Type to search

#EndorseThis: Elizabeth Warren Calls Trump “A Small, Insecure Money-Grubber”

Endorse This Politics Top News

#EndorseThis: Elizabeth Warren Calls Trump “A Small, Insecure Money-Grubber”

Share

This morning, Sen. Elizabeth Warren appeared on the campaign trail with Hillary Clinton for the first time, saying she had “a good heart” and repeating the campaign’s slogan that Clinton “fights for us.” While introducing Clinton to a cheering crowd in Cincinnati, the progressive Massachusetts senator repeatedly drew contrasts between the former secretary of state and Donald Trump.

“Donald Trump says he’ll make America great again… It’s stamped right on the front of his goofy hat,” Warren said, drawing laughs from the crowd and referring to the Republican candidate’s recent replacement of the term “Pocahontas” with “goofy” in his Twitter battles with her. “You want to see goofy? Look at him in that hat. But when Donald Trump says ‘great,’ I ask: ‘Great for who?’”

Warren dove into an eight-minute tirade against Trump, characterizing him as a selfish, conniving hustler and ally of the Wall Street uber-wealthy. “What kind of a man roots for people to lose their jobs, to lose their homes, to lose their life savings?” Warren asked. “I’ll tell you what kind of a man: a small, insecure money-grubber who fights for no one but himself.”

The Clinton campaign has been looking intently at Warren as a potential vice presidential pick, after the senator endorsed her on June 9, the same day as President Obama and Vice President Biden. The following day, Clinton and Warren had a private meeting in Washington, D.C., and later that month Warren appeared at Clinton’s campaign headquarters in Brooklyn. Today, ABC News’s Cecilia Vega reported that Warren was being formally vetted for the vice presidential position. If she were picked, it would mark one more attempt to attract former Bernie Sanders supporters to Clinton’s campaign.

“Donald Trump believes poor, sad little Wall Street bankers need to be free to defraud anyone they want,” Warren said, echoing another progressive rallying cry. “Hillary Clinton believes that we need strong rules to prevent another financial crisis.”

 

Image source: Twitter/CBS News

Tags:

157 Comments

  1. Jane June 27, 2016

    These two are brilliant. Great strategy to bring in EW.

    Reply
    1. AgLander June 27, 2016

      The Uni-Bomber was brilliant too…..your point is?

      Reply
      1. Jane June 27, 2016

        Actually the Uni-Bomber was not intelligent according to the Harvard study on multiple intelligences.

        Reply
        1. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

          Actually that’s retarded.

          Reply
          1. Jane June 27, 2016

            Ha…ok so now I just feel sorry for you and your anti-intellectual bias.

            Reply
          2. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

            Claiming Kaczynski, who entered Harvard at 16, graduated at 20, earned a PhD in math under George Piranian (whom he highly impressed), then taught math at Berkeley, isn’t intelligent is absurd.

            Reply
          3. Jane June 27, 2016

            Multiple intelligences include interpersonal and moral development…clearly missing from Kaczynski as his schizophrenia took hold. But I’m curious as to why your extreme views on these two women and why you would ever compare them to an isolated and disturbed killer. That is frightening. I hope you’re not dangerous to yourself or others. Please take care. Perhaps share your posts with loved ones and see if they think you need some help. Seriously.

            Reply
          4. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

            Schizophrenic doesn’t mean unintelligent. I didn’t compare Clinton and Warren to Kaczynski. Please learn how to read.

            Reply
          5. Jane June 27, 2016

            True. In fact most schizophrenics are highly intelligent. But they can lose their executive functioning when the disease is allowed to get out of control, thus the need for treatment. But I’m happy to see that you aren’t comparing Clinton and Warren to Kaczynski. Good on you.

            Reply
          6. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

            I’m glad you concede calling Kaczynski unintelligent was stupid.

            Reply
          7. Jane June 27, 2016

            Yes…you’re right. Intellectually intelligent but impaired because of mental illness…like so many terrorists.

            Reply
          8. AgLander June 27, 2016

            You sure are hung up on gender.in your posts….let me guess….you are a product of “Gender Identity and Sexuality Studies” major and can’t understand why employers never came running to you after graduation!

            Reply
          9. Jane June 27, 2016

            Law school.

            Reply
          10. AgLander June 28, 2016

            Dodged my question. You sound like another Sandra Fluke…..she had an undergraduate degree in “Feminist, Gender & Sexual Identity Studies”.

            Reply
          11. Jane June 28, 2016

            English and French undergrad.

            Reply
          12. AgLander June 28, 2016

            Do you stay in touch with Fluke?

            Reply
          13. Daniel Wright June 28, 2016

            Maybe she can get a job an a sex change clinic.

            Reply
          14. dpaano June 29, 2016

            Whoops, Jane, don’t get him started on law school….he fixates on it to the point of ridiculousness. Along with his buddy, David, they have this problem with believing women, especially women who say they are lawyers or went to law school. David is a little upset because I refuse to give him personal information; i.e., my bar number, etc. None of his business and doesn’t pertain generally with the subject at hand. Just giving you a warning……

            Reply
          15. Jane June 29, 2016

            I believe I’m catching on. Ha! Thank you dpaano!

