The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

Modern Republicans Stand For Exactly One Thing

Reprinted with permission fromUExpress.

In 1909, President William Howard Taft, a Republican, proposed an income tax on corporations. Such a tax required the passage of the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and when the amendment gained the required state support, a permanent federal income tax was born.

It’s nigh impossible to imagine a sitting Republican president mounting such a campaign now. The 21st-century Republican Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries, the empire of the insanely rich and ultra-conservative Koch brothers. In its current iteration, the party’s only permanent principle is to cut taxes for the nation’s one-percenters. Its elected representatives seem to believe that those who have profited most from America’s favorable economic environment, including President Donald J. Trump, have the least responsibility to maintain and nurture it.

That’s an assault on longstanding American traditions, an attack on the vaunted ideal of equal opportunity, an explosive device aimed at the middle class. It’s also a surefire recipe for the decline of the GOP, if this week’s (Nov. 7) election results are any indication. Trump’s low approval ratings clearly helped defeat Republican candidates around the country. The idea of lowering taxes on the filthy rich — very unpopular among voters, including those who identify as Republicans, according to polls — is unlikely to help GOP candidates do much better in next year’s midterm congressional elections.

Many economists believe that the growing problem of income inequality has been made worse by tax policy that favors the wealthy. (As just one example, working-class men and women pay a heftier portion of their incomes in Social Security taxes than do more affluent workers.) The Republicans’ tax plans — the House and Senate have slightly different versions — would so tilt the playing field toward the very rich that the average man or woman would never have a chance to catch up.

The Brookings Institution’s nonpartisan tax experts estimate that the House plan would confer 80 percent of its benefits — 80 percent! — on the richest 1 percent of households. Conservatives like to argue that they favor taxation that encourages work and discourages indolence. But what about the indolence of the trust fund babies, the super-rich scions who inherit their wealth? The House tax plan would give them a break worth $172.2 billion over 10 years, according to Brookings.

Those “trustafarians,” as I like to call them, have done absolutely nothing to earn their riches. They haven’t started a company, invented a marvelous digital device or found a cure for cancer. They’re just members of the Lucky Sperm Club, people born with silver spoons in their mouths.

The Republican Party has long been associated with the wealthy, but it was also long associated with fiscal restraint, a reasoned outlook toward science and an internationalist approach to foreign policy. It has jettisoned all but its subservience to the super-rich, who want massive tax cuts above all else.

Remember when the GOP stood for reining in the budget deficit? Remember conservatives who insisted that the towering national debt represented a grave threat to the health of the nation?

Throughout President Barack Obama’s tenure, Republicans hounded him about spending — so much that his economic stimulus plan was not nearly as generous as it should have been. He wanted Republican votes to pass the plan, and the GOP insisted on a stingy proposal. Similarly, the Affordable Care Act is as complicated and convoluted as it is because Obama was trying to lure GOP votes. He didn’t get any, but Obamacare was a careful balancing act — paying for subsidies to buy insurance with a tailored set of tax increases. The ACA didn’t add a dime to the federal debt.

But worrying about budget deficits is so 2009. U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, has acknowledged that the House tax cuts would add $1.51 trillion (yes, that’s the T-word) to the federal debt over 10 years. The nonprofit Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says it’s more likely to be $2 trillion.

Apparently, that’s OK as long as the rich get richer. That’s the only principle the Republican Party has left.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Youtube Screenshot

Republicans need the political press to do a lot of bad journalism in order to carry out their strategy of forcing through devastating spending cuts by leveraging the prospect of a calamitous default on U.S. debt. They need political journalists to produce wishy-washy “both sides” coverage that hides the party’s ultimate culpability and shields it from blame. And the latest coverage from The New York Times shows that their plan may already be working.

It shouldn’t be difficult to acknowledge that Republicans will be the ones at fault if the U.S. breaches the statutory limit on federal borrowing in June. Members of Congress of both parties routinely voted for clean debt limit hikes during Donald Trump’s presidency, which also saw record debt increases. But with Joe Biden in the White House, GOP leaders startedsaying last fall that they would require significant spending cuts – including to Social Security and Medicare – alongside further debt limit increases if their party won the House.

Keep reading...Show less

Rep. Michael McCaul

Youtube Screenshot

On Sunday's edition of This Week, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) defended House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) for placing Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) on the Homeland Security and Oversight Committees, despite her history of peddling conspiracy theories about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

ABC moderator Martha Raddatz asked McCaul:

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}