The National  Memo Logo

Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019

New Transcripts Confirm Trump Demanded Ukraine Probe Of Biden

The three House committees leading the impeachment inquiry released two more transcripts from their closed-door hearings on Friday, further confirming the existence of a quid pro quo between the White House and Ukraine.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Dr. Fiona Hill testified before the House Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs Committees on Oct. 29 and Oct. 14, respectively. The transcripts of those depositions were made public on Friday afternoon.

Vindman, a decorated veteran who serves on the National Security Council, listened in on the July 25 phone call between Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — now at the center of the impeachment probe — from inside the White House situation room. He testified last month that he was “concerned” by the conversation.

“I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Vindman said in his opening statement.

Following the call, Vindman said he “immediately went to the senior NSC legal counsel and shared those concerns.”

Vindman also testified that the Trump administration dangled the possibility of a White House meeting to pressure Ukraine into opening an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden.

“It was a demand for him [Zelensky] to fulfill his — fulfill this particular prerequisite in order to get the [White House] meeting,” Vindman said.

Hill, an aide to former national security adviser John Bolton, testified before the same committees on Oct. 14. Her testimony was delayed when Republicans threatened national security by storming the secure testimony room with their cell phones.

In her testimony, Hill testified that Bolton did not want to be a part of pressuring Ukraine to open an investigation into Biden in return for a White House meeting.

“…Ambassador Bolton asked me to go over and report this to our NSC counsel, to John Eisenberg,” Hill said. “And he told me, and this is a direct quote from Ambassador Bolton: You go and tell Eisenberg that I am not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up on this, and you go and tell him what you’ve heard and what I’ve said.”

Hill also corroborated other testimony pointing out that Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, played a key role in the removal of former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.

Hill said Giuliani was behind “a mishmash of conspiracy theories” smearing Yovanovitch, which eventually led to Yovanovitch’s removal.

Vindman’s full testimony can be read here, and excerpts can be found below:

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman excerpts (PDF)

Hill’s full testimony can be read here, and excerpts can be found below:

Fiona Hill excerpts (PDF)

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Advertising

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Leopard 2 tanks

This is the latest report in my months-long coverage of the war in Ukraine. For more reporting like this, and to read my screeds about the reprehensible Republican Party, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Keep reading...Show less
Youtube Screenshot

With Republicans once again setting the stage for gridlock in Congress over raising the U.S. Treasury's statutory debt limit, and using interviews to push disingenuous analogies comparing the federal government’s budgeting practices to that of an average American household. The real danger is that mainstream media could fall for this misleading comparison and pressure Democrats into enacting painful cuts to popular social programs, while also letting Republicans off the hook for their role in manufacturing this crisis in the first place.

These comparisons between federal and household budgets go back many years, and they ignore some glaring differences: Unlike a household or business, the U.S. government issues its own currency and can roll over its own debt. The political utility of this comparison, however, is that it has enabled conservatives to target social programs, while they avoid answering for their own role in running up the public debt through unfunded tax cuts under Republican administrations.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}