The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

The Summer Of The Anti-Hillary Clinton Books Rolls On

By Hector Tobar, Los Angeles Times

In June, Hillary Clinton released a new book that served as the unofficial kickoff to a presidential campaign set to hit the homestretch in the summer of 2016. But for the moment she’s enduring what Politico called “the summer of the anti-Clinton books,” and what a left-leaning website called “The Summer of Nonsense.”

“There may be no clearer sign of Hillary Clinton’s political reemergence than the flurry of new books critical of her — two in the past month alone, with another pair coming soon,” Politico reports. The books mark the resurrection of a genre that had gone dormant in the years since President Bill Clinton survived impeachment and left the White House in 2001.

Blood Feud, by Edward Klein, debuted at No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list on July 13, displacing Hillary Clinton’s Hard Choices. Klein’s book is said to detail the feud between the Obama and Clinton families and has received mixed reviews. Even Rush Limbaugh said the dialogue seemed stilted, and Buzzfeed amused its readers with a list of “the 9 Most Inane Passages” from the book, which include an alleged physical altercation between Barack and Hillary.

Blood Feud is the funniest book of 2014. Maybe ever,” Katherine Miller wrote for BuzzFeed. “On nearly every page, you’ll feel like yelling ‘BLOOD FEUD!’ over a guitar solo (think ‘Panama’ by Van Halen) while an eagle flies out of an explosion.”

“Conservatives don’t buy books the way other people do,” David Brock, the founder of progressive watchdog group Media Matters, told Politico in an interview. “I think they buy them as political statements or to see their own prejudices and fantasies in black and white … [Hillary Clinton] called it a cottage industry on The Daily Show and that’s right, it’s a business.”

Media Matters published a detailed retort last week to three of what it called “The Summer of Nonsense” books: Blood Feud,” Daniel Halper’s Clinton, Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine, and Ronald Kessler’s The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents.

Among many other allegations and negative characterizations, Halper’s Clinton Inc. suggests that Hillary Clinton has a drinking problem. And Halper claims drinking may have been behind her 2012 illness. In response, Media Matters writes: “Halper baselessly posits that Clinton may have hit her head after falling down drunk. Invoking a ‘rumor’ from ‘bloggers and websites’ that Clinton drinks heavily, Halper points to ‘one well-known Clinton hater’ for the claim the injury was the result of drinking — citing no names.”

Halper’s book has sold a mere 3,500 copies, according to Politico.

In response to the books, spokespersons for Hillary, Bill and Chelsea Clinton issued a joint statement: “With Klein, Halper and Kessler, we now have a Hat Trick of despicable actors concocting trashy nonsense for a quick buck, at the expense of anything even remotely resembling the truth.”

A fourth anti-Clinton book, by conservative talk show host Aaron Klein, is set for release next month: The REAL Benghazi Story: What the White House and Hillary Don’t Want You to Know.

Klein is the author of several books attacking President Obama, including The Manchurian President and Impeachable Offenses. His website refers to his latest work as “a ground-breaking investigative work that finally exposes some of the most significant issues related to the murderous Sept. 11, 2012, attack” in Libya.

AFP Photo/Brendan Smialowski

You may also enjoy:  When Ed Klein, Author Of Clinton And Obama Smear Books, Met Joe Conason And Al Franken

Two Versions Of Cesar Chavez Come To Light In New Film, Book

By Hector Tobar, Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — At least 25 streets and 46 schools are named in his honor, but many young people know little about Cesar Chavez, who in life was a polarizing figure, most famous for the successful series of marches, fasts and strikes he led on behalf of mostly immigrant farmworkers.

The next big act of Chavez’s afterlife begins this month, with the first dramatic film about the towering Chicano figure and a major biography due out days before California and other states celebrate Cesar Chavez Day on March 31.

Both projects seek to reclaim Chavez’s place in the American memory. But the book and the movie offer markedly different portraits of a man who joined the pantheon of American civic saints after his death in 1993.

In the film Cesar Chavez, by a Mexican production team led by the actor-director Diego Luna, he is a heroic and beatific figure using nonviolence to lead his people to victory. The movie ends with Chavez’s United Farm Workers winning contracts in 1970 from recalcitrant growers.

The 534-page book, The Crusades of Cesar Chavez, by former Los Angeles Times editor and reporter Miriam Pawel, follows Chavez, from his birth in a Depression-era Arizona and his father’s loss of the family farm, to his death, following a long period in which the UFW was in decline. Much of the second half of the book delves deeply into what Chavez’s old allies call “the dark side” — his isolation and his embrace of what some saw as a cult of personality.

For Luna, the movie has been a four-year crusade, working largely outside the Hollywood studio system.

“We’re lucky (Hollywood) didn’t say yes,” Luna said in an interview.

Hollywood executives suggested Luna cast one of two bankable Spanish heartthrobs, Antonio Banderas or Javier Bardem, as the lead. Instead he gave the role to Michael Pena. Like many talented Mexican-American actors, Pena’s has a resume filled with mostly small roles, including as a faux Arab sheik in American Hustle.

Luna and his production company Canana (which he co-founded with actor Gael Garcia Bernal) have been screening the film for select, often largely Latino audiences across the U.S. ahead of its Friday release date. Last Wednesday, he also screened it at the White House for President Barack Obama.

Luna and producer Pablo Cruz were also recently at UCLA, at a standing-room-only event for more than 300 people, sponsored by the university’s Chicano Studies faculty and students. “Please help us spread the word,” Luna told the audience. “We have to send a message to the industry that our stories have to be represented. And with the depth and the complexity they deserve.”

