Tag: urgency
In Battleground North Carolina, Harris Brings A Sense Of Joy -- And Urgency

In Battleground North Carolina, Harris Brings A Sense Of Joy -- And Urgency

One rule for politicians and politically inclined citizens: Stay away from Hitler references. They have a “boy who cried wolf” quality and usually end up backfiring, making you appear more extreme than the opponent you’re trying to label.

However, as everyone knows, every rule has an exception. And 93-year-old Ruth Hecht has more than earned hers.

Like most in the boisterous crowd that filled the arena at Kamala Harris’ rally during her Charlotte stop last week, Hecht was inspired by the Democratic candidate for president, especially by her debate with Donald Trump a few days earlier.

“I’m so proud of her,” she said of Harris. “She’s dynamic, educated and so poised.”

But Hecht, a retired registered nurse who now lives in a senior facility in Matthews, North Carolina brought a warning born of her own World War II experience, when she was shuttled to Belgium from Austria, eventually making it to safety in the United States. Fellow Jews in wartime Europe were not so lucky. She herself had a close call, something she is reminded of every time she brushes her hand across her beautiful face and feels scars from surgery to repair damage inflicted by fragments of a German bomb.

She held my own hand and looked into my eyes, as she issued a warning: “You want to know why I’m here? I want democracy to continue.” She heard echoes, she said, in Trump’s demonization of minorities and immigrants, his pledge to prosecute and jail political opponents and refusal to accept election results unless he wins. The people around Trump scare her.

“I learned the hard way, and I don’t want this country to go through that.”

While her journey might have set her apart from most who stood in line for hours, and then waited a few more, there was a sense of urgency and anxiety that tainted the upbeat mood.

Can you blame them when Trump and running mate JD Vance (who once wondered if Trump could be “America’s Hitler”) tell Democrats to end any criticism in the wake of a gunman seen near Trump’s golf course, but refuse to end heated, baseless and racist rumors about Haitians legally residing and working in the city of Springfield in Ohio. It’s the state Vance is supposed to represent, though if you asked if he considers those particular residents his constituents, I’m not sure he would understand the question.

Their words, amplified on conservative, conspiracy-minded sites, are stoking chaos and unrest, with extremists, no doubt feeling a kinship, joining in.

In contrast, Harris, in a conversation with National Association of Black Journalists’ reporters this week, said that while she and her family felt protected, she worried for other Americans. “Not everybody has Secret Service, and there are far too many people in our country right now who are not feeling safe,” she said.

Those might include some constituents of Ohio Sheriff Bruce Zuchowski, who is urging folks to write down the addresses of homes with Harris signs in the yard. He would certainly seem more at home in a time when the government was there to intimidate and bully rather than serve and protect everyone.

Zuchowski is just following the lead of Trump, who is placing blame for the country’s ills on immigrants, the Black and brown ones, that is. Two of the former president’s three wives — both immigrants — escape his opprobrium.

I wonder why.

When Donald Trump Jr. suggests that Haitian immigrants are less intelligent as a group, with low IQs, he is dipping into dangerous and debunked race science that has been used as justification for heinous acts throughout history.

It’s no wonder many Harris supporters share Ruth Hecht’s fears.

Her son Martin Hecht, 62, who had traveled from the Portland, Oregon, area to help his mom celebrate her birthday, said he was very excited that Harris could be the first female president of the United States. But he realistically knows and is worried that a second Trump administration is possible. “I can’t imagine why so many people are supporting Trump,” he said.

The phrase “this is the most important election of our lifetime” has been repeated so often, it’s become cliché. Yet everyone I spoke with at the Charlotte rally believed it this time. Most also thought North Carolina, the state that has tantalized Democratic presidential candidates since Barack Obama narrowly won here in 2008, was winnable for Harris in 2024.

From Harris at the top of the ticket to down-ballot Democratic candidates (many of whom shared a few words before the vice president’s speech), there was optimism, but also the hard truth that success will take work, campaigning and increased voter turnout, often quite sketchy when it comes to Democrats in the state.

No DJ blasting Frankie Beverly and Maze or mini-set from Charlotte native and Grammy winner Anthony Hamilton could quite make the crowd forget that a lot can happen before November, despite polls that show Harris with a slight, within-the-margin-of-error lead in North Carolina.

