Tag: environmental protection
Rising Up Against Trump-Kushner Resort Ripoff, Albanians Lead The Way

Rising Up Against Trump-Kushner Resort Ripoff, Albanians Lead The Way

Americans exasperated by the Trump family’s ceaseless trashing of culture and nature can look toward a small country on the Mediterranean for inspiring resistance. As we await with dread the president’s next round of gilded vandalism in our capital, the people of Albania are pouring into the streets of their capital to stop Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump from degrading a gorgeous and vital coastal refuge into yet another garish upper-crust resort.

Over the past week the streets of Tirana have seen throngs of protesters, denouncing the crooked couple, along with inflatable pink flamingos that symbolize the wildlife habitat endangered by their multibillion-dollar profiteering project. The “flamingo revolution” is expected to spread across the nation in coming days as revelations about the real-estate scheme intensified public outrage.

Ever the clueless heiress, Ivanka inflamed the situation still when she told a podcast host when how she and Kushner “discovered” Sazan -- an undeveloped island along the Albanian coastline – while swimming off a friend’s yacht. Describing herself as “captivated” by its pristine beauty, she said the ultra-luxury development she and her husband envision as “the culmination of all of my experience in real estate, all of my travel, a lot of reflection on how I want to live, how I think people increasingly are wanting to live, and trying to really build something that’s a tangible manifestation of that.”

To the angry Albanians, however, the grasping and pretentious couple represent the opposite of how they want to live and are instead a “tangible manifestation” of oligarchy’s threat to the natural environment, economic equity and democracy.

The coastal region that Kushner proposes to transform into a “very high-end luxury product” where he would “want to be at with my family and with my friends” is a place of exceptional biodiversity and ancient cultural heritage. It would ravage not only Sazan, Albania’s only island, but the wetlands and habitats in a surrounding marine national park and along the adjoining coast, to make way for hotels, apartment complexes, and a marina.

According to BirdLife International, those waters now shelter the Mediterranean monk seal and hundreds of bird species, including endangered flamingos and pelicans.

The project sponsor is Kushner’s Affinity Partners, financed with dubious investments from his royal cronies in the Emirates and Saudi Arabia, which has proceeded in the usual high-handed Trump style. “

“From start to finish there has been a total lack of transparency,” said Aleksandr Trajce, executive director of the country’s leading conservation group, the Protection and Preservation of the Natural Environment in Albania (PPNEA). As he told The Guardian, “We have seen no public consultation or public documentation regarding permits.”

Indeed, the Albanian government has plainly sped the project’s approvals ever since the reelection of Donald Trump in late 2024, granting it “strategic investor status.” Unsurprisingly, the involvement of Kushner and Trump in this bulldozing scheme has provoked suspicion, which led Albania’s independent public prosecutor to announce a probe of legislative changes enabling the swift approvals.

The surging revolt against the Trump-Kushner depredations have forced the Albanian government, led by longtime Prime Minister Edi Rama, to seek talks with the protesters while declaring his iron determination to see the project built. He may well fear that his ambitions to bring his country into the European Union will be jeopardized by its shadows of environmental pillage and possible corruption. As for the flamingo revolutionaries, they may well be encouraged by the fate of a Trump deal slated for neighboring Serbia -- which fell apart last year after top government officials were indicted for abusing their authority in promoting the plan. When Affinity Partners announced the Belgrade development's abandonment in December 2025, it explained that “meaningful projects should unite rather than divide" and cited its "respect for the people of Serbia and the city of Belgrade.”

Perhaps we need a "Flamingo Revolution" on these shores too.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.



Trump’s EPA Keeps Trashing The Planet

Trump’s EPA Keeps Trashing The Planet

In the face of any serious and growing problem, three options are available: You can do more to solve it. You could do the same things you’ve been doing. Or you could do things to make it worse.

When it comes to combating climate change, the Trump administration cannot be accused of foot-dragging. The problem is that it is marching briskly in the worst possible direction.

Methane is rocket fuel for global warming. It amounts to only 10 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, but in its first 20 years in the atmosphere, it traps 80 times more heat than carbon dioxide. There’s an upside: Cutting methane emissions yields quicker benefits in slowing climate change. But Donald Trump cares nothing for that project.

This is the same EPA that Donald Trump turned over to Scott Pruitt, a darling of Charles and David Koch — fossil fuel billionaires. After scandals forced Pruitt’s departure, Trump replaced him with Andrew Wheeler, a lobbyist for the coal industry. In their minds, the “p” in EPA stands for “persecution.”

The oil and gas industry is the biggest single source of methane emissions. Barack Obama’s EPA issued regulations to reduce methane leaks from new wells, pipelines and processing facilities — emissions that come not from energy that is used but energy that is wasted. The change also forced companies to take measures to stop discharges from old equipment.

The rule proposed by Trump’s EPA would undo this whole effort, sparing companies the tedious obligation of frequent inspections and monitoring to detect methane leaks. Its proposal comes even though a study last year in the journal Science found that this leakage was 60 percent higher than Obama’s EPA thought.

The administration also ignores the evidence from Colorado. Since the state mandated more frequent inspections, leaks have been cut in half — while oil and gas production has set records.

It’s clearly possible to be more vigilant about pointless, damaging emissions without hindering the production, transportation or use of natural gas. Don’t take my word for it: ExxonMobil, Shell and BP, among the nation’s biggest gas producers, all oppose the reversal.

