The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

At the debate last night, Jeb Bush challenged Donald Trump for having attacked his wife Columba to rack up cheap political points in the debate over immigration reform.

Trump has said: “If my wife were from Mexico, I think I would have a soft spot for people from Mexico.”

Unfortunately, Jeb’s response was simply awful.

But first, let’s take a look at how presidential candidates are supposed to respond when a hated rival personally attacks their spouse’s honor.

Back in March of 1992, during the Democratic primaries, Jerry Brown tried to score a small victory over Bill Clinton with media reports alleging that the Arkansas governor had steered state business to Hillary’s law firm. At a debate, Bill turned up the outrage.

“Let me tell you something, Jerry,” he said. “I don’t care what you say about me. I knew when [former Democratic pollster] Pat Caddell told me what you were gonna say — that you were gonna reinvent yourself, and you were gonna be somebody else’s mouthpiece — you would say anything. But you oughta be ashamed of yourself for jumping on my wife. You’re not worth being on the same platform as my wife.”

As their exchange continued, Bill continued to belittle his rival: “Jerry comes here with his family wealth and his $1,500 suit, and makes a lying accusation about my wife.”

By contrast, at Wednesday night’s GOP debate, Jeb delivered this muddled response: “You’re proud of your family, just as I am. To subject my wife into the middle of a raucous political conversation was completely inappropriate, and I hope you apologize for that, Donald.”

Trump refused to apologize, declaring that he did “nothing wrong” — and condescendingly said, “I do hear she’s a lovely woman.” A limp, defeated Bush then seemed to regress into campaign-script mode on immigration. He said:

So, here’s the deal. My wife is a Mexican-American. She’s an American by choice.

She loves this country as much as anybody in this room, and she wants a secure border. But she wants to embrace the traditional American values that make us special and make us unique.

We’re at a crossroads right now. Are we going to take the Reagan approach, the hopeful optimistic approach, the approach that says that, you come to our country legally, you pursue your dreams with a vengeance, you create opportunities for all of us?

Not only did The Donald again refuse to apologize — he continued to pound away at Bush being “weak” on immigration.

And later in the debate — when the candidates were all joking around about the absurd request to come up with their own Secret Service code names — Jeb even gave Trump a friendly low-five.

This morning, during an appearance on Morning Joe, The Donald reviewed Jeb’s showing at the debate: “I thought he did very well. I thought he was going to push me harder to apologize to his wife.”

Indeed, most people would have expected a candidate to do that.

As New Republic‘s Elizabeth Bruenig put it on Twitter:

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}