Republicans are worried, which may be one reason they are trying things like an Republican National Committee lawsuit to prevent University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill students from using digital ID to vote or an effort to purge voter rolls of more than 200,000 names.

Even someone who carries the name that’s the vibe of the Harris-Walz ticket’s “New Way Forward” said she is cautious. Joy Del Gaizo of New London, N.C., said she felt a “responsibility to the future of my kids and grandkids.” She has four of each.

Del Gaizo, a retired information technology consultant, recalled how she cried after Trump was elected in 2016, and vowed to do everything — from calling prospective voters to going door-to-door in her Republican-leaning neighborhood — this election season.

“I would not want to live in a country that is a dictatorship,” she said, remembering Trump’s promise he won’t be a dictator, “except for day one.”

And when Harris took the stage, the crowd chanted “not going back,” fueled by a desire to elect the Harris-Walz ticket, and to make sure the Trump exposed at the debate and over the past nine years never gets another chance to return rage and retribution to the White House, and take millions of voters down the same path.

Reprinted with permission from Roll Call.

Recent Accidents Increase Pressure For New, Safer Energy Sources

In recent years, the main debate surrounding energy sources has focused on economic and, to some extent, environmental factors. But the existing methods of energy production and transportation also pose grave health risks to humans — a fact shown by recent disasters that could add more urgency to the development of safer energy sources.

Nuclear energy has long been criticized for its deadly potential, a concern that is intensified in the wake of perennial disasters. On Monday, an explosion at the Centraco site that treats nuclear waste in southern France killed one person and hurt four. France, which is more dependent on nuclear energy than any other country worldwide, was relatively lucky in that the accident did not result in radioactive leaks that might affect more people. Japan was not as fortunate in their own nuclear accident earlier this year: the leaks from a tsunami-hit nuclear plant contained the same amount of radioactive cesium as 168 of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima. The risks at nuclear plants have made many people question the benefits of the energy source: a Pew poll from March found increasing opposition to nuclear power. Even though accidents are rare, they have disastrous potential.

France was not the only country that experienced a fatal accident involving energy on Monday: a leaking gasoline pipeline in Kenya created an explosion that killed at least 75 people and injured more than 100. The explosion set shacks ablaze in the slum near the pipeline, as people tried in futility to escape the fire. The situation in Kenya is even more tragic when considering that many of the victims would not have been the beneficiaries of the fuel supply; they bear the risks while the wealthy elite and international community reap the benefits. Such disasters are far too common, and they would presumably not be as tolerated and ignored if those affected had a different skin color and social status.

These recent tragedies emphasize the need to consider the human as well as economic and environmental impact of energy sources. As scientists and politicians discuss the fuels of our future, the recent loss of lives should make it even more apparent that more resources should be dedicated to enforcing regulations and developing safer energy sources.

Obama has already faced several key energy-related crises during his presidency, and his failure to take clear steps toward new energy sources — as he had pledged in his campaign — might haunt him as he seeks reelection. The frequency of accidents related to old energy sources have made people more frustrated with the government’s ineffectiveness in supporting new energy. Some of the administration’s greatest blows resulted from such incidents: The president did not take quick, decisive action after the 2010 BP oil spill that killed 11 workers and had a critical impact on everything from birds to fishermen. Instead, many dangerous drilling practices have been able to continue. The episode disappointed already-disenchanted environmentalists who had helped secure the presidency for Obama in 2008.

The administration continues to grapple with energy debates, and Obama has new opportunities to take a stand for safer energy sources. Environmentalists protested last month against the construction of a new pipeline that would carry oil from the Canadian tar sands to the Gulf of Mexico, voicing concerns that the existing pipeline has already leaked several times. The State Department issued a report favoring the controversial project, but Obama still has the opportunity to halt the construction. Otherwise, he risks losing the last shreds of support from environmentalists outraged at his recent cancellation of potential new Environmental Protection Agency rules on ozone emissions.

The environmental necessity of developing new energy strategies is well-known to most rational people, but the human toll should also be considered as part of the energy debate. As the risks of existing energy sources become even more apparent in light of recent fatal accidents, the incentive to invest more money in alternative energy has never been greater.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World