Tag: adam schiff
Trump Makes People Laugh, But Not Because He's Witty (Or Even Funny)

Trump Makes People Laugh, But Not Because He's Witty (Or Even Funny)

In a display of Stockholm Syndrome, the White House Correspondents' Association invited Donald Trump to be the keynote speaker at their annual festival of self-appreciation. Because he is who he is, he did not take the opportunity to do the kind of gentle press ribbing that past presidents have engaged in, and he certainly declined to engage in the self-deprecating humor that charmed audiences in the old days. Instead, he delivered a string of puerile insults that would be beneath a fifth grader.

The tuxedo and ball gown-clad lads and ladies were forced to sit through meandering gibberish about the White House UFC fight, the weather forecast, the White House ballroom, why he hadn't attended the Correspondents' Association dinner in the past, and how "hot" America is now. Then he let loose with a string of gross insults:

"But I can exclusively reveal to you this evening that for the heaviest of the heavyweights, we will have Sloppy Chris Christie, one of the sloppiest human beings you'll ever meet. Fighting, I would say, I could mention the governor of Chicago (sic), but I'm going to mention instead Jerry Nadler. And they're fighting for a big piece of cheesecake, big fat piece of cheesecake."

But we had a contest for who had the lowest ratings and the lowest IQ on television. And that was actually Don Lemon, I think. When I said that he's the dumbest man on television, I said, 'When you say some things, you never make a comeback.'

"But this year, the association decided not to have a comedian. So they considered using Jimmy Kimmel. Jimmy Fallon. These guys, they're terrible. They're terrible. Stephen Colbert, these are people without talent. They get a lot. They have talent. You know who has talent? Their agent getting them the money they get. They have no talent. But they are not comedians. They're not funny people. They're angry people. They're sick people."

The president also noted that he "hated ... Adam 'Shifty' Schiff," calling him "a terrible person. He's a liar. And I called him Watermelon Head because he is the largest head I've ever seen with the smallest neck, pencil neck. How does that big, fat, ugly head stand on a little pencil neck?"

Why dwell on this? Because many people, even those who abhor Trump, say he's funny.

I confess I've never seen the evidence. People often laugh at transgression. It's not that they find it funny (though some may) but that laughter is often a reaction to surprise. I've noticed in meetings that when people use the f-bomb, others tend to smile, not because it's funny but because it's surprising in the circumstances (or at least it used to be before the f-word became the all-purpose placeholder in modern speech).So perhaps Trump's gross insults and vile jibes evoke a certain shock and therefore laughter? I don't know. Certainly, some of his fans enjoy the grossness and cruelty, but that ain't wit.

We have seen wit in politicians in the past, and one must wonder whether our age would even recognize the real thing.

Sen. Bob Dole, the Kansas Republican who was crippled fighting in Italy during World War II, had a deadpan delivery. After he received just 607 votes in the 1980 New Hampshire Republican presidential primary, he said, "The day after New Hampshire, I went home and slept like a baby. Every two hours I woke up and cried." He coined the much-repeated line "The most dangerous place to be in Washington is between Chuck Schumer and a TV camera."Others did self-deprecating humor with grace. George W. Bush performed an 11-minute routine alongside Steve Bridges, a hilarious Bush impersonator. Both poked fun at the president's malapropisms and poor pronunciation.

Several years later, Obama invited Keegan-Michael Key to be his "anger translator." While not quite as self-effacing as Bush's skit, it did poke fun at Obama's cerebral, detached, sometimes even robotic delivery.

Running against World War II hero Dwight Eisenhower cannot have been easy. But Democrat Adlai Stevenson brought a certain elan to the task. In a 1952 Fresno speech, he said, "I have been thinking that I would make a proposition to my Republican friends ... that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them." On another occasion, when a supporter approached him and declared, "You are every thinking man's candidate," he replied, "Thank you madam, but I require a majority."

When Dick Tuck lost a California state senate primary, he called a press conference and deadpanned, "The people have spoken — the bastards." Rep. Mo Udall later borrowed that line and also quipped that "the only cure for presidential fever is embalming fluid."

New York Mayor Ed Koch offered a variation on Tuck's theme when he lost reelection in 1989: "The people have spoken ... and they must be punished."

GOP Sen. Alan Simpson, Wyoming's unfailing wag, once described the political parties this way: "We have two political parties in this country, the Stupid Party and the Evil Party. I belong to the Stupid Party." He also said, "Those who travel the high road of humility are not troubled by heavy traffic."

And the frequently droll Sen. John McCain, responding to a young man who asked whether he wasn't too old to run for president (the Arizona Republican was 63), quipped, "Thanks for the question you little jerk." That was tart but not cruel, because the point was that the question had hit a nerve.

I don't know about you, but I would give a lot for a politician of genuine wit right now.

Trump said the White House Correspondents' Association didn't hire a comedian this year. True, but they did invite a clown.

