Tag: centers for disease control and prevention
COVID Lockdown Critic Kennedy Orders Hanta Cruise Survivor Held In Quarantine

COVID Lockdown Critic Kennedy Orders Hanta Cruise Survivor Held In Quarantine

Right now, at the explicit direction of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. himself, Angela Perryman, an American exposed to hantavirus on a cruise ship, is being forced to stay in quarantine against her will at a federal hospital facility in Nebraska.

In keeping Perryman locked up, Kennedy ignored his own medical experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who said Perryman could quarantine at home. But, Kennedy, in his infinite public health wisdom, overruled that.

Now, a CDC medical review by practicing doctors found that, while Perryman could have contracted the virus despite showing no symptoms, the risk of developing symptoms decreased during the 42-day quarantine period recommended by the World Health Organization. That lengthy stay is necessary because hantavirus has a long incubation period.

Perryman’s 42 days were up this past Sunday. But she’s still locked up.

Kennedy, in his order extending Perryman’s involuntary confinement, simply decided that she was infected based on, well, vibes, and therefore she had to stay locked up.

Other patients have been allowed to quarantine at home, but Perryman ostensibly cannot because Florida, where Perryman lives, refused to meet the surveillance requirements demanded by the CDC. People quarantining at home are literally under constant surveillance 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to ensure they comply with quarantine orders.

Initially, the CDC even told states that they had to post a law enforcement officer outside people’s homes, a genuinely dystopian, thuggish thing to do. Health officials later decided that the 24/7 monitoring could be done by a healthcare worker, which doesn’t really make this any less terrible.

It was inevitable that the CDC, ravaged by mass firings, currently without a Senate-confirmed leader, and constantly in the grip of the weirdest, worst anti-science vaccine skeptics, would be utterly unable to rise to the occasion if there was a public health crisis. Indeed, the only thing that Kennedy seems to be doing here is enforcing a quarantine with the full might of the government behind him.

Kennedy has stacked HHS with people who cut their teeth on COVID conspiracies, just like he did. And you know what Kennedy really hated? COVID lockdowns.

In 2022, he compared lockdowns in the United States to Nazi Germany, except somehow they were worse?

“Even in Hitler Germany (sic), you could, you could cross the Alps into Switzerland. You could hide in an attic, like Anne Frank did,” Kennedy said during a Washington rally against vaccine mandates.

Y I K E S.

After President Donald Trump tapped him to be health secretary, Kennedy justified the mass firings at the CDC, saying the agency responded “miserably during COVID when its disastrous, nonsensical policies destroyed small businesses, violated civil liberties, closed our schools, caused generational damage in doing so, masked infants with no science, and heightened economic inequality.”

But where COVID lockdowns were the most unjust thing that ever happened, hantavirus lockdowns are totes cool. Indeed, the Trump administration has taken an extremely hard line on both Ebola and hantavirus, lockdowns that go far beyond COVID restrictions and previous outbreaks—and Kennedy is leading the way.

For conservatives, every accusation is a confession, and that’s crystal clear here. The Biden administration did not demand 24/7 surveillance of people who had COVID. Biden’s CDC did not put people in solitary confinement, which is how one person described the hantavirus lockup, saying he became so distraught that he went on a hunger strike and was suicidal.

Perryman described her confinement as being locked alone in a room at the medical facility 23 hours per day, where she can only go outside for one hour on the roof of the building.

Kennedy is a eugenicist freak who believes that contracting diseases is some sort of moral failing, so it’s perhaps not all that surprising that he sees no problem with locking someone up indefinitely regardless of whether there is any danger.

So now Perryman has no idea when she will be released. Call Kennedy’s philosophy “lockups for thee, but not for me.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

As RFK Jr. Shatters The Promise That Got Him Confirmed, Who's Calling The Shots?

As RFK Jr. Shatters The Promise That Got Him Confirmed, Who's Calling The Shots?

The news that a Centers for Disease Control panel is now recommending that newborns not be vaccinated for Hepatitis B is frightening. As The New York Times put it, "the divisiveness and dysfunction surrounding the decision raised questions about the reliability of that process — and the future of the C.D.C." Not to mention questions about the result of that process, and how many children will pay for this political theatre.

The shots for newborns have been recommended for 30 years now. No new scientific breakthroughs since then have come along to replace them, or changed the calculus in favor of them. Hepatitis B has been eliminated in newborns. Half the cases in children before 1991 were not due to an infected mother; hepatitis B can also be spread by the use of the same household objects — like combs or toothbrushes — of infected persons.

