that “every Black kid is now just standard put on Adderall, on SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and those kids are going to have a chance to go somewhere and get re-parented.” So, stripping children away from their parents is still an option?

Of course, Kennedy denied his own inconvenient truth in an exchange with Democratic Rep. Terri A. Sewell of Alabama during a recent congressional hearing.

And when asked by Democratic Rep. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania about the administration ending research that could lower the maternal mortality rates for Black women, who disproportionately suffer and die in this greatest country in the world, Kennedy could barely say the word “Black,” but he did bark “DEI” at every attempt Lee made to get him to at least acknowledge that a disparity shaped by history exists.

These are the kinds of sentiments — believed by those in charge of budgets and rules and who should get the benefit of the doubt — that make Stevenson’s work necessary.

“Narrative work has become a priority.” We are all impacted by “the burden of our history of racial inequality.” He considers the Legacy Sites as “places of truth-telling,” and storytelling as something that “gets people closer.”

“I have no interest in punishing America; my interest is liberation.”

The truth was never inconvenient for Americans who want to seek justice — and move forward.

Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Charlotte Observer, as national correspondent for Politics Daily, and is a senior facilitator with The OpEd Project. She is host of the CQ Roll Call “Equal Time with Mary C. Curtis” podcast. Follow her on X @mcurtisnc3.

Reprinted with permission from Roll Call

War On Iran Is Still A War Even When Gutless Republicans Insist It Isn't

War On Iran Is Still A War Even When Gutless Republicans Insist It Isn't

Republican lawmakers spent the past week trying to defend their refusal to give congressional approval for President Donald Trump's poorly planned and ill-conceived war in Iran, insisting that it’s merely a "conflict" that doesn't require a vote—or a spine.

It is painfully obvious that the Trump administration's extended bombing campaign—which may even lead to boots on the ground—to effect regime change in an adversarial country is a war.

Hell, Trump himself even called it a war when he brushed off the deaths of U.S. soldiers as something "that often happens in war."

But because a war would require congressional authorization, GOP lawmakers have twisted themselves into knots to explain why Trump can do whatever he wants in the Middle East—even though the public doesn't support it and it is already destroying the economy.

Indeed, both House and Senate Republicans blocked bills that would have curtailed Trump's war powers this week.

Take a gander at what the likely future Homeland Security secretary and current contender for dumbest U.S. senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) said on Tuesday:

Reporter: You'll concede this is war?Mullin: We haven't declared war. They declared war on us
Reporter: The president called it war and Secretary Hegseth called it war
Another reporter: When you walked up just now, you called it war
Mullin: Okay. That was a misspoke.

RAJU: You'll concede this is war?MARKWAYNE MULLIN: We haven't declared war. They declared war on usRAJU: The president called it war and Secretary Hegseth called it war REPORTER: When you walked up just now, you called it warMULLIN: Okay. That was a misspoke.

[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) March 3, 2026 at 6:14 PM

Fellow moronic Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama also walked into the same trap.

“This is not your Democrat war. This is President Trump’s war, and he’s not going in to be politically correct. He’s going in to protect, first of all, Americans first and then our allies and the people around the world,” he told NewsNation Monday.

Tuberville: "This is not your Democrat war. This is President Trump's war. And he's not going in to be politically correct."

[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) March 2, 2026 at 10:29 PM

But when CNN later asked why such a war wouldn't need congressional authorization, Tuberville tried to backtrack.

“I wouldn’t call this a war as much as I’d call it conflict that should be very short and sweet, if you can put it that way," he told CNN’s Manu Raju Wednesday.

Similarly, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida also performed some mental gymnastics to defend Trump’s war, saying that it's not a war because there are no "boots on the ground."

"Strategic strikes are not war," she said on MS NOW.

And the virulently racist Rep. Randy Fine of Florida had the excellent argument that Trump’s war isn’t a war because Congress didn’t say so.

“It’s not a war,” he told The New York Times. “The way you are officially at war is Congress declares war, and we haven’t declared war.”

Anna Paulina Luna: “It is not the intention of the U.S. Government to invade…Targeted strategic military strikes and invasions are two totally different things.”@crampell.bsky.social: “They’re calling it a war. The President called it a war.”Luna: “Strategic strikes are not war.”

[image or embed]
— The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com) March 1, 2026 at 8:38 PM


That’s not how definitions work, Randy.

Meanwhile, Rep. Ken Calvert of California said that the war in Iran couldn’t possibly be a war because it hasn’t gone on long enough.

“This has been about 72 hours,” he told the Times. “I would call it an operation at this point.”

Of course, length of time is not what defines a war either.House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) also tried to thread the same needle, saying that whether it's a war or a conflict is "semantics."

“We’re not at war right now,” Johnson said during a news conference, describing the actions as defensive.

“We’re four days into a very specific, clear mission—Operation Epic Fury,” he added.\

Johnson: “We're not at war right now.”

[image or embed]
— The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com) March 4, 2026 at 10:41 AM

If by “clear” he means not at all clear and by “mission” he means totally conflicting objectives, then sure.

Even MAGA loyalists have slammed GOP leaders for their spinelessness.

“It’s not a war unless it comes from the war region of France, otherwise’s [sic] it’s just sparkling combat,” The Federalist co-founder and CEO Sean Davis wrote on X, mocking Johnson’s sorry attempt to explain away the war.

Ultimately, Republicans will do anything to let their Dear Leader get his way—even light the Constitution on fire to let Trump wage a war they didn't authorize.

When the country is a smoldering heap of ashes by November as gas prices surge, inflation spikes, and the economy craters, good luck defending this “conflict” to voters.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

'Hell To Pay': Tuberville Threatens Democrats With January 6 Repeat

'Hell To Pay': Tuberville Threatens Democrats With January 6 Repeat

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) threatened that there would be another January 6 riot if Democrats did not pass a Republican-backed bill that would make it harder to vote.

At a Wednesday news conference, Tuberville urged Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to schedule a vote on the "Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act" or "SAVE Act." The bill would require a birth certificate or passport in order to vote, even though it is already unlawful for noncitizens to participate in federal elections.

"The Democrats know better than this, but they want power so bad that they're going to try to tear down our election system," Tuberville said. "And I'm going to tell you this. My first day was January the 6th in 2021."

"And what's going to happen if we do not show the American people that the elections are going to be fair and they're going to be satisfied with the outcome, no matter whether Republicans win or Democrats win, you are going to have hell to pay in this country," he continued. "It's coming."

"And I'm not so sure that's not what the Democrats want."

Former President Donald Trump has urged Republicans to shut down the government if the SAVE Act was not passed before the November presidential election.

Watch the video below from C-SPAN or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World