Tag: americans
Kamala Harris

Voter Registration Surging As Harris Inspires Young Americans

After President Joe Biden ended his reelection campaign on Sunday and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as the next Democratic nominee, Vote.org reportedly registered 38,500 new voters over the next 48 hours. This represents a 700 percent surge over the previous 48 hours, with most of those voters being ages 34 and younger.

That beats the previous best day of the 2024 cycle, which came on National Voter Registration Day in September when pop superstar Taylor Swift posted an Instagram story urging her followers to get registered. That message helped spur over 35,000 new voter registrations.

The latest surge in registrations comes as Harris and other Democratic candidates see a flood of donations. Since Harris entered the race, ActBlue has recorded $179 million in donations to Democratic candidates and causes. That's just part of a historic flood of over $250 million that poured in since Harris became the nominee-apparent.

It all reflects a genuine, pent-up demand for something new. And Harris is meeting that demand.

Even before it was clear there would be a Biden vs. Donald Trump rematch, voters were begging for something, anything, other than a Biden vs. Donald Trump rematch. In a December poll by the Associated Press/NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, over half of Americans said they would be dissatisfied if the race were a repeat of the 2020 matchup.

The lack of enthusiasm was notable at ActBlue, where contributions were not only running behind the 2020 election cycle but also trailing contributions during the 2022 midterm elections.

That big spike on the far right of the chart reflects the sharp increase in contributions since Harris started running for president. This article was written early Wednesday morning, and this week already rivals the top weeks at the very end of the 2020 presidential election cycle. That’s big.

Democrats are excited about Harris. That’s reflected in the contributions.

Young voters, who tend to be more Democratic than other age groups, are excited about Harris. That’s reflected in the registrations.

Those young voters are particularly energized and enthusiastic over the change in the ticket. As WGBH Boston reported on Sunday, some young Democrats were willing to turn up for Biden. But they’re willing to work for Harris.

“This is the most energized I have felt as a young Democratic voter in so long,” 22-year-old Democrat Audrey Grant told WGBH. “I think this is one of the first times that the Democratic Party has seized control of a media narrative and really changed the tide.”

That younger demographic—and in particular, younger voters of color—was critical to carrying Biden and Harris over the top in 2020. It could be even more critical this year.

That Harris could pull in the kind of registration numbers associated with someone like Swift is encouraging. But the real power that such cultural figures have to move the needle shouldn’t be ignored.

On Tuesday, Beyoncé gave Harris permission to use her popular 2016 song “Freedom" in her campaign. Harris made it her entrance song in her first campaign appearance in the swing state of Wisconsin.

Swift’s obvious political clout and concerns that she would endorse Biden drove Republicans to distraction earlier in the year, leading to a host of conspiracy theories. Since Harris kicked off her campaign, the surge of Democratic zeal is already generating speculation over what might happen if Swift publicly rallies around Harris.

If Swift did so, she’d be in good company among pop stars. British singer—and the summer’s it-girl—Charli XCX declared that “kamala IS brat,” referring to the title of her latest album, and the Harris campaign quickly adopted the album’s lime-green cover art as the backdrop on their X (formerly Twitter) account.

There’s plenty of room for more synergy between Harris and singers whose impact is great enough to shift economies. A 2018 post from Swift in which she endorsed two candidates in Tennessee helped propel a surge of roughly 65,000 new signups at Vote.org in just 24 hours.

Official endorsements from Swift, Beyoncé, and others might break the internet—and the will of Republicans who see the tide turning against them.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Behind Vance's Appalachian Fairy Tale, A Less Uplifting Reality

Behind Vance's Appalachian Fairy Tale, A Less Uplifting Reality

America loves a poor-kid-makes-it-big story—and J.D. Vance told a whopper. The then-venture capitalist’s 2016 memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy,” presented Vance as an impoverished Appalachian kid who escaped a violent childhood overshadowed by a drug-addicted mother, fled to an Ivy League university, and eventually found wealth among the coastal elite as a high-rolling investment banker.

And his success didn’t stop there. The book was so well received that it spawned a big Hollywood film. Refreshed by wealth and fame, Vance returned to his home state of Ohio and began a nonprofit organization to “make it easier for disadvantaged children to achieve their dreams.” Then he ran for Senate—and won. Then, less than two years later, Vance was selected to be Donald Trump’s new running mate after his previous vice president was mysteriously unavailable.