“We found the right partners for the film,” Luna said. Mexican investors put up much of the funding. The $10-million film, shot in Sonora, Mexico, is being distributed by Participant Media and Lionsgate, and is opening in about 600 theaters.

Chavez declined offers to have dramatic films made about him during his lifetime, and since his death he has appeared on the big screen mostly in documentaries.

Luna made Chavez’s family life the emotional center of his story. He said he ignored another executive who asked, “How can you make this more sexy?” “I said that this is beyond sexy,” Luna said. “It’s not even just the story of Cesar Chavez. It’s the story of a movement.”

Cesar Chavez is filled with authentic visual details, including the religious iconography that was a staple of UFW events and the infamous “short hoes” that ravaged the bodies of farmworkers forced to use them. America Ferrera plays Cesar’s wife, Helen, with Rosario Dawson as union leader Dolores Huerta and Jack Holmes as ally Robert F. Kennedy. At 101 minutes, the film limits itself to a decade in Chavez’s life.

The book, published by Bloomsbury Press, is the first full-scale biography. “I’m writing beyond the hagiography,” Pawel said. “It does him a disservice to portray him in a more simplistic way.”

Chavez earned his saintly hue by going on a 25-day fast in 1968 that helped turned public opinion in the UFW’s favor, an event that’s key in Luna’s film. But Pawel said the film only fleetingly captures the real Chavez’s genius for strategy and tactics. He could also be gruff leader who gave no quarter to perceived enemies, a quality he readily acknowledged.

“There is a big difference between being a saint and being an angel,” he told a reporter in an interview quoted in Pawel’s book. “Saints are known for being tough and stubborn.”

Pawel made ample use of archival sources, including Chavez’s papers, which he donated to Wayne State University in Detroit. She also listened to hundreds of tapes of interviews and UFW board meetings. The early tapes capture his “lyricism” and idealism, she said. But later tapes record the ethnic slur he used in the 1970s to refer to undocumented immigrants he considered to be strikebreakers.

The sharply different perspectives reflect how the film and book were made. Canana held the Chavez family’s film rights, and the family met extensively with Luna and his cast. But author Pawel is persona non grata to Chavez’s descendants, largely because she wrote a 2006 series in the Times that portrayed the modern-day UFW as an organization that does little to improve the lot of farmworkers.

“The family wouldn’t talk to me, but I knew that going in,” Pawel said. Only one family member responded to her emails: Fernando, Chavez’s oldest son, whose conflicts with his father are portrayed in the film. But Pawel said he too declined to talk to her.

Fernando, now a lawyer, is at the center of the movie because of a story Helen Chavez shared with the cast before shooting began. “She said that at one point, Fernando left the family,” Luna said. His conflicts with his famous father were just too much to bear.

For Luna, a native of Mexico, the story was a reminder of what led him to Chavez. Not long ago, his second child was born — in the United States. Luna, who has homes in Mexico City and Los Angeles, wanted to be able to tell his Mexican-American son more about the man revered as a pioneer of Chicano history.

“This is a movie about a father and son, and about how hard it is for a son to understand what his father needs to do,” said Luna, a former child actor and star of Y Tu Mama Tambien.

There’s an air of earnestness about Luna’s film. After it screened in Berlin, reviews suggested that he was too respectful and thus drained his protagonist of complexity. Cesar Chavez has also earned mixed reviews from those who worked with Chavez.

Current UFW President Arturo Rodriguez praised the film. But Marshall Ganz, one of Chavez’s closest aides, called it “a cartoon of the man and his leadership.” Although the movie often depicts Chavez alone, he “could not allow himself to be alone,” Ganz said in an interview. Nor was Chavez likely to do something he does in the film — begin shouting at a picket line.

“His charisma was a kind of counter-charisma,” Ganz said. “His leadership was built around his capacity to build relationships … He connected people to each other.”

Still, Ganz said he hopes the film will stimulate new interest in Chavez, and lead people to read Pawel’s book and the growing body of scholarship about the farmworker movement. That scholarship includes the work of Yale professor Stephen Pitti and Arizona State’s Matthew Garcia, whose own book From the Jaws of Victory focused on how the movement changed after the UFW’s great triumphs.

“He’s a man who’s been characterized as an ‘American Gandhi,’ but he was also a union man,” Garcia said. “The union world is rough and tumble.” In the 1980s, Chavez purged perceived enemies and “Communists,” and in his final years he isolated himself at his home in the Tehachapi Mountains. “It was his Lear period,” Garcia said.

Garcia hopes that renewed interest in Chavez will lead students to explore Latino history and discover leaders whose names are not as widely known, including the late activists Bert Corona and Luisa Moreno, both of whom were pioneers of the immigrant rights movement.

But Cesar Chavez the film seems destined to have an effect, especially among those yearning for courageous role models. Chavez has long been just a name on a street sign to many students, or a chapter in a school textbook. Cesar Chavez gives them a flesh-and-blood person.

At one screening this month at the Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools in central Los Angeles, hundreds of students erupted into a rhythmic, united clap as the film’s final credits rolled.

“We don’t have to do big things to make ourselves leaders,” said student Jaewoong Lee during a post-screening discussion. “We have to unselfishly spend a little time for a cause and that’s what is going to make us into a greater individual that contributes to society.”

Photo: Pantelion Films/MCT