Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Saturday, February 16, 2019

118 responses to “Notes from the Trump-Pence Logo Design Meeting”

  1. AgLander says:

    The author describes the Trump-Pence logo as “…….interlocked, almost sexual position”.

    Using that sophomoric, dorm room logic, I guess everyone walking around with their shoelaces tied are displaying an “interlocked, almost sexual position”.

    Why do liberals always act like barnyard animals in seeing (and seeking) sex in everything? Are they repressed?

    P.S…….most articles here at NM are created in dorm rooms, so maybe I answered my own question!

    • charleo1 says:

      I know you prefer your articles to come out of a Koch funded think tank. You Righties are just too tough. Hypocrite much? Ouch! That didn’t hurt! Faker/Con, Ouch! That didn’t hurt either! WMD liars/warmongers! You’re not hurting me at all! Birthers, nut jobs, flat Earthers, science deniers, corporate lap dogs, Italian loafer lickers, fingers in your ears, tongue wagging turkeys voting for Christmas! It’s all good because Trump’s going to win. Isn’t that the turkey corn they’er feeding you?

      • AgLander says:

        Science denier? Let me guess….you are against the science of GMO’s that have led to tremendous improvements in agriculture production and quality…….now whose the anti-science hypocrite?!
        P.S….I bet you are a loud voice against the science of childhood immunization shots too! Recognize yourself “hippie-crit”?!
        P.S.S……and yet you probably are for the legalization of pot because it is so harmless!
        You libs are so low intellect it would be funny if it wasn’t so dangerous for the rest of us common sense folks.

        • charleo1 says:

          You’re going with agriculture, and immunization, to cover the fact that half the Republican Party believes the Earth is only 5,000 years old, and the other is sure global warming, the most serious environmental challenge man has ever faced, is a hoax. I’d like to say, a very nice try. But that would be a big old lie.

          • AgLander says:

            Deflection…..are you in favor of GMO’s or aren’t you? It doesn’t get any more high science than that. Be careful….your answer may reflect whether you are science based or (more likely) fear based in things you don’t understand and have no gumption to learn about because it would require a little effort.

  2. AgLander says:

    Hillary has just released her own campaign logo featuring an email server with Chinese and Russian hackers standing arm in arm behind it while congratulating one another!

    • Jinmichigan says:

      Spoken like the child you are.

      • tbs says:

        Awe, poor sport! You can dish it out, typical PC liberals, but can’t take it when someone calls you out!
        Whose the child? Humph!

        • Bev Haut says:

          You’re just all over this TP thing aren’t you, sugar? I hope you get some therapy soon because you can’t spell, and you obviously are incapable of independent thought, much less form a complete sentence. I hereby sentence you to Disqus Hell.

    • ralphkr says:

      Once again you have outdone yourself in proving your ignorance, AgLander. Computer experts have examined the Clinton server and stated repeatedly that there are no signs of anyone hacking (the one person who claimed to have hacked the Clinton server finally admitted that he was lying but only after it was proven that he had extremely limited computer expertise). On the other hand, the government servers, including the State Department’s, have often been hacked soooo the Chinese & Russian hackers are standing arm-in-arm behind the official US government servers.

      • AgLander says:

        “Computer experts”!?! That’s the first I’ve heard…….did you have an alcohol induced dream? Give me their names, Santa…..and Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills do not qualify!

        • ralphkr says:

          You’ve never heard of computer experts.AgLander??? I strongly suggest that you have a discussion with whomever reads and interprets the news for you as there have been numerous articles that mention experts examining the system and how there had been attempts to hack that had been thwarted by the servers security system. You want the names or they did not exist…well, AgLander by your strange reasoning you have just proven that there was never any FBI investigation because the FBI did not publish the names of the agents. By the way, the Clinton server had newer and better security programs that the official government servers (which had been hacked by foreign entities).

          Personally, if I had been the Clintons and the FBI wanted my server I would have told them that if they wanted it that they should bring a checkbook because it is private property.

          • AgLander says:

            So…you got nuthin….thanks……at least we understand one another, nice try! Next!! Go back to sleep, Santa……..

          • ralphkr says:

            Yep, AgLander, it is so true that I have nothing that supports your falsehoods & fantasies. Unfortunately, for you, I am able to read & comprehend articles that you continuously prove that all of which are far beyond your comprehension. If you know someone who can do a bit of digging for you they shall quickly discover page after page of articles about computer experts (none of whom are ever identified) examining the Clinton server just as they shall find reams of articles about the FBI investigation (none of those FBI agents are ever identified).