Roll credits.

Only the story that Vance is telling has holes more than large enough to accommodate Trump’s private 757 jet. For starters, Vance isn’t from Appalachia. His book was riddled with broad negative stereotypes clearly written to appeal to exactly the cultural critics who welcomed its publication. And his nonprofit organization was a thinly veiled platform to launch Vance’s political career.

Most people are more than they seem at first glance. J.D. Vance is a whole lot less.

The Oscar-winning film “American Fiction,” based on the novel “Erasure” by Booker Prize-shortlisted author Percival Everett, tells the story of accomplished Black author Thelonious "Monk" Ellison. Frustrated by the market’s appetite for books that present Black culture only as a product of “da hood,” Ellison writes a fake autobiography titled “My Pafology” satirizing those works with an extreme story of a man whose life consists only of drugs, violence, and the worst stereotypes of inner-city life.

It’s hard to believe that Vance didn’t read Everett’s 2001 novel, because that’s exactly what he wrote. “Hillbilly Elegy” is the “My Pafology” of working-class, rural white people.

Both books are full of only the worst imaginable stereotypes. Both books are meant to specifically appeal to an audience that loves to extend false pity while indulging itself in feelings of superiority.

As Monk’s character said in the film, “I'm sure white people in the Hamptons will delight in it.” When it comes to Vance’s book, they certainly did.

For people who actually grew up in the region, the reaction to Vance’s book was somewhat different.

“I barely read 30 pages before I saw the book Hillbilly Elegy for what it was: a political platform masquerading as memoir,” wrote Appalachian native Neema Avashia. “Before I saw J.D. Vance for what he was: an opportunist. One willing to double down on stereotypes, to paint the people of Appalachia with a culture of poverty brush, rather than be honest about the ways in which both electoral politics and industry have failed our region.”

Only a few months after the book was published, Vance announced that he was leaving his posh job as an investment banker in San Francisco—the triumphant conclusion to the Horatio Alger story he told—to start a nonprofit organization in his home state of Ohio. In a fawning interview at NPR, where Vance was described as a “frequent guest,” he described how the opioid crisis was “obviously very personally important to me.”

Vance didn’t say what he was going to do to help beyond conducting a “listening tour.” However, even before that interview, Vance had filed the paperwork to start a nonprofit organization called Our Ohio Renewal.

Following that link now leads only to a blank page. Vance’s nonprofit no longer exists.

As The New York Times reported in 2022, Vance’s group “raised only about $220,000, hired only a handful of staff members, shrank drastically in 2018 and died for good in 2021.” Vance may say that he is “proud of the work we did,” but that work seems to have accomplished exactly nothing in addressing the problems Vance claimed to be fighting.

But it did do something else: It gave Vance a platform to publish op-eds and raised his visibility within Ohio.

The New York Times said Vance was “irked” by the idea that he was returning to Ohio to run for political office. But in 2018, as Our Ohio Renewal was shedding the staff that was supposed to help it address real problems, the nonprofit was also paying for a political consultant who advised Vance about entering the upcoming Senate race.

It’s hard to say it better than this ad for Vance’s Senate opponent in 2022: Vance created a bogus nonprofit to advance his political visibility. As the small business owner featured in the ad intoned, “J.D. Vance was in a position to really help people, but he only helped himself.”

Vance created a nonprofit to give himself a platform. He used that nonprofit to pay for a consultant to prepare him for a Senate campaign. Once that campaign was underway, Vance discarded the organization. It's not a surprise that Our Ohio Renewal is dead; its real job is over.

Now that he’s in Congress, how much does the issue of drug addiction in Ohio really matter to Vance? As the Ohio Capital Journal reports, Vance did cosponsor anti-fentanyl legislation written by Ohio Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. But when that bill came up for a vote, Vance voted against it.

Vance’s Senate office claimed that he voted against it because the bill had become attached to funding for Ukraine. The issue of drug addiction may be “very personal” to Vance. But apparently, it’s not as personal as his need to please Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.

As Avashia wrote in her review of Vance’s book, “Folks outside Appalachia devoured Hillbilly Elegy because it reinforced what they already believed about us: that we were lazy, homogenous, and to blame for the unemployment, addiction and environmental disasters that plagued us. Vance’s description of a Jackson, Kentucky, where ‘people are hardworking, except of course for the many food stamp recipients who show little interest in honest work’, allowed liberals and conservatives alike to write Appalachia off as beyond saving, and its problems as self-created, and thus, deserved.”

