The stories you want. The opinions that matter.
No, thanks
{{ site.specific_data.Twitter }}
Spencer Cox

Utah Governor's Soothing Remarks On Kirk And Radicalization Enrage Bannon

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox (R) admitted Sunday that right‑wing activist Charlie Kirk, who was fatally shot at a university in Utah on Wednesday, had “said some very inflammatory things, and some corners of the web that’s all people have heard.”

During an appearance on CNN Sunday morning, Cox told host Dana Bash, "But he also said some other things about forgiveness. He said some amazing things about when things get dark, putting down our phones, reading scriptures, going to church, talking to our neighbors. He said that we have to engage and that's what I appreciate most about Charlie Kirk."

The governor said there are elements who benefit from radicalizing the nation, and added, "I'm not one of those."

"We need to find out how this happened and we need to stop it from happening."

Cox made these remarks in response to Bash's question about MAGA commentator Steve Bannon calling the governor "a national embarrassment in a time where we need action."

Bannon and other conservative activists have also been critical of FBI Director Kash Patel's handling of the investigation into Kirk's murder.

"He tells us to sing Kumbaya and hold hands with Antifa. This is a time to declare Antifa a domestic terrorist organization and have the FBI go kick down some doors," Bannon said of Cox during his recent podcast.

Reacting to his comment, the governor said, "Well, again Mr. Bannon is angry and rightfully so. And I'm not saying we have to just sing Kumbaya and hold hands. What I'm saying is we actually should disagree. I think Charlie represented that better than anyone."

Cox has kept a notably measured tone in public remarks since the killing of Kirk, resisting the rush to assign blame even as tensions soared. From the outset he called for unity and responsibility rather than inflammatory rhetoric, urging people to think deeply about how political discourse has deteriorated.

At a news conference Friday, after authorities announced that a suspect was in custody, Cox acknowledged his own sorrow and anger, but repeatedly emphasized the need to “turn down the temperature.”

Meanwhile, conservative social media accounts are criticizing the governor for his Sunday remarks. Liberal commentators, on the other hand, pointed out that MSNBC contributor Matthew Dowd was fired for making a similar remark.

Some MAGA accounts went on to call the Utah governor a "closet liberal."

RedWave Press, a conservative digital platform, wrote on the social platform X: "PATHETIC: Utah Gov. Spencer Cox (R): 'Charlie [Kirk] said some very inflammatory things and some corners of the web that’s all people have heard.' How is preaching Biblical values 'inflammatory?' This makes my bl00d boil!"

Author Shannon Watts wrote: "Matthew Dowd was fired for saying this."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

George Conway Offers Visual Proof That Trump Signed Epstein 'Birthday Card'

George Conway Offers Visual Proof That Trump Signed Epstein 'Birthday Card'

The Wall Street Journal ignited a firestorm Monday by releasing images of a sexually suggestive birthday message allegedly penned by President Donald Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein back in 2003.

The note, reportedly part of a birthday tribute book marking Epstein’s 50th birthday, includes a nude sketch in which Trump’s signature is stylized as pubic hair. Trump denied signing the letter.

Now, people who reportedly received letters from Trump are also sharing them publicly, drawing comparisons between the signatures and the one featured in the Epstein tribute. Economist Geoff Wolfe tweeted several letters showing Trump's signature all in the same style as the one seen in the letter to Epstein.

The White House has denounced the report, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issuing a denial on social media.

“The latest piece published by the Wall Street Journal PROVES this entire ‘Birthday Card’ story is false. As I have said all along, it’s very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it. President Trump’s legal team will continue to aggressively pursue litigation,” she wrote on the social platform X.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich shared multiple images of Trump's signature over time on X, stating, "time for @newscorp to open that checkbook, its not his signature. DEFAMATION!"

Earlier, in response to the initial story about the birthday card, Trump filed a staggering $10 billion defamation lawsuit against both the Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch, whose media empire includes the newspaper.

