Tag: fox & friends
A Surprising Moment Of Real Patriotism -- And Civic Sanity -- On Trump's Fox Favorite

A Surprising Moment Of Real Patriotism -- And Civic Sanity -- On Trump's Fox Favorite

It turns out that America is more than its blood and soil, even on President Donald Trump’s favorite show. All three Fox & Friends co-hosts delivered monologues on Monday detailing why they are proud to be Americans — and in each case, they highlighted core civic values that bind us together as a nation rather than embracing European-style nationalism.

Lawrence Jones described the United States as “the one place where your outcome isn't set the day you are born” and pointed to the protections for freedom of speech and worship provided by the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Ainsley Earhardt likewise highlighted how in America, “your dreams do come true with hard work, a positive attitude, and the grace of God,” and “we can worship how we choose and say what we want.” And Brian Kilmeade discussed the “belief among Americans that we can accomplish whatever we set out to do.”

Their litany is incomplete. America’s determination, constitutional safeguards, and economic mobility and vitality are all treasured aspects of our national story. But we are not commemorating the 250th anniversary of our defeat of the British Army, or the signing of our Constitution, or our national economy becoming the world’s largest. In America, we date our nation’s birth to the ratification of the Declaration of Independence, and the America 250 celebration officially commemorates its signing.

America has spent the last 250 years struggling and often failing to live up to the Declaration’s essential promises of equality, liberty, and democracy. But the revolutionary sentiment behind the document is powerful, and its language has been invoked by generations of civil rights leaders who sought to extend the American creed to those who had been excluded from it by pointing to what the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. termed “a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.”

These values of equality, liberty, and democracy went largely unaddressed by the Fox hosts, beyond the invocation of the First Amendment’s protections.

But their monologues nonetheless effectively reject the work of right-wing media figures like Tucker Carlson, who have tried to replace the foundations of American greatness — its existence as a creedal nation defined by shared principles like liberty, equality, and democracy — with the blood-and-soil nationalism of poor European countries like Viktor Orbán’s Hungary.

“If I were advising a politician, I would say — the first thing I would do: ‘What is America?’ ‘Well, America is a physical place. No, it’s not an idea,’” Carlson said in a 2022 speech. “Anybody who says ‘America is an idea’? Please. It’s not an idea; it’s a place. I live there. I don’t live in an idea. I don’t live theoretically. I get out of bed and there’s like a ground underneath me. There’s, like, soil.”

Carlson’s vision of America as simply “a place,” one populated by “legacy Americans” like himself and the white nationalists who celebrate him, is impoverished and ahistorical — and not even the hosts of Fox & Friends can abide it.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Trump's Latest Fox Interview On Iran Displays Perilous Propaganda 'Doom Loop'

Trump's Latest Fox Interview On Iran Displays Perilous Propaganda 'Doom Loop'

President Donald Trump called in to his old stomping ground of Fox News’ Fox & Friends on Thursday morning, using the surprise interview to denounce the “crooked” media’s coverage of the war he started with Iran, praise Fox’s own positive coverage, and listen to the program’s co-hosts urge him to escalate further by deploying U.S. ground troops on Iranian soil.

Trump watches Fox programming religiously, frequently takes action based on what he sees from its coverage through a phenomenon I’ve described as the Fox-Trump feedback loop, and treats its hosts like unpaid members of his cabinet. The network played a key role in convincing the president to launch the Iran war earlier this year.

That war has settled into a stalemate. The U.S. and Israel launched major strikes in late February and early March that decimated the Iranian military and killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But Iran responded by closing the vital trade route of the Strait of Hormuz, and after months of alternating periods of tit-for-tat conflict and diplomacy, the Iranian regime remains intact and in control of its uranium stockpile and the strait, leading experts to describe the conflict as a strategic debacle for the U.S.

The U.S. and Iranian militaries have traded strikes this week, and on Thursday morning Trump posted on social media that the U.S. will hit Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT,” adding, “At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island, and other oil infrastructure points, and assume total control of their Oil and Gas Markets.”

Minutes after issuing that threat, Trump called in to Fox & Friends, the program on which he used to have a weekly guest slot as he built his political profile before his 2016 presidential run.

The president told the co-hosts that his “preference has always been take Kharg Island” — a tactic people on Fox have been pushing for months which would require putting boots on the ground — but that he’s unsure whether “America has the stomach for it.” He repeatedly complained over the course of the interview about what he deemed the “crooked” media’s insufficiently supportive coverage of the war, a subject that has consumed him since shortly after he launched it.

Responding to one such salvo, in which the president grouched about “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” co-host Ainsley Earhart urged Trump not to “worry about” the coverage and to go ahead and escalate the war by seizing Kharg Island, promising that Fox’s viewers would support it.



