The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

They’re calling it the #SNAPChallenge.

A total of 26 Democratic House members will be living on $4.50 a day, the food budget of an average beneficiary of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — food stamps — in order to call attention to the $20 billion in cuts House Republicans would like to make to the program.

“We can’t let these cuts go through,” writes Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA). “This isn’t who we are as Americans. We need to protect our vulnerable, not cut them out of a budget.”

The Senate has already voted to cut $4.1 billion from the “Heat and Eat” program that supplements the food budgets of the elderly and disabled. The Center for American Progress estimates that every billion dollars cut from SNAP costs the economy 13,781 jobs. Using that math, Republican SNAP cuts would kill 275,620 jobs, not to mention the pain it would cause to the most vulnerable Americans.

Republicans often point to the fact that a record number of Americans, some 46 million, are receiving SNAP benefits. But they do not mention that the need for SNAP benefits is growing most quickly in areas that vote Republican.

Most SNAP beneficiaries also have at least one working adult in the household, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Former congressman and current candidate for mayor of New York City, Anthony Weiner, is also doing his own #SNAPchallenge, living on about $1.50 a meal.

“In New York City, there is an enormous amount of need right under our nose,” Weiner said.

Newark mayor Cory Booker and Philadelphia mayor Michael Nutter did their own versions of the challenge last year.

“When I was a young, single mother, I was on public assistance,” Rep. Lee writes, explaining her passion for this issue. “It was a bridge over troubled water, and without it, I wouldn’t be where I am today. I spent hours debating what to buy and what to skip, all the while keeping my sons in my mind. I could go without breakfast; my sons couldn’t.”

The ultimate irony in this fight is that food stamp usage is growing the fastest in areas that vote Republican.

Photo: Rachel Zack via Flickr.com

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons, a novel and a memoir. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.

Donald Trump

Youtube Screenshot

The baseless claim that the FBI may have planted evidence while carrying out a court-approved search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence on Monday has surged through right-wing media, as the former president’s allies continue their effort to turn their audiences against the probe and shield Trump from accountability.

The FBI searched the premises after obtaining a warrant from a federal magistrate judge and “removed a number of boxes of documents” as part of a federal investigation into whether Trump had illegally “taken a trove of material with him to his home at Mar-a-Lago when he left the White House that included sensitive documents – and then, in the Justice Department’s view, had failed to fully comply with requests that he return the disputed material,” the New York Times reported. Politico concluded after consulting with legal experts on the handling of classified documents that “it’s highly unlikely the DOJ would have pursued – and a judge would have granted – such a politically explosive search warrant without extraordinary evidence.”

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}