            Reply
          16. dpaano June 29, 2016

            Unfortunately, “intelligence” and mental capacity don’t mesh and have nothing to do with each other. Even in Mensa, we see so-called geniuses who are real nut cases, so being intelligent doesn’t mean you have mental stability!

            Reply
    2. dpaano June 29, 2016

      Actually, I think she’ll do a better job if she stays in the Senate and helps Hillary from that group.

      Reply
      1. Jane June 29, 2016

        Yep. Totally agree on that. Less restrictive role for sure. Frankly it’s going to be a roller coaster ride here on in until the election. I’m quite looking forward to it.

        Reply
        1. dpaano June 30, 2016

          It’s going to be utter chaos, and I, for one, am NOT looking forward to it. Trump will keep ranting about nothing, giving NO plans for what he wants to do to make things better, and people will still believe him! Amazing how stupid some people can be in the fact of such blatant facts!

          Reply
          1. Jane June 30, 2016

            Yes, the gullibility is remarkable. There is just no substance and even if he followed through with some logic, the assumptions are just dead wrong. And worse, they are demented. If only we could see it as bad stand up comedy. But he won’t win so take care and laugh.

            Reply
  2. Kurt Kruse June 27, 2016

    Ms Warren is a soulless hag.She exemplifies what is wrong with our Political system.That is of-course that once elected our Politicians think only of what will benefit them.They rant and rave about nothing refuse to read laws and bills before passing them,Spend reckless and crate more problems than they solve.Theirs is a community full of self serving individuals.Each and every year we find out that members of this community have committed crimes.Crimes that had you or I committed we would be in jail for. Yet these self serving jackass’s run unchecked and do what suits them.We would be wise to stop listening and begin to Vote out these impostors. Those who will say and do anything to become elected and once that has been accomplished they No Longer serve the people.We have term limits folks!! Each and every election cycle we the people have in our hands the fate of “all elected politicians” we must simply get up off of our collective ass’s and go to the polls and Vote Out each and every Politician who has served either a single term unsuccessfully or if two terms have been served, it’s time for new blood,before corruption will inevitably creep in.

    Reply
    1. Arturo Robles June 27, 2016

      What the Hell are you talking about!? I guess you haven’t been privy to Trumps’ business problems. Do you think Tantrum “man-baby” Trump cares about you racist low-life? Give me a break. Once he’s in office he’s gonna pull an Adolph on America. Don’t be stupid, cause I’m sure you already look like a fool!~

      Reply
      1. AgLander June 27, 2016

        Every time you people yell “racist” it confirms that you are losing the battle and are desperate!

        Reply
        1. Jane June 27, 2016

          Well…good luck with your candidate.

          Reply
    2. yabbed June 27, 2016

      Powerful women scare you silly and make you angry, don’t they? 🙂 It shows.

      Reply
    3. bobnstuff June 27, 2016

      I think you have your parties mixed up. It has been of late, meaning the last fifty years or so that the Democrats have fought for the little guy with the republicans fought for their corporate over lords. We have term limits, it’s called elections. It’s the voters who decide who stays and who goes. If people like their politician they can keep them. There are some very good people in Washington, trying to make a difference. Ms. Warren is one of them. That being said I hope she doesn’t run for VP. She is needed in the Senate.

      Reply
    4. dpaano June 29, 2016

      You’re DEFINITELY talking about the Republicans! They care nothing about the people they are supposed to represent….the ones that voted them into office. All they care about is the “party line,” which has NOTHING to do with what you and I and the middle class want! If they did, they wouldn’t have blocked as many bills as they did or tried to pass ridiculous bills that were vetoed (thank goodness for someone with some moxie in the White House). Other than that, I tend to believe you in some terms. Yes, we have politicians who are crooked, and we’ve elected them and then re-elected them year after year. Some voters out there just don’t have any political sense of what’s being done to them, so they keep voting in the SAME politicians who have screwed them over and over again! Not sure what can be done about that, but it’s very true in some aspects! Trying to find a 100% honest politician is quite a task….the ones that are honest don’t have the money or the backing (nor can they get it) to get elected, and that’s the sad part. We need to get rid of lobbyists and PACs and Citizen’s United so that honest politicians can run for election without being outspent by the dishonest ones!

      Reply
      1. Kurt Kruse June 29, 2016

        I am most Definitely am not. Apparently you feel the Obama and his gang, plus a large group of Democrats garnering unto them a 20 TRILLION DOLLARS DEBT is a good thing it is NOT!!! Hillary has proven time and time again She is a liar, coupled with amoral character deficits so she represents no choice at all.