            I do know that there is one source that you shall gobble up because they state that there were over 90K confidential E-mails on the Clinton server and they were all copied to China & Russia. You shall quickly realize just how believable this source is (to idiots) since that is also the one that reported that Benghazi was caused by Hillary Clinton after Ambassador Stevens wife had refused her advances Hillary went to Obama and requested that he have his Muslim Brotherhood take care of Ambassador Stevens so Hillary could have Stevens’ wife.

      • Daniel Wright says:

        You are the ignorant one. Comey said that the methods Russia,China or Iran used would leave no traces of their intrusion. He didn’t say there were no hacks,he said his techs couldn’t tell.Comey didn’t say Hillary wasn’t hacked.He said she was likely hacked. http://www.cyberwar.news/2016-07-08-though-she-wasnt-charged-with-a-crime-hillary-clintons-private-email-servers-were-likely-hacked-fbi.html

        • ralphkr says:

          Yes, Daniel, I do know that in Comey’s political speech he said that his techs could not tell if Clinton’s server had been hacked but he failed to explain how these untraceable hackers were exposed in official government servers such as the Russian hacking of the State Department servers & Chinese, Iranian, & Russian hacks of other Federal government servers. Considering that the Clinton server had far more modern and sophisticated security systems than the government systems (Congress consistently refuses to waste money on computer security) it is far more likely that IF the Clinton server was hacked that there would be giant flags showing the attempt. Oh, I just realize how we know. We know that the federal servers were hacked because they left little messages behind “Boris was here” or “Xuan was here” but they forgot to leave messages on the Clinton server (because they never hacked it). Of course, as a good Republican Comey would do all he could to smear Clinton but, as a good LEO, he would not go as far as Congressmen and fake evidence.

          • Daniel Wright says:

            You’re coming up with lots of excuses but no evidence. Hillary’s server was unsecured. You’re also claiming that foreign hackers would have deliberately left breadcrumbs to follow. When they do that it is usually for bragging rights. When the enemy has such unfettered access to top secret information they want to keep the flow of information going. Leaving evidence of intrusion would cause the hacking victim to take steps to stop that leak. Why would they do something that stupid? Would you if you were a spy? That aside,Her destruction of classified documents and her refusal to turn them over to the rightful authority[the state department] were crimes in them selves. Comey lied about intent being necessary in order to be criminal isn’t true. I have looked up the statutes myself. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/8/28/1416309/-Hillary-Clinton-s-Felony-The-federal-laws-violated-by-the-private-server

          • ralphkr says:

            No, Daniel, I have not come up with any excuses. By the way, if Hillary’s server was unsecured then every government server is unsecured because it was the Secret Service’s duty to secure her server. I never claimed hackers left breadcrumbs but used that to show how ridiculous the claim that certain hackers were untraceable on Clinton’s server (which had far better security programs installed than the Federal computers) even though those same hackers had been traced on Federal computers therefore, if they really were invisible, they had to have left notes.

            If what Clinton did with Emails is so criminal that she should be jailed as you claim then I reckon Colin Powell will be spending even more time in prison than Clinton because he not even refused to turn over his Emails to State when they requested them but he destroyed them.

            Now here is the real question for you, Daniel: If there were Emails sent to Clinton’s server that should not have been sent there then why are they investigating Clinton instead of the people who illegally sent those Emails? The senders of those Emails are far more guilty than the recipient (ignoring the fact that most of those “confidential” Emails were not classified until long after they had been sent). Think of it this way, Daniel: If I mail you a bomb are you the guilty person or am I? Oh, that’s right, it depends upon if the recipient is a Democrat (guilty) or a Republican (innocent).

          • Daniel Wright says:

            I see nothing but diversions,false claims and poor excuses coming from you……………nothing. The secret service was only required to protect the premises the physical server was located at. That would only be when she was home. She never told them she had a server in her basement. Your belief that government servers are not as secure as Hillary’s was is pure fantasy. Tech experts know the truth. This is a computer tech site. Argue with them. https://www.wired.com/2015/03/clintons-email-server-vulnerable/ Here is another. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/hillary-clintons-infamous-email-server-6-things-you-need-to-know/ Colin Powell’s emails are no comparison. He used a private email address but it was hosted on a .gov server. He never had his own private server in his basement. Hillary did. http://www.weeklystandard.com/why-colin-powells-emails-are-not-like-hillarys/article/2000949 How could Powell have destroyed emails that were preserved on the host .gov server? Her we go to fantasy island again. Only three of Powell’s emails were deemed classified and that was years after they were sent. Clinton sent over 100 that were “born classified” http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/09/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-said-my-predecessors-did-same-thin/ Hillary didn’t have just one server. Over the years she had four.All unsecured and monitored. She also had unsecured blackberries against the advice of the NSA which she sent emails to her private server from them.Many of which were sent on airplanes and sometimes in unfriendly countries. http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/06/hillary-clinton-emails-probe-blackberry-224154 But I’m sure that you will ask,What difference does it make?

