Tag: conflicts of interest
RFK's Nutrition Guidelines Advisory Board Rife With Conflicts Of Interest

RFK's Nutrition Guidelines Advisory Board Rife With Conflicts Of Interest

First, a mea culpa. Yesterday, I failed to confirm claims in several news accounts that the Health and Human Services did not issue a scientific report backing the claims contained in the new nutrition guidelines.

In fact, thanks to StatNews reporting this morning, I learned that there was a report titled The Scientific Foundation for the Dietary Guidelines for Americans on the Department of Agriculture website. The 90-page report’s acknowledgements listed as its primary author, Dr. Christopher Ramsden from the National Institute on Aging. He received unnamed “input and revisions” from unnamed persons at the HHS and Agriculture departments.

The report also listed the names of its 9-member scientific review panel with their financial conflicts-of-interest disclosure statements.

So a tip of the hat to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for fully disclosing that information. But put a dunce cap on his hypocritical head for allowing onto the review panel six reviewers with financial ties to corporate interests with a direct stake in the outcome of the guidelines. There is no evidence that this committee, two-thirds of whom have ties to industry, received vetting under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1948.

FACA prohibits advisors with conflicts of interest from serving on federal advisory committees unless they have officially received a waiver declaring their expertise essential and unavailable from other, non-conflicted sources. When I went to see if such waivers existed, I learned the General Service Administration’s FACA committee database is currently “not operational.”For the record, here the names, affiliations and financial ties of those six scientific reviewers:

J. Thomas Brenna, Dell Pediatric Research Institute, University of Texas at Austin: Consulting or research fees from Nutricia, a subsidiary of Danone, and the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association/Texas Beef Council; served on a General Mills and Washington Grain Commission panel reviewing healthfulness of grains; lecturer with travel reimbursement from American Dairy Science Association.

Michael Goran, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California: Scientific Advisor to Else Nutrition, Bobbie Labs (infant formula companies) and Begin Health (produces gut health supplements for babies and infants).

Donald Layman, Professor Emeritus, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Consultant fees and/or honoraria from National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, National Dairy Council, and Functional Medicine. Serves on the advisory board of the non-profit Nutrient Institute, which is wholly funded by Nutrient Foods LLC.

Heather Leidy, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin: Honoraria and/or research grants from General Mills’ Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, National Pork Board and Novo Nordisk. Serves on the advisory boards of General Mills Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, Rivalz, and National Pork Board.

Ameer Taha, University of California, Davis: Honoraria from the California Dairy Innovation Center; research grants from Fonterra Ltd. (a New Zealand-based dairy cooperative with U.S. operations), California Dairy Research Foundation, and Dairy Management Inc.

Jeff Volek, The Ohio State University: Co-founder and owner of Virta Health (a firm promoting ketogenic diets to reverse diabetes); advisor to Simply Good Foods.

So much for eliminating corporate influence from official government policy, a stated Make America Healthy Again goal. I wonder if RFK Jr. will let his followers know.

Merrill Goozner, the former editor of Modern Healthcare, writes about health care and politics at GoozNews.substack.com, where this column first appeared. Please consider subscribing to support his work.

Reprinted with permission from Gooz News

It's Time to Dump, Depose and Defenestrate DeJoy

It's Time to Dump, Depose and Defenestrate DeJoy

Now that Postmaster General Louis DeJoy has confirmed reports that he is under investigation by the FBI for alleged campaign finance violations, ordinary postal customers who have suffered under his regime may rightly wonder why he is still in office. That is an urgent question — and has been an urgent question ever since President Joe Biden's inauguration — but it is worth examining how DeJoy got the job, and how he abused a position of constitutional trust.

The FBI probe concerns an alleged "straw donor" scheme undertaken by DeJoy to illegally funnel over a million dollars in excess contributions to the Republican Party and Donald Trump's presidential campaign. It's an obvious form of trickery designed to evade federal limitations on individual donations by urging others to support a campaign or candidate and then reimbursing them under the table. Corporate executives with political ambitions like DeJoy have committed this particular felony over and over again — and if DeJoy is indicted and convicted, he won't be the first suit sent to prison for it.

During and after the 2016 election, DeJoy raised upwards of a million dollars each for the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee. For that he was named one of the party's three deputy finance chairmen — along with Michael Cohen, then still Donald Trump's personal attorney, and venture capitalist Elliott Broidy.

By then, Broidy had already been convicted on public corruption and bribery charges, while Cohen would soon plead guilty to campaign finance crimes as well as bank fraud. DeJoy would complete a dubious trifecta.

Last fall, a Washington Post investigation found that DeJoy had used the straw donor technique for over a decade to raise his profile as a Republican fundraiser in North Carolina. Former employees of New Breed Logistics, the supply chain firm he founded and then sold, said they had been pressured to make donations and repaid with bonuses and other compensation. The pattern dated back to the Bush administration — and appeared to have won at least two ambassadorial appointments for DeJoy's wife, Aldona Wos.