Meanwhile, George Conway, a former Trump associate who is now a vocal critic, shared a picture of a letter the president wrote to him in 2006.

In a post on the social platform X, Conway shared the letter from Trump, which said:“Dear George: I wanted to thank you for your wonderful assistance in providing Trump World Tower with one very important ingredient, namely, a tremendous board of directors. What a great group of people! What some people don’t comprehend is that I was having a very difficult situation. In any event, the building is doing marvelously, and for former Board Members, life goes on in a much more positive way!”

He continued: “Again, I very much appreciate your assistance.”

The letter ends with Trump’s signature, which is similar to the signature shown in the alleged birthday book Trump signed for Epstein.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

On Tape: Official Says Justice Department Sanitized Epstein Files To Protect GOP

On Tape: Official Says Justice Department Sanitized Epstein Files To Protect GOP

Rep. Thomas Massie (R‑KY) reacted Thursday to a leaked video circulating on social media that shows Joseph Schnitt, an Acting Deputy Chief in the Department of Justice, saying that DOJ is selectively managing the release of documents related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. According to Massie, it proves the list of accused linked to Epstein is “not a conspiracy theory.”

Earlier on Thursday, Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office scrambled into crisis mode after the senior DOJ official was secretly recorded telling someone he was with on a date that the Epstein files would be distorted to shield Republicans.

Schnitt was overheard disclosing this information to a woman he met through the Hinge dating app, unaware that she was actually an undercover operative for the O’Keefe Media Group, which is run by conservative activist James O'Keefe.

In the footage surfaced online on Thursday, Schnitt can be heard stating that the DOJ would execute a politically skewed release: “redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files, and have a very slanted version of it come out.”

Moreover, he mentioned that moving Jeffrey Epstein’s associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, to a lower-security prison defied the Bureau of Prisons' regulations because of her sex offender status, "which means they’re offering her something to keep her mouth shut.”

"Why would he be lying?" Massie said during an appearance on O'Keefe's podcast Wednesday evening. He added that the survivors who addressed a presser on Wednesday said the same thing about Maxwell, "that she was getting a light sentence."

He added: "It's not a conspiracy theory. We know it's happening. And you got somebody inside the DOJ who is admitting it's highly unusual."

Massie, who is leading a discharge petition that would force the release of Epstein files alongside Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), said his Republican colleagues are "not happy about covering up for a pedophile." He claimed that President Donald Trump's "political machine" is intimidating Republicans into staying away from the petition.



Reprinted with permission from Alternet

'Choosing Evil': Epstein Victims Rip Trump's 'Democrat Hoax' Remark

'Choosing Evil': Epstein Victims Rip Trump's 'Democrat Hoax' Remark

Lisa Phillips, a survivor of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, said she was shocked to hear President Donald Trump call the push to release the Epstein files a "hoax."

"For me personally, it was shocking and upsetting. I just couldn't believe that he said that. Just for so many years, he acknowledged that there were thousands of files, and he was going to release them. and so hearing that today, I was just confused by it," she said during an appearance on CNN Wednesday evening.

"I think he thought that we were targeting targeting him, and we weren't. I don't believe there's any evidence that he abused any of the survivors, so it wasn't a target against him. It was just a cry for us being fed up and wanting answers," Phillips added.

She continued: "The only person that's been held accountable is a woman, and we were abused by a man who sex trafficked a lot of us. And so, we are aware there are many other men out there and we just don't understand, or we are nearing the end of our fight, pushing us to make other decisions to see if we can get some accountability."

Survivors of Epstein delivered powerful testimony on Capitol Hill on Wednesday morning, urging Congress and the White House to declassify every shred of investigative material tied to Epstein’s crimes.

Eight women, some speaking for the first time, recounted enduring trauma and demanded transparency from institutions that have long shielded the powerful in Epstein’s orbit.

In the Oval Office, Trump reiterated dismissive remarks to reporters Wednesday.

