Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Shareblue.

 

On the heels of the deadliest act of anti-Semitic violence in American history, the Trump administration is planning to shut down the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Countering Violent Extremism Grant Program, according to a new report.

The anti-extremism program was initially established under the Obama administration for the purpose of funding groups around the country that work to counter domestic terrorism.

Since Trump took office, funding for certain projects — particularly those focused on stopping far-right violence — has been cut and/or withheld, but the program itself is still operational.

Now that’s about to change. NBC News reports that the Trump administration is not going to renew funding for the program, despite recent high-profile acts of violent extremism and a nationwide spike in white supremacist violence and far-right extremism.

Currently, that funding goes toward the development of new approaches to preventing domestic terrorism and identifying early warning signs of extremism. “Programs that develop training materials for law enforcement, mental health counselors and schools to better identify warning signs of extremism so that terrorism can be averted were designated to receive funds,” according to NBC News.

If the Trump administration moves forward with the reported plan to end funding, none of those programs will get the grants they were slated to receive.

That’s what happened last year to a program called Life After Hate, the only program in the country devoted solely and specifically to countering neo-Nazi and white supremacist ideologies. It was supposed to receive $400,000 in grants. Ultimately, it received nothing.

DHS has not yet publicly confirmed that funding will be canceled for the Countering Violent Extremism program. But the Office of Terrorism Prevention Partnerships, which is housed within DHS, has taken down any mention of future funding from its website.

The Countering Violent Extremism program is at least the second domestic terrorism program that the Trump administration has gutted.

According to a recent report in The Atlantic, the interagency task force on Countering Violent Extremism — which included experts from the FBI, the National Counterterrorism Center, and the Departments of Justice, Education, and Health and Human Services — has gone inactive and exists only in name now.

George Selim, the former director of the Office of Community Partnerships, which oversaw the task force, told The Atlantic that “there’s been a precipitous decline in the dedicated staff and program funding devoted to combatting ideologically motivated violence” under the Trump administration.

All of this comes amid a growing threat of homegrown extremist violence, particularly from white supremacist groups.

The FBI concluded in a 2017 report that white supremacists killed more Americans from 2000 to 2016 than “any other domestic extremist movement,” and would likely continue to pose a growing threat of lethal violence in the year to come.

And they did.

According to the Anti-Defamation League, white supremacist murders doubled in 2017. White supremacists “were directly responsible” for 18 out of 34 extremist-related deaths nationwide — double the number of deaths attributed to Islamic extremists. Overall, 2017 was the fifth deadliest year on record for extremist violence in America.

But officials in the Trump administration continually deny these facts, and instead point to Islamic extremism and illegal immigration as the primary domestic terror threats in America, despite evidence to the contrary.

On top of that, national security agencies are being directed to focus on threats other than white supremacist terrorism, even though white supremacist violence poses the greatest domestic terror risk.

According to The Daily Beast, DHS convened a conference call with more than two dozen current and former government officials on Tuesday, just three days after the deadliest anti-Semitic attack in U.S. history.

The topic of the call? The so-called “caravan” of asylum-seekers slowly working their way towards the U.S.-Mexico border.

Trump claims to be “making America safe again,” but his own anti-immigrant fervor and white supremacist sympathies may actually pose the greatest risk to national security.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

 

Poll: Most Parents Oppose Rapid School Reopening

Numerous local school systems around the country are plowing ahead with plans to resume in-person instruction despite growing evidence that children are just as capable of spreading the coronavirus as adults.

Classes were set to begin on Monday in Baker County, Florida. Masks for students will be optional, not required. "It looks like it's back to normal this morning, honestly," a local television reporter observed as parents dropped their kids off in the morning. Many students wore no face coverings.

The Trump administration and the GOP have pushed for full reopening of schools for months."Schools in our country should be opened ASAP," Donald Trump tweeted in May. "Much very good information now available."

"SCHOOLS MUST OPEN IN THE FALL!!!" he reiterated on July 6.

"The science and data is clear: children can be safe in schools this fall, and they must be in school this fall," demanded Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) on Aug. 1.

"I believe our schools can, and should rise to the occasion of re-opening for in-person education this fall," agreed Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) two days later.

"The CDC and Academy of Pediatrics agree: We can safely get students back in classrooms," tweeted House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) last Tuesday.

But while Scalise, Mike Pence, and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos have all cited the American Academy of Pediatrics in their arguments for reopening, a new study by the group and the Children's Hospital Association raises red flags about how safe that will be.

Their report found 338,982 reported coronavirus cases in children as of July 30 in the United States. Between July 16 and July 30, the nation saw a 40% increase — 97,078 new infected children.

Last week, a high school student in an Atlanta suburb posted a photo online showing few students wearing masks in a crowded school hallway. Since that time, at least six students and three adult employees in the school have reportedly contracted the coronavirus, and the school temporarily has switched to online classes.

Another Georgia school district has already seen at least 13 students and staff members test positive since reopening a week ago.

A recent study in South Korea found that children aged ten and older spread the coronavirus at the same rates adults do. A separate study in Chicago suggested young kids might also be effective spreaders.

These contradict the false claims made by Trump and his administration that kids have an "amazing" near immunity to COVID-19.

"If you look at children, children are almost — and I would almost say definitely, but almost immune from this disease, so few. They've got stronger, hard to believe, and I don't know how you feel about it, but they have much stronger immune systems than we do somehow for this," Trump told Fox News on Wednesday.

"You got to open the schools. They have a stronger immune system even than you have or I have," he told Barstool Sports on July 23. "It's amazing. You look at the percentage, it's a tiny percentage of one percent. And in that one case, I mean, I looked at a couple of cases. If you have diabetes, if you have, you know, problems with something, but the kids are in great shape." Children have made up nearly nine percent of all cases, even with schools mostly closed.

And DeVos incorrectly said in a July 16 interview, "More and more studies show that kids are actually stoppers of the disease and they don't get it and transmit it themselves."

In early July, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued guidelines for how schools could operate more safely during the pandemic.

Trump publicly ridiculed the guidelines, dismissing them as "very tough & expensive" and "very impractical."

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.