Tag: federal reserve
Trump's Tariffs Are Still Inflating Prices -- And Will Stop Fed From Cutting Rates

Trump's Tariffs Are Still Inflating Prices -- And Will Stop Fed From Cutting Rates

Donald Trump assured us that exporters would pay his tariffs; that it would effectively be free money to the United States. At times he even suggested a tariff dividend, where he would send us all checks of $1k to $2k with all the money that was pouring in from his tariffs.

Virtually all economists said this was nonsense. Based on extensive research, they argued that people in this country would pay the overwhelming majority of the tariffs, even if there is some question as to how much might be borne by importers and retailers, as opposed to consumers.

We quickly learned that the Trump story was wrong. Before Trump’s election, inflation had been headed down to the Fed’s 2.0 percent target. After Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs went into effect, inflation began rising, hitting 3.0 percent even before the Iran War. With the big war-related run-up in energy prices, inflation is now over four percent.

With everything else going on in the economy and the world, we shouldn’t lose sight of the impact of the Trump tariffs. We got new data on that yesterday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics released May data on import prices. The data showed non-fuel import prices rose 0.8 percent in the month of May and were up 3.7 percent over the last year.

Just to be clear, these are the prices that are paid to exporters. They do not include the tariffs that are paid by importers. The tariffs are added on to these prices. If exporters were eating the tariffs, as Trump promised, import prices would fall.

To take a simple case, if Trump imposed a ten percent tariff on shoes, in the exporters eating the tariff story, the price of imported shoes would fall ten percent. That would leave businesses and consumers here unharmed and exporters getting ten percent less for the price of their shoes.

This is clearly not happening. Trump’s tariffs may not be responsible for import prices rising (although his war might be), but they clearly are not falling. As every academic study has shown, and U.S. consumers know, we are paying Trump’s tariffs.

The sharp rise in import prices will be another factor pushing inflation higher. The increase in import prices may not be fully passed on to consumers, but certainly much of it will.

To take the simple arithmetic here, imports of goods are roughly percent of GDP. If import prices rise 3.7 percent, that would add a bit less than 0.4 percentage points to inflation, and that is before the impact of any Trump tariffs. The full story will be more complicated, but this should give us some idea of what we’re looking at.

These new data come out just as the Federal Reserve Board is having its first meeting under its new Trump-appointed chair, Kevin Warsh. Trump demanded that Jerome Powell, the prior chair, lower interest rates. When he refused, Trump threatened to fire him and then prosecute him.

Trump clearly wants lower interest rates and has said that he expects Warsh to give him what he wants. With the recent data all showing inflation on an upward path (we got bad news on both the Consumer Price Index and the Producer Price Index last week), it would be very hard to envision any of the other 11 members of the Fed’s Open Market Committee (FOMC) that determines interest rates voting for a rate cut.

This leaves Warsh with the option of either being the first Fed chair ever to be in the minority on an FOMC vote or incurring Trump’s wrath on Truth Social. Being an opportunistic sycophant can sometimes get people in trouble.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Fun Times Ahead! What Kevin Warsh Can Expect At His First Fed Meeting

Fun Times Ahead! What Kevin Warsh Can Expect At His First Fed Meeting

Newly appointed Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh will lead his first Fed meeting in less than a month. Ordinarily, I would feel sorry for a person in his situation. But since the guy is a rich, power-hungry jerk, I am looking forward to some great entertainment.

To set the table here, in his vast ignorance, Donald Trump has decided that interest rates should be much lower than they are now. He has muttered something along the lines of the Fed having a 1.0 percent interest rate instead of the current 3.5 percent rate.

Trump repeatedly threatened the outgoing Fed chair, Jerome Powell, who he had initially appointed. Trump started with insults on his Truth Social platform, moved on to threats of firing, and then told his Justice Department to cook up a criminal investigation.

While they at least temporarily suspended any prosecution, to get the votes needed in the Senate for Warsh, Trump has explicitly left the option on the table. And Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has made it clear that he will indict people for getting Trump angry. Powell may still end up facing criminal charges for not going along with Trump’s demands to lower rates.