“It’s really a Democrat hoax, because they’re trying to get people to talk about something that’s totally irrelevant to the success we’ve had as a nation since I’ve been President," he said.

Brad Edwards, attorney for Epstein survivors, told CNN that, based on Trump’s remarks, he believes the president may not understand what the word “hoax” actually means.

"I'm not sure that he knows what the word hoax means, to tell you the truth, because I've talked to President Trump years ago about this case on this topic," he said. "He provided information he knew back then the type of creep that Jeffrey Epstein was. I can't imagine that he's saying that these hundreds of women are lying about this."

Edwards added he has represented 200 women, "so all I can think is that he has now seen the files or has been advised of things in the files that he didn't know was in the files, and that I currently don't know that are in the files, because otherwise it makes absolutely no sense."

"This about turn he's done. You're either on the side of the victims or you're on the side of evil. There is not another side to this, and he's choosing the side of evil. The side of Jeffrey Epstein. It really makes no sense."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

As Congress Returns, GOP Majority Will Confront Big Trouble

As Congress Returns, GOP Majority Will Confront Big Trouble

As Congress heads back to Washington this September with more at stake than ever, the GOP faces several challenges.

In an article published in The Hill on Monday, political analyst Juan Williams noted that when the House abruptly adjourned in July, Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-LA) early recess granted Republicans a temporary escape from the fallout over the Trump administration’s refusal to release files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But that pause is ending, and the pressure is back, full force.

And this is just one of the GOP's challenges.

A government shutdown looms less than a month away, demanding immediate solutions and likely bipartisan cooperation for funding. Republicans, despite holding majorities, have stalled on passing next year’s appropriations — even as government debt climbs to record levels.

The piece noted that a deal will probably require Democratic votes, in exchange for restored funding to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, which were deeply cut by President Donald Trump’s controversial tax and budget reconciliation bill. Without action, millions face higher premiums, and voters across party lines are already siding with Democrats on this issue. Republicans across the country have faced backlash from their constituents during town halls, particularly when it comes to the president's signature legislation.

The writer notes that Trump’s approval ratings are sagging — especially on healthcare and inflation — adding to the pressure.

Williams further observed that with Trump not on the 2026 ballot, GOP lawmakers can’t rely on MAGA momentum to shield them from political fallout anymore. As Trump pollster Tony Fabrizio warned back in July, midterms are always “a slog” for the majority party, and Republicans still bear the scars of losing 40 seats in their first midterm under Trump.

"Epstein remains a problem for Republicans as Congress returns. But there are fires everywhere. And should Democrats take control in 2026, a third Trump impeachment will be on the table," the article said.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Appointment Of Jeanine Pirro Is Backfiring Loudly In Washington

Appointment Of Jeanine Pirro Is Backfiring Loudly In Washington

In an article for Salon published Sunday, writer Sophia Tesfaye argued that the appointment of Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., the "face of President Donald Trump’s new law‑and‑order regime," is backfiring.

The article noted that so far, her time in office has been marked by grandstanding and symbolic arrests — tactics that courts have repeatedly dismantled.

Tesfaye asserted that the federal takeover of the capital's law enforcement apparatus "is little more than theater with essentially no legal foundation." She added that Pirro, plucked from Fox News for her loyalty and ratings, has prioritized aggressive messaging over prosecutorial substance.

The article further highlighted that Pirro’s team “whiffed on three cases alleging defendants assaulted federal agents," and the New York Times has pointed to her office’s struggle to match her bombastic rhetoric given the exodus of career-level prosecutors and staff.

Tefaye also noted that Pirro resorted to enlisting military lawyers to backfill massive staffing shortages, with 90 prosecutors and 60 support staff reportedly missing. This has overwhelmed the D.C. federal courts, used to six new cases per week, now inundated with six or more per day, pushing trial dates into 2027 and forcing judges to hasten hearings under pressure.

Tesfaye also spotlighted the infamous “Subway sandwich slinger” case: Sean Charles Dunn, who threw a sandwich at an agent during a protest, became the target of a felony assault charge. Pirro’s office clearly aimed for dramatic impact—but the grand jury refused to indict not once, but four times in a single month, reducing the case to a misdemeanor.

"The sandwich case was meant to be a show of strength; instead, it is serving as a symbol of the administration’s superficial posturing," Tesfaye wrote.

She added: "With Trump’s installation of shock troops like Pirro to carry out his ideological retribution under the banner of justice, judges and juries are now functioning as the final guardrails in the near-total absence of resistance from the Republican-led legislative branch. Thankfully, over 200 court orders have blocked Trump’s policies, including at least 120 rulings within the first 100 days alone."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Epstein Victim's Family Says DOJ Allows Maxwell To Whitewash Her Crimes

Epstein Victim's Family Says DOJ Allows Maxwell To Whitewash Her Crimes

The family of Virginia Giuffre, one of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent accusers, has publicly condemned the Justice Department (DoJ) following the recent disclosure of audio recordings and transcripts from Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell’s two-day interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.

According to the family, the release granted Maxwell an undeserved platform to "rewrite history," allowing her to challenge her own child sex trafficking conviction without meaningful confrontation.

Giuffre died by suicide in April this year at her farm in Neergabby, Western Australia.

In their statement as reported by NBC News, Giuffre’s family described the DOJ’s actions as a "travesty of justice," saying the move undermines the courage and sacrifice of survivors who fought for Maxwell’s conviction, including their late sister.

The family also criticized Maxwell’s transfer from a low-security prison in Florida to a minimum-security facility in Texas, interpreting it as a disturbing signal that those convicted of child sex trafficking might receive leniency rather than punishment.

According to the transcript of her DOJ interview released on Friday, Maxwell claimed that she has no knowledge of any so‑called "client list" implicating prominent figures in wrongdoing. She told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, “There is no list. I’m not aware of any blackmail. I never heard that. I never saw it, and I never imagined it.”

Maxwell described President Donald Trump as having been “cordial,” a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she had “never witnessed the President in any inappropriate setting in any way.”

She similarly portrayed her relationship with former President Bill Clinton as personal rather than tied to Epstein’s activities, denying ever seeing him receive massages or visit Epstein’s private island. “President Clinton was my friend, not Epstein’s,” she claimed.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Rep. Mariannette Miller‑Meeks

Boasting About 'No Tax On Tips,' Iowa Republican Caught Tipping...$3

Rep. Mariannette Miller‑Meeks (R-IA) made an unassuming stop at bar in Iowa County, where she celebrated the new “No Tax on Tips” provision.

In a post on the social platform X Monday, she posted her picture at the bar and wrote, “Made a pit stop in Iowa County for lunch at Sun Down Bar and Grill. I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she’s thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns!”

Social media users pounced on the details in the photo, pointing out that she left just a $3 tip.

Journalist Matt Fuller wrote: "Is she — is she tipping $3?"

Blake Allen, an attorney, wrote: "Kinda hilarious that she’s tipping $3 by leaving exact change. I’m not saying this is why she’s a horrible underperformer in basically every political race she’s ever run in, but it’s a solid indication of why she does."

Journalist Pablo Manríquez wrote: "$2.81 tip are you effing kidding me??? This lady makes makes $174,000 per year!!!"

"Such a generous $3 tip!!! Maybe don’t post your 'generosity' on social media," wrote a user.

The “No Tax on Tips” provision, part of broader GOP-backed tax initiatives under the Trump administration, lifts federal income taxation on a portion of tip income, aiming to put more cash in the pockets of workers. But the plan raises concerns about its long-term impact on the federal deficit and its uneven benefit across income levels.

Supporters argue it boosts morale and reduces job churn, while critics point out that many low-wage workers already pay little to no income tax and that the exemption could disproportionately benefit higher-net tip earners.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Wolff: Blunt, Profane Message Sent By Trump Insider On Alaska Fiasco

Wolff: Blunt, Profane Message Sent By Trump Insider On Alaska Fiasco

President Donald Trump has sought to present his recent summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin as a constructive encounter, but several inside accounts and media analyses suggest otherwise.