"We know it's safe, and we know it's very effective," Dr. Cody Meissner, a professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, and one of the panelists, said on Friday, warning that if the vote passed, "we will see more children and adolescents and adults infected with hepatitis B."

But the panel was stacked with the anti-vaxxers whom RFK Jr. has brought to the table and empowered; he fired and replaced all the prior members of the panel, and I suppose we should be impressed that there were any dissenting votes. Or maybe it should scare us even more.

In another divided vote, the panel recommended that parents who choose to have the three-shot series of vaccinations be advised to have an antibody test after the first shot to see if it is effective — even though there is no scientific evidence that antibodies show up that early. According to Dr. Meissner, it was "kind of making things up, I mean, it's like Never Never Land."

Except there are real lives on the line. Public health reports suggest that as many as 70 percent of the adults with hepatitis B in this country don't know they have it and could be exposing loved ones through shared objects in the house. If those loved ones are unvaccinated.

In the hours after the vote was made public, the panel was roundly denounced by public health experts. A number made the point that this marks the end of the day when you can rely on the government for public health information. And raises questions as to insurance coverage, particularly for the unnecessary antibody test, much less for the vaccines themselves.

One of the authors of the prior guidelines, Dr. Noele Nelson, a hepatitis expert at Cornell, said the panel did not "follow the scientific evidence, and risks undoing decades of progress in hepatitis B prevention, eroding vaccine confidence, and causing confusion among parents and health care providers."

Kennedy made some kind of commitment to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), himself a doctor and supporter of vaccines, to win his deciding vote for confirmation. Whatever commitment it was, if it included a promise to rein in the anti-vaxxers and protect America's children, it is not being kept. We look to the government to protect our public health. Robert Kennedy Jr. is not doing that. I don't care if he had an affair with a Vanity Fair editor. I care that he is cutting clinical trials and scientific research and pandemic preparation, that I can't trust him to cure any diseases or advance any research because he's too busy playing politics with kids' lives.

It's time for Sen. Cassidy to call in the chit. It's time for him to start drawing the line. This is not what we want or need, and Dr. Cassidy knows that. Someone else needs to be calling the shots here — or at least exercising clear oversight over the ones who are.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Kennedy Violates Agreement On CDC Vaccine Guidance, Putting Millions At Risk

Kennedy Violates Agreement On CDC Vaccine Guidance, Putting Millions At Risk

Scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were stunned this week after the agency quietly rewrote long-standing language on vaccines and autism, adding false information that has been extensively debunked.

The CDC’s website, once unequivocal that studies show “no link” between childhood vaccines and autism, now carries a very different message.

The updated page says the statement “vaccines do not cause autism” is “not an evidence-based claim,” falsely arguing that research has “not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to the development of autism.”

It also incorrectly states that public health authorities have “ignored” studies pointing to a supposed connection. That framing mirrors arguments long pushed by one of the country’s most prominent anti-vaccine advocates: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who oversees the CDC.

Inside the agency, the fallout was immediate. Five CDC officials told The Washington Post they had no warning about the changes and played no role in drafting them. They requested anonymity out of fear of retaliation—a sign of how fraught the science-policy boundary has become inside an agency now run by a committed vaccine antagonist.

To some former officials, the rewrite confirmed their worst suspicions. Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, who led the CDC unit overseeing respiratory viruses and immunizations before resigning in August, told the Post the new language shows the agency “cannot currently be trusted as a scientific voice.”

“The weaponization of the CDC voice by validating false claims on official websites confirms what we have been saying,” he added.

The shift is all the more jarring given the mountain of research behind the original guidance. Dozens of peer-reviewed studies have found no association between autism and the mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine. A Danish study of more than 1.2 million children published this year similarly found no link between aluminum in vaccines and any neurodevelopmental harm.

The false link between vaccines and autism stems from a now-retracted 1998 article in The Lancet, an esteemed medical journal. Despite that retraction and decades of studies debunking it, the anti-vaccine conspiracy theory endures—thanks in large part to Kennedy and, at moments, President Donald Trump, who has floated baseless speculation about autism and Tylenol use during pregnancy.

Even the CDC page’s header, which says “Vaccines do not cause autism,” now carries an asterisk noting it remains only because of an agreement with Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy, a medical doctor and the Republican chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. Cassidy secured the commitment during Kennedy’s confirmation process, pressing the nominee to preserve federal vaccine guidance.

On Thursday, Cassidy issued a statement condemning the new CDC guidance.