  3. charleo1 says:

    As I said, I can’t see where Pence will fix any of the political problems, and tremendous demographic shortfalls the Trump campaign will need to overcome in order to be successful. A headline could read, racist and polarizing demagogue picks ideologically rigid career politician, as running mate to further narrow his popular appeal.

    • AgLander says:

      “As I said, I cant’ see…….”

      You should have stopped right there because those 6 words perfectly capture the essence of every comment you have ever posted!

      • charleo1 says:

        Well that was pretty easy. A headier thing would have been to tell me how you think Pence helps the Trump ticket. But you can’t see where he helps either. You’re funnier than you think you are. Say something else useless, yet full of absurdity.

    • tbs says:

      Yes, but beat Romney only by fraud voting! Fraud has been all the way through this Presidents term!
      So that view, of your article, is voided out as a valid one.

      • charleo1 says:

        Sore loser much? Instead of making lame excuses, I’d think you’d want to find where the Right, and the majority in the Country are parting ways.

      • Sand_Cat says:

        Yeah, we all know you project GOP – and your own – faults on Democrats and “Liberals.” Can you give a coherent definition of “liberal” without looking it up or lapsing into nonsensical mutterings and profanity?

        • Daniel Wright says:

          Why should he have to jump through your hoops? You would discount him no matter what. I also see no profanity from tbs. He only used seven four letter words in his post. None started with an F or an S.

          • Sand_Cat says:

            You’re right. Neither he nor other morons like you should try such a difficult thing as giving a coherent answer devoid of lies and delusion. It’s called a “rhetorical question,” idiot.

          • Daniel Wright says:

            There is nothing stopping me from answering your “rhetorical” question. I know exactly what it means. Now tell me what this means ANAL ORIFICE! I know the modern definition of liberalism is. Liberals are definitely NOT liberal. Progressivism is also not progressive. I also know what socialism means. I despise all those isms due to their destructive results on the Human race.

          • Sand_Cat says:

            My, but you have been busy.
            Yes, you obviously know a great deal. I believe it was Mark Twain who said something clever about the things we “know” that aren’t so.
            But keep going. You seem to have worked yourself up into a fine frenzy over a couple of jokes. I don’t know about your “mommy,”
            or whatever, but you sound like someone with serious insecurity issues.
            In any case, I won’t be joining you, but thanks for the offer.

          • Daniel Wright says:

            Frenzy? Hilarious. You are the one nutting up. Someone with an opposing view is “projecting”. Liberals seem to see opposing opinions as some kind or psychosis. Liberalism no matter how illogical, no matter how much it fails in it’s goals is [in your mind] the right thing to do even when it leads to massive poverty and misery. It’s ironic that the people who lay claim to the highest intelligence and the strongest moral character continue to stick to the same moronic policies that have failed millions upon millions of people insisting that they will succeed in eliminating poverty and create equality and justice for everyone. Your goals will be met if you can just throw enough money at them. Liberalism does just the opposite. Relying on emotion and good intentions gets you nowhere. The Einstein quote about insanity describes the liberal mindset to a tee. progressivism/socialism has proved a total failure. The only equality it creates is to make the people equally impoverished and yet you keep trying and failing over and over. Isn’t that what Einstein meant when describing the definition of insanity? Now who’s doing the projecting?

  4. itsfun says:

    How can anyone think the logo is sexual? Have you seen the logo’s of sports teams?

    • Jinmichigan says:

      Yes, you are that stupid.

    • JPHALL says:

      You obviously do not know the nearly universal sign for intercourse. One finger poking a circle make by your other hand.

      • King of America says:

        This guy literally thinks there’s nothing wrong with nazism; it’s not possible to explain things to him.

        • itsfun says:

          If someone doesn’t agree with you, it makes them a Nazi. Isn’t it just wonderful how people like you preach tolerance of the opinions of others, but have absolutely no tolerance.

      • itsfun says:

        Are you stupid enough to actually believe the logo is some kind of sexual sign? How much of a idiot are you?

    • King of America says:

      Please learn to use the apostrophe correctly.

      • itsfun says:

        Another comment from the leading horses ass on the site.

        • King of America says:

          There’s no need to talk about yourself like that. Otto, for one, is far worse than you.

        • Sand_Cat says:

          Hey! I thought you gave ME that title!

          Shall I file a lawsuit, or just have you “investigated”?

