The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

 

On Wednesday, the Military Times reported that White House Chief of Staff John Kelly had signed a “cabinet order” directing Defense Secretary James Mattis to give the troops stationed at the border in anticipation of the approaching Honduran migrant caravan the authority to use deadly force to protect Border Patrol agents, and to engage in some law enforcement activities like crowd control, detention, and searches.

The order represents yet another show of force by the administration, which has tried to gin up public fear about the caravan as an “invasion” and possibly a cover for terrorists, even though it is not a national security threat. But this new move is bizarre and unsettling on a number of levels.

First, the law enforcement provisions of the order to raise questions about the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the military from serving domestic law enforcement functions. Until now, the military has only been serving in a support role, including surveillance and transportation. Mattis gave assurances that the order complies with Posse Comitatus. Retired Army lawyer and Lt. Col. Geoffrey Corn, however, is unconvinced, calling the order “troubling” and noting that “absent the invocation of a law called the Insurrection Act, the president is not supposed to deploy federal active-duty military forces” for law enforcement:

Second, although this order does follow a “memorandum of understanding” signed by the president, some are questioning why Kelly, a White House official with no role in the military chain of command, was the one who signed the order to the Secretary of Defense:

Third, it is unclear why this order is needed at all. Kelly, a former Marine General and the initial Homeland Security Secretary, has claimed there is “credible evidence and intelligence” that the first group of migrants near Tijuana “may prompt incidents of violence and disorder.” But the claim that the situation is dangerous is undercut by the recent report that the Pentagon is preparing to start withdrawing the troops in the coming days. Moreover, even though Mattis claims this order expands his authority to protect border agents, New York Times reporter and former Marine Thomas Gibbons-Neff has pointed out that existing rules already allow troops to use force to protect nonmilitary personnel:

Dara Lind of Vox has a more cynical theory about why this order was signed: it’s yet another political stunt to make Trump feel powerful:

This would certainly make sense, as Trump has openly fantasized about the military using force on migrants. A few weeks ago, Trump said that troops should shoot migrants if they throw rocks, which would be a war crime and which was met with such an uproar that Trump hastily backtracked.

Matthew Chapman is a video game designer, science fiction author, and political reporter from Austin, TX. Follow him on Twitter @fawfulfan.
 

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Republicans in the Arizona state Senate are officially off the hook for the $2.8 million needed to replace hundreds of voting machines ruined during the GOP-led, scandal-ridden "audit" of the 2020 election results in the state, the Arizona Republic reported.

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted in August to force GOP state senators — who had signed an agreement saying that they would be responsible for any costs incurred from their "forensic audit" of the state's 2020 election — to pay the millions for the machines.

Keep reading... Show less

In December 2019, when then-President Donald Trump was facing his first of two impeachments, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie launched the nonprofit Right Direction America to defend him. The 2022 campaign of far-right Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, a hardcore Trumpista, donated $100,000 to the nonprofit earlier this year during Trump's second impeachment — and journalist Roger Sollenberger, in an article published by the Daily Beast, stresses that the donation raises some questions.

Keep reading... Show less
x
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}