        Reply
        1. dpaano June 29, 2016

          Believe what you want….I didn’t say that ONLY Republicans were on the dole. Most of the problems we have with our politicians is due to lobbyists, PACS, etc. Without them, we wouldn’t have so many of them kowtowing to corporate lobbyists, etc. As for Hillary being a liar….59% of Trump’s checked claims have been deemed false or “pants on fire” false vs. 12% for Clinton. The breakdown is as follows:
          Trump: True 2% Clinton: True 23%
          Mostly True 7% Mostly True 28%
          Half True 15% Half True 21%
          Mostly False 17% Mostly False 15%
          False 40$ False 11%
          Pants on FIre False 19% Pants on Fire False 1%
          So, she may have some untruths during her campaign, but Trump has her beat! As for “amoral deficits,” Trump has too many to even list! Hillary may not be perfect, but she’s a hell of a lot better than the alternative!!!
          Additionally, as to the debt, EVERY president has raised the national debt….chalk it up to inflation, etc. But, President Obama HAS lowered the deficit considerably. Plus, you don’t factor in that most of the debt was debt he inherited from the last administration (yes, I’m blaming Bush, rightly so). If you did your research, you would see that he has not raised the debt significantly when you factor in the debt he inherited. He’s about right on par with past presidents as to the percentage of debt his administration has added. And, you need to also realize that the debt he’s incurred was approved by Congress…..the president does NOT have America’s checkbook….Congress has to approve every dollar spent!

          Reply
  3. ivory69690@yahoo.com June 27, 2016

    seeing how it is said that DONNY DUMP has small hands if it was that DONY DUMP’s hands where 1/1000 th the size of his DUMPSTER mouth he would be a porn star but seeing how much he hate women id bet he would be hanging out with the guys side with the happy guys

    Reply
  4. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

    Fauxcahontas no understand she fall for Trump trap.

    Reply
    1. yabbed June 27, 2016

      Elizabeth Warren: “Donald Trump calling me Pocahontas reminds us that Indians, unlike Mr Trump, know how to run casinos that do not fail.”

      Reply
      1. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

        Actually it reminds us she lied about her background to get a job intended to go to an actual minority.

        Reply
        1. yabbed June 27, 2016

          Funny how smart competent women make misogynist old geezers shake with fear and anger. 🙂

          Reply
          1. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

            Many Native Americans are angry about her pretending to be a Native American.

            Reply
          2. AgLander June 27, 2016

            This link does not support your claim!

            Reply
          3. AgLander June 27, 2016

            There’s a standing bemusement among those in Indian Nation over the fact that 90% of those falsely claiming Indian ancestry will claim to be Cherokee in identifying their bloodline ties. It must be due to the name most easily remembered from history books. At least Warren was paying attention during history class!

            Reply
          4. Jane June 27, 2016

            I love that they are both grandmothers. First time ever that grandmothers will lead the most powerful nation on earth.

            Reply
          5. laurele June 27, 2016

            So there’s no other role that qualifies women other than mother and grandmother?

            Reply
          6. Jane June 27, 2016

            Of course. All the best with your run!!

            Reply
          7. Jane June 27, 2016

            The world would be such a better place without misogyny. If only they knew the correlation between misogyny, terrorism and world poverty. If you take a closer look at every mass killing throughout the world it is always tied to hatred of one or more women in the poor soul’s life or a sexual repression that was left unabated. If only this was a common understanding then we could mitigate it or even cure it through enlightenment.

            Reply
          8. AgLander June 27, 2016

            Someone has really done a number on you….wow! Your use of the absolute, “aways”, is what allowed an easy diagnosis of your psychosis!

            Reply
          9. Jane June 27, 2016

            I don’t understand what you mean by “aways.” I’m trying to be polite here but I see you’re trying to undermine that so I’m signing off now.

            Reply
          10. AgLander June 27, 2016

            Quitting while you’re behind?
            P.S. And I know you are fully aware, typo aside, that your use of “always” was the word being pointed out.

            Reply
          11. dpaano June 27, 2016

            Good idea….you can’t talk to AgLander because it’s like talking to a brick wall!!!

            Reply
          12. Jane June 27, 2016

            dpaano…love you girl!!!

            Reply
        2. AgLander June 27, 2016

          Rule #456 in the Democrat book of ethics”
          “It’s not a lie if you get away with it!”
          40

          Reply
          1. Jane June 27, 2016

            Like Trump?

            Reply
          2. dpaano June 27, 2016

            Gee, I thought that came from the Republican’s book of Ethics…oh wait, they don’t have any ethics!!!

            Reply
        3. AgLander June 27, 2016

          As Hillary would say: “What difference at this point does it make?”

          Reply
          1. Otto T. Goat June 27, 2016

            Hillary is a lot better at shrugging off scandals than Warren is, but then Hillary has decades of practice.

            Reply
          2. Jane June 27, 2016

            Now you’re just trying too hard.

            Reply
      2. I of John June 27, 2016

        damn that was a good one!

        Reply
        1. AgLander June 27, 2016

          I’m still waiting for Liz to share that Indian based recipe she claims she found in her granny’s desk drawer that made her logically conclude she was an Indian princess!

          Reply
          1. Jane June 27, 2016

            She didn’t say that and you know it.

