Tag: retirement
Thom Tillis

After Trump Attacks, North Carolina's Sen. Tillis Says He'll Quit

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who had been poised for a highly competitive 2026 Senate race, announced Sunday that he will not run again.

His decision came shortly after he cast a “no” vote on a procedural motion tied to President Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” Saturday. Following Tillis' vote, Trump launched a series of attacks against him via social media, threatening to back primary challenge against the North Carolina senator for opposing his domestic bill.

In a statement released Sunday afternoon, Tillis said, “In Washington over the last few years, it’s become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species.”

He continued: "As many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven’t exactly been excited about running for another term. That is true since the choice is between spending another six years navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home. It’s not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re‑election.”

Tillis' announcement led to strong reactions on social media.

Political commentator Sarah Longwell wrote on the social platform X: "Would be cool if instead of unconditional surrender these guys would use their power to beat back the forces that have so degraded the institutions they took an oath to protect."

Analyst Michael Baharaeen, reacting to the news, said: "Whoa. Well, there's one crucial building block in the Dems' uphill battle to winning back the Senate. This and ME are likely to be among the party's best pick-up opportunities of the cycle."

Journalist Vince Coglianese wrote: "Right after Trump announces that he’s searching for a Thom Tillis replacement, Tillis throws in the towel. He’s retiring."

Democratic strategist David Bergstein wrote: "The work that is being done by so many to shine a spotlight on how bad this bill is has created an unescapable political vice for the most vulnerable GOP Senator."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Tina Smith

Smith Retirement Will Open Up Senate Seat In Minnesota

Democratic Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota announced on Thursday that she won’t seek reelection in 2026.

“This decision is not political, it is entirely personal,” she said in a statement, citing that while she entered the Senate with no grandchildren, she and her husband now have four who live nearby. “But it's not lost upon me that our country is in need of strong, progressive leadership—right now maybe more than ever.”

“We have a deep bench of political talent in Minnesota, a group of leaders that are more than ready to pick up the work and carry us forward,” she added.

Smith, age 66, was appointed to the seat following then-Sen. Al Franken’s resignation in 2017. She subsequently won the seat’s 2018 special election and its 2020 election for a full term.

Shortly after Smith’s announcement, Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan jumped into the race.

“I love Minnesota and my intention is to run for United States Senate and continue to serve the people of this state,” she said in a statement. “I’ll make a formal announcement later this month. In the meantime, I’m talking with community and my family and friends. I will have more to say soon.”

Meanwhile, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who ran as vice president on the 2024 Democratic ticket, is also considering entering the Senate race, according to Politico.

Minnesota is a blue-leaning state, but it’s not the safest place on the map. Republican candidates have won five of 16 Senate races since 1980, and in 2008, Democrat Al Franken eked out a victory, winning by 0.01 percentage points—just 312 votes—over Republican Norm Coleman. And last year, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris won the state by just over fourpoints.

The state is a must-win for Democrats in 2026 if they want any shot at retaking the Senate majority. The chamber currently stands at 53 Republicans to 47 Democrats.

Smith is the second Democratic senator to announce they won’t seek reelection, opening up a path for the party to bring in younger, fresher voices.

In January, Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan announced he won’t seek reelection in 2026, after serving two terms. This means that 2026 will be the second election cycle in a row where Democrats must defend an open Senate seat in Michigan, a state Trump took in 2024. Last year, Democrat Elissa Slotkin won her Senate race by just 0.3 points.

The Cook Political Report, a reliable race-rating outlet, considers Peters' Michigan seat to be a toss-up, along with the seat held by Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia.

As Daily Kos reported in December, winning back the Senate for Democrats is a long, treacherous road. They must not only defend six seats in 2026 and 2028 that were decided by fewer than 5 points, but they must also gain three to four seats to reach the majority in 2028, depending on whether a Democrat or Republican wins the White House that year.

Now, with Smith and Peters set to exit, there will be many opportunities for new leaders with fresh ideas to introduce themselves.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

When Not To Save For Retirement

When Not To Save For Retirement

By Mark Miller

CHICAGO (Reuters) – Everyone should save for retirement – that is a mantra we have all heard endlessly.

But for many people, saving for retirement actually should be fairly low on the financial priority list – well behind the more immediate goals of building a rainy day fund and reducing their consumer debt.

That is evident in new research by the Pew Charitable Trust examining causes and impacts of financial shocks that hit Americans. A Pew survey of more than 7,800 households found that most households have failed to build enough liquid savings outside retirement accounts to respond to emergency needs.

Sixty percent of households experienced a financial shock in the past 12 months – typically lost income due to unemployment, illness, injury, death or a major home or vehicle repair. The financial setbacks affect people of all ages and racial groups, although shocks disproportionately affect younger and minority households.

However, even higher-income workers grapple with the problem. Thirty-five percent households earning more than $85,000 reported a financial shock in the past year.

When income shocks come along, lower-income households – those with income below $25,000 – have enough savings to replace only six days of household income, Pew found. Households with more than $85,000 can replace just 40 days of income from savings.

SEEKING BALANCE

“We don’t talk enough about the balance people need to strike for themselves between consumption, preparing for the short-term and preparing for the long term. All three are important,” said Clinton Key, research officer with Pew’s financial security and mobility project.

Another sign of imbalance: a sizable share of financially stressed households also are saving for retirement, according to Pew. Thirty-five percent of households with no liquid saving said that they do own a retirement account.

These accounts often are used as emergency funds – 23 percent of workers have taken a loan or early withdrawal from their retirement savings, according to a 2015 survey by the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies. But withdrawals from IRAs and 401(k)s by investors younger than 59-1/2 are subject to a 10 percent withdrawal penalty in most cases, plus any income tax that is due.

