{{ site.specific_data.Twitter }}
It's The Corruption, Stupid -- With Both Viktor Orban And Donald Trump

It's The Corruption, Stupid -- With Both Viktor Orban And Donald Trump

The humiliating demise of Viktor Orban’s authoritarian regime is bracing news for endangered democracies, including our own, but America isn’t Hungary. Of the parallels that can be drawn between their despot and ours, the most salient may have been commented on the least – the overwhelming and unprecedented mafia-style corruption that enriched the ruling family and entrenched their power.

It was the corruption that motivated Peter Magyar, a lifelong loyal appartchik until two years ago, to break with Orban’s Fidesz party and inaugurate the campaign to overthrow the regime. It was the corruption that forced the European Union to act against Budapest by withholding billions in funding and isolating its government. And it was the corruption – so pervasive in Hungary’s media, judiciary, and business institutions – that finally drove otherwise conservative Hungarian voters to reject the crooked outfit that had ruled them for 16 years.

Liberals in Hungary celebrated Magyar’s election victory, not necessarily because they agree with the new prime minister on every issue – they don’t – but because he vowed to clean up Orban’s legacy of outrageous theft, to enforce accountability and to strengthen the nation’s frayed ties with Europe. Relying on his long experience inside the Fidesz machine, Magyar was able to expose its sleazy deals, including a pardon scandal that embroiled his then-wife, who had served as Orban’s justice minister.

Like so much of the criminality perpetrated by Orban and his cronies, that pardon affair echoed a train of remarkably similar offenses in the Trump White House. And as Magyar emphasized throughout his innovative grassroots campaign, the cost of Orban’s venality fell on ordinary Hungarians, whose national wealth was siphoned off to enrich the dictatorship’s cronies.

According to Akos Hadhazy, a leading voice against corruption as an independent member of Hungary’s parliament, the mafia-style graft perpetrated by the Orban regime has looted more than 2.8 billion euros (over $3.2 billion) annually from public funds. Much of that stolen money came from the European Union itself, which played a role in the regime’s demise by withholding further funds from suspect projects. Among the reasons to renew ties with Brussels, as Magyar often explained, was to facilitate prosecution of the ‘Orban mafia’ that stole those EU funds.

The details of the Fidesz government’s boodling might almost seem quaint in comparison with the high-tech crypto scams hatched in the Trump White House. Viktor Orban’s son-in-law, an entrepreneur named Istvan Tiborcz, became wealthy by forming Elios, a company that won multi-million-euro contracts to upgrade street lighting in cities and towns all over the country. Those contracts were financed by the European Union, but as auditors later discovered, the project details were designed to favor Tiborcz’s firm and eliminate any competition. In fact, the same officials who oversaw the lighting specifications also wrote the Elios bids.

EU investigators recommended that Hungary void those contracts, claw back the money, and commence legal action against the officials and business executives responsible for the scandal. The crooks in Budapest have been “investigating” that case for the past 11 years.

Meanwhile even more public millions flowed into the accounts of Orban’s father Gyozy, whose real estate development company swelled with government and EU contracts – and is suspected of serving as a front for Orban himself. This arrangement smacks of the millions in US government funding and related payments that have flowed over the years to the Trump Organization.

Various other Orban cronies – notably including the chief of his cabinet, Antal Rogan, and his closest friend since childhood, Lorinc Meszaros – have walked away with enormous fortunes. So brazen was Rogan that the U.S. Treasury sanctioned him in January 2025, during the final weeks of the Biden administration.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control found that Rogan had “orchestrated Hungary’s system for distributing public contracts and resources to cronies loyal to himself and the Fidesz political party, [including] schemes designed to control several strategic sectors of the Hungarian economy and to divert proceeds from those sectors to himself and to reward loyalists from his political party. “

The Trump administration lifted the U.S. sanctions on Rogan within three months of taking office, as part of its broader abandonment of anti-corruption agencies and measures throughout government.

As for Meszaros, he is the richest man in Hungary, sitting atop a fortune estimated at over $3 billion. Having started out as a gas-pipe fitter in 2006, with assets worth less than $42,000, his wealth grew exponentially through state energy and construction deals. When asked how this could have happened, Meszaros modestly attributed his wealth to “God, luck, and Viktor Orban.”

Americans have long seemed indifferent to the orgy of corruption that has characterized Trump’s career and especially his return to power. Citizens whose news consumption is limited to Fox News, Newsmax, and the MAGA media have heard little or nothing about the ways that Trump, his wife and offspring, and their circle of supporters have gorged themselves in one shady deal after another, often at risk to our national security.

Yet somehow, despite a state-controlled Hungarian media universe, Peter Magyar’s movement brought the truth about Orban’s corruption to the people, who responded with appropriate fury. In this country, democrats of every persuasion must convey to every American voter that same message about the decadent MAGA movement and its greedy overlord.

Trump's 'Total And Complete Victory' A Costly Debacle For America And Our Allies

Trump's 'Total And Complete Victory' A Costly Debacle For America And Our Allies

Whether presented in ALL CAPS on social media, following the style of Donald Trump, or bellowed aloud with blustering smacks on a lectern by Pete Hegseth, the White House proclamations of “victory” in the war against Iran have no weight or credibility. By any sane measure, Trump’s misadventure has turned into a debacle that may ultimately rank with Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan in the annals of great power arrogance.

The early hours of the chaotic “ceasefire” hailed by Trump are proving that the consequences of this particular disaster will be difficult to mitigate. On the first day of the two-week cessation of hostilities -- announced by the president on Tuesday after dropping his threat of genocidal war crimes – the Iranians celebrated their own declared victory by launching fresh drone and missile attacks on Israel, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, while the Israeli Defense Forces again struck Lebanese civilian targets, killing hundreds more. What Vice President JD Vance called a “fragile truce” appears to be no truce at all.

But whether the ceasefire holds for two weeks or not, it is simply untrue that this conflict has enhanced the security of the United States and its allies or substantially diminished the threat posed by Iran. The latest US intelligence reports indicate that, contrary to Hegseth’s claims, massive bombing by American and Israeli forces have reduced the Iranian air war arsenal by half at most – which is why Teheran can still launch fiery strikes at its neighbors and maintain military control over the Strait of Hormuz.

Indeed, Iran’s assertion of authority over the strait – a new dispensation that enriches the Islamic regime and extends its power – will allow them to rebuild whatever they have lost over the past two months. That enormous new source of revenue dwarfs the amount awarded to the regime for signing the 2015 deal restricting its nuclear program and will no doubt finance its eventual renewal.

Going forward, Iran will force ships passing through the strait to pay the equivalent of $1 per barrel of oil during the two-week ceasefire with the U.S, an Iranian official told the Financial Times. These tolls must be paid in cryptocurrency, highlighting the true value of blockchain currency as a means to advance banditry while evading sanctions, taxes, and international law enforcement. Ludicrously, Trump has bleated his hope for a “joint venture” with Iran to impose tolls on tankers crossing the strait.

As we contemplate the ruinous outcome of Trump’s decision to junk Barack Obama’s Iran deal and join Benjamin Netanyahu’s fantasy crusade for “regime change,” it is worth glancing back to assess his stupid, feckless and deceptive conduct. Once again, this president has demonstrated his unfitness for the office he holds or any position of public responsibility.

How things have changed in the weeks since Trump initiated the attack with his usual bombast.

