The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

The Ukraine scandal and the impeachment inquiry that President Donald Trump is facing in the U.S. House of Representatives have been so prominent in the news that other Trump-related investigations and scandals have been receiving less attention. But those investigations are continuing nonetheless, including Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance’s probe of Trump’s financial history and 2016 hush money payments. A federal judge, on Monday, vehemently disagreed with a lawsuit attacking Vance’s investigation, and legal experts have had a lot to say about the matter.

Vance has been trying to obtain Trump’s tax returns as part of an investigation into hush money payments made during his 2016 presidential campaign. But Trump, in his lawsuit against the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, has asserted that because he is president of the U.S., he is immune to such investigations — an argument that U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero rejected on Monday in a 75-page ruling. According to Marrero, “this court cannot endorse such a categorical and limitless assertion of presidential immunity from judicial process.”

Trump, as expected, is appealing Marrero’s decision, and the case will now move to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Mimi Rocah, a former federal prosecutor, predicted on Twitter that Trump will go out of his way to demonize Marrero. The legal expert tweeted, “Get ready for unfounded, dirty and partisan attacks on the federal judge who absolutely did the right thing and followed the law. Let’s hope the Second Circuit Court of Appeals does as well.”

Vance has subpoenaed Trump’s long-time accountants, Mazars USA, to obtain his tax records. And according to Marrero’s ruling, that subpoena is perfectly legitimate and should go forward.

On Twitter, Rocah explained, “One of the most the most important points from (Marrero’s) decision allowing Manhattan DA subpoena to go forward: Trump’s position would prevent not only the POTUS from being investigated, but also, anyone who happened to be part of that scheme before he became POTUS.”

A long list of U.S. presidents, from Barack Obama to George W. Bush to Bill Clinton, have publicly released their tax returns. But according to legal expert Glenn Kirschner, Trump is terrified at the prospect of doing the same — and Marrero’s ruling is very bad news for him. Kirschner asserted, “All other presidents, all legitimate presidents, have released their tax returns. No harm. Trump is scared to death. He will fail.”

Journalist Shimon Prokupecz tweeted, “If this ruling holds up, it would be the first known prosecutor to get their hands on Trump’s tax returns.”

Trump’s lawsuit against Vance asserted that he would suffer “irreparable harm” if the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office succeeded in obtaining his tax returns. And Trump, in the lawsuit, argued that it was unnecessary for Vance to obtain eight years of Trump’s tax returns.

Adam Klasfeld, a reporter for Courthouse News, tweeted that there is an important message in Marrero’s ruling: “Donald Trump is not a king.”


Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Sonia Sotomayor

Photo by Gage Skidmore licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and examining the constitutionality of Mississippi’s highly restrictive abortion law. Abortion rights defenders fear that the case will result in Roe v. Wade being overturned. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, speaking on Wednesday, was highly critical of the Mississippi law’s supporters — expressing concerns that the Supreme Court will be viewed as overly politicized.

Keep reading... Show less

Gina Bisignano, left, a Beverly Hills salon owner, joined a violent conspiracy to attack the Capitol

Image from Department of Justice court filing

Reprinted with permission from DailyKos

Most of the attention to the conspiracy prosecutions in the January 6 insurrection has been directed at the largest known (and overlapping) plots to besiege the Capitol involving the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. But a fresh indictment handed down this week by a grand jury makes clear that there were multiple conspiracies unfolding that day.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ }}