The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

Rep. John Katko

Photo by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (Public domain)

Reprinted with permission from American Independent

On May 19, 35 House Republicans joined with the Democratic majority to vote in support of creating a bipartisan commission to investigate the deadly January 6 Capitol insurrection. But just two of the 50 Republicans in the Senate say they will back the bill their House counterparts demanded.

On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer began the process of bringing the bill up for consideration. Doing so will require 60 votes — including at least 10 Republicans. But it appears unlikely there are even close to that many GOP votes for the House-passed proposal.

On Tuesday, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she would support the House bill. Utah Sen. Mitt Romney endorsed the proposal on Monday. None of the other 48 Republicans in the chamber have said the same.

The bill is almost exactly what House Republicans asked for. Six days after pro-Donald Trump rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol to try to overturn the 2020 election results in January, Rep. John Katko (R-NY) and 30 Republican colleagues filed a bill to create a "National Commission on the Domestic Terrorist Attack Upon the United States Capitol," modeled after the 9/11 Commission.

House Democrats initially suggested a Democratic-controlled panel. After Republicans objected and demanded bipartisan parity, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy tasked Katko, the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Homeland Security, to negotiate a deal with Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), the committee chair.

Though Katko and McCarthy (R-CA) got nearly everything they asked for — a bill closely mirroring the original GOP plan, with an equal number of Democratic and Republican appointees and support from both parties required before any subpoenas could be issued — McCarthy refused to back the bill. He called it "duplicative and potentially counterproductive" and complained it did not also allow an unrelated examination of "political violence that has struck American cities."

Even the most conservative Democrats back the bill. On Tuesday, Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona said in a joint statement, "We implore our Senate Republican colleagues to work with us to find a path forward on a commission to examine the events of January 6."

But they have found little support from Republicans.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell vowed to block the bill on Tuesday, calling it "a purely political exercise that adds nothing to the sum total of information" and would distract from GOP attacks on President Joe Biden's administration.

Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri said Sunday that he thinks it is "too early to create a commission" and "Republicans in the Senate will decide that it's too early to create that commission."

Sen. John Boozman of Arkansas has said the bill is not needed because "there are already multiple investigations already underway, within Congress and by law enforcement."

His fellow Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton said the "duplicative, partisan commission isn't designed to uncover new information, but rather to advance the Democrats' partisan goals."

Even Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who has backed the concept of a bipartisan commission, has demanded significant changes to the proposal — insisting on Sunday that the already bipartisan process for selecting staff be altered and that the investigation be completed by the end of 2021.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Mark Levin

Politico reported Friday that John Eastman, the disgraced ex-law professor who formulated many of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, was also apparently in communication with Fox News host Mark Levin. The story gets even more interesting from there, revealing the shell game that right-wing media personalities engage in while doubling as political operatives.

A legal filing by Eastman’s attorneys reveals that, among the messages Eastman is still attempting to conceal from the House January 6 committee are 12 pieces of correspondence with an individual matching Levin’s description as “a radio talk show host, is also an attorney, former long-time President (and current board chairman) of a public interest law firm, and also a former fellow at The Claremont Institute.” Other details, including a sloppy attempt to redact an email address, also connect to Levin, who did not respond to Politico’s requests for comment.

Keep reading... Show less

Sen. Wendy Rogers

Youtube Screenshot

There have been powerful indicators of the full-bore radicalization of the Republican Party in the past year: the 100-plus extremist candidates it fielded this year, the apparent takeover of the party apparatus in Oregon, the appearance of Republican officials at white nationalist gatherings. All of those are mostly rough gauges or anecdotal evidence, however; it’s been difficult to get a clear picture of just how deeply the extremism has penetrated the party.

Using social media as a kind of proxy for their real-world outreach—a reasonable approach, since there are few politicians now who don’t use social media—the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights decided to get a clearer picture of the reach of extremist influences in official halls of power by examining how many elected officials participate in extremist Facebook groups. What it found was deeply troubling: 875 legislators in all 50 states, constituting nearly 22% of all elected GOP lawmakers, identified as participating members of extremist Facebook groups.

Keep reading... Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}