"There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” he declared in a March 6 post on Truth Social, one week after bombing began. Following the anticipated capitulation, he additionally demanded “the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s)” to run the country, under his personal control. “It’s going to work very easily,” the delusional president told CNN around that time. “It’s going to work just like Venezuela.”

It didn’t work at all like Venezuela. Iran remains under the dictatorship of Islamist mullahs and their army of thugs, with no prospect of change. And while any ceasefire is far better than the conflagration of war, Trump and his stooges have achieved none of the objectives they so loudly proclaimed when the bombing commenced. In terms of American security objectives, the situation is plainly worse -- with the United States missile arsenal depleted, a global economy weakened by rising energy costs, and a disunited NATO facing a strengthened axis of Iran, Russia, and China.

"War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength,” as the authorities broadcasted in Orwell's 1984. And today, on his own propaganda channels, Donald Trump assures us of his “total and complete victory.”

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

'We're Fighting Wars': Trump's Swindle Of American Voters Is Now Complete

'We're Fighting Wars': Trump's Swindle Of American Voters Is Now Complete

Signals that Donald Trump is losing his grip flash across our screens nearly every hour, but what arrived just the other day was new, different and historically significant. The moment occurred at a White House luncheon that was supposed to be private, and Trump's aides quickly attempted to hide the incriminating video of his remarks.

They were too late.

The president sounded at first as if he were merely discussing a disfavored federal program with White House budget director Russell Vought. "I said to Russell, 'Don't send any money for day care because the United States can't take care of day care.' That has to be up to a state. We can't take care of day care. We're a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people."

Those particular facts would in no way prevent the United States government from providing day care services for our children, at it has done for decades through Head Start and other programs. But Trump said he now wants to direct that program's relatively small cost to a purpose he deems more urgent.

"We're fighting wars," he continued. Or at least a war (which isn't going well). "We can't take care of day care. You got to let a state take care of day care, and they should pay for it too."

Not only is war a more compelling purpose for government spending than day care but — as Trump explained in a stunning departure from a century of public policy — he regards national defense to be in fact the only legitimate purpose of government.

"It's not possible for us to take care of day care, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things. They can do it on a state basis. You can't do it on a federal. We have to take care of one thing: military protection. We have to guard the country." He went on to express his disdain, never before stated so bluntly, for the popular and vital programs that he brushed aside as "all these little things, all these little scams that have taken place. ... You have to let states take care of them."

Never mind that states could not begin to raise the tax revenue required to finance Medicare, a federal budget item well north of $1 trillion annually and steadily rising as our population ages, let alone Medicaid too. Did Trump mean to suggest that the states should cover monthly Social Security checks too, the program that he and his billionaire henchman Elon Musk so brazenly undermined last year?

Already they have trashed and starved America's foreign aid infrastructure — causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people who depended on U.S. food and medicine for survival — so maybe now he is keen to inflict such bloody mayhem on poor and elderly Americans.

We know that Trump is determined to squander more of our treasure — much, much more - on forever wars and other military boondoggles. Every day, he lights a match to at least a billion dollars over Iran, and he has proposed to raise the budget of his "Department of War" to $1.5 trillion, the highest level ever. That doesn't include the expected supplemental funding request of $200 billion for Iran, an "excursion" that is supposed to end in two or three weeks.

Why the United States needs to increase defense spending so abruptly by 40 percent remains unexplained. Perhaps it is because the president, obsessed with stamping his name everywhere, wants a fleet of new "Trump-class battleships." Perhaps it is because his tech donors want big wads of taxpayer cash for artificial intelligence weaponry, with all the obvious dangers of uncontrollable killing. Or perhaps it is because his two older sons, grifters extraordinaire like Dad, have invested in weapons manufacturing.

Whatever his rationale, the pain and deprivation to be inflicted by this "historic paradigm shift" in government are also becoming clear. Trump and Vought mean to pay for these shiny, deadly objects by slashing billions from domestic spending, just as he hinted over lunch last week. Capitulating to this budget can only encourage the aggression of a man who -- on Easter Sunday -- emitted a blasphemous threat of unlimited war crimes against the people of Iran.

His betrayal of the Iranian civillians he once pretended to protect mirrors his double-cross of American voters, which couldn't be more blatant or thorough. Trump is the president who promised no new wars, who swore to protect Medicare and Social Security, who vowed to balance the budget, and bring forth a "beautiful" health care system that would insure every American.

Does he understand that the war is submerging his approval in uncharted depths of public scorn? Is he even able to understand that his latest brutal proposals will only make voters despise him more?

Or does he believe that he will somehow rig the midterm elections and retain control by seizing elections away from the states?

He would not be the first autocrat to lose his mind before losing his power.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.


Trump's Big Iran Speech Offers No Way Out Of His Needless, Ruinous War

Trump's Big Iran Speech Offers No Way Out Of His Needless, Ruinous War

The world hoped to hear that Donald Trump, reeling in domestic polls and bereft of strategic wisdom, was ready to end his reckless assault on Iran. His absurdly boastful address, vowing to persist, threatening war crimes, and offering no prospect of a negotiated exit, provoked an instant global response in falling markets and spiking energy prices.

Despite expectations that Trump would shuffle toward a conclusion to this ruinous “excursion,” no matter how undignified, he resorted instead to beating his chest and berating our allies.

“I want to provide an update on the tremendous progress our warriors have made in Iran and discuss why Operation Epic Fury is necessary for the safety of America and the security of the free world…We will continue until our objectives are fully achieved.”

Americans wondering what objectives Trump is pursuing and why may still be puzzled after this speech, in which he boasted of destroying Iran’s aging air force and navy while ruling out efforts to retrieve its large cache of highly enriched uranium or to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, whose closure has so badly disrupted the global economy.

Reiterating the childish rhetoric of dominance that appears in every Trump utterance, he invited listeners to “celebrate this progress,” insisting, “We’ve beaten and completely decimated Iran. They are decimated both militarily and economically and in every other way…There’s never been anything like it militarily. Everyone is talking about it.” What everyone is talking about, in fact, is the astonishing vacuity of this speech, which explained nothing and resolved nothing.

While Trump said that the war’s “core objectives” are nearing completion, that claim depends on redefining the objectives that he and his administration announced at the beginning. Nobody except him believes that these weeks of bombing have achieved regime change in Teheran, where the Islamic Republic remains in power despite the deaths of previous top leaders. If anything, the successors of the late Supreme Leader may be even more radical and intransigent, having learned the hard way that negotiations with the United States are a meaningless prelude to missile strikes.

As for the Iranian nuclear program, Trump could only justify this war by spewing a series of ridiculous lies. The nuclear deal achieved by the US and an international coalition -- which he abandoned solely because President Obama oversaw its negotiation and implementation – would not have led to “a colossal arsenal of massive nuclear weapons for Iran.” Nor would they “have had them years ago, and…used them.” What they have is a stockpile of nuclear fuel which Trump said the United States would monitor via satellite – just as we could have done without any bombing campaign. His complaint that Obama’s agreement turned over $1.7 billion to Teheran rings with irony now that he has lifted sanctions on Iranian oil, which will bring at least ten times that amount to the regime’s treasury.

They can use those funds to rebuild their missile and drone arsenals, their damaged military production facilities, and eventually even their nuclear enrichment program.

So the most compelling rationale for Trump’s Iran misadventure is in fact no reason at all. He has achieved nothing to insure against Teheran building a nuclear weapon than the safeguards that existed a month ago, before we lost 13 Americans, many more wounded, thousands of Iranian civilians, including children, and tens of billions of dollars that could have been better used at home. His complaint

Behind the incessant chest beating that Trump constantly indulges is a distinctly less uplifting reality. Iran has learned that it can cripple international shipping through the Gulf and the United States won’t risk a naval mission to reopen it. Our allies and the rest of the world have learned that the US is an unreliable ally that will betray those who negotiate with us, wantonly inflict destruction, and leave the wreckage behind for others to manage.

Or, as Trump suggested last night, if the Iranian government refuses to meet his conditions for a ceasefire, “We are going to bomb them back to the Stone Ages where they belong.” Such a spree of war crimes against the Iranian people, whom he once promised to liberate, would be the ultimate disgrace – not just for Trump but for the country he has so badly betrayed.

Americans Want Trump's Iran War To End, But His Paymaster Isn't Ready Yet

Americans Want Trump's Iran War To End, But His Paymaster Isn't Ready Yet

Donald Trump knows that his reckless and pointless war on Iran is exceptionally unpopular, which must be why he now claims that the United States has already “won” – and why he sometimes seems to be promoting a negotiated exit. Yesterday he claimed that the Iranians sent him a big and very expensive “present,” like other nations that have sought favors from this eminently corruptible president.

Officials in Teheran still deny any talks about ending this round of hostilities, as they continue missile and drone strikes on other states in the region. Despite the destruction they and their people have suffered from US bombing, the mullahs enjoy a strategic advantage over the critical Strait of Hormuz, which the Trump White House evidently forgot to consider.

So pulling back from yet another flawed Mideast military venture is plainly the preferred course now. But bad news came this morning for everyone who hope to end this conflict before we sacrifice even more lives and treasure. Whatever Americans may want, there is a figure with far more influence over the Trump family than any voter, and he reportedly wants the war to conclude with “the destruction of Iran’s hard-line government.”

According to the New York Times, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is pressing Trump to continue the war, despite his government’s public pronouncements to the contrary. Although the Saudis were not eager for this war and its predictable impact on their oil exports and security, the crown prince reportedly believes that a wounded but extant Iranian regime will be extremely dangerous to his country.

Quoting “interviews with people who have had conversations with American officials, and who described the discussions on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of Mr. Trump’s talks with world leaders, the Times noted the crazy zigzag of the president’s daily comments on the war –sometimes claiming that it will soon be over, sometimes vowing to bomb Iran into oblivion and regime change. Notably, the White House didn’t deny the Times story when asked about Trump’s conversations with the crown prince.

What the stunning Times report didn’t mention is the troubling relationship between the Saudi ruler, known as MBS, and Jared Kushner, the Trump adviser and son-in-law who led the negotiations with Iran that ended so abruptly with US and Israeli bombing. Not only has Kushner’s investment fund received $2 billion from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund, but he has been seeking another $5 billion even as the Iran crisis unfolded. Moreover, the Trump organization has recently booked at least $50 million in Saudi-linked projects through real-estate licensing agreements, golf tournament deals, and an unknown amount from purchases of Trump crypto-currency products.

To underline the corrupt relationship between the kingdom's ruling family and the Trump extended family of crooks, the president will deliver the featured address at the Saudi sovereign wealth fund’s Miami investment conference on March 27 -- just as he did one year ago. A senior Saudi delegation — including the head of the nearly $1 trillion Public Investment Fund and the kingdom's finance minister — will mingle with top US officials, business leaders, Donald Trump Jr., and Trump diplomatic amateur Steve Witkoff (as well as Witkoff's son Zach, who runs a crypto business with the Trumps).

As they assess the daily barrage of propaganda and smoke from the White House, Americans shouldn’t deceive themselves about the motives behind this war. We did not need to sacrifice American troops, innocent civilians, and hundreds of billions of dollars to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. It seems that the proponents of wanton destruction, global chaos, and “regime change” have paid hefty bribes to get their way.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

After Trump's Fusillade Of Lies About Iran, Why Would Anyone Believe Him Now?

After Trump's Fusillade Of Lies About Iran, Why Would Anyone Believe Him Now?

Few circumstances are more dangerous to American and world security than an American president – specifically, Donald J. Trump – who lies brazenly to the public in time of war. At a moment when his assault on Iran has jeopardized the global economy in a way not seen for four decades, Trump appears to be prevaricating about the “very good talks” his envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff are conducting with the regime in Teheran.

It is reassuring that Trump used these alleged talks to postpone his mad threat of military strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure. It is not reassuring that Iranian officials immediately denied that they are engaged in any contacts, let alone negotiations, with the Trump White House. And while it isn’t impossible that the president has at last authorized contacts with the Iranians, who are also prone to mendacity, there is simply no reason to believe him now.

But given the history of falsehoods leading up to the first strike on Iran and the fog of contradictory justifications for this war of choice, such deception is hardly surprising. After so gravely disrupting the world’s energy supply lines, at a cost of more than a dozen American troops, thousands of innocent Iranian lives, and countless billions of dollars – with no sign of achieving the vague and ever-changing objectives of this mission – Trump suddenly seems desperate for an exit.

Whatever bluster he and his Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth may emit, they have so far failed to eliminate Iran as a military threat to the Middle East, let alone accomplished the “regime change” that has long been sought by Israel, its only ally in this venture. They have failed as well to secure the highly enriched uranium at bombed Iranian sites, and they have likewise failed to protect the critical shipping lanes of the Strait of Hormuz.

And all of this came to pass because, from the beginning, Trump remained focused on trashing Barack Obama, whose multilateral effort to curtail Iran’s nuclear ambitions had at least forestalled them for a decade. By appointing the greedy but feckless and utterly inexperienced team of Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff to seek a new settlement with Iran, he ensured failure. Many observers suspect that was his aim – or at least Kushner’s aim – all along, because that was what the far-right Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu wanted.

None of that has transpired as the war criminal Netanyahu and his Washington cronies would have predicted – indeed, as they did predict at the outset of this conflict. Despite the massive military and leadership losses sustained by the Iranians, they appear to have prepared far more carefully for this fight than their counterparts in the Trump White House, and therefore are prepared to continue an asymmetric battle that the US president wants to abandon.

After the killing of his father, comrades and immediate family, Iran’s Supreme Leader probably won’t make it easy for Trump to declare victory and move on. What is the basis for ceasefire talks with an adversary who began bombing while engaged in the last round of negotiations, even as observers indicated that agreement was near? Without that bare minimum of honor and trust, it is hard to imagine how that would work.

Had Trump not trashed America’s diplomatic relations with its traditional allies, we might have called upon more trusted European or Asian friends to broker an exit deal. They have no reason to trust us anymore or to put their own credibility on the line – except that they too will suffer as long as this fiasco continues and worsens. We will be lucky if their enlightened self-interest is enough to help us out of Trump’s latest catastrophe.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

Deflecting Guilt For School Bombing Won't Absolve Hegseth Or Trump

Deflecting Guilt For School Bombing Won't Absolve Hegseth Or Trump

Pete Hegseth won’t have to wait much longer before notching his first official war atrocity as Secretary of Defense.

Investigators for the Pentagon’s Central Command, in charge of all Mideast operations, have determined that U.S. forces were likely culpable in the lethal air strike on a girls’ school in Minab, Iran that killed 175 Iranian civilians two weeks ago, mostly children under 12. While that reported finding is “preliminary,” the Tomahawk missile that hit the school is only being deployed in this conflict by the United States – and the same weapons were fired the same day at an Iranian base close by.

