The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

The Trump administration’s much-hyped initiative to help 50 million women in the developing world has allocated only $1 toward each woman.

Ivanka Trump is the public face of the “Women’s Global Development and Prosperity Initiative,” announced to much fanfare during the same week as the State of the Union address.

But so far, the initiative has only had $50 million allocated to it from the budget of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

“That’s just a dollar a year each!” said Charles Kenny, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development.

The funds are extremely small in comparison to efforts by previous administrations.

In 2016, President Barack Obama’s administration submitted a budget requesting $1.34 billion in foreign aid that would support gender equality and efforts to reduce gender-based violence. Some $40 million of that was set aside for Let Girls Learn, the initiative launched by Michelle Obama to help girls in the developing world get a quality education.

A year later, the Trump administration ended the program.

Just last year, philanthropist Melinda Gates announced a $170 million plan to increase the economic power of women around the world. That’s more than three times as much as the commitment from the entire U.S. government.

Yet, despite the comparatively paltry sum of his offering, Trump clearly wanted praise for the program.

During his State of the Union address, Trump congratulated himself for launching “the first ever Government-wide initiative focused on economic empowerment for women in developing countries.”

“Trump is committed to women’s economic empowerment,” claimed a White House press release. The document said the $1 per woman effort would advance “women’s full and free participation in the global economy.”

As Trump signed a memorandum establishing the initiative, Ivanka wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed that laughably claimed the fund would help “boost global economic output by an additional $12 trillion by 2025.”

The public relations maneuver is right in line with an administration that has attacked women around the world at every turn.

He reinstated the anti-choice global gag rule, then later expanded it — banning the United States from funding certain reproductive health initiatives around the world.

Opposition to abortion also led Trump to cut funding for the United Nations Population Fund, which is responsible for family planning, including ending deaths from childbirth, across 150 countries.

Trump hurt women and families when he ended the Syrian refugee program and imposed a ban on Muslim travel to the U.S. Additionally, he put in place policies at the U.S.-Mexico border that separated children from their families.

Trump is reviled by women, and this initiative is part of a gambit to improve his standing with them before the election. But even then, with Ivanka leading the charge, Trump hobbled the program and made it into an obvious joke.

There is no real commitment here, just smoke and mirrors for another con in progress.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes at Capitol on January 6, 2021

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

Members of the Oath Keepers — along with QAnon and the Proud Boys — were among the far-right extremists who, according to the FBI, were involved in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building. The role that the Oath Keepers played in the Capitol insurrection is the focus of a report by PolitiFact's Samantha Putterman, who examines their activities before and during the attack.

Keep reading... Show less

Steve Bannon

When it comes to events surrounding the January 6 insurrection, there are some whose involvement remains unclear. Did Rep. Lauren Boebert lead future insurgents on a tour of the Capitol in order to help them identify the shortest route to the people they wanted to hang? Not certain. There are others who will pretend that their calls to storming the Capitol and spilling a swimming pool of patriotic blood were purely metaphorical. Right, Rep. Mo Brooks?

And then there's Steve Bannon.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}