            Reply
          2. AgLander June 27, 2016

            Sorry to break it to ya, doll…..but she previously claimed she found recipes that belonged to her granny.

            Reply
          3. dpaano June 27, 2016

            So, I found recipes from my grandmother too….big deal!!! Some of them are even indian in nature. Gram was from Wisconsin….maybe I, too, have indian blood somewhere.

            Reply
  5. ivory69690@yahoo.com June 27, 2016

    the Republican candidate’s recent replacement of the term “Pocahontas” with “goofy” in his Twitter battles with her. “You want to see goofy?/// so people dose this say anything about DONNY DUMP ? I say DONNY DUMP for I feel its the truth and im not running for the POUS but him (Donny dump ) act the child all the time when he cant either answer a question or isn’t smart enough to say something intelligent (witch pretty much is all the time ) he lashes out like a deranged problem child . calling names like a kid in first grade . statements like well thy started it (fast backward thinking DONNY DUMP ) what next ? I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I ?)

    Reply
  6. laurele June 27, 2016

    Senator Warren, please distance yourself from that female version of Trump, who is as much a “small, insecure money grubber” as Donald is. You’re better than this.

    Also, major objection to the term “former Bernie Sanders supporters.” This is one more example of how you don’t get us. We are current Bernie Sanders supporters who will never be “former.” And we’re still not voting for Hillary.

    Reply
    1. Jane June 27, 2016

      Looks like the Hillary camp understand that already.

      Reply
    2. AgLander June 27, 2016

      You’re not alone….if the truth be known, Bill ain’t voting for her either!

      Reply
      1. Jane June 27, 2016

        So you like Bill? Then you would know that he is campaigning for her and has asked to have a portfolio to end poverty in America. He can do great things.

        Reply
      2. dpaano June 27, 2016

        And you know this how???

        Reply
    3. Jane June 27, 2016

      Wow…that statement just attracted a few Trump supporters to you Laurele. Are you sure you want to promote Trump through Hillary hatred?

      Reply
      1. laurele June 27, 2016

        I’m promoting Bernie and only Bernie. Just say no to the status quo!

        Reply
        1. Jane June 27, 2016

          That’s great. I hope he wins.

          Reply
          1. laurele June 27, 2016

            A lot of us will do everything in our power to help him win. If Hillary wins, I’m primarying her in 2020, DNC be damned! How about a contest between two strong women?

            Reply
          2. Jane June 27, 2016

            Who’s the other woman candidate?

            Reply
          3. laurele June 27, 2016

            That would be me, Laurel Kornfeld. #Laurel2020

            Reply
          4. dpaano June 28, 2016

            Good, now I know who NOT to vote for in 2020, IF you even get a chance to run. No one has ever heard of you, so not sure how you think you’ll be able to run for the presidency! If you do, wish you luck.

            Reply
          5. AgLander June 27, 2016

            No you don’t! Do you have an honest bone on your body??

            Reply
          6. Jane June 27, 2016

            I would have loved to have seen Bernie win given his socialist stance. But it’s not to be. I can see that now.

            Reply
          7. laurele June 27, 2016

            Yes, it is to be. Stop repeating mainstream media propaganda.

            Reply
  7. greenlantern1 June 27, 2016

    President Calvin Coolidge called himself the “GREAT WHITE FATHER!”
    Any outrage from Trump?

    Reply
  8. yabbed June 27, 2016

    The women were impressive on stage together. Powerful women are hugely threatening to some men, especially men like Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Read Bernie’s misogynist pornographic Sex Essay where he says men masturbate to visions of women abused, tied up, on their knees and that women fantasize about being raped simultaneously by three men. Imagine a man saying such things and thinking he could be elected President of the United States. Look at Donald Trump and his constant spewing of insulting put downs of women, marginalizing even his own wives and daughters with his unapologetic scorn. It’s a new world out there and impotent old geezers like Bernie and Donald are relics of an ugly era that is coming to an end with the election of the first woman POTUS. Yes!

    Reply
    1. AgLander June 27, 2016

      Hillary will be a “powerful woman” in cell block D alright……when it comes time for the inmates to elect a fellow prisoner to serve as their grievance representative with the warden! She won’t be “threatening to men” guards, however.

      Reply
      1. Jane June 27, 2016

        Oh well…welcome to a new era with Hillary as the new POTUS.

        Reply
        1. AgLander June 27, 2016

          I thought you claimed you are supporting Bernie and hopes he wins! You are certainly a study in contrasts from one posting to the next!

          Reply
          1. Jane June 27, 2016

            Yes. I love Bernie. But I know he is now out of the race. I love Hillary too and Elizabeth Warren. So I am now supporting them. I cannot support Trump. Sorry.

            Reply
          2. AgLander June 27, 2016

            So, you like losers……the wounded duck thing, eh?

            Reply
          3. Independent1 June 28, 2016

            How is the candidate who garnered about 3 million more votes than any other candidate a loser?? Only in your feeble demented mind!!!

            Reply
          4. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

            Europe here we come.