The immediate cause of the tragic incident appears to be faulty targeting based on outdated intelligence data, which may not be directly laid to Hegseth, Trump, and the other reckless planners of the attack on Iran. But the cavalier attitude toward war crimes so often expressed by Hegseth before his confirmation – as well as his glaring lack of fitness, character, and competence – all made such an awful disgrace inevitable.

That such an atrocity occurred within the first days of the war only underlines the stark warnings against Hegseth’s appointment by Senator Angus King, the Maine independent, and Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee and a veteran of the 82nd Airborne.

What makes the school bombing even worse are attempts by both Hegseth and President Donald Trump to evade responsibility, which reflects their well-documented contempt for the laws of war and American traditions of honor and humanity.

Trump has repeatedly and falsely suggested that Iran uses Tomahawk missiles and is probably guilty of firing on its own schoolchildren, while Hegseth has said more than once that unlike the United States, Iran purposely kills civilians, with an obvious implication. The salient issue here is not whether the US purposely blew up the school, of course, but whether directives from the Pentagon and White House increased the chance of such horrors.

What cannot be denied is Hegseth’s mindless approach to the laws of armed conflict, which he has expressed on countless occasions, in his 2024 book on war, and in the opening days of the Iran war.

“Our warfighters have maximum authorities granted personally by the president and yours truly,” the man who calls himself the “Secretary of War” boasted at a Pentagon briefing on March 4 – four days after the school bombing. “Our rules of engagement are bold, precise and designed to unleash American power, not shackle it.”

Ignorant as they are arrogant, neither Hegseth nor Trump understands the purpose of the laws of war, nor do they seem aware that the origins of the Geneva conventions they scorn are wholly American. The first American general to insist that our military treat its enemies with decency was George Washington. And the first president to establish rules governing combat was Abraham Lincoln, with whom Trump has dared to compare himself.

Amid the bloodiest battles ever seen on our soil, President Lincoln ordered his generals and a German immigrant lawyer named Francis Lieber to formulate a code of conduct for Union troops. They wrote a detailed manual, with more than 150 specific regulations, that became known as the “Lieber Code” and formed the basis for the Geneva conventions more than 80 years later.

Instead of upholding those principles, Trump selected Hegseth because he is eager to trash them. And Hegseth has fulfilled that expectation by firing career legal officers who had faithfully upheld those laws, while appointing and promoting figures who share his lawless, careless and despicable attitude.

Under this regime, the Minab school bombing as well as the indiscriminate killings of alleged narcotics smugglers at sea were among the most predictable offenses ever committed. It is just as predictable that as this war proceeds, we will see more and worse.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

Trump caricature

Behind The World Crisis Are Trump's Unrestrained Egomania And Those Who Enable Him

The global crisis that America and its allies now confront, as well as the multiple threats to our country’s prosperity, democracy, and security at home, arise from the same singular source: Donald Trump’s unshackled and rampant egomania.

The president is pursuing his instincts and gratifying his conceits, in a world where nobody exercises the power or the will to thwart him. He believes, as he always has, that he alone deserves attention and obedience. He believes that he is the smartest person in the Oval Office, the Situation Room, the Mar-a-Lago terrace or anywhere else he happens to go.

We are now surrounded by the ruinous evidence of how wrong he is about himself and everything else.

The immediate consequences of Trump’s wholly unnecessary and apparently pointless war on Iran are driving the world toward economic crisis – for reasons that were entirely predictable and that he nevertheless failed to foresee. In the first days of the conflict, according to an initial investigation, US forces perpetrated a hideous war crime on an Iranian girls’ school.

What Trump thought would be a quick triumph – just like the overnight capture of Venezuela’s dictator -- is turning into a panic room without any clear exit. He ignored warnings from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and many others that Iran is nothing like Venezuela, and in fact still seems to think that purloined Venezuelan oil will swiftly solve the current shortage.

Everyone with a functioning brain knows that is a false hope, just as they all know that Trump’s tariffs are causing grave damage to the American economy, that he isn’t restoring manufacturing and is wrecking agriculture, and that his dismantling of the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and US intelligence agencies leaves us vulnerable to the rising terror threat provoked by his war.

Did his enablers in the White House, the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Republican Party and America’s corporate suites always see the shallow fraudulence and bone stupidity behind his blustering self-confidence? To those of us who have been following Trump’s career for the past four decades or so, the void of intellectual substance and personal achievement has long been obvious. But now the disjunction between his image of himself and the reality of his ruinous reign must be plain even to his most sedulous servants.

Those who promoted the myth of Trump as a brilliant business man, a “genius” in his own estimation, ought to have realized how dangerous it would be to place the nation’s fate in his hands, without any constraints. His perennial bankruptcies were not a byproduct of clever strategy, and his constant scamming offered the clearest possible warning of a defective character.

The only spark of genius, as his early political adviser Roger Stone understood 20 years ago, lies in Trump’s capacity to manipulate the political media, to insist on lies against truth, and to bamboozle the low-information masses. That was enough to launch him into Republican politics.

Many of those around Trump have long been aware of his real nature but chose to use their proximity to him for their own advancement. Others are simply dim-witted figures, chosen by because they look like they’re from “central casting.” Characters of both varieties are playing major roles in this disastrous war, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio exemplifying the former and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth the latter.

Unlike nearly every other member of Trump’s incompetent cabinet, Rubio has at least some qualifications for his job and is less stupid than average. Indeed, he was smart enough to realize during the 2016 primary, when he ran against Trump, that the New York real estate heir had committed enormous frauds and should never be president, as Rubio said at the time.

What the former Florida senator doesn’t possess is the spine to oppose a catastrophic decision.

As for Hegseth, whose personal history as a sexual harasser, notorious drunk and bully ought to have disqualified him from any public trust, Trump selected him precisely because he lacks any standing to oppose presidential excesses. In fact, his own pronouncements on war – he admires lawless killers and hates rules of engagement – foretold the disgrace that now haunts our assault on Iran.

The countervailing forces that ought to have constrained Trump – in Congress, the courts, the free press, or the world community – have barely been able to slow him, let alone stop him. Even if he pulls back from this war, there can be little doubt that he will do more and worse so long as his authority remains largely unchecked. The only way to oppose him now is to limit the power wielded by him and his party and erect constitutional obstacles in their path.

That is what elections are supposed to do.

Trump and his enablers now fear the prospect of November and the furious voters they have so brazenly betrayed.

.Our only hope is for those voters to fulfill their worst political nightmare.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

In Wartime, Trump's National Security Clown Show Endangers Us All

In Wartime, Trump's National Security Clown Show Endangers Us All

The belated dismissal of Kristi Noem – Trump’s woefully unqualified and performatively ridiculous custodian of homeland security --- highlights the perils now faced by all Americans in an increasingly perilous world. Now that the United States is at war with a regime notorious for terror tactics, it is no longer possible to ignore the frightening incompetence of a government that is expected to keep us from harm.

Noem cut an especially clownish figure at the Department of Homeland Security -- with her constant costume changes, soap opera escapades, corrupt expenditures, and abuse of Coast Guard aviation and residential facilities – but the MAGA style of governance is all too visible across our national security agencies.