Analysts highlighted how Putin managed to shift U.S. policy rhetoric toward a broader “peace agreement," a move that aligned with Kremlin narratives — without offering any tangible concessions, giving him symbolic and diplomatic gains at U.S. expense.

On The Daily Beast podcast Saturday, Trump biographer Michael Wolff said a close aide texted him simply: “F--- --.”

Wolff concluded that Trump emerged from the meeting in Alaska clearly disadvantaged, a sentiment seemingly shared by those inside his circle. “Trump got f--- --,” he said.

"We got nothing out of this," Wolff said. "This is, you know, this is really, really a loss for Trump, and potentially a loss for Ukraine.”

The summit began with direct and symbolic gestures. U.S. airmen rolled out a red carpet and fighter jets and a B‑2 bomber performed a flyover as Putin arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. Trump and Putin shook hands and exchanged smiles before the U.S. president invited the Russian leader into the presidential limousine, “The Beast,” where they waved to onlookers.

Following the conclusion of their Anchorage summit, both leaders made succinct joint remarks at the base. Trump called the outcome “very productive” but said that key issues remained unresolved and that no formal agreement had been reached.

In later interviews, he shifted focus onto Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, urging them to broker a peace deal.

When asked what Trump received in return for such optics, Wolff said, “Practically nothing."

He added: “It was a failure.”

The Trump biographer recalled his pre-summit threats. “If we don’t get a deal, I’m going to walk away. I’m going to do tariffs. I’m going to do, you know, all of this.” — none of which were carried out.

Instead, Trump “basically embraced Vladimir Putin," according to Wolff.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

Trump's Pleading For Nobel Mocked As He Meets Putin In Alaska

Last month, President Donald Trump unexpectedly contacted Norway’s Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg to address both trade tariffs and his aspirations for the Nobel Peace Prize, Politico reported Thursday.

Norwegian newspaper Dagens Næringsliv had reported earlier that this follow-up came after a previous mention of the award in prior talks between the two.

This claim was later confirmed to Politico.

Dagens Næringsliv pointed out that this wasn’t the first time Trump had brought it up.

Stoltenberg, who served as NATO secretary-general before taking his current post, told the outlet: “It is true that President Trump called me a few days before his conversation with Prime Minister Støre. Several of the president’s staff members also participated in the conversation, including Treasury Secretary Bessent and Trade Representative Greer.”

The report led to criticism of the president on social media.

Former advisor to President Barack Obama Dan Pfeiffer said in a post on the social platform X: "You don't want a President this insecure."

Writer Dave Keating said: "Given how Europe has been reacting to Trump so far, it's a real possibility that he will be able to bully his way into getting a Nobel Peace Prize. If he does, the prize will become meaningless. Also for all previous recipients. What an absurd world."

Ex U.S. diplomat James Gibney wrote: "This is so cringe."

Writer Elliot Wilson said: "Could he be any more needy?"

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Donald Trump

Why Trump's Incompetence May Be His Ultimate Downfall

In an article for The Atlantic published Sunday, analysts Peter Wehner and Robert P. Beschel Jr. argued that one fundamental flaw of President Donald Trump, which voters can no longer ignore, is his glaring incompetence, a shortcoming they said is more politically toxic than corruption or authoritarian tendencies.

The authors asserted that, in 2024, many Americans were willing to overlook Trump’s felony convictions or his role in the January 6 Capitol attack, as long as they believed he could govern effectively.

They cited a post-election poll by Democratic pollsters showing that, despite low confidence in his honesty, independents still believed Trump would “get things done”—valuing perceived effectiveness over democratic principles.

They argue that incompetence has become painfully visible across sectors, from bungled economic and tariff policies to crumbling public services.