Mona Charen is policy editor of The Bulwark and host of the "Beg to Differ" podcast. Her new book, Hard Right: The GOP's Drift Toward Extremism, is available now.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

Vengeful 'Investigation' Of E. Jean Carroll Shows Justice Department Running Amok

Vengeful 'Investigation' Of E. Jean Carroll Shows Justice Department Running Amok

President Donald Trump may be the smallest, meanest and most vengeful man to serve in the Oval Office. Every time I think he and his minions could stoop no lower, they surprise me. There is simply no limit to Trump's hunger for vengeance, or the willingness of his minions to do his bidding, no matter how unethical.

The latest is Wednesday's news, first reported by CNN, that the Justice Department has launched an investigation of E. Jean Carroll, the woman who successfully sued Donald Trump for sex abuse and defamation. And won. And won on appeal.

So what does Trump do? Own up to his wrongdoing? Never. Accept the verdict and move on? Not Trump-like. No, when someone does something Donald Trump doesn't like, he sics the Justice Department on them for a pretextual investigation. If that doesn't amount to weaponizing the Justice Department for partisan political purposes, what does?

The "investigation," if you can call it that, reportedly centers on whether Carroll lied in a deposition four years ago when asked whether outside backers were funding her fight against Trump. Carroll later disclosed that billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman helped cover some of her legal expenses through a nonprofit with which she had no direct connection. So what? It doesn't change any of the facts. It is hardly the stuff that the Justice Department could be bothered to investigate. This is not a federal case. It is the latest act of petty vengeance by a man who has no limits to the grudges he keeps or the power he is willing to use to get even.

The reaction to the news of the Carroll investigation prompted outrage, as it should. Gavin Newsom, with his usual taste for understatement, called the president "sick." If this is an illness, it threatens all of us with its inherent corruption and its assault on the rule of law.

Said California's Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff: "First, Trump weaponized the DOJ to target his political enemies. Now, perversely, he's targeting E. Jean Carroll, the woman who credibly and successfully sued him for sexual assault. He's using the power of the DOJ to go after his own victims. It's a vile attack on the rule of law and a disgusting insult to victims everywhere."

This is not just about Donald Trump and E. Jean Carroll. It is, as Sen. Schiff points out, "a disgusting insult to victims everywhere." It is a message to anyone who dares to take on Donald Trump that they will be subject to a criminal investigation. If he would do this to the woman who successfully sued him for sexual abuse, who would he not do it to?

Just for the record, Carroll defeated Trump in two separate civil cases. In 2023, a jury found Trump liable for sexually assaulting and defaming Carroll.

A second jury later ordered Trump to pay additional damages for repeated defamatory statements attacking Carroll as a liar. Trump appealed both rulings and lost both times. So what? He is the king.

The Justice Department is not supposed to be doing the dirty work for a president who does not believe in the rule of law. Trump had his day in court — multiple days — and lost. Now he is abusing his power as president to get even.

There were times when the Justice Department would have refused to be dragged into an abyss like this. They would not have done the president's private bidding. Those days are past. So the question is, who is going to stop this? The press is doing its job. So are most of the courts. But that is not enough. Congress, with its oversight role, must investigate and rein in an out-of-control Justice Department.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.


E. Jean Carroll

Latest Target Of Trump's Weaponized Justice Is Successful Rape Accuser Carroll

President Donald Trump is committing impeachable offenses at a dizzying clip, weaponizing the federal government against his enemies and lining his pockets with taxpayer dollars.

In his latest offense, Trump’s Department of Justice is criminally investigating E. Jean Carroll, the writer whose lawsuits led to Trump being found liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

According to CNN, the DOJ is investigating Carroll for perjury, claiming that she lied in a 2022 deposition in her ultimately successful lawsuit against Trump. DOJ prosecutors say Carroll perjured herself when she said her lawsuit against Trump wasn’t being financed by any outside entities. But before the trial was set to begin, Carroll’s lawyers told the judge and Trump attorney Alina Habba that billionaire Reid Hoffman covered some of the trial expenses.

Habba—whom Trump later appointed to serve as a U.S. attorney until a judge kicked her out—had accused Carroll’s lawyers during the trial of having “conspired to conceal the truth for nearly six months.”

Yet a judge blocked Trump’s legal team from asking about how Carroll’s lawsuit was being financed during the trial, which Carroll went on to win.

Trump’s DOJ going after Carroll is clearly a revenge effort. He is livid that she was awarded nearly $90 million in damages between two separate cases—$5 million for damages related to the alleged sexual abuse and another $83 million for defamation. (Trump has been appealing both decisions for years and is now hoping the Supreme Court, which he stacked with right-wing hacks, will throw out the cases and prevent Carroll from receiving the funds awarded to her.)

“This is an unbelievable abuse of power,” Democratic Rep. Adam Smith of California told CNN on Wednesday.

Sen. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who is also a target of Trump’s weaponized DOJ over bullshit mortgage-fraud allegations, also slammed the DOJ probe into Carroll.