While it was apparent from the day of her appointment that Noem had no relevant experience or knowledge, she and her “special employee” Corey Lewandowski brought extreme levels of chaos and disrepute to the agencies they oversaw. Like other Trump officials, she imposed senseless waves of cuts, mass firings of veteran officials, useless expenditures, and measures such as polygraph tests that destroyed morale.

And in her zeal to enforce the administration’s absurd deportation schedule, Noem fomented a confrontation with Congress and indeed the entire country that has resulted in the DHS shutdown. With most of its staff forced to work unpaid, all of its security functions are now subject to staffing shortages, rising absences, and declining resolve.

It’s not a good time for that to be going on: The Iranian regime, along with allies in Hezbollah and kindred terror groups, is assuredly seeking means of revenge for the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the wider war. Given Iran’s known capabilities in cyber warfare, the reduced defensive capacity of the DHS-based Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency is troubling.

Yet the president has replaced Noem with another politician whose Fox News appearances he enjoys, rather than a serious figure with military, intelligence or even government experience. Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin may be popular among his peers, but his resume for this position is thinner than paper.

As Kevin Carroll, a former senior DHS official, told CNN on Thursday, ““I'm not sure that Senator Mullin is really qualified. I mean, most of the other secretaries of Homeland Security have had substantial experience in federal law enforcement or the military, or have held senior executive positions… He was a successful, small businessman. But we're in a severe threat environment right now [with the invasion of Iran]. It’s probably the highest threat environment since 9/11 … I really don't think it's time for him to be in his first national security position or his first executive position.”

That disturbing vacuum of professional leadership and skill is reflected throughout Trump’s government, with potentially ruinous consequences. It is especially glaring at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, where the comedy team of Director Kash Patel and former Deputy Director Dan Bongino achieved so much destruction in the span of a few months. Their dismantling of FBI divisions tasked with protecting the country showed a reckless enthusiasm that must have excited our foreign enemies.

Patel has done grave harm to the bureau’s national security branch, which encompasses its divisions of counterterrorism, intelligence and counterintelligence, and its special directorate for weapons of mass destruction – all vital to protecting us at this moment of heightened threats. The FBI cyber division, like CISA at DHS, has likewise suffered from the firings and fear that have destroyed confidence among agents in Washington and in FBI offices around the country and abroad.

The impact of Patel’s recurrent displays of idiocy, arrogance, and abuse are felt far beyond our borders – although the damage has become obvious in major, highly publicized cases like the Brown University murders and the Guthrie abduction. Early in his tenure, at the request of the head of the United Kingdom’s MI5 intelligence agency, Patel agreed to maintain a London FBI station where both countries monitor adversary activities. He violated the pledge almost immediately, earning distrust among the “Five Eyes” intelligence consortium, which includes Australia, Canada, and New Zealand as well as the US and UK and is critical to our counterterrorism effort.

The barely disguised contempt for Patel (and Bongino, whose position was crucial to everyday operations) among foreign security officials is a serious hindrance to the bureau’s international operations division – which depends on our foreign allies to provide actionable information about threats originating overseas.

So toxic is Patel’s presence in the FBI that the bureau may be better off with him spending most of his time far from headquarters, whether at his home in Las Vegas, with his country-singer girlfriend on a government jet, or at the Olympics, car races or other sporting events where he weirdly shows up.

The pattern of dubious political appointees extends into the top levels of every sector, from Tulsi Gabbard at the Directorate of National Intelligence – whom even Trump no longer pretends to respect – to Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon, where security breaches and outright lies have become routine.

Will we pay a hideous price for the misconduct of all these MAGA bozos? In Trump’s second term, America has so far escaped the sort of deadly disaster that arises from stupid, amateurish government -- whether in an intelligence snafu like 9/11 or a botched pandemic response like Covid-19. By now we should know that our luck won't hold forever.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

Why Trump And His Minions Cannot Articulate A Believable Reason For This War

Why Trump And His Minions Cannot Articulate A Believable Reason For This War

A striking aspect of Donald Trump’s warmaking is the contrast between the orderly deployment of American military power and the chaotic disorder of its civilian leadership. From the Joint Chiefs of Staff all the way down, US forces are executing the presidential directive to attack Iran, while defending our bases and allies, with their usual surefire efficacy.

And from the Oval Office all the way down, the Trump administration is pursuing a chaotic, contradictory, and potentially disastrous approach to this conflict, with no clear objective and no forward plan.

Discerning any strategic purpose to Trump’s actions, behind the barrage of lies, bluster, and propaganda emanating from the White House, is impossible. Indeed, the absence of any stated strategy or end point to this war -- as it blazes across the region with unpredictable consequences – raises the suspicion that the administration’s intentions are purely political, selfish, and corrupt. Its greatest success so far in this war is to drive the Epstein files off the front pages, airwaves, and internet.

But the questions provoked by this sudden conflict are proliferating, even as the president, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth refuse to offer any comprehensible answers.

If the Iranian nuclear program was obliterated during the 12-day war last summer, then why did the US and Israel need to destroy it again now? If the aim of this war is regime change, then why would Trump have chosen members of the regime to take over after he ordered the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei? If the aim is not regime change, then why would Trump and members of his war cabinet urge Iranian civilians to seize power in the wake of US bombing? If the regime does not fall, then how will it be possible for American officials to reach a ceasefire or peace settlement after killing Iran’s leaders during the last round of negotiations?

Rubio is now telling us that the United States initiated this war because Israel was about to attack Iran, regardless of American policy, and therefore we had to mount a pre-emptive strike, anticipating an Iranian response. This reckless narrative underlines the worst antisemitic conspiracy theories about our partnership with Jerusalem – and puts the lie to claims by Trump and Hegseth that our own country was in imminent danger of attack by Iran (which possessed no weapons that could reach our shores).

As a harsh critic of the 2003 Iraq invasion and its bloody, costly aftermath, Trump might have been expected to avoid another ill-founded Mideast quagmire – or at least to have ordered up a plausible scenario for when the bombing stops. Yet it is increasingly plain, as Hegseth, Rubio and his assorted minions offer up a series of inconsistent and implausible assertions, that there isn’t even a drawing board, let alone a blueprint. They can’t even tell us whether United States troops will be sent into Iran, in gross violation of Trump’s campaign promises. Their only believable prediction is that more of our airmen, soldiers and Marines will die.

In the absence of forthright and credible leadership from the White House, this is what we suspect: Trump’s success in capturing Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro induced a dangerous sense of hubris in the American president. Despite sharp warnings from his own handpicked Joint Chiefs chairman Dan Caine, who told him to expect terrible consequences if we went to war in Iran, he abruptly scuttled promising negotiations for "epic fury." And he did all this for reasons that we still do not know but can only guess.

My best guess? We have come full circle to the Iraq fiasco Trump denounced so many times-- except that the underlying motivation this time is not some lofty geopolitical dream, or even a scheme for vengeance, but merely to distract us from the emerging depravity of the man in power.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

UFOs? Pizzagate!? Boebert Explains Why Clinton Inquest Went Off The Rails

UFOs? Pizzagate!? Boebert Explains Why Clinton Inquest Went Off The Rails

You may have wondered why the House Oversight Committee voted overwhelmingly to subpoena Hillary Clinton in its probe of the late pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, since the former secretary of state never met Epstein or had any contact with him.

But now that mystery at least is solved. While the committee chairman Rep. James Comer asked almost no questions – a lapse that Clinton mocked during their six-hour session – certain Republican members did have very urgent inquiries for her. (Several committee Democrats, who had voted to hold Clinton in contempt if she didn’t show up, didn’t bother to show up themselves.)