            Reply
        2. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

          Thanks for supporting a traitor!

          Reply
      2. yabbed June 27, 2016

        Don’t be silly.

        Reply
        1. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

          Common sense and truth is never silly. Thanks for supporting a traitor.

          Reply
      3. Keith Garevich June 27, 2016

        Your life will be even more miserable after Hillary is POTUS, and that makes me very happy. You’re a dick

        Reply
        1. AgLander June 27, 2016

          Keith, Keith, Keith……let’s talk again in a few weeks when I plan to be magnanimous in consoling you over the FBI’s criminal referral on the most corrupt person to ever seek the office of president of the United States.

          Reply
        2. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

          Thanks for supporting a traitor.

          Reply
        3. Box June 30, 2016

          If life is more miserable under Hillary, why vote for her?

          Reply
    2. dpaano June 27, 2016

      And AgLander…..he’s terribly threatened!!!

      Reply
        1. dpaano June 29, 2016

          Yeah, maybe……he’s threatened by shadows in his closet, so who knows?

          Reply
          1. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

            And maybe by illegal alien would be assassins. That has already happened. You knew that didn’t you? Or then again maybe you were too bust letting Hillary turn your nose brown. Warren is a strange bird campaigning for someone with financial ties to wall street and middle eastern Islamic supporters of terror; Someone who’s foundation is actually under investigation as a money laundering and influence peddling organization. That bird comment applies to all you useful idiot lemmings who are willingly supporting the most corrupt family in American political History. Shame on you all.

            Reply
          2. Box June 30, 2016

            At this point Warren would cash everything in since she wanted to be president herself.
            But scandals have always followed the clintons and her husband was impeached for lying. Apart from her problems in Watergate in 1974, she is under FBI investigation and though legally nobody stops her from running, how can someone vote as if she is pure? And where is hillary herself to bow out because its not right to put the country through all this? And though she wont do jail time for Benghazi, people still died under her and because of her. The common denominator in all the scandals is HER. Call it conspiracy of her enemies but She Was There. This disqualifies her automatically in the minds of voters, if not the jailers. Her only hope is to escape to the WH from where she can replace all agency heads who will not pursue her anymore and shred remaining records.

            Reply
          3. dpaano June 30, 2016

            But, of course, it’s okay to let Trump run when he’s under indictment in several lawsuits, including Trump University, right? What a hypocrite you are! As for Benghazi, the report just came out that she had NOTHING to do with anything that happened there, but you still won’t believe that. No one died “because of her,” and if that’s the truth, why isn’t GWB being pilloried for all the deaths that occurred in embassies, etc. on his watch? Why don’t we hear about those? Why wasn’t HE put before panels…..maybe because he forbade any panels to investigate those and 9/11 facts! Again, you are such a jackass and need to get your head out of your butt!

            Reply
          4. Daniel Wright June 30, 2016

            The deaths in Libya are only the tip of the iceberg. There is no conspiracy against the Clintons. That sob story about those poor victims of the right wing is getting downright nauseating. They are serial victimizers!! If Hillary wins and is not indicted before the inauguration it’s over. She will appoint a hand picked already in her pocket AG [the senate will breeze the nominee through for fear of being labeled sexist] The same will apply for the supreme court. Her crimes will then forever go unpunished and the United states as it was created to be will cease to exist. Did you see Hillary’s latest victim? http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/this-u-n-official-accidentally-crushed-his-own-throat-right-before-he-was-set-to-testify-against-hillary-clinton_06282016?AID=7236 It seems strange how people about to testify against a Clinton turn up dead or missing before they can testify.[Or does it]? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35mG57pUy80

            Reply
          5. dpaano June 30, 2016

            What an idiot….several of the so-called “terrorist attacks” were NOT done by “illegal aliens.” Talk about lemmings….you are all about to go over the cliff to nominate a lying, bloviating, morally corrupt individual to the presidency. Trump has more problems in his background that ANYTHING that Hillary has in hers! It’s amazing what you people seem to fixate on when the truth hits you in the face and you can’t handle it!

            Reply
          6. Daniel Wright June 30, 2016

            What “terrorist attacks” are you referring to? I incorrectly used plural when referring to the singular assassination attempt that was made on trump. Hillary is the morally bankrupt one. Who is under FBI investigation for espionage,money laundering and influence peddling,Hillary or Trump? The FBI is pursuing RICO charges against Hillary. Snopes and the Huff. post deny it but you know which way the lean. http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/presidential-candidate-hillary-clinton-indicted-breaking-news/ http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/30/exclusive-huffington-post-writer-editors-deleted-my-article-on-hillarys-imminent-indictment-disabled-me-from-writing/ be of good cheer.Hillary will feel right at home in Leavenworth.

            Reply
    3. Chessie June 28, 2016

      Did you even read this “pornographic” essay? I read the entire original, and you are completely missing the point of it.