“We know that America is winning this fight, but when they destroy or they shoot down one of our Apache helicopters and we strike Iranian targets and then they fire missiles at our bases in Bahrain and Kuwait and Jordan, we have to fight back,” she said. “So, when you say you don't think America has the appetite to do what we are seeing tonight, I think we do. I think we’re ready to see this.”

Trump responded by praising her network’s “great” coverage. He name-checked evening hosts Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters, and Laura Ingraham, calling them “fantastic” and adding that “every single anchor has been great.” (Notably, Trump did not mention Mark Levin, the arch-hawk whose war commentary the president has previously touted but who has criticized negotiating with the Iranian regime even as he praised Trump himself.)

“You guys have been amazing, and Trey Yingst is a superstar,” the president continued, referring to the Fox correspondent who has been covering the war from Israel and said last month that Trump held “the cards” while the Iranians were “grasping at straws” and desperate to negotiate an agreement with the U.S..

“He just covers so accurately,” Trump added. “I don't know Trey Yingst, but, I mean, he covers it so accurately. It's so beautiful to watch. And he's got a level of excitement that's amazing. But the accuracy is so good, I just saw him on your show a little while ago, and I said that's exactly what’s happening.”

Indeed, Fox has produced near-lockstep promotion of the war, with hosts constantly lavishing the president with praise and touting the “major geopolitical win” he is supposedly achieving there. Its personalities have also regularly urged Trump to order risky escalations like seizing Iran’s refineries, claiming that victory is “two weeks” away if only he would unleash the military and “finish the job.”

Now the president, who is obsessed with Fox’s coverage and often makes decisions based on its programming, appears to be listening — and says he plans to carry out their strategy. In search of more compliments from his television, he’s trapping the U.S. in a doom loop.

Prosecutors Drop Charges Against Immigrants Accused Of Attack On ICE Officer

Prosecutors Drop Charges Against Immigrants Accused Of Attack On ICE Officer

In mid-January, right-wing media figures seized on a story that could serve as a narrative reset after an

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed Renee Good in Minneapolis. Amid rising backlash to the Trump administration’s mass deportation operation across Minnesota, MAGA pundits hyped claims from the Department of Homeland Security that Venezuelan immigrants had attacked federal agents with a shovel and broomstick. Federal agents shot in response, the story went, wounding one of the men accused in the attack.

Since then, those claims have totally fallen apart, and on February 12 prosecutors asked the presiding judge to dismiss the case with prejudice. The prosecutor wrote that “newly discovered evidence in this matter is materially inconsistent with the allegations” put forward by the government in official filings and testimony.

Right-wing media coverage of the story was unhinged, and it followed a clear, established pattern of hyping dubious initial government claims that would later turn out to be false.

As news of the incident broke on January 14, Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin called in to Sean Hannity’s show to read a DHS statement he’d been given “literally 45 seconds ago” and to lay the foundation for the coverage to come, a role he often plays in the conservative media ecosystem.

“While the subject and law enforcement were in a struggle on the ground, two subjects came out of a nearby apartment and also attacked the law enforcement officer with a snow shovel and broom handle,” Melugin read. “As the officer was being ambushed and attacked by the two individuals, the original subject got loose and began striking the officer with a shovel or broomstick.”

“Fearing for his life and safety as he was being ambushed by three individuals, the officer fired defensive shots to defend his life,” Melugin continued.

The narrative was set, and the next morning Fox News’ Fox & Friends weighed in on the story.

“You come at these guys and these women with a shovel and if you are being apprehended and try to run away or drive over them, you will be featured in retaliation videos,” said host Brian Kilmeade. “That's what this is about."

Kilmeade’s co-host, Steve Doocy, also bought the government’s line. “You cannot hit a cop with a shovel or a broom. You just can't do that. It is against the law,” Doocy said. “It is terrible when anybody gets shot. But, unfortunately, a lot of people don't realize, if you break the law -- when you're breaking the law, there's going to be repercussions.”

Co-host Ainsley Earhart suggested capital punishment should be on the table. “When we were growing up, if you harmed a police officer, if you killed a police officer, in South Carolina you got the electric chair,” Earhart said. “When we were growing up, you didn't go after police with your car. You listened to what they said.”

Guest Trey Gowdy, who hosts another Fox show, said the supposed attack and the broader resistance to ICE’s presence gave President Donald Trump “all the justification” he needed to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minnesota, thereby deploying active military units against civilians.

The tenor of the coverage was similar elsewhere, and sometimes even more irresponsible.

On the podcast of former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, Kevin Posobiec — brother of MAGA influencer Jack Posobiec — said an immigrant was “shot in the leg because he was trying to kill an ICE agent with a shovel.”

