Tag: fox & friends
Rerun Season: Fox News Revives 'Migrant Caravan' For Midterm Election

Rerun Season: Fox News Revives 'Migrant Caravan' For Midterm Election

President Donald Trump’s extreme unpopularity has the Republican Party seemingly on course for a midterm elections drubbing — which means it’s once again time for Fox News to try to scare its viewers to the polls with frantic coverage of a “caravan” of migrants in Central America headed toward the U.S.-Mexico border.

In October 2018, Fox hosts began warning viewers that a group of up to 4,000 Honduran migrants were moving through Central America with plans to “storm our border” — and urged Trump to make that “caravan” a central issue for that year’s midterm elections. Trump, an inveterate Fox watcher whose worldview is shaped by the network, obliged. Fox showered its viewers with hours of coverage over the ensuing days, and the story also became a major fixation of mainstream news outlets in the leadup to the election.

Eight years later, Fox is starting to run the same play. Trump’s approval numbers have tanked due to his economic policymaking and Iran war, and GOP officials are reportedly panicking over the upcoming midterms and treating the president as a liability for their prospects. Fox and the Trump administration are using the narrative of a new “caravan” to drive attention back to border security, a rare issue where Trump and his party retain an advantage in the polls, but one whose salience has fallen.

Anthony Aguero, a former GOP congressional candidate turned conservative border news streamer, drew attention to the “caravan” on Sunday with a viral social media post. “Over 400 aliens predominantly from Honduras entered Mexico on Thursday, ready to make their way to the US southern border,” he wrote. “Here’s footage of the caravan. Someone is incentivizing this movement, this is not organic.”

While the group is reportedly growing, it remains a fraction of the size of the 2018 “caravan” — which was successfully dispersed by U.S. authorities rather than “storming” the border — raising questions about why the 2026 version deserves significant coverage at all.

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Trump critic, has a hypothesis. “We have not seen a caravan headed to the U.S. southern border in several years, why now?” she responded to Aguero’s post. “Oh yeah, there is an election coming and the GOP needs to scare you into voting because nothing else is working.”

To be sure, Greene is a notorious conspiracy theorist who sees insidious forces everywhere.

But sure enough, on Monday, Fox News Digital ran a story featuring what it termed an “ominous warning” to the “caravan” provided to Fox by the Department of Homeland Security. “Biden’s disastrous open border policy has been SEALED SHUT,” DHS stated. “Anyone attempting to illegally enter the United States will be apprehended, prosecuted, and removed from the country.”

That night, Fox host Laura Ingraham gave the story a partisan spin during her opening monologue. Ingraham denounced “blue cities” for “doling out the cash” to “illegals,” then raised the specter of the “new caravan.”

“So with all this cash waiting and what they perceive to be a weakened GOP, hundreds of migrants have now organized themselves into a new caravan and are heading through Mexico toward the U.S. border,” she said. “Now, someone got to them and probably got them to pay heavy prices in hopes that if they reach the border and Republicans get shellacked in the mid-terms, they'll just be let in.”

Ingraham’s program aired footage of a column of migrants walking along a highway over the chyron, “Amnesty for all is the Dem plan.”

The Fox host later brought on White House “border czar” Tom Homan, who was conveniently available, to fearmonger about the migrants and assure viewers that Trump would keep his promises about border security.

Fox & Friends, the president’s beloved morning show whose fixation on the 2018 “caravan” played a key role in attracting his attention, joined in on Tuesday.

“Right now, a caravan of more than 600 migrants is heading toward the U.S.,” co-host Brian Kilmeade warned as Fox aired footage of the group, noting that it is “traveling through Mexico — you’re looking at them now — after departing Honduras earlier this month.”

Kilmeade read from the DHS statement, then added, “Critics say the mass migration could be on hopes Democrats will embrace open border policies if they control Congress.”

His guest, retired chief border patrol agent Chris Clem, then speculated that the migrants were involved in illicit election interference.

“It is a different election cycle, but the same bad cast with the same bad script,” Clem claimed. “But here’s the good news, we’ve got a president and a border security policy that shuts this down. So, I think this is just about propaganda to bring some kind of sympathetic plight to the migrants.”

“This is really about showing some kind of opportunity at the midterm,” he added. “We saw this play out in 2018, we saw this play out again in 2020, they are coming here to try to make a point against the strong enforcement policies by this administration.”