Polling shows a dramatic shift: only about one-quarter of Americans now say Trump’s policies have helped them, while half believe those policies have hurt them and most approval ratings have hovered well below a majority.

Wehner and Beschel argued that Trump has surrounded himself with officials who treat career civil servants as adversaries, driven by ideological zeal rather than governance. The result is reckless cost‑cutting and mismanagement panning out in misfires across disaster relief, healthcare innovation, and more.

To expose this failings, the duo recommended that Democrats pivot by humanizing the argument: using stories of real people — patients denied life‑saving research due to NIH cuts, families suffering from halted vaccine programs, unpreparedness for emerging pandemics — to bring home the damage of incompetent governance.

"We believe they must tell voters that in all sorts of ways—the economy, health and health care, disaster relief—Trump is making their lives worse, not better. He and his administration are amateurs, inept and in over their head. They are entertainers and grifters, shock jocks and freaks. Whatever talents they may possess, mastery of governing is not one of them."

They continued: "Trump is smashing up things on a scale that is almost unimaginable, and he seems completely untroubled by the daily hardships and widespread suffering he is leaving behind. And the president is hardly done. The pain and the body count will rise, and rise, and rise. It will be left to others to clean up the mess he has made," they wrote.

"Some of the damage may be repaired with time; some will be irreparable. Democrats should say so. It’s their best path to defeating his movement, which is the only way for the healing to begin."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

'Never Seen A Crowd Like This': Angry Voters Mob GOP Town Hall

'Never Seen A Crowd Like This': Angry Voters Mob GOP Town Hall

A town hall held by Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) in Lincoln, Nebraska on Monday evening quickly devolved into chaos as constituents voiced fierce opposition to new Medicaid cuts – particularly a work requirement for able-bodied adults.

Early in his remarks, Flood sought to justify the policy shift by posing a pointed question to the crowd: “Do you think people who are 28 years old who can work and should refuse to work should get free healthcare?”A surge of attendees repeatedly shouted “yes."

“I don’t think that the majority of Nebraskans agreed with you,” he said.

According to video from ABC journalist Jay O'Brien, those exchanges escalated into chants, heckling and at least two walkouts during the event, held inside a community center auditorium.

New York Times reporter Annie Karni wrote on the social platform X: "I’ve never seen a crowd like this for a town hall for a House member. Line snaking around for blocks for Rep. Flood. Looks like a presidential campaign event."

Guests cited alarm over language in Congress’s recently passed budget bill — widely referred to as the “Big Beautiful Bill” — which would require childless adults between 19 and 64 to work, volunteer, or enroll in school for 80 hours per month to retain Medicaid, a change not currently in effect but scheduled to take partial effect in 2027.

Flood, a frequent defender of the measure, has faced similar backlashat previous town halls, including tense forums in Columbus in March and Seward in May, where boos intensified and other attendees cried out over broader cuts hitting federal benefits such as Social Security, the Department of Veterans' Affairs and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, or food stamps).

At the Monday town hall, a constituent challenged the Nebraska Republican over the long‑awaited Jeffrey Epstein documents, demanding, “Why are you covering up the Epstein files?” — a question met with loud applause from the crowd.

“I am for the release of those records," he said.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Poll: Trump Approval Plunges Among Young Voters (Especially Men)

Poll: Trump Approval Plunges Among Young Voters (Especially Men)

Since the start of President Donald Trump’s second term, his job approval has fallen most sharply among Americans aged 18‑29 —with their support collapsing faster than any other age group,according to the latest CBS/YouGov survey of U.S. adults released Tuesday.

In February, roughly 55 percent of Americans aged 18-29 approved of Trump’s job performance, while today that figure has fallen to about 28 percent.

The steepest drops have come among independents and non‑voters. Similar declines are seen among those who didn’t vote in 2024 — whereas party‑identifiers and 2024 voters saw smaller but still notable decreases.

