The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

The Balanced Budget Amendment: Good Politics, Bad Policy

Congressional Republicans are once again pushing for the enactment of a Balanced Budget Amendment. The Amendment, which was introduced by conservative Utah Senator Mike Lee, would require that revenues equal expenditures every year, and that they never exceed 18 percent of the gross domestic product. A two-thirds majority of Congress would be required to exceed those limits or to “levy a new tax or increase the rate of any tax.”

In a political environment where almost all spending has been demonized, it’s easy to understand how the idea of a Balanced Budget Amendment has become popular. While it may be good politics, however, the Balanced Budget Amendment would be terrible policy. As Slate’sDoug Kendall and Dahlia Lithwick put it:

“A balanced budget amendment sounds like a great idea—until you read a little U.S. history and count all the times America spent more in a fiscal year than it raised in taxes and why that was necessary for our very survival….[d]ebt helped fund the War for Independence, complete the Louisiana Purchase, and preserve the Union during the Civil War. Debt not only helped us weather the Great Depression; it also gave us the tools we needed to emerge victorious from two world wars.”

There’s a reason the Constitution specifically grants Congress the authority “to borrow money on the credit of the United States.” In times of crisis, the Balanced Budget Amendment could be a fiscal disaster.

The provision that would require a supermajority to raise taxes also ignores the intent of the Constitution, which empowers Congress “to lay and collect Taxes … to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States.” As Kendall and Lithwick point out, the provision “would remove huge swaths of lawmaking power from majority rule and arbitrarily limit the size of government to a level not seen since the 1960s. Under the guise of promoting fiscal responsibility, we would be creating a government that could not govern.”

The Balanced Budget Amendment has little chance of becoming law; even if all 47 Republicans in the Senate vote in favor of it, 20 Democrats would have to support it as well. That seems highly unlikely, if not impossible.

Congress is currently looking to find $1.5 trillion in cuts to the deficit through the “supercommittee,” toying with efforts to solve the painful unemployment crisis, and trying to avoid a devastating double-dip recession. It should not waste time debating the Balanced Budget Amendment, which is a political ploy that would be disastrous policy, and will only serve to distract Congress from the important issues that it has yet to tackle.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons, a novel and a memoir. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.

Fox News' Tucker Carlson Tonight.

Youtube Screenshot

Fox News star Tucker Carlson hosted former Bush administration official Catherine Austin Fitts on Wednesday to share her theory that the financial system is creating “digital concentration camps.” Fitts is a prominent 9/11 truther and anti-vax activist who has written that “Ziocons” control top U.S. officials as “puppets.”

Carlson began the segment by alleging the shuttering of some bank branches and ATMs indicates that a shadowy global cabal is planning to eliminate cash in order to control the world population and leave people with “no power whatsoever.”

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}