At The Daily Wire, host Matt Walsh claimed that after a foot chase, “the illegal alien began attacking the officers and then two individuals, apparently family members of this person, came out of a nearby apartment and began ambushing the officers with a shovel and a broom handle.”

Walsh called it “another clear-cut, totally justified shooting by law enforcement.”

Walsh’s colleague, Michael Knowles, said, “The poor ICE agents now getting ambushed — they take out shovels, they start beating this guy with a shovel, and, so, luckily, happily, the ICE agent was able to get his gun out and shoot the Venezuelan.”

Although the exact details of what happened in the incident remain unclear, the prosecutor’s own words make it plain that the government's account was false. Less than two weeks after the shooting, two Border Patrol agents would shoot and kill Alex Pretti. Right-wing media tried to justify that shooting as well.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Bill Melugin Fox

After 36 Hours Spent Excusing Alex Pretti Killing, Fox News Suddenly Spins Around

On Sunday evening, Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin published a lengthy report detailing internal dissent among his federal immigration enforcement sources regarding the narrative pushed by Department of Homeland Security leaders after Border Patrol officers gunned down Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse who had been videotaping their activities, in Minneapolis on Saturday morning.

Amid the several hundred words describing an internal schism over how DHS is messaging masked agents of the state opening fire on a man who had already been restrained, Melugin slipped in the following statement: “There is no indication Pretti was there to murder law enforcement, as videos appear to show he never drew his holstered firearm.”

Melugin’s stark acknowledgement was whiplash-inducing for anyone who had been following Fox’s on-air coverage of Pretti’s killing up to that point, and it marked the start of a dramatic shift in the network’s treatment of the case.

Fox spent Saturday and much of Sunday blaming the victim and local Democrats for his death while excusing and even valorizing his executioners. In doing so the network was following in the footsteps of the high-ranking administration officials who baselessly argued that Pretti was a “would-be assassin” engaged in “domestic terrorism.” Melugin himself was the vehicle DHS used to launder its excuse that Pretti “was armed.”

And notably, some Fox contributors repeatedly justified Pretti’s killing by going beyond the official comment to allege that he had drawn the gun he was reportedly legally carrying and that he even pointed it at the Border Patrol officers — the very claim Melugin said Sunday night had been disproved by videos.

The fallacy of the DHS smear of Pretti had long been clear to anyone who had reviewed videos of the shooting, triggering widespread outrage over his killing. But Melugin’s admission — and his reporting on a schism within immigration enforcement over the case — apparently provided his colleagues the permission structure they needed to abandon their narrative.

“Tomi, speak plainly with the audience right now,” Fox host Johnny Joey Jones told his co-host Tomi Lahren on Sunday night. “What we're getting from Bill — and as he cited, many of his sources are pro-what's happening as far as enforcing immigration and mass deportation — but what they're concerned with is every video we've seen so far doesn’t show him brandishing a gun, it doesn’t show him — it doesn’t substantiate the idea that he was there to commit a massacre or that he was a domestic terrorist.”

“Usually, when those words are used you usually have more than the fact that he had a gun on him as evidence, and that is what at least some officials are taking issue with,” he added.

Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade on Monday morning followed the editorial boards of Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post and Wall Street Journal in urging President Donald Trump to change course.

“I would love to see Tom Homan just be asked to go in there and settle things down,” Kilmeade said, referencing his former Fox colleague turned White House border czar, who has stressed the need for “collateral arrests” of immigrants without criminal backgrounds.

“He understands the president’s objective. He could come in with a fresh set of eyes,” Kilmeade added. “For some reason he’s been sidelined of late, and I think we could use someone to come in there and settle everything down from the Trump perspective.”

And Dana Perino, who served as press secretary to President George W. Bush and now anchors Fox’s morning “straight news” hours, stressed the need for the White House to get its facts in order and find a way to make adjustments.

She said that current White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt needed to be “very clear to the officials that we have a gigantic problem and, yes, we can say that the media is biased, and we can say that the Democrats are crazy and that they're radical and that they're ginning everything up, but we have a problem and I need better answers for you before we go to the briefing room at 1 o’clock.”

Perino added that Trump should take credit for having “arrested a lot of illegal immigrants” in Minneapolis and then send presidential envoy Steve Witkoff to the city “because I believe they need somebody that can be trusted on both sides to say, I hear you, I hear you, and here's where we're going.”

Co-host Griff Jenkins noted in response that Trump, who regularly watches Fox & Friends and often implements ideas he sees on it, had just announced that he was sending Homan to Minneapolis that night.

Perino praised Trump’s “good decision,” adding that the president understood “it’s unsustainable.” Apparently, he wasn’t the only one who came to that conclusion.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters


Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World