The Republicans were evidently eager to hear whatever Clinton could tell them about unidentified flying objects or UFOs, and the phony “Pizzagate” conspiracy promoted by the far right in 2015.

“It then got, at the end, quite unusual because I started being asked about UFOs and a series of questions about Pizzagate, one of the most vile bogus conspiracy theories that was propagated on the internet that was serving as the basis of a member’s questions to me,” said Clinton afterward.

Perhaps the best summation of the Chappaqua fiasco was delivered by MSNow's Joe Scarborough, who swore and cracked up as he admonished the Republicans who made the mistake of summoning Hillary.

Unsurprisingly, the member who raised the defamatory Pizzagate fable -- which ended with a near-tragic shooting at a pizza restaurant in Washington, D.C. -- was Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert, the clown Congresswoman infamous for her bizarre antics with her ex-husband, boyfriends, and others. (Of course it was also Boebert who violated committee rules by leaking a photo of Clinton during the closed session to plagiarist-propagandist Benny Johnson.)

Later, when NewsNation’s Chris Cuomo wondered why committee Republicans would pester Clinton with such irrelevant garbage, Boebert replied with a smirk.

“Well, you know, those topics did come up and there are things within the Epstein file that leads to these questions. These files open up a whole mess, a whole trove of questions to go down,” she said. “This isn’t to highlight some big, vast conspiracy about a pizza parlor, but I think there needs to be questions, and I asked some questions on this topic that should be explained. There wasn’t an explanation given, of course, and then other members certainly asked about UFOs.”

Today the committee will turn its attention to former President Bill Clinton, who did know Epstein, albeit years before any hint of his heinous crimes were known. Any reputable news outlet that mentions Clinton’s connection with Epstein will note that there is no evidence linking the former president to those offenses or anything untoward.

Undoubtedly committee members will ask Clinton about his trips to Africa and Asia on Epstein’s jet – all in pursuit of humanitarian aims They will surely ask him as well about the contribution from Epstein to establish the Clinton Global Initiative (first disclosed in Man of the World, my 2016 book about the Clinton post-presidency). They will ask about the photos of Clinton in proximity to women on that Africa trip, one of whom has recalled that he was “a perfect gentleman.”

What the committee and investigators already knows is that no evidence exists to implicate Bill Clinton in Epstein’s horrific history. If there is anyone has been “exonerated” by the available evidence -- as Donald Trump has falsely claimed on his own behalf -- it is Clinton. Unlike Clinton, Trump and his minions are now plausibly implicated in crimes and coverup.

Which again raises the issue framed by Democrats in Chappaqua today: Why won’t the Republicans seek Trump’s testimony?

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, will be published in February 2026.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

No Justification: Trump Won't Explain His Feckless And Bellicose Iran Policy

No Justification: Trump Won't Explain His Feckless And Bellicose Iran Policy

Donald Trump’s interminably verbose State of the Union address delivered all the typical Trumpian tropes in an extended version, from his mendacious slurs against immigrants to his cosplay as super-patriotic commander in chief. He even riffed on his yearning to give himself a Congressional Medal of Honor, an award normally unavailable to draft-dodgers.

What the president did not do, even as a ballooning U.S. air and naval force surrounds Iran, was to justify such ostentatious preparations for war against an adversary he claimed to have disarmed only months ago. It is all well and good to hang medals on courageous service members; it is imperative to tell the American people – especially those in uniform and their loved ones – why they must again go in harm’s way.

Dwelling at length on stories of valor and pathos, Trump uttered only a few sentences about the military buildup that indicates preparation for an extended and bloody conflict. Unlike Venezuela or any of the other adversaries that his administration has targeted, the Islamic Republic maintains a formidable arsenal of weapons and nearly a million men under arms. Any attempt to overthrow that regime beyond the bombing campaigns already undertaken is liable to inflict mass casualties on our troops -- and even more damage on our reputation abroad.

Trump might at least have mentioned why he believes those risks are worthwhile. The rationale he offered last night made little sense. He claimed again to have “obliterated” the Iranian nuclear weapons program during last year’s bombing campaign – an assertion rejected by the International Atomic Energy Agency – which ought to mean that the regime is years away from making a bomb. He said that the Iranians have refused to foreswear any nuclear weapons ambitions, a falsehood contradicted eight hours before his address by Iran’s foreign minister, who posted on X that his country would "under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon."

Trump also mentioned the Iranian regime’s killing of thousands of protesters, a horrible crime that he had vowed to prevent in one of his many hollow promises. While he is no doubt furious over that embarrassing dereliction, that would hardly vindicate a war killing thousands more innocent Iranians.

Led into a cul-de-sac by his own bellicose pronouncements, Trump finally is facing the consequences of the rash decision in his first term to abandon the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action negotiated by President Obama, which was backed by an international alliance that included France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Russia, and China. Personal animosity toward Obama was his only real reason for wrecking that painstakingly negotiated agreement. Among the many valuable aspects of that deal was its safeguards against Iran enriching uranium to weapons grade before 2030 – precisely the issue that has stalled the current negotiations. (It doesn’t help that Trump again dispatched Steve Witkoff, his befuddled real estate pal and crypto investment partner, to deal with the Iranians in this hour of crisis.)

If we brush aside all the flag-waving and jaw-thrusting in his State of the Union, it should be clear that Trump now faces a pair of bad choices – one worse for him, perhaps, and the other far worse for his country and the world. If he backs away from war without any major concessions from the Iranians, then “Trump Always Chickens Out” will echo louder than ever. If he plunges us into a forever war he always pledged to avoid, the costs could be incalculable and even catatrosphic.

Let us hope that the clueless Witkoff – or maybe Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is smarter -- can somehow retrieve a deal from the ruins of the JCPOA before it is too late. But remember that we have only reached this perilous moment because of Trump’s dishonesty and egomania.

Dear MAHA Moms: Don’t Be Surprised When Bobby Sells You Out

Dear MAHA Moms: Don’t Be Surprised When Bobby Sells You Out

The fans and followers of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are now learning what others have known for decades: You can rely on him to lie whenever it is expedient and profitable, and you can’t rely on him to uphold any principle except his own advancement.

That unpleasant jolt of awareness struck the devoted legions of Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” movement when he dropped their priorities in obedience to the corrupt Trump White House. Across the country, stunned “MAHA Moms” and influencers watched their idol Bobby meekly endorse the president’s decision to rapidly increase production of glyphosate – a ubiquitous pesticide they consider deadly.

Back during the 2024 campaign, Trump promised he would empower Kennedy to “ensure that everybody will be protected from harmful chemicals, pollutants, pesticides,” a category that clearly included glyphosate, known commercially as Roundup. In a June 2024 social media post, Kennedy wrote that glyphosate is “one of the likely culprits in America’s chronic disease epidemic…Shockingly, much of our exposure comes from its use as a dessicant [drying agent] on wheat, not as an herbicide…My USDA will ban that practice.” He noted that across Europe, the use of glyphosate is sharply restricted or even banned.

Flash forward to February 18, 2026, when the president issued a directive that not only failed to reduce the use of glyphosate but will rapidly increase its production. Kennedy responded with a wag of his tail and a press release that echoed the usual Trumpian tropes about “America first” (and downplayed any specific mention of the pesticide’s name). Expanding the availability of the substance he had many times denounced as “poison,” he declared, would “protect American families.”