”I’m a doctor who has seen people die from vaccine-preventable diseases. What parents need to hear right now is vaccines for measles, polio, hepatitis B and other childhood diseases are safe and effective and will not cause autism. Any statement to the contrary is wrong, irresponsible, and actively makes Americans sicker,” he said.

Publicly, HHS insists the overhaul is rooted in “gold standard, evidence-based science,” as spokesperson Andrew Nixon told Axios.

Former officials aren’t buying it. Dr. Debra Houry, the CDC’s former chief medical officer—who also resigned in August—questions how the new language that “misrepresents decades of research ended up on a CDC website.”

Public health communication, she added to the Post, must be “accurate, evidence-based, and free from political distortion. Anything else erodes trust and puts lives at risk.”

Outside the agency, anti-vaccine activists celebrated the shift. Children’s Health Defense, the group formerly led by Kennedy, declared that the CDC is finally “beginning to acknowledge the truth” and “disavowing the bold, long-running lie that ‘vaccines do not cause autism.’”

That embrace underscores what’s at stake. A federal health agency once known for its methodical caution is now echoing rhetoric that science overwhelmingly rejects. With Kennedy shaping the message, the country’s most important public health voice is inching toward fringe territory—and millions of Americans may pay the price.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

With New Vaccine 'Guidelines,' Kennedy Makes America Sick Again

With New Vaccine 'Guidelines,' Kennedy Makes America Sick Again

Pregnant women and children may be losing access to more vaccines, in addition to COVID-19, due to new recommendations. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s newly beefed-up Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices met Thursday to discuss whether or not they will continue to recommend vaccinations in young children for hepatitis B as well as the measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella, known as the MMRV vaccine.

Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention veteran Dr. Fiona Havers, who resigned in response to Kennedy’s dismantling of the CDC, saw the meeting as another anti-vaccine spectacle.

“This meeting, with a committee that is stacked with RFK Jr.'s handpicked appointees, many with a well-documented history of anti-vaccine views, was another opportunity for the HHS secretary to falsely stoke fears about vaccine safety,” Havers told Daily Kos.

Havers oversaw critical data-gathering on hospitalizations related to COVID-19 and crafted guidance on handling the Zika virus and other outbreaks during her time at the CDC. But now, she told Daily Kos as she watched the hearing, votes like this are just putting more people at risk.

“Anything that decreases vaccine confidence or access to vaccines will lead to unnecessary infections, more hospitalizations, and more preventable deaths,” she said.

When discussions kicked off Thursday afternoon, it didn’t take long for some to point out the pitfalls of removing or tampering with current vaccine guidelines.

At one point, ACIP member Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist, pointed out that the proposed changes to the MMRV vaccine would put families at risk of not being able to afford immunizations for their children even if they did, in fact, want it. Under the proposed changes, the vaccine wouldn’t be covered by the financial assistance program Vaccines for Children. Additionally, insurance companies may drop coverage of the shot as well.

"So that implies that the parents' choice, unless they want to pay for it themselves, the parents' choice is taken away," Hibbeln said, adding that the option would be "basically taken away from them.”

While one ACIP member made a case against altering the MMRV vaccine recommendation, Kennedy made sure to fill the council with people who shared his ideology.

The HHS secretary sacked 17 members of the ACIP in June, and replaced them with his handpicked staff. Many of the people Kennedy selected have already been linked to anti-vaccine rhetoric.

And given the disastrous spread of measles across Texas earlier this year, vaccine availability may be a high concern for some.

However, it wasn’t just the MMRV on the table. The ACIP members also were voting on removing recommendations for hepatitis B immunizations in newborns. Typically, this shot has been administered to children soon after birth to protect them from contracting the virus in case their mother is a carrier.

Kennedy’s team of vaccine skeptics pushed the idea of waiting one to four months before giving the child the shot, should the mother test negative for hepatitis B.

“If there is some benefit or removal of harm from waiting a month, I haven’t seen any data,” one member of the panel shot back said. “But there are a number of potential harms.”

Havers also pointed out the dangers of delaying the shot.

“If the recommendation for a universal hepatitis B birth dose is changed, more infants will be infected with a lifelong, incurable infection that can cause cancer, cirrhosis or death,” she told Daily Kos.

“Administering the birth dose to all infants prevents vulnerable infants from being missed at birth and also protects them throughout childhood from hepatitis B infection. The current vaccine has been used for decades and is extremely safe and effective. If it is changed, we will see children die unnecessarily.”

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine grip on HHS has grown since he’s taken over the position. From firing CDC directors who don’t agree with his agenda to altering vaccine recommendations, many changes are taking place within the groups that manage America’s health and wellness.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World