Trump also has said that he expects Warsh to lower rates or he wouldn’t have appointed him. For this reason, we might expect that Warsh will be looking to lower rates next month.

The problem for Warsh is that he can’t lower rates by himself. He would have to convince a majority of the 12-person Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to go along with lower rates. He is not likely to get much help here.

At the last meeting, there was only one person arguing for lower rates, Stephan Miran, another Trump appointee. Warsh replaced Miran in his seat on the FOMC when he became Fed chair. This means that Warsh will step into the meeting with 11 other FOMC members who wanted to keep rates unchanged at the last meeting. Several of them actually leaned toward raising rates.

The new data since that meeting all point to higher inflation and also a somewhat improved labor market. That is not a mix that makes a good case for lowering interest rates.

The overall Consumer Price Index increased 0.6 percent in April, after rising 0.9 percent in March. This brought the year-over-year rate to 3.8 percent, the highest since early 2023. The core wasn’t too much better, rising 0.4 percent in April, bringing the year-over-year rate to 2.7 percent.

The Producer Price Indexes (PPI) and the Import Price Indexes were arguably even worse. The final demand index in the PPI rose 1.4 percent in April, bringing the year-over-year increase to 6.0 percent. The core index rose 0.6 percent, bringing its year-over-year increase to 4.4 percent..

The non-fuel import price index rose 0.8 percent in April, bringing the increase over the last year to 2.9 percent. These prices, on items like imported clothes and cars, had been falling in 2024. (The import price index does not include tariffs.)

These data all indicate a rate of inflation that is well above the Fed’s 2.0 percent target, and considerable pressure from input prices pushing inflation still higher in the future. It is hard to see how Warsh would be able to convince the other 11 FOMC members that the new data since the last meeting justify a rate cut.

This puts Warsh in the interesting spot where he either votes to keep rates constant (there will likely be members pushing for a rate hike) and incurs Trump’s wrath, or he casts a pointless vote for a cut. If Warsh does the latter, it will be the first time ever that a Fed chair has been in the minority on a vote on monetary policy.

If Warsh ends up being the only vote for a cut, like his predecessor, Stephan Miran, it would be truly unprecedented for a Fed chair to be completely out of line with the rest of the FOMC. Most often, the FOMC has no dissents, as the committee works to reach a consensus. The Fed chair being the lone dissenter would be extraordinary.

This dissent may make Trump happy, but it likely takes Warsh further from the goal of lower rates. Unless Trump tries to jail the rest of the FOMC, it will be necessary to convince the other members that there is a good argument for lower rates. A vote for a cut with the data we have recently seen does not look serious. It is not going to carry weight with the people Warsh needs to convince.

As I said, if he weren’t a pathetic, power-hungry jerk, I would feel sorry for him. However, given the situation, I look forward to the entertainment.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.


Now It's The Fed Chair's Choice: Should He Stay Or Should He Go?

Now It's The Fed Chair's Choice: Should He Stay Or Should He Go?

Just to be clear, I’m not saying that the Clash had those numbers right re the trouble ratio if he stays or if he goes. But it did seem to be the relevant hook.

Now that the pathway for replacing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell with Trump’s nominee, Kevin Warsh, was cleared yesterday, I expect Warsh’s nomination to quickly get out of committee and over to the Senate floor, where he should have no problem getting a majority (he may not get any D votes, but he doesn’t need them). He could then take over the chair in mid-May, when Powell’s term as chair ends.

Why the bold above? Because even though Powell’s term as chair ends, his term on the Fed board doesn’t end until January ‘28. The norm, however, is for Chairs to leave the building once their Chair term ends, with, as far as I can tell, one exception: when Marriner Eccles stepped down from the Chair in 1948, he rolled over to the Fed board for another few years.

In this case, if Powell stayed on, Miran would have to resign to make room for the newly minted Chair Warsh to take over.