The reaction of Kennedy’s civilian cadre was swift and horrified. Zen Honeycutt of Moms Across America, a grassroots MAHA organization, accused Trump of placing “toxic farming and businesses” ahead of children’s health – and said he had betrayed “every voter who voted for him to [Make America Healty Again].” Kelly Ryerson, an influencer who goes by “Glyphosate Girl” on X, warned that she was seeing “the bottom drop out of MAHA,” a dire forecast for Republicans already pessimistic about their midterm prospects.

Perhaps the MAHA masses shouldn’t be quite so surprised that Bobby betrayed them, since this double-cross has been in the wind for months. When the Trump White House released its much-publicized interagency “MAHA report” last year, its hundreds of pages barely mentioned pesticides or toxic chemicals and equivocated on glyphosate, noting that human studies of its carcinogenic effects are “limited.”

Evidently the outraged MAHA moms weren’t listening to Bobby last year when he told a Senate committee that “we [the Trump administration] cannot take any step that will put a single farmer in this country out of business…One hundred percent of corn in this country relies on glyphosate. We are not going to do anything to jeopardize that business model.” (Farmers driven bankrupt by Trump’s tariffs may be excused for being skeptical.)

That is a complete reversal of Kennedy’s stance from the years when he was suing the makers and distributors of glyphosate on behalf of cancer victims and earning millions of dollars for himself from those successful lawsuits. He’s still collecting the proceeds, according to his most recent financial disclsoures, which show about $2.4 million in referral fees from a law firm handling lawsuits on behalf of individuals who got sick after glyphosate exposure.

The harsh truth behind his first year as health secretary is that Bobby has succeeded most with the least popular aspect of his agenda, the longstanding campaign against vaccines that first marked his turn toward the far right. Abusing his control of the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control, and the National Institutes of Health, he has inflicted grave damage on public health and vaccine research.

Kennedy has far less authority over environmental policy, including the use of toxic chemicals and pollutants such as mercury. Indeed, he has kept dishonorably silent while Lee Zeldin, the politician appointed by Trump to dismantle the Environmental Protection Agency, oversees ruinous deregulation schemes that insure the spread of mercury, “forever chemicals,” and sundry lethal toxins across the American biosphere.

MAHA was always a gauzy construct, serving less as a movement for change than as a handy instrument of deception by manipulative politicians like Trump and his acolyte Kennedy. When Bobby abandoned everything that his family had represented for half a century and pledged fealty to a crooked authoritarian, the eventual denouement should have been obvious: A man who sells out his family legacy is certain to sell out his followers.

He just got there even sooner than we expected.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, will be published in February 2026.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

Bannon Epstein

Epstein's MAGA Enabler: Why Steve Bannon Needs A Mirror

There may be nobody — perhaps not even Donald Trump himself — who embodies the degeneracy of what used to be called conservatism like Stephen K. Bannon. That the "War Room" host still exerts influence over the American and international right as a media personality, political strategist and power broker indicates just how empty of moral character that movement truly is.

Like dear leader Trump, Bannon owes his prominence and prosperity to a pervasive atmosphere of impunity. Every day, in an era of burgeoning scandal on every front, both of them test its limits — and have yet to find any at all.

What the Epstein files have lately revealed about Bannon, however, as disclosed in hundreds of emails between him and the predatory financier, is so depraved as to be almost unbelievable. In the face of these damning documents, the former Trump campaign manager has offered mutterings and excuses that scarcely even amount to a denial.

Not only did Bannon begin to execute a costly "op" (as he called it) with Jeffrey Epstein to rehabilitate the latter's image — which ended only with his arrest by federal authorities in 2019 — but they conspired politically together on various schemes both in the U.S. and Europe. Desperate for Bannon's help, Epstein financed his travel and connected him with potentates and politicians around the world. He paid Bannon hundreds of thousands of dollars to tape a dozen or more hours of "documentary" interviews that were evidently meant as media training, in anticipation of Epstein's prosecution.

All absolutely damning when assessed in the context of Epstein's vile assaults on girls and women, as well as his apparent financial crimes. Yet what seems most appalling so far, and most illustrative of the enveloping corruption, was their joint plotting against Pope Francis, whose liberal gestures toward gays and lesbians, migrants, Muslims and the global poor had enraged the self-styled "traditionalists" of the Catholic Church.

Together Bannon and Epstein aimed to produce a documentary film exposing the culture of hypocrisy and concealment surrounding homosexuality in the church, based on a 2019 French book "In the Closet of the Vatican." Bannon met with the book's author several times in Paris, where he also met Epstein, who had an apartment there.

With Epstein as the executive producer, Bannon predicted that the movie would wreak cataclysmic damage on the papacy and his other political adversaries, from Beijing and Brussels to Chappaqua. "Will take down Francis. The Clintons, Xi, Francis, EU — come on brother," he wrote, encouraging Epstein (who would soon be dead).

Stop to ponder for a moment exactly what Bannon was attempting to engineer. He wanted to produce a movie, with the help of a monstrous pedophile who had victimized hundreds of children, that would destroy the reputation of the Holy Father and perhaps many others equally without blame. And aside from the political benefit to his hard-right allies, Bannon no doubt hoped to bank a substantial profit.

It isn't easy to imagine a more sinister project. By comparison, Bannon's swindling of the suckers who financed his "We Build the Wall" nonprofit and his phony indictment of the humanitarian Clinton Foundation look quaint.

Now a few of Bannon's longtime enemies in the MAGA movement — including Elon Musk and Roger Stone, dismal characters in their own right — have leaped to attack him over these reports. Presumably Musk would like to distract attention from his own cameo role in the Epstein files, including his solicitation of an invite to "the wildest party" on Epstein's Caribbean island. And the scorpion-like Stone is merely stinging a perceived rival, as he always does.

Yet there are many self-proclaimed Catholics and Christians in Trump's orbit, MAGA influencers and conservative pundits who should have something to say about these appalling revelations. Why have we not heard from JD Vance, vice president of the United States, a fairly recent Catholic convert and a MAGA nationalist like Bannon, who spends so much of his time blathering on social media? Why haven't we heard from Peter Thiel, the ultra-right gay billionaire and Epstein buddy who lectures about the "Antichrist" among "woke Democrats"?

Indeed, very few of our moral arbiters on the right have felt moved to speak up about Bannon — just as they remained silent when his coconspirators in the "wall" scam served prison terms, while he skated with a presidential pardon.

The most apt summation of this MAGA mountebank appears in a video recently released among the Epstein files, one of several shot for that aborted documentary.

Bannon asks Epstein, "Do you think you're the devil himself?"

"No," Epstein retorts. "But I do have a good mirror."

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, will be published in February 2026.

Reprinted with permission from Creators


As Patriotic Olympians Step Up To Defend Our Values, Trump's Attack Backfires

As Patriotic Olympians Step Up To Defend Our Values, Trump's Attack Backfires

With his petty attack on US Olympic freeskier Hunter Hess – and by implication all the American athletes who dissent from the authoritarian regime – Donald Trump opened up a dispute that he and his minions will inevitably lose. Not only is Trump on the wrong side of the nation’s values of free expression and individual rights, but he has exposed the rejection of his politics by the most talented members of a new generation.

Hess violated the dictatorial MAGA mandate when he forthrightly answered a reporter’s question about “wearing Team USA” at a Winter Games press conference. “It’s a little hard,” replied the 27 year-old Oregon native. “There’s obviously a lot going on that I’m not the biggest fan of.” In the next breath, he made it clear that he feels alienated from the Trump administration, not his beloved country.