Vance was smart enough to know that there was an audience eager to buy into that narrative. That doesn’t just apply to the Republican delegates meeting this week in Milwaukee, but to the media guilelessly reporting on Trump’s replacement for Mike Pence.

And … that’s about it. Vance is smart enough to know the narrative the media loves and hypocritical enough to say whatever it takes. That makes him a most appropriate sidekick for Trump.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Climate Change

Project 2025 Would Wreck Our Daily Lives -- Including Weather Forecasts

A lot of disaster is packed into the 900+ pages of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. Between the scheme to turn the federal government into the servant of an imperial president, and the plan to force Christian nationalism into every aspect of American life, it’s easy to get lost in the details.

One of those details is the plot to gut the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, including the National Weather Service. Project 2025 calls for that agency to “be dismantled and many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories.”

Why get rid of an agency providing such singularly useful information not only used by many Americans daily, but also the basis for forecasts that appear on most local radio and television stations? There are three reasons. One of these is profit. The other two are … also profit.

Project 2025 doesn’t hesitate to explain the primary reason why it has put such a vital agency in the crosshairs. According to Heritage, the various components of NOAA:

... form a colossal operation that has become one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry and, as such, is harmful to future U.S. prosperity. This industry’s mission emphasis on prediction and management seems designed around the fatal conceit of planning for the unplannable. That is not to say NOAA is useless, but its current organization corrupts its useful functions. It should be broken up and downsized.

In other words, the problem with the weather service is that it tries to predict the weather. And all too often that involves making people aware that we are experiencing an unprecedented period of rising heat around the globe. That’s something Project 2025 means to stop.

Protecting the fossil fuel industry is a key feature of the plan. Blocking any expression of concern about the climate crisis is so important to Project 2025’s goals that it calls on the National Security Council to block the promotion of any military officer who expresses concern over climate change or “other polarizing policies.” (This is currently on page 52 of the plan, but page numbers have been altered several times since the plan’s first publication, making it more difficult to reference components of Project 2025.)

As The Atlanticreports, the NWS provides Americans with current weather conditions; short-term and long-term forecasts; and warnings for tornadoes, hurricanes, severe storms, floods, and excessive heat. It does all this at a cost of about $4 per person.

But Project 2025 wants to hand over these tasks to commercial services, specifically mentioning commercial firm AccuWeather. It admits that services like AccuWeather completely depend on data provided by NOAA, and wants that to continue; It just wants to hide the government service behind the commercial product, ensuring profit and keeping citizens from connecting their government with such a useful service.

That way commercial services get the profit, and the credit, while what remains of the government agency toils thanklessly in the background. Also, Americans don’t get exposed to the idea that government bureaucrats and scientists are doing something of value.

According to the actual report, Project 2025 also wants to eliminate most of the National Oceanic Service and National Marine Fisheries Service, turning over survey functions to the United States Geological Survey, and ending functions that are designed to protect large areas of the ocean from overfishing by commercial fleets. That includes weakening protections to seals, otters, and whales under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act.

The reduction of these offices would also limit NOAA’s ability to provide permits for offshore wind power. According to Project 2025, permitting wind facilities generates a “detriment of fisheries and other existing ocean-based industries.” In other words, your clean energy is getting in the way of our overfishing and oil platforms.

But the biggest target of the plan is the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research:

OAR is, however, the source of much of NOAA’s climate alarmism. The preponderance of its climate-change research should be disbanded.

Put it together and Project 2025 isn’t stealthy about what it wants to do:

  • Protect the profits of the fossil fuel industry by eliminating the ability of NOAA to research and report on the climate crisis and by restricting the permitting of wind farms.
  • Project the profit of commercial weather services by eliminating features that Americans get now from the National Weather Service and making Americans reliant on for-profit forecasts.
  • Protect the profit of commercial fishermen by eliminating offices that oversee protected areas and weakening rules around causing harm to the environment and endangered animals.

As Ben Jealous writing for the Sierra Club points out, not only is Project 2025 the product of one of the largest Republican think tanks, more than 100 other right-wing groups have signed on to the plan. This isn’t the design of one splinter group; This is a Republican effort spearheaded by a massive organization that is the primary sponsor of the RNC and employed dozens of former Trump staffers in Project 2025’s creation.