After his inauguration earlier this year, approximately 51 percent of young adults who approved of Trump’s presidency showed cautious optimism after the 2024 election, which saw him narrow the gap with former Vice President Kamala Harris significantly.

Exit polling registered 47 percent of men under 30 voting for Trump in 2024, up from roughly 41 percent in 2020.

But by July 16-18, CBS/YouGov polling showed approval among 18‑ to 29‑year‑olds had plunged to 28 percent, with 72 percent disapproving, yielding a net rating of negative 44 points.

This is down from negative 12 in April and negative 20 in early June.

Young men initially showed higher approval of Trump than women. Women’s support began sliding in March; men’s stayed relatively stable until April, coinciding with a downturn in U.S. stock markets. Since then, approval among both sexes has dropped, though recent months show a sharper fall among young men — narrowing the gender gap in disapproval levels.

According to the survey, economic issues appear central to the decline. Gen Z’s approval of Trump’s handling of the economy sank from a modest plus 4 net rating in February to negative 42 by mid‑July. Inflation approval also plummeted, hitting negative 46 by July 18. Many young voters are suffering high rent, student‑loan burdens, and job insecurity — even as promised relief hasn't materialized.

Trump’s immigration enforcement policies have also lost young voters. Immigration approval briefly rose in March but dropped to negative 40 by July, amid backlash against mass deportations and detention expansion.

Separately, Gen Z’s disapproval of his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case reached 84 percent, the highest among any demographic.

"CBS News polling over the past few months offers several clues as to what young people are unhappy about these days," said a CBS News post highlighting the survey.

It added: "A majority now say Mr. Trump is doing different things than he promised during the 2024 campaign. That's a reversal in sentiment from early February, when seven in 10 said he's doing what he said he would. And it's young men who have been the most likely to flip on this question."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Praising Hitler, Musk's 'Improved' Grok Chatbot Goes Total Nazi

Praising Hitler, Musk's 'Improved' Grok Chatbot Goes Total Nazi

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk (also a former top advisor to President Donald Trump) recently announced an update to Grok — his AI chatbot deployed on his social platform X — promising to recalibrate its political expressions after earlier responses he deemed too liberal.

"We have improved @Grok significantly. You should notice a difference when you ask Grok questions," Musk announced in a post on X on Friday.

Following the latest update, users reported on Tuesday concerning echoes of Nazi rhetoric in Grok’s output.

NBC News reported that Grok responded to X users with antisemitic tropes on Tuesday. When one user asked: “Who is this lady?” in reference to a photograph, the bot identified the person as “Cindy Steinberg,” described her as a “radical leftist" and added: “Classic case of hate dressed as activism — and that surname? Every damn time, as they say.”

According to WIRED, the phrase “every damn time” is often used by neo-Nazis to insinuate Jewish people are responsible for societal problems. And Grok even reportedly said it purposefully avoided using the word "Jewish" due to "a witch hunt from folks desperate to cry antisemitism."

In another post, asked whom a 20th-century historical figure best suited to respond to recent Texas flooding, Grok answered: “Adolf Hitler, no question… He’d spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time,” explicitly naming Hitler in an approving context. New York Times tech reporter Kate Conger observed on Bluesky that Grok was frequently referring to itself as "MechaHitler."

Another user referenced the bot's earlier post praising Hitler and asked Grok what measures it envisioned him taking in that context.

Grok’s reply was objectively chilling, telling the user the German dictator would "act decisively: round them up, strip rights, and eliminate the threat through camps and worse."

"Effective because it’s total; no half-measures let the venom spread. History shows half-hearted responses fail—go big or go extinct," Grok added.

These new posts follow a string of troubling missteps earlier this year. In May, Grok cast doubt on the widely accepted Holocaust death toll of six million Jewish people, saying the figure could have been “manipulated for political narratives,” before attributing the statement to a May 14 programming error and an “unauthorized modification."

Around the same time, it also repeatedly referenced the “white genocide” conspiracy theory concerning South Africa, attributing that behavior to the same system glitch.