      Reply
      1. yabbed June 28, 2016

        Of course I did. We all did. It is revolting, Disgusting. And we all got the point. Bernie finds abused women, tied up and on their knees, to be sexually stimulating. Bernie is one of those low order men who think women secretly like being raped – and raped simultaneously by three men. Sick! I know his fellow misogynists have taken to trying to defend the old geezer by saying he was just trying to write erotica or some try to say he was writing a satire. Nonsense Women aren’t fools. We can read for ourselves. Bernie is a lout and a disgrace and no self respecting woman would vote for the old creep.

        Reply
        1. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

          Agreed. However you are backing someone much worse. Bill Clinton has assaulted, fondled and even raped women. Actions speak louder than words in more ways than one. You back the woman who enabled Bill in his predatory actions by attacking his victims to the point of character assassination,harassment by private detectives, IRS audits and threats against their families and personal safety. How can you willingly support someone who turns her back while her husband takes trips to “pedophile island”? The actual behavior of the Clintons,or the fantasy life of an old codger. The latter pales in comparison to the former.

          Reply
        2. Box June 30, 2016

          But hold on….how can you say that but not the same about Hillary who worked to suppress women who slept with her husband? The point here is about protecting women and bill and hillary have a very poor record of that. So how can any self-respecting woman vote for her?

          Reply
    4. Daniel Wright June 28, 2016

      Then look at Bill Clinton who Raped his first victim in 1969. Look at the ex POTUS who took dozens of trips to pedophile island. Then look at his wife who sicked private detectives and the IRS on his victims.

      Reply
      1. dpaano June 29, 2016

        Who in the hell are you talking about? As for Bill Clinton raping anyone, that is a fallacy that the RW idiots choose to believe. If he had actually done this, he would have served jail time or been convicted of the crime. As a felon, he would NOT have been able to run for president either.

        Reply
        1. Daniel Wright June 30, 2016

          You fail to see just how powerful a governor or president can be. In Arkansas Bill had the press,the local broadcast media, law enforcement and the courts in his back pocket. He was attorney general then governor. Do you think that AG or Gov. Clinton would have prosecuted himself? When He took office he fired 93 US attorneys. http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/nets-ignored-clinton-firing-93-us-attorneys-fret-over-bushs-8-3142007 He then got his choice of AG with Reno and his choice of FBI head. Those things put the entire justice system under his control. With the media already firmly in the pocket of the Democrat party he took the same control he had in Ark. to the federal level. The only assault he had to account for was in the Paula Jones case which was a lawsuit,not a criminal trial. He was ordered to pay her $8500,000 by the judge. Knowing that provable fact isn’t it possible that the other women were truthful? or is that judgement just a fiction made up by the “vast right wing conspiracy? What you don’t know about the Clinton’s criminal past could fill a library. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35mG57pUy80 Do you want to know the truth? here it is.

          Reply
          1. dpaano June 30, 2016

            That’s not the truth, but you believe what you want to believe and are told to believe!!! Typical!

            Reply
          2. Daniel Wright June 30, 2016

            You don’t know the Clintons personally.The witnesses in the documentary [you obviously didn’t watch] is filled with first hand accounts from local state and federal officials who were warning about the Clintons and show how they got away with everything by fixing the system. I believe the testimony of the people who were actually there and actually worked with and for the Clintons,not the propaganda from leftist spin doctors. Watch the video. Or are you afraid you might find something that will change your mind.

            Reply
  9. AgLander June 27, 2016

    What do you call a woman who fakes being an Indian throughout her entire educational and employment life for no reason other than for the purpose of gaining preferred minority status consideration over potentially more qualified candidates?

    POCAHANTAS ELIZABETH WARREN…….the shameless and phony Indian.

    And Democrats, predictably, think she’s great and a person to be admired….because she got away with it!!

    Reply
      1. AgLander June 27, 2016

        There are 3 federally recognized Cherokee tribes. Warren has claimed she is a Cherokee Indian.

        Elizabeth Warren is NOT a citizen of the Cherokee Nation.
        Elizabeth Warren is NOT enrolled in the Eastern Band Of Cherokee Indians.
        And Elizabeth Warren is NOT one of the United Ketoowah Band Of Cherokee.

        Nor could she become one, even if she wanted to.

        The ONLY claim she has to being Cherokee is an UNSUBSTANTIATED claim that she MIGHT be 1/32 Cherokee. And EVEN IF that 1/32 could be substantiated, it wouldn’t qualify her to be a member of one of the above tribes.

        Your posting defending the phony Indian only deepens the lie, deepens the shame and reflects poorly on you as well.

        Reply
        1. Jane June 27, 2016

          I haven’t heard her say she wants to belong to a tribe, only that she has ancestry Cherokee blood. I have ancestry British royalty blood but I would never claimed to be a royal or even of noble or gentry birth.

          Reply
          1. AgLander June 27, 2016

            Thank you for acknowledging she is not an Indian…..a claim she made for a major part of her life. She even had her name listed in Harvard’s faculty book as a minority (Indian). The woman is obviously shamed but continues to find a home in a political party that admires those who cut corners and cheat to get ahead..