When talking about climate change, the parable of the boiling frog is often used. A frog, says the myth, if placed in a pot of cold water, will remain in that water even as it gets hotter and hotter, never escaping before being boiled alive.

Project 2025’s big plan for NOAA is designed to keep Americans in the pot until it boils. And make sure they never get a free look at the thermometer.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

President Joe Biden

How Much Would You Gamble On A Biden Comeback?

One of the saddest fables people comforted themselves with over the past eight years was the one about the strength of American institutions: The voters could elevate an unfit, malevolent demagogue, but our checks and balances were robust; our institutions would prevent any serious damage.

Over the course of these years, one institution after another has demonstrated the opposite — that they are not bulwarks, merely facades.

An entire political party, the party of Lincoln no less, abandoned its devotion to law and tradition as well as principles like free trade, concern about government debt, welcoming immigrants, cordiality to free enterprise and devotion to American world leadership.

Huge swaths of the press, an indispensable institution in a free society, have turned themselves into propaganda outlets that rival North Korea's.

Leaders of the business community have rallied to Trump's side, showering him with contributions and soft-pedaling his threat to the freedoms that are foundational to free enterprise.

Conservative organizations and think tanks have become MAGA mouthpieces.

Some churches have swapped God for Trump, and even among those who haven't gone that far, criticism of Trump is treated as a kind of blasphemy.

Until this week, one institution that mostly resisted the prevailing winds was the judiciary — Aileen Cannon, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito notwithstanding. With Trump v. United States, that is gone. Another domino falls — a massive one. The decision, which may rank among the most egregious in American history, places the president above the law and creates a glidepath for massive abuse of power if not outright dictatorship.

It is against this backdrop that we must consider the Biden candidacy. The past week has demonstrated that the only check left against autocracy in our own country is the vote on Nov. 5. The stakes were massive before Trump v. United States. They have become astronomical since.

The question all of us must answer is: Are we willing to gamble our democracy on Biden's capacity to win?

Before the debate, I was. Now, I conclude that the risks are too great. Before the debate I was disappointed in Biden's decision to run again (though I thought he did a good job as president) but reconciled to it. Now I am enraged at him and those around him who put ego, pride and stubbornness ahead of country when making that decision. I believed the Biden team when they said that State of the Union Biden was the real thing and that the manifold stories of decline and dementia were extremely exaggerated partisan hits. Now I can see that the reports of deterioration were more right than wrong and that the Biden team was hiding him and deceiving us.

He skipped the Super Bowl interview. He's been taking the back entrance to Air Force One to avoid the longer staircase. Even in the press conference he called to deny Robert Hur's allegations that he was losing his grip, he got the presidents of Mexico and Egypt confused. That followed hard on the heels of referring to Emmanuel Macron as Francois Mitterrand (who died in 1996).

Further, Biden asked for this debate. Presumably, he and his team recognized that he needed to reassure Americans, even large numbers of Democrats, that he was mentally and physically up to the demands of another term. A March AP/NORC poll found that only 40% of Democrats were extremely or very confident that Biden had the mental capacity to serve another term. That's bad enough, but among non-Democrats the picture was grim. A June 5-7 CBS poll found that 72% of independents did not think Biden had the mental and cognitive health to serve as president.

Biden's debate performance confirmed the very worst rumors of his senescence. The early post-debate polls are confirming the scale of the failure.

In a normal year, it would be irresponsible to ask voters to choose an ailing 81-year-old. This year, it is a catastrophe. The Biden who was revealed last Thursday night cannot defeat Trump. Remember: The 2020 version of Biden barely did.

If Biden were to withdraw from the race, he would be hailed immediately as a statesman. Meanwhile, the prospect of a decades-younger candidate who can articulate an argument would thrill voters who've been approaching November with all the enthusiasm of French Revolution victims riding in tumbrils to the guillotine. Independents in particular would rejoice at having another option.

In 2020, the normally fractious and identity-mad Democrats put all of that aside to unite behind the old white guy in the name of defeating a true menace. I pray that the party can find its way to doing that again this year — thinking not of who is Black or female or Asian or Hispanic but who is best situated to win. It may be Kamala Harris. But it may be someone else.

The Democratic Party is the oldest continuously functioning political party in the world. Everything is riding on whether it remains a strong institution capable of fulfilling its purpose. Right now, its overriding purpose is to keep Trump from power.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World