"I think for me it's more I'm representing my friends and family back home and the people that represented before me and all the things that I believe are good about the U.S.,” he continued. "If it aligns with my moral values, I feel like I'm representing it. Just because I'm wearing the flag doesn’t mean I represent everything that’s going on in the U.S.”

His freestyle teammate Chris Lillis didn’t hesitate to stand up with Hess. “A lot of times, athletes are hesitant to talk about political views and how we feel about things. I feel heartbroken about what’s happening in the United States,” said Lillis in response to a reporter. “I’m pretty sure you’re referencing ICE and some of the protests and things like that. I think that as a country, we need to focus on respecting everybody’s rights and making sure that we’re treating our citizens as well as anybody, with love and respect.”

Hess later expanded his remarks on social media. “I love my country,” he wrote, using a flag emoji. “There is so much that is great about America, but there are always things that could be better. One of the many things that makes this country so amazing is that we have the right and the freedom to point that out.”

For Trump and his usual gang of media stooges, all that nuanced speech amounted to “borderline treason,” as one of them barked on Fox News. The president himself called Hess “a real loser” and said it is “hard to root for” any American athlete who who expresses even such mild dissent. They piled on, with Michael Knowles declaring that Hess “actually has no place on the Olympic team. Because the point of the Olympics is patriotism…This guy hates his country, he's clearly ashamed to be wearing the flag. “

Fortunately Knowles has no role in deciding who belongs on the US team or much else of importance – and his lie about Hess “hating his country” is rejected not just by one athlete but a growing chorus of the outstanding young (and veteran) athletes on Team USA.

Indeed, over the days since Trump’s ill-advised outburst, more and more Hess teammates have spoken up to defend his right to share his views and to affirm the values he expressed – without in any way diminishing their own love of country or pride in representing the United States at the Olympics.

Among the first to stand up against the MAGA onslaught was Amber Glenn, 26, the amazing figure skater who has already won a team gold medal -- and is well known as a “pansexual” advocate for LGBTQ rights.

Glenn told the New York Times of her pride in singing the national anthem at the games, her determination to defend her community against the Trump regime, and her hope that Americans will come together behind the Olympians even as they exercise their First Amendment rights. A barrage of death threats from Trump supporters ensued, which Glenn said didn’t affect her.

“People online attacking people for speaking their minds, which is their (First Amendment) right, is absolutely absurd,” she said. “So I just hope that going forward we can be positive and support our team athletes. I’m always going to speak my truth.”

It is worth noting that several top athletes on the US team are the children of immigrants who have given heart and soul to representing their country while listening to Stephen Miller, JD Vance and other Trump minions deny their right to live here as full citizens.

On Monday, after winning a silver medal – the fourth in her career – snowboarder Chloe Kim said, “We need to lead with love and compassion, and I’d love to see more of that." A 25 year-old Californian whose parents emigrated from South Korea more than 40 years ago, she added, “Obviously my parents being immigrants, this one hits pretty close to home.” Her teammate Bea Kim, likewise a child of Asian immigrants, told reporters that while she’s very proud to wear the Stars and Stripes, she feels just as strongly that “diversity is what makes us a very strong country and what makes us so special.”

Others spoke out just as firmly, rejecting Trump’s divisive and bigoted outburst, but perhaps the most eloquent rebuke was voiced by Mikaela Shiffrin, the downhill champion widely regarded as one of the greatest Alpine skiers of all time. Quoting Nelson Mandela, Shiffrin said:

“Peace is not just the absence of conflict. Peace is the creation of an environment where we can all flourish regardless of race, color, creed, religion, gender, class, caste or any other social markers of difference.”

At 30, Shiffrin is a few years older than most of her teammates, but with those words she expressed the hopes of a generation who will long outlive this president and who hugely outnumber his bullying crew. They are the hope of a nation that yearns to be rid of Trump and Trumpism.

James Comer

"Transparency"? Why Republican Comer Won't Let The Clintons Testify In Public

Under Republican control, the aims of the House Oversight Committee are to promote partisan narratives rather than to reveal facts and advance public understanding of national issues. Rep. James Comer (R-KY), its chairman, has displayed that routinely self-serving approach in the committee’s “investigation” of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal – and especially in his zeal to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Comer was never among the tiny handful of Republicans who demanded that the Trump administration release the government’s files on the deceased sex predator. Instead, the plodding Comer dutifully followed Donald Trump’s lead in defecting public anger over the case. Focusing on the Clintons, who know little (Bill) or nothing (Hillary) about this matter, is exactly how Trump has handled his own troubling connections with Epstein for the past several years.

With tens of thousands of mentions of Trump in the released Epstein materials, that distraction is more urgent than ever. And the Clintons somehow remain enticing targets for politicians like Comer and even some of the Democrats on his committee.

But after resisting the subpoenas for months – until it became clear that a vote to hold them in contempt would pass the House – the Clintons have flipped Comer’s script. Rather than give depositions behind closed doors, as the Republicans evidently prefer, the former president and secretary of state have demanded that the committee question them in a public hearing.

On February 5, Hillary Clinton posted this challenge on X:

“For six months, we engaged Republicans on the Oversight Committee in good faith. We told them what we know, under oath,” she wrote. “They ignored all of it. They moved the goalposts and turned accountability into an exercise in distraction.”

In a follow-up post, she urged Comer to “stop the games.”

“If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it—in public. You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on. We will be there.”

Comer is not about to accept that challenge, which he ignored.

First, he knows how that worked out when Hillary Clinton showed up to testify about the Benghazi terror attack for 11 hours, at the behest of his predecessor, former Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) – in short, not well for Gowdy and the Republicans, who made themselves look stupid as Clinton briskly schooled them. It’s not at all clear that Comer, a simpleton often mocked in whispers by his fellow Republicans, would fare better against both Clintons.

Second, Comer is obviously planning to pursue the devious strategy that proved more successful for Gowdy during the Benghazi farce – to record the depositions and then selectively leak snippets that create a misleading impression of the testimony. That is how Gowdy abused Sidney Blumenthal, the journalist and former Clinton White House aide called to testify privately for nine hours during that inquest in 2015.

I wrote extensively about that clown show – and the complicity that Gowdy enjoyed from the New York Times Washington bureau, which eagerly lapped up the leaks – in a series of posts. Gowdy and his stooges fabricated a tale about Blumenthal’s supposed “business interests” in Libya and how they had influenced Clinton’s policy. Having invented that diverting story, the Republicans could not afford to let the public see and hear Blumenthal’s testimony demolishing it.

So despite protests from Democrats, notably the late and highly esteemed Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), a much sturdier figure than the current ranking Democrat, Blumenthal’s testimony was kept under wraps – where it remains a decade later. Neither Gowdy nor his fellow Republicans wanted the public to see how they had misused their power to spread falsehoods, pursue partisan grudges unrelated to Benghazi, and generally make fools of themselves.

Will House Democrats, the Epstein victims, and the media allow Comer to get away with the same game? For all their rhetoric about “transparency,” not to mention similar high-minded blather from the Republicans, why would they permit this nonsense?

This attempt to conceal and distort the Clintons’ testimony is the latest episode in the ongoing Trump coverup – and it would be shameful indeed to allow such a deception to proceed.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, will be published in February 2026.

Reprinted with permission from Creators