          • Daniel Wright says:

            What will the grounds for your suit be.,itsfun’s exposing of your stupidity?

          • Sand_Cat says:

            Obsessive much?
            Don’t get enough attention on your own?

          • Daniel Wright says:

            I don’t need your kind of attention. You are the one who mentioned a lawsuit;But then was that another of your clever “rhetorical questions”?

          • Sand_Cat says:

            Yes, it’s obvious that you, like most zealots, are irony-deaf. I also didn’t mention the “suit” to YOU. I may not be clever but it’s pretty obvious you’re even worse.

          • Daniel Wright says:

            Are you denying that you made a veiled threat against itsfun? True, you didn’t mention the suit to me. You insinuated yourself into the conversation between itsfun and King of America. You can do it but I can’t? Who the hell are you except someone with an unjustified superiority complex just like most puffed up elitist leftist lemmings?

    • Sand_Cat says:

      The same way you can think the fecal nonsense you post here.

      • Daniel Wright says:

        You must be referring to the male bovine excrement emanating from your mouth.

        • Sand_Cat says:

          Not really.
          Having your head firmly ensconced in your rectum, you’re not in much of a position to see or judge anything.

          • Daniel Wright says:

            We can go on for days with these insults. Why don’t you ask your mommy to tuck you in for the night. You sound a little grouchy.

          • Sand_Cat says:

            You’re the one doing the insulting of someone who never even addressed you at all.
            As for your attempts at insults: projection, anyone?

          • Daniel Wright says:

            You are the one who said I had cranial /rectal inversion syndrome. This is a free forum. You don’t have exclusive rights to comment here. I will say my peace as I wish. You insert yourself into others conversations. I will too.What are you going to do about it,sue me?

  5. FT66 says:

    When my progressive friend saw the logo, he shouted loudly, this logo means: “TRASH the POOR”.

    • tbs says:

      Really! Your progressive friend has a very sick small mind! It is no wonder the liberals are, in the trouble they are in, as they are self destructing themselves finally!
      Couldn’t happen to crazier thinking people than them!????????????????

      • MGR says:

        Donald, I know your reading skills are the same as a pecan, but the only self-destructing party is the GOP. We all know you picked Pence because any Republican that may have a snowball’s chance in heII of a successful run at the presidency flat refuses to be your running mate.

  6. tbs says:

    This article is sick with liberal PC side comments!
    Only a sick mind would come up with this thinking!
    Get a life!
    Surprised they did not complain about the white background being racist.

    • charleo1 says:

      That would be, Liberal, “snide comments.” Get an education.

      • FireBaron says:

        tbs probably comes from one of those states that keeps losing their educational accreditation. Either that or he is a graduate of “Liberty University”.

    • Bev Haut says:

      I see that you’ve missed the entire point of satire. Perhaps lessons in sarchasm(tm) might help? And you’re the obvious racist here, since you’re the only one who’s mentioned it. Go and smoke some more meth in yo mama’s basement and let the adults have a conversation.

    • King of America says:

      I love – LOVE – that you idiots have decided to die on this particular hilarious hill.

    • MGR says:

      Hey, Donald, love your new screen name, but I think Ted Turner has the copyright on that.

    • CrankyToo says:

      The article’s hilarious!!! And you’re out there, Squire.

    • Sand_Cat says:

      So pleased you liked it.

      • Daniel Wright says:

        You’re so pleased that your party turns politics into porn.

        • Sand_Cat says:

          I, unlike blind and delusional zealots like you, don’t “have” a party. Speaking of delusions, not sure who is worse: tbs or you. As for “porn,” the obscenity is all yours.

          • Daniel Wright says:

            So being a registered independent makes me a blind zealot? If you say so. It was left wing idiots who’s dirty minds interpreted two letters on the alphabet as a a phallic symbol.

          • Sand_Cat says:

            What in the Hell are you talking about?

            Really, have you anything rational to say?

          • Daniel Wright says:

            You called me a blind zealot. meaning that I blindly follow a party. [most likely Republican] You’re just like another idiot named Wayne Thorson who thinks that all non Democrats are Republicans. I’m not a Republican. I call Wayne Forrest Gump because he deserves the moniker. You run neck and neck with old Wayne IMO.

  7. Dan S says:

    With the T & P interlocking it goes without saying WHOA ???? I really wonder what they were smoking when they came up with that ridiculous logo. And to think of all the grief the right has given Hillary over hers ????

    • King of America says:

      I feel quite safe in claiming that this is quite literally the most hilariously inept logo ever used by any political campaign in the entire history of mankind. Nobody has ever done a worse job.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.