In addition, the paperwork necessary for getting your money out of a retirement account easily can take a couple of weeks. That is too long to meet some emergency needs.

DIGGING OUT OF DEBT

Eliminating high-interest consumer debt is another priority that generally should come ahead of retirement saving. The percentage of older households carrying debt is troubling: in 2014, some 47 percent of baby boomers still carried mortgage debt (median balance: $90,000), according to the Pew study. Forty-one percent carried credit card debt and 35 percent had an auto loan.

“Getting rid of consumer debt by the time you retire is huge,” said Dirk Cotton, a financial planner and retirement researcher who blogs at the Retirement Cafe (http://bit.ly/1nlxKYe). “I have three kids in their twenties, and they’re constantly reading that they need to be saving for retirement. But I tell them there are more important things. One of them is, don’t run up a huge amount of consumer debt.”

Retirement researchers often focus on the risk of outliving retirement savings, but Cotton thinks debt – and the absence of liquid saving – poses a bigger risk when financial shocks occur. His research shows that debt leaves households vulnerable to multiple financial shocks. During the Great Recession of 2009, households over age 65 accounted for 8.3 percent of all bankruptcy filings, up from 7.8 percent in 2006, according to the Institute for Financial Literacy.

“It can start with a job loss that forces you to borrow on the credit card to meet living expenses,” Cotton said. “But as the balance grows, the interest rate gets higher and higher, and the credit ultimately is cut off. Now you have a financially devastating problem that is really difficult to escape.”

A better approach, he argues, is to focus on debt reduction and aim to maximize retirement income through delayed filing for Social Security benefits.

The prioritization questions are striking, considering that policymakers are pushing for new ways to get us to save more for retirement.

California and Illinois are among the states creating plans that would require employers to cover nearly all workers. Just this week, the Obama administration rolled out a proposal to make it easier for small businesses to band together to form 401(k) plans. ().

Those are admirable initiatives – but they need to be coupled with sound advice about where the first available dollar should go.

“You can easily get the impression that the biggest retirement planning problem is how much of your portfolio can you spend every year and not go broke,” Cotton said. “But most people don’t have a big portfolio, and we don’t hear nearly enough about this huge group of other risks people face.”

(The writer is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own)

(Editing by Matthew Lewis)

Photo: Debt doesn’t melt like snow, unfortunately. 

Getting Started: Are You Saving Enough For Retirement?

Getting Started: Are You Saving Enough For Retirement?

By Carolyn Bigda, Chicago Tribune (TNS)

Saving for retirement is no easy task, but a new study says you don’t need to be a Powerball winner to put away enough cash for old age.

According to the study by Fidelity Investments, 45 percent of those surveyed in 2015 were on track to cover essential expenses during their retirement, up from 38 percent in 2013.

Although that’s still less than half the population, the percentage is heading in the right direction. One reason: People are saving more.

From 2013 to 2015, the median savings rate among survey participants jumped from 7.3 percent to 8.5 percent.

Millennials, those age 25 to 34, made the biggest leap of any group, with a median savings rate of 7.5 percent in 2015, up from 5.8 percent two years before. (The study was based on responses from 4,650 people age 25 to 75 who earn at least $20,000 annually.)

For young investors, a higher savings rate is especially beneficial.

“They have time on their side and a long work history ahead of them,” said John Sweeney, executive vice president of retirement and investing strategies at Fidelity. “So the biggest thing that they can do is to increase their savings rate.”

Although millennials are socking away more, they still fall short of the 15 percent savings rate that many financial advisers, along with Fidelity, recommend for retirement.

“If millennials doubled their savings rate, it would have a very significant improvement on their retirement preparedness,” Sweeney said.

You can see the impact for yourself by using Fidelity’s Retirement Score calculator. The calculator will ask your age, annual salary, how much you’ve saved for retirement so far and a few other financial details. It also makes assumptions about the future, like market returns and Social Security benefits.

In the end, you get a score, which is then ranked on a scale of colors ranging from red (the worst) to dark green (the best).

If your score puts you in dark green, you should be able to cover all of your essential costs in retirement, plus fun stuff like travel. Land in the red, and you’re at risk of not being able to cover even your basic needs.

The 15 percent recommended savings rate includes any employer match you might get in your 401(k) or other company-sponsored retirement plan. The closer you can get to — or even exceed — that goal, the better off you’ll be.

Take a 27-year-old today with $10,000 in retirement savings and an annual salary of $50,000. His score lands in the red if he saves $300 per month and retires at age 67, when he is eligible for full Social Security benefits.

But if he saves twice as much per month, his score changes to light green. (Light green means you can cover your essential expenses in retirement but not all of your discretionary ones.)

If you can’t save more for retirement, changing your portfolio’s asset allocation can also brighten your financial future.

“It’s not as impactful as other steps,” Sweeney said, “but it does make a difference.”

In the example above, the 27-year-old had an allocation of 70 percent stocks and 30 percent bonds and cash. But if the portfolio mix was too conservative — say, with only 20 percent in stocks and the rest in bonds and cash — his score fell. Likewise, the score took a hit if he invested 100 percent in stocks.

For a young investor, Fidelity recommends putting 90 percent in stocks and the remaining 10 percent in bonds.

ABOUT THE WRITER

Carolyn Bigda writes Getting Started for the Chicago Tribune. yourmoney@tribune.com.

©2016 Chicago Tribune. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Photo: Retirement Plan. American Advisors Group via Flickr

 

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World