The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from

As speculation increases that Donald Trump will take the daring and desperate step of firing special counsel Robert Mueller to shut down the Russia investigation, perhaps the better question is, will Trump sack Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who effectively controls the future of Mueller’s probe?

To that end, word is leaking out that Trump is bad-mouthing Rosenstein to colleagues and denouncing him as a threat.

Trump has “complained that Rosenstein has shown insufficient accountability on the special counsel’s work,” the Washington Post reports. “A senior official said Trump mocked Rosenstein’s recent testimony on Capitol Hill, saying he looked weak and unable to answer questions.” Trump has even claimed Rosenstein is a “threat to his presidency.”

Perhaps most absurdly, Trump has attacked Rosenstein as a Democrat. But Rosenstein, like Mueller, is a Republican. And so is former FBI Director James Comey. Yet all three men are increasingly being depicted by Republicans and Fox News as the three key players is a sprawling, and partisan, anti-Trump campaign.

That’s how far flung the right-wing crusade now stretches: It’s smearing life-long Republicans as part of the Trump problem.

Why is Rosenstein so important, and why is Trump now grousing about him and making veiled threats about implementing “changes in the Justice Department’s leadership,” according to the Post?

Rosenstein remains central to the investigation into possible collusion between Trump and Russian operatives because Trump’s attorney general, Jeff Sessions, recused himself from having any connection or oversight of the probe.

That task now falls to Rosenstein, who has said he is satisfied with the investigation. And it was Rosenstein who pushed back on Republicans last week during the House Judiciary Committee hearing, as they relentlessly attacked Mueller’s investigation as being tainted, unfair, and out of control.

Rosenstein insisted he saw no reason to take any action against Mueller. Instead, the Republican special counsel has Rosenstein’s full confidence. He praised Mueller as being “ideal” for the investigation.

If the White House does get desperate enough and decides to move against Mueller, the way the White House desperately moved to fire Comey last May, Trump would have to demand that Rosenstein take up the task of firing the special prosecutor.

Mueller can only be removed from his role if Rosenstein found “good cause.” If he did not find good cause, Trump would have to fire him and likely others inside the Department of Justice leadership until he found someone willing to complete the White House’s command to get rid of Mueller.

In other words, it would be another stunning Saturday Night Massacre scenario from the Richard Nixon era, when the crooked Republican president had to go down the chain of command at the Department of Justice before he could find someone willing to fire Watergate prosecutor, Archibald Cox. (Judge Robert Bork finally agreed to do the dirty work.)

It’s fitting that Trump’s possible blueprint looks so much like Nixon’s.



Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Ginni Thomas, center

A bombshell exposé by an award-winning investigative journalist takes a deep look into lobbyist and far right wing activist and conspiracy theorist Ginni Thomas, and the ties she has to people, groups – and money – that have or may have business before the U.S. Supreme Court, on which her conservative husband sits.

Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer asks point-blank. “Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.”

Keep reading... Show less

Judge Alexis G. Krot

Judge Alexis G. Krot shouted at Burhan Chowdhury, a 72 year old cancer patient whom local police cited for not maintaining his yard. “If I could give you jail time on this I would,” the Michigan jurist warned Chowdhury.

A cancer diagnosis doesn’t buy much more leniency in other courtrooms. In 2020, a judge in Pennsylvania sentenced Ashley Menser, a 36 year old in need of a hysterectomy for ovarian and cervical cancer, to a 10 month term.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}