Yet while DeJoy's appointment as postmaster general was obviously greased by his massive donations, his alleged violations of election law are not the worst aspect of his regime. Even more troubling are major conflicts of interest that he has failed to resolve — and that some experts have described as potentially criminal.

When DeJoy sold New Breed to XPO Logistics, he held onto large amounts of stock and options in the merged company — which is a U.S. Postal Service contractor and might well profit from decisions made by him as postmaster. Policies promoted by DeJoy to diminish and even destroy postal delivery last year became controversial because of their effect on mail balloting — which his patron Trump blatantly sought to impede for partisan gain. But DeJoy is suspected of devising policies destructive to the Postal Service for his own self-serving purposes, too.

DeJoy and his family have invested tens of millions of dollars in companies, including XPO, that either contract with USPS, compete directly with USPS or both. Their investments in those competing firms, such as United Parcel Service, Forward Air and JB Hunt Trucking, are estimated between $30 million and $76 million, according to their own financial disclosures. Holding those interests in competing companies while serving in government is a serious violation of the law.

As Walter Shaub, former director of the Office of Government Ethics, said last year, "the idea that you can be a Postmaster General and hold tens of millions in stocks in a postal service contractor is pretty shocking." Except that the behavior of Trump, his family, his treasury secretary and many other conflicted employees lowered ethical expectations below zero.

Incredibly, DeJoy has only pretended to shed those conflicts since they were exposed last summer — by "divesting" his XPO holdings to his adult children. He continues to represent a holdover of the corrupt administration that voters ousted in 2020. And his plans to wreck the U.S. Postal Service remain a grave danger to an agency founded in Constitutional authority.

Biden could take action to have the Postal Service Board of Governors remove DeJoy from the board, which would mean he could no longer serve as postmaster general by law. Americans who depend on the mail for their livelihoods, medications and so much more need reform now. They can't wait until the last crooked Trump appointee is taken away in handcuffs.

To find out more about Joe Conason and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

House Oversight Panel Reissues Subpoena For Trump's Tax Records

House Oversight Panel Reissues Subpoena For Trump's Tax Records

By Jan Wolfe (Reuters) - A U.S. House of Representatives panel has reissued a subpoena seeking Donald Trump's tax and financial records, saying in a memo made public on Tuesday it needs the documents to address "conflicts of interest" by future presidents. In a court filing on Tuesday, House lawyers told a judge that the House Oversight Committee reissued a subpoena to Trump's accounting firm, Mazars USA LLP, on Feb. 25. The committee issued a similar subpoena in 2019, but that subpoena expired in January when new U.S. lawmakers took office. Tuesday's court filing included a Feb. 23 memorandum...

Inside Ivanka And Jared’s Ethics-Free Money Machine

Inside Ivanka And Jared’s Ethics-Free Money Machine

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Despite the pandemic, which took a toll on many businesses across the United States, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner reportedly made substantial profits during their time working for the U.S. government under former President Donald Trump's administration.

According to a report published by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), the affluent couple's final financial disclosure reports, which cover the duration of 2020 up to Jan. 20, 2021, signal monetary profits of "$23,791,645 and $120,676,949 in combined outside income."

The analysis also highlights a number of questionable aspects of Trump's disclosure reports that center on "fixed guaranteed payments she arranged to receive from a few entities to prevent a situation in which she would have a stake in their performance while she worked in the White House."

CREW reports:

Starting in 2018, Trump began receiving annually $100,000 from T International Realty LLC, $800,000 from TTT Consulting LLC, and $600,000 from TTTT Venture LLC. In her latest financial disclosure report, however, she reported receiving an extra $62,500 from TTTT Venture LLC and only $362,500 from TTT Consulting LLC. While the extra income from TTTT Venture LLC could be explained by the longer reporting period covered by her annual/termination report, it is not clear why she received less than half of the $800,000 guaranteed payment from TTT Consulting LLC in her final year working for the government.

As for Kushner's financial disclosure report, CREW noted that although the former White House senior advisor had committed to selling his $25 to $50 million stake in Cadre over conflict of interest due to his work for the government, "the Office of Government Ethics withdrew the certificate of divestiture related to his plans to sell his interest in the company in June 2020," per his request.

Kushner also unveiled "Kushner Companies BVI Limited," a new company he has formed offshore in the British Virgin Islands. The publication reports that it appears the new offshore company, which is one of many for Kushner, was formed in an effort to restructure some of his assets.

The latest reports come as former President Donald Trump, as well as his family business, faces a number of pending investigations into potential fraud and tax evasion.

Ivanka Trump and Kushner took no salaries from the government, according to previous disclosures; advisers of their status tend to make around $183,000 a year. But their decision to forgo this payment isn't necessarily a good thing, from an ethics perspective. Government workers are typically expected to make their money from the government itself so that they aren't improperly influenced by or dependent on outside entities while doing work for the American people. Kushner and Ivanka Trump could only choose to decline their salaries because they had so much income and wealth from other sources.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World