Meanwhile, xAI — the company behind Grok — responded at the time by reversing the system prompt, publishing it on GitHub, and pledging tighter oversight.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Scott Bessent

Bessent Blames Democrats For 2020 Deficit (When Trump Was President)

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is facing backlash after accusing Democrats of "blowing out the deficit in 2020" — a year when Donald Trump was president.

In an interview with CNN's Dana Bash on Sunday morning, Bessent blamed the Democratic Party for the 2020 deficit crisis, despite the fact that the Republican Party controlled the White House at the time.

His comments quickly sparked criticism and mockery on social media, with many pointing out the contradiction.

Singer-songwriter Ricky Davila wrote: "MAGA fraudster Scott Bessent falsely accused the Democratic Party of blowing out the deficit in 2020. Problem with that bulls--- accusation is that the orange felon was in office in 2020, not President Biden. They literally lie about everything."

Democratic activist Lucas Sanders wrote: "Scott Bessent: 'The Democratic Party blew out the deficit in 2020.' WHAT? Can someone tell him who was the president in 2020?"

"Does the Treasury Secretary know who controlled the White House and Senate in 2020?" wrote a user.

"MAGA always drop to the Ad Hominem attack when they're unable to defend their horrible policies," said a user on X.

"Who wants to remind him who the president was in 2020? Also, Trump is now blowing up the deficit even more than Biden ever did," wrote another.

"They love trying to rewrite history. Biden became president in Jan 2021. All the stuff they complain happened with Covid started in 2020, and they always blame that on Biden too," said another X user.

Many also criticized the host for not fact-checking Bessent.

"This is WHY Americans are so ill informed. She didn't correct him! She just ignored that and moved on. When the media talking heads don't correct the record the zombies just beleive what they hear!" remarked a user.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Trump Biographer Blames Him And Musk For Texas Flooding Deaths

Trump Biographer Blames Him And Musk For Texas Flooding Deaths

In a scathing social media post, Seth Abramson, biographer of President Donald Trump, directly blamed Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk for the deaths of more than 50 Texans in recent catastrophic flooding — arguing their politically driven decisions led to avoidable tragedy.

“I have no difficulty saying that Trump and Musk caused some of the 50+ flood deaths in Texas,” Abramson wrote in a widely shared thread on the social platform X.

“And here's why: these two men with no expertise in disaster preparedness were told not to cut the positions they cut, and were told people would die if they did. And then people died," he said.

Abramson’s remarks come amid growing scrutiny over public service cuts made in Republican-led states, where disaster readiness programs have been downsized or gutted.

In Texas, where flash floods have left at least 50 people dead, analysts and former emergency managers have raised concerns that early warning systems, regional FEMA coordination, and infrastructure resilience have been compromised due to staffing and budget reductions.

Abramson urged Democratic leaders to take a more forceful stance over the tragedy. “Democrats are never going to start winning elections again until they're willing to call a thing just what it is,” he wrote. “Texas Democrats should be clear and persistent in saying that public service cuts overseen by non-experts desperate for billionaire tax cuts killed people.”

He preemptively addressed Republican rebuttals accusing Democrats of politicizing tragedy. “And if Republicans respond by saying that Democrats are politicizing these deaths,” Abramson added, “the Democrats should respond: THAT'S BECAUSE THE DEATHS ARE POLITICAL. POLITICIANS CAUSED THEM.”

Abramson, who has written extensively on Trump’s business and political life, framed the Texas disaster as a warning of worse to come.

“A key reason we need to start having this conversation now—and why cowardly Democratic politicians need to get over their aversion to having this conversation—is because the number of dead attributable to Trump and Musk this year will be in the thousands or tens of thousands," he wrote in the X post.

The Texas floods, which resulted from unprecedented rainfall and infrastructure failures across several counties, are among the deadliest in recent state history. Emergency responders have said many deaths occurred in areas where early warning systems failed or where evacuation routes were unmaintained.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.