            Reply
          2. dpaano June 27, 2016

            Yeah, AgLander, everyone on this planet actually has African blood in them too. Do you want to complain about that one?

            Reply
          3. dpaano June 28, 2016

            Jane: I have also heard that someone from my distant ancestry came over on the Mayflower…..who knows? The only thing I can prove is that my grandmother’s father fought in the Civil War (and we can prove that), but proving an ancestor came over on the Mayflower is a little tricky. We’re doing extensive research into this, but not expecting anything substantial until I see actual proof. Family stories are often wrong or are reconfigured as they go down the family history….it happens. Elizabeth Warren MAY have some Cherokee blood in her, but the paperwork from that time did not make it clear, but does leave a question. I personally don’t think she’s lying…..I just think more research needs to be done by her family to verify whether or not there is any Cherokee blood in her past. You never know and for Trump to level these charges is ridiculous!

            Reply
          4. Jane June 28, 2016

            Wow. What a great legacy. And good for you for doing the research. Mine takes me to the Duke of Norfolk. I have met others with the same heritage and there are thousands of us living all over the world. You’re right about the record keeping. I imagine the Cherokee history is oral at best. Even 50 years ago names were left off and misspelled and death dates are inconsistent with what we know. I agree that Elizabeth Warren isn’t lying. She’s going with what she found. There’s no evil in that. She’s not using it for any other gain than as a curiosity. At best it’s a curiosity and at worst it’s an error. This rhetoric about Obama’s birth right and Warren’s ancestry are just mean spirited attempts to discredit them. But…I hope you find out more about the Mayflower passenger list! Good luck!

            Reply
        2. Keith Garevich June 27, 2016

          Why are you so obsessed with her tribal ancestry? You need to get a life! The fact that you would back someone as disgusting as the child rapist, Drumpf, is appalling. You back Drumpf because you’ve got nothing else in your putrid life to hate but minorities!

          Reply
          1. AgLander June 27, 2016

            Me obsessed? Keith, my friend, it is Elizabeth Warren who has been obsessed with forwarding her career all along the way on the back of Cherokee Nation. What does it say about your ethical base when you attack those who simply point out her life of fraud?
            You really need to do a self evaluation inventory because you are morally derailed.

            Reply
          2. dpaano June 27, 2016

            AgLander….do you know FOR SURE that she doesn’t have Cherokee blood. And, even 1/32nd is still Cherokee. It may not be enough to be an actual member, but it’s enough to be able to say she is “part” Cherokee!!! Get a life, okay. If you can’t think of anything else to bitch about, give it up!

            Reply
          3. Keith Garevich June 28, 2016

            Thank you. The right wing will look for anything to gripe about that is insignificant such as this. Sad tea baggers they are! Drumpf is the man they’ll vote for. That’s all they got!

            Reply
          4. Daniel Wright June 28, 2016

            What tribal ancestry? Are you saying she grew up on a reservation?

            Reply
          5. Keith Garevich June 28, 2016

            I’m not quite sure what you’re getting at. Where did you arrive at the reservation idea? Faux News? Aglander is obsessed with her American Indian heritage. Even if she’s 1/32 Cherokee, she’s still has some Indian blood in her. I see no problem there.

            Reply
          6. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

            So she has a few drops of Cherokee blood in her veins. So what. She built her career on being an oppressed minority. If someone claims to be Jewish you have to live as one,go to temple go through the bar mitzvah or batmitzvah ceremonies. How many ceremonies did she attend? Did she actually live as a Cherokee? Does she look like one? Which is which? Not even in the ball park.

            Reply
          7. dpaano June 29, 2016

            Interesting, I’m Jewish (my grandfather and that side of the family were Russian Jews), but I don’t go to temple or celebrate most of the ceremonies? Does that make me any less of a Jew? I don’t think so!! You don’t have to “live as one” to be one!!!

            Reply
          8. Daniel Wright June 29, 2016

            Explain that to a Hasidic court and see how far it gets you.

            Reply
          9. dpaano June 30, 2016

            I’m not a Hasidic Jew……there are several different Jewish religions just as there are several different Christian groups. Maybe if you knew what you were talking about, you’d know that!

            Reply
          10. Daniel Wright June 30, 2016

            The Rabbinical courts would declare you not Jewish. I know exactly what I’m talking about. If you went to temple once a decade you would too.

            Reply
          11. Box June 30, 2016

            Why are you so obsessed with Ag? You seem to dislike candidate challenges and questions. Why?

            Reply
          12. Box June 30, 2016

            She has put herself out there as an Indian, perhaps to gain favor as a minority. But people are part german, french, british, austrian, and danish dont call themselves french, or they call themselves by the majority of what they have in them. Thats been Ag’s point, seems. If she is 1/32, why wouldnt you have a problem with a person calling themselves Indian? I would. What is the other 31/32 made of?

            Reply
          13. Box June 30, 2016

            Who said Ag hates anyone, including Indians? He challenges her words and thats called hate?