A number of folks, including commenters here, have argued to me that, in the interest of protecting this critically important institution and the economy itself from Trump’s destructive influence, Powell should emulate Eccles. I certainly understand their argument, but I’m not wholly there. I’ll explain my thinking, but only briefly, because this is Powell’s call and there’s nothing anyone can tell him about this that he doesn’t know. (Read Nick Timiraos in the Wall Street Journal this morning for a comprehensive treatment of the stay/go question, with strong stay-vibes from former Fed economist David Wilcox, who knows more about the inner workings and history of the institution than most).

The motivation for stay, Jay, stay! is understandable nervousness about Warsh’s independence from Trump, a concern I share and have written about in recent days. Powell has been a fierce defender of such independence and thus his presence, especially absent Miran, who has consistently voted, often alone, for the rate cuts Trump wants, would be reassuring in that regard.

There’s no doubt in my mind that Powell’s staying on the board would yield better, more balanced, and more independent-from-Trump monetary policy, which would in turn be better for the U.S. and even the global economy. But there are two countervailing factors.

First, Powell has earned the right to do whatever he sees fit. He’s delivered consistently thoughtful, carefully explained, effective monetary policy in 14 years of service, eight of which he was chair. And many of those years were under Trump (who, for the record, reappointed him), wherein he got more presidential harassment than any Fed chair in history, from daily badgering and name-calling, to a phony criminal inquiry.

To be clear, our hearts should not over-bleed for him. He also had one of the coolest jobs in the world, backed by a deeply talented staff and some very smart colleagues on the board. You take the bad with the good. But the point is he served admirably, and has not only pulled rabbits out of monetary-policy hats—the post-pandemic soft landing, which many tony economists said couldn’t happen—but stood up to Trump and preserved the Fed’s independence. He’s earned the right to make whatever next move he desires.

But second, and I know not everyone will share this take, Warsh deserves the chance to establish himself as the new chair without the old chair hanging around. Readers know that I fear where he’s going with his new gig, but under the assumption that he’s legitimately confirmed in coming days, he has the right to takeover and begin to put his imprimatur on the joint.

If Powell should decide otherwise, i.e., that, as Wilcox argued in the Timiraos Wall Street Journal piece, the institution should at least initially be protected from Warsh’s unencumbered leadership, or, for that matter, that he (Powell) is still at risk of prosecution from the bullshit inquiry that Trump cooked up, I’ll of course support his decision.

But the norm of the Chair stepping down is a norm for a good reason: clearing the path for the new Chair is good for the institution. Of course, independent monetary policy is also very good for the institution, so there are good arguments on both sides.

Luckily, there’s only one person who has to make that call. And his call will be the right one.

Jared Bernstein is a former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President Joe Biden. He is a senior fellow at the Council on Budget and Policy Priorities. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.


Kevin Warsh

Warsh's Answer About The 2020 Election Disqualified Him As Fed Chairman

I’ve been on the road, so I didn’t have time to post yesterday. But I did want to quickly comment on a news item I saw. On Tuesday, Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee asked Kevin Warsh, Trump’s nominee for Fed chair: “Who won the 2020 presidential election?”

Several commentators referred to this as a political question. Sorry, but there is nothing political about this question. It is a simple factual question, like adding together 2+2.

There is no ambiguity about who won the 2020 election. Biden won by more than seven million votes, a landslide in Trumpian terminology. (Trump routinely calls his 2024 victory a “landslide.” Biden’s margin was more than three times as large.)

Trump may be unable to acknowledge his loss, but his whining does not change reality. The simple fact is that Biden won in 2020, by a lot, and everyone knows this. There is no set of facts about the vote totals in dispute.

Trump’s yelling about some unidentifiable “fraud” changes nothing. He has had more than five years to produce evidence in court to prove that the numbers were not counted accurately or that there were millions of fraudulent votes. He has produced nothing. No serious person can question the 2020 results based on the Trump complaints.

The question for Warsh was simply whether he could say something that he knows to be true, when it will cause Trump to get angry. That is a perfect test of his ability to be an independent Fed chair.

Warsh gave a clear answer. He will do what Trump wants him to do, even when that means making a fool of himself in front of the whole country. This is not someone who should be Fed chair.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Reprinted with permission from Dean Baker.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World