The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus gave a tone-deaf response to a question about marriage equality during a Friday morning appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe.

In response to the RNC’s recent report urging the party to reach out to minority voters, including gays, Huffington Post‘s Sam Stein asked what Priebus would “tell an independent-minded gay man who believes the right to marry is a civil right? What would you tell him about why he should vote Republican?”

Priebus, completely ignoring the GOP’s ongoing war on gay rights, responded “my God, I don’t agree with my wife on 100 percent of the issues but it doesn’t mean we don’t have a great marriage.” Of course, given Republicans’ ongoing efforts to deny gays the legal right to marry, maybe this wasn’t the best example. Priebus essentially said, we as a party don’t believe you should have the same rights that other Americans enjoy, but maybe we can agree on other issues, like the economy and education — so come on over to our side!

The GOP still doesn’t get it. To paraphrase James Carville, “It’s the policies, stupid!”

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

A scene from "Squid Game" on Netflix

Reprinted with permission from Responsible Statecraft

The Treasury Department's nine-page "2021 Sanctions Review" released on Monday makes vague recommendations for "calibrating sanctions to mitigate unintended economic, political, and humanitarian impact." Unfortunately, it offers few tangible policy suggestions on how to end the high humanitarian
Keep reading... Show less

Mt.Rushmore

Reprinted with permission from Creators

In New York City, a statue of Thomas Jefferson has graced the City Council chamber for 100 years. This week, the Public Design Commission voted unanimously to remove it. "Jefferson embodies some of the most shameful parts of our country's history," explained Adrienne Adams, a councilwoman from Queens. Assemblyman Charles Barron went even further. Responding to a question about where the statue should go next, he was contemptuous: "I don't think it should go anywhere. I don't think it should exist."

When iconoclasts topple Jefferson, they seem to validate the argument advanced by defenders of Confederate monuments that there is no escape from the slippery slope. "First, they come for Nathan Bedford Forrest and then for Robert E. Lee. Where does it end? Is Jefferson next? Is George Washington?"

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}