“First, Trump weaponized the DOJ to target his political enemies. Now, perversely, he’s targeting E. Jean Carroll, the woman who credibly and successfully sued him for sexual assault,” Schiff wrote in a post on X. “He’s using the power of the DOJ to go after his own victims. It’s a vile attack on the rule of law and a disgusting insult to victims everywhere.”

Should charges be brought against Carroll, it will be the just latest vindictive prosecution effort by the DOJ.

Already, Trump forced the DOJ to charge former FBI Director James Comey twice on dubious charges—once for supposed perjury and again for allegedly making threats against Trump. The first case has been thrown out because the court determined the U.S. attorney who sought the charges—Lindsey Halligan—was not legally serving in her role when she sought the indictment.

Trump also sought charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James for bogus mortgage-fraud charges, which were thrown out by a federal judge for the same reason as in Comey’s case. Trump’s DOJ tried to indict James again but failed when a grand jury declined to pursue charges—something that rarely happens.

Trump went after James because she successfully prosecuted him for charges of falsifying business records, which now makes him forever a convicted felon.

And a federal judge last week went as far as to throw out criminal charges against Maryland resident Kilmar Albrego Garcia—whom Trump wrongfully shipped off to a torture prison in El Salvador—due to vindictive prosecution. Again, that is a ruling that almost never happens since it is so difficult to prove.

If Carroll were ultimately charged, she would almost certainly seek to have the case thrown out on similar grounds.

Ultimately, Trump’s use of the DOJ as his revenge squad is not popular, with majorities of Americans saying that indictments of Trump’s perceived enemies have been unjustified.

What’s more, a majority of Americans now believe Trump should be impeached.

Should Democrats win control of the House this fall, you can be sure they will probe these investigations—and possibly move forward with impeachment.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


President Trump

How Trump's Drive For Personal Revenge May Backfire On MAGA

President Donald Trump wants revenge. He has made getting even the centerpiece of his administration, as if vengeance is a popular or attractive response. It isn't.

Last week, Trump asked Attorney General Pam Bondi on Truth Social why "nothing is being done" about James Comey, California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James. What's to be done? Schiff's only offense was his leadership of the Trump impeachment effort; James' offense, if you can call it that, was successfully prosecuting Trump. Since when is that a crime? Since when does a member of Congress deserve the attention of the attorney general for doing his job?

"They did it with me for four years," Trump said Friday, repeating his familiar criticism that the Biden Justice Department was weaponized against him. "They went after me." Frankly, the most troubling criticism I've heard of my friend and former Attorney General Merrick Garland is that he was too cautious and waited too long before appointing Jack Smith to independently investigate the president, leaving no window for a trial on the January 6 charges before the 2024 election. Garland did everything he could as attorney general to protect the independence of the Justice Department. The Trump Justice Department doesn't even make a pretense of independence. Trump says, "Jump" and the only acceptable answer is, "How high?"

That is precisely what happened in Comey's case. Two career prosecutors, experienced in applying the accepted Justice Department charging guidelines, found insufficient evidence to justify an indictment of Comey. So Trump brought in a new U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, a woman who was his personal lawyer and has zero prosecutorial experience. So much for the judgment of the career prosecutors.

The Justice Department, acting in response to more bullying demands from Trump, has reportedly launched an investigation of George Soros, the billionaire philanthropist who has long supported democratic movements around the world. He has also contributed generously to U.S. Democrats. For this he should be prosecuted? Trump has demanded that Soros be thrown in jail.

Comey was indicted Thursday on one count of making a false statement and one count of obstruction of a congressional proceeding in connection with his testimony before a Senate committee in September 2020.

"He's a dirty cop," Trump said of Mr. Comey. "He's always been a dirty cop." The flimsy two-page indictment, signed only by Trump's personal lawyer and not, as usual, also by the prosecutors who gathered the evidence, hardly reads like an indictment of a "dirty cop." What an irony. Ask any Hillary Clinton supporter about James Comey and they'll probably remind you that Comey's handling of Hillary's email server, particularly in the closing days of the campaign, cost her the election. We all thought that Trump should thank him.

Comey is going to be tough to beat. He seemed almost to welcome the opportunity to take the fight to Trump. "We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn't either." He referred to his daughter, who was removed from her own post at the Justice Department last summer: "Somebody that I love dearly recently said that fear is the tool of a tyrant, and she's right, but I'm not afraid, and I hope you're not either."

The younger Ms. Comey is right. Trump turned the Eastern District of Virginia into the "tool of a tyrant" just as he is doing to the Justice Department. Being a tyrant is clearly what Trump wants and relishes. But whether it will wear well politically remains to be seen. Trump clearly does not believe that living well and outlasting the James Comeys is the best revenge. His taste for pure vengeance is insatiable, and he is willing to dwell in the gutter to get it. Trump was reportedly elated by the charges against Comey and insisted that there would be "others." Beware what you wish for. Whether the public wants to dwell in that gutter with him — rather than address the people's many legitimate worries — remains to be seen.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World