“ExxonMobil strongly encourages the agency to continue regulating methane emissions at new and modified sources, and to expand methane regulation to existing sources,” Matt Kolesar, regulatory manager at its XTO Energy, said in March. “With the experience we have gathered across our operations, we know how to reduce our methane emissions in a cost-effective manner.”

Some of its competitors, however, claim that being forced to cut down on leaks would be ruinously expensive. Reported The New York Times: “Lee Fuller, executive vice president of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, said the smaller operators … that his group represents could not absorb the costs that Exxon or Shell could, particularly when it came to inspecting and repairing older wells.”

Maybe it is cheaper for these companies to save money by letting methane escape. But so what? Their prosperity should not come from causing unnecessary damage to the environment and humanity in general. If they can’t afford costs that Exxon and Shell can, they are welcome to sell out to Exxon and Shell so the job can be done right.

Even the EPA doesn’t pretend the change would be financially significant. It estimates the net savings at no more than $19 million a year. That’s the equivalent of zero in the oil and gas industry, whose 2017 revenue totaled more than $135 billion.

If barring companies from indiscriminate spewing put some of them out of business, the effect on consumers would be invisible. Natural gas output in the U.S. has been so high that pipelines can’t handle it all.

The EPA sees no need for the Obama-era rules because, it says, companies will police leaks on their own. Said assistant EPA administrator Anne Idsal, “There’s every incentive for industry to minimize any type of fugitive methane emissions, capture it, use it and sell it down the road.”

She should tell the operators in West Texas that have been burning off $1 million worth of excess gas every day just to get rid of it. Oil companies in North Dakota have been flaring some 20 percent of the natural gas they bring up.

If you to protect the planet from needless harm, a policy of ignoring methane leakage and accelerating climate change is hard to understand. If you don’t care about that mission, of course, it makes perfect sense.

Trump Golf Course Illegally Cut Down Protected Trees

Trump Golf Course Illegally Cut Down Protected Trees

Late last month, the Trump Organization decided to clear-cut a bunch of large trees at Trump National DC, its golf course in Loudoun County, Virginia. Then, they just threw all the trees in the Potomac River.

However, it turns out that it was a protected area, and therefore removing the trees — not to mention throwing them in the river — was completely illegal.

First there’s the part where tossing the trees in the river is a safety hazard. Then there’s the fact that regulations require permits to cut down trees on that part of the river because it is designated as being prone to flood. Next, this was no small removal operation; Loudoun County officials said that the golf course cleared nearly three-quarters of an acre of land. Finally, removing the trees leads to increased sediment in the water and ends up, eventually, polluting the Chesapeake Bay.

But, apparently, Trump believes his golf courses should not be beholden to any laws, environmental or otherwise. His clubs, for example,  employ massive amounts of undocumented immigrants even as Trump viciously rails against the immigrants who enter at our southern border. Trump also battled the government of Scotland for years because he believed the presence of wind turbines to be an abomination. And at his Bedminster golf course in New Jersey, he was cited by that state’s Department of Environmental Protection when he cut down trees and disturbed wetlands.

This isn’t even the first time that this particular golf course was in the news for clearing trees. Back in 2011, the Washington Post reported that the Trump Organization had mowed down over 400 trees along the Potomac River, all so that the people paying $100,000 to join and another $700 per month to be members could have a better view of the water.

In a thoroughly Trumpian move, they replaced some of those trees with a giant American flag, and in the process they created an environmental nightmare, leaving migratory birds and bald eagles with nowhere to go.

Not much, it seems, has changed since 2011 at the golf course, which Trump has visited over 40 times since becoming president.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Trump Golf Course Illegally Cut Down Protected Trees

Trump Golf Course Illegally Cut Down Protected Trees

Late last month, the Trump Organization decided to clear-cut a bunch of large trees at Trump National DC, its golf course in Loudoun County, Virginia. Then, they just threw all the trees in the Potomac River.

However, it turns out that it was a protected area, and therefore removing the trees — not to mention throwing them in the river — was completely illegal.

First there’s the part where tossing the trees in the river is a safety hazard. Then there’s the fact that regulations require permits to cut down trees on that part of the river because it is designated as being prone to flood. Next, this was no small removal operation; Loudoun County officials said that the golf course cleared nearly three-quarters of an acre of land. Finally, removing the trees leads to increased sediment in the water and ends up, eventually, polluting the Chesapeake Bay.

But, apparently, Trump believes his golf courses should not be beholden to any laws, environmental or otherwise. His clubs, for example,  employ massive amounts of undocumented immigrants even as Trump viciously rails against the immigrants who enter at our southern border. Trump also battled the government of Scotland for years because he believed the presence of wind turbines to be an abomination. And at his Bedminster golf course in New Jersey, he was cited by that state’s Department of Environmental Protection when he cut down trees and disturbed wetlands.

This isn’t even the first time that this particular golf course was in the news for clearing trees. Back in 2011, the Washington Post reported that the Trump Organization had mowed down over 400 trees along the Potomac River, all so that the people paying $100,000 to join and another $700 per month to be members could have a better view of the water.

In a thoroughly Trumpian move, they replaced some of those trees with a giant American flag, and in the process they created an environmental nightmare, leaving migratory birds and bald eagles with nowhere to go.

Not much, it seems, has changed since 2011 at the golf course, which Trump has visited over 40 times since becoming president.

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World