            Reply
          14. Keith Garevich June 30, 2016

            My point is that Aglander is obsessed with her Indian ancestry. With all the scandals and lawsuits that Drumpf has, this is something even worth talking about? It’s pathetic that the right wing only has this. And it isn’t working and most of America doesn’t care about her ancestry.

            Reply
    1. yabbed June 28, 2016

      Did you hear what Elizabeth Warren said about Donald Trump calling her Pocahontas? She said Trump was just jealous because Indians can run casinos that don’t go bankrupt!

      Reply
      1. dpaano June 29, 2016

        Yeah, she’s SO right!!! I thought that was a primo put-down!!!

        Reply
  10. AgLander June 27, 2016

    Elizabeth Warren, in lying about being an Indian, is in the same “stolen valor” classification as the shameless punks posing as military veterans of past conflicts when they never even served.

    Reply
      1. AgLander June 27, 2016

        debunked…see my other post.

        Reply
        1. dpaano June 28, 2016

          Apparently, you didn’t read ALL of the link. Although it did not say that Elizabeth Warren WAS from Cherokee stock, it did say that she COULD have been. Because the paperwork back then was spotty to say the least, it was never clear whether O.C. Smith was Cherokee or not. There’s nothing to prove OR disprove it, so you may be totally wrong (which seems to happen with you on most occasions).

          Reply
      2. AgLander June 27, 2016

        The Cherokees have set up a website challenging Warren’s tall tales of Cherokee heritage
        “It’s not who you claim, but who claims YOU!”

        http:///cherokeesdemandtruth.com

        Reply
    1. oldlion June 27, 2016

      Is that all you got? How about Draft Dodging Donald who says his military school attendance is the same as being a veteran. Talk about “stolen valor.” Trump is a huckster who is reeling in huckleberries like you.

      Reply
    2. dpaano June 27, 2016

      Not exactly the truth AgLander…..most people in Massachusetts have indian blood in them. Massachusetts was heavily populated with American Indians and it’s hard to find anyone that was born and raised there for any length of time NOT to have some indian blood. So, you may believe anything Trump says, but it may not be the truth!! And, if you don’t know for sure, you need to stop talking about it….seriously. As for military veterans…..at least there are some. Trump never served a day and his daddy got him out of it at least twice that we’re aware of!

      Reply
      1. meridaest June 27, 2016

        Warren is from Oklahoma, not Mass. Still, almost everybody in OK has native american blood.

        Reply
        1. dpaano June 28, 2016

          You’re right…..I meant Oklahoma. I just read an article that said most Oklahomans, if their families have been in Oklahoma for many years, DO have Indian blood in them. So, she isn’t lying. I’m not sure if 1/32nd is sufficient for her to claim she’s a minority, but she probably DOES have some Cherokee blood in her somewhere from a past ancestor. I’m not “up” on Indian ancestry laws enough to be sure. Trump doesn’t know squat and only bloviates about things he knows NOTHING about….typical!

          Reply
          1. Box June 30, 2016

            If you are going to throw it in peoples faces at least brush up on third grade geography first.

            Reply
          2. dpaano June 30, 2016

            If you read the article, it says she’s the Senator from Massachusetts, so it was an honest mistake!!! Get your head out of your a$$, okay?

            Reply
      2. AgLander June 28, 2016

        And do these micro-fraction of Indian blood individuals declare themselves minorities for the purpose of the advantages they could entertain at the expense of others in education and employment throughout their lives? And do they list themselves in faculty publications as “Indian” even though the amount of Indian blood they possess in their veins from a genetic marker standpoint is considered micro contamination? Hmmmm? And remember…..Warren isn’t even confirmed to be 1/32 Indian. She now admits her claim is based on family folklore, a found Indian based recipe in her granny’s desk and what she thought were high cheekbones noticed when she was brushing her teeth one morning!

        Reply
        1. Daniel Wright June 28, 2016

          I thought she was 1/64 Cherokee. She’s in the wrong business. Casinos are big money makers.

          Reply
        2. dpaano June 29, 2016

          By the way, the correct spelling is “Mensa.” Get it right, okay? If you’re going to keep throwing it in my face, at least learn how to spell it!

          Reply
          1. AgLander June 29, 2016

            I think there should be a subset spelled my way to house lemmings like you!

            Reply
      3. yabbed June 28, 2016

        As did Bernie. He was a religious conscientious objector during the Vietnam draft. However, in Congress he certainly voted for more than his fair share of wars. And now he’s decided he wants to be Commander in Chief. Bernie a joke!

        Reply
  11. Phil Christensen June 27, 2016

    Fauxcahontas made her pile by flipping foreclosed properties. Pretty savvy businesswoman in her own right.

    Reply
  12. Terry June 30, 2016

    Elizabeth Warren may not be Native American but she does carry a straight edge razor. She doesn’t collect scalps but she has already collected the “Donald’s” manhood. He would be wise not to attack her, because he does not stand a chance. One would think that he would have figured this out by now. Not very bright and he wants to be President – who does he think he is? – George Bush. The lady is probably the smartest lady in Congress and a debate champion to boot.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.