The same “bad cast” does seem to be running the same “bad script,” and there’s definitely “propaganda” involved.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

'Fox & Friends' Keeps Pushing Trump To Expand Iran war To Yemen

'Fox & Friends' Keeps Pushing Trump To Expand Iran war To Yemen

Fox & Friends host Brian Kilmeade has repeatedly advocated for attacking the Houthis in Yemen in what would amount to a significant expansion of the simmering Iran war.

The Houthi movement, known officially as Ansar Allah, has been in a protracted war with Saudi Arabia since 2015. The two parties established a fragile ceasefire in 2022, which the Saudis broke in July of this year when they bombed the airport in Sanaa, Yemen, to prevent an Iranian plane from landing. Both the Biden and Trump administrations waged unsuccessful bombing campaigns against the Houthis for blockading the Red Sea in protest of Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Recently, the Houthis captured the key port city of Mokha and Perim Island, a crucial staging ground giving them near total control over the Bab al-Mandab Strait. Roughly 12% of global shipping travels through the strait, and although the Houthis have said they are only blockading Saudi ships, the effect on worldwide energy markets has been significant. Additionally, Saudi officials blamed an Iranian-backed militia in Iraq for an attack that destroyed parts of their East-West pipeline, and accused Houthi militants of aiding in the strike. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reportedly asked President Donald Trump to bomb the Houthis in retaliation, but Trump denied him.

Kilmeade, one of Fox News’ loudest supporters of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, has responded to these developments by urging the Trump administration to come to Saudi Arabia’s defense.

“Let's talk about the Houthi rebels,” Kilmeade said on September 14. “They contacted the president and say look, my problem is not with you guys — don't bomb us. My problem is with the Saudis and the Yemeni government.”

“Well, that’s too bad, it is our problem — you are shutting down that other strait on the Red Sea, stopping oil from flowing while blowing up the Saudi pipeline which was redirecting oil out of the strait,” Kilmeade continued. “So it is our problem.”

The next day, Kilmeade was more explicit in calling for aid to the Saudis following a report on the Houthis’ “rapid gains” in Yemen. “I don't know why we just don't back the Saudis,” he said. “They are our ally.”

On September 16, Kilmeade again advocated for escalation. “Does it seem like we're leaving the Saudis out to dry?” Kilmeade asked.

“Why wouldn't we help an ally like Saudi Arabia being that they are bombing — they’re shutting off a strait that’s affecting our oil prices and they’re bombing a pipeline that’s affecting our oil prices?” he added.

On September 17, Kilmeade criticized opening diplomatic talks with the Houthis.

“U.S. officials met with Houthi representatives in Oman over the weekend and they’re reaching out to us trying to say hey, my problem is not with you,” he said. “But our problem is with them, because they've basically shut down the Bab al-Mandab Strait, which has 12 percent of the world's oil, which is rocketing up our price of oil. Are we really buying this line that they're not causing us a problem?”

The Trump administration’s bombing campaign against the Houthis in 2025 — most memorable to U.S. audiences for Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s “Signalgate” scandal — failed to meaningfully diminish the Houthis’ military capacity.

But when the Trump administration and the Houthis agreed to a ceasefire in May of that year, several voices at Fox News celebrated their supposed demise nonetheless.

Fox News host Sean Hannity said of the Houthis, “They seem to have now just given up and given in.”

Fox contributor Hugh Hewitt claimed: “The Houthis have thrown in the towel after President Trump turned up the heat.”

Fox contributor Marc Thiessen, who has reportedly advised Trump on the Iran war, said, “Iran has lost all of its terrorist proxies. Trump has pummeled the Houthis.”

On Jesse Watters Primetime, former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said at the time that Trump had “taken the Houthis out.”

As the journalist Spencer Ackerman recently chronicled, Ansar Allah has withstood a decade of war, and any simplistic calls to defeat them with a bombing campaign are likely futile on their own terms.

Even some people at Fox News acknowledge that fact. On September 15, Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum noted “the resilience of the Houthis, who have been in this battle for a long time, and we have tried to sort of intervene over different administrations — but they still seem to have gas in the tank, to put it one way.”

Whether MacCallum realized it or not, having gas in the tank separates Ansar Allah from a growing number of people in the United States. Kilmeade, as a host of the president’s favorite morning show, seems determined to expand the war that has already cost so much.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Fox News Investigates: What 'Yard Line' Has US Reached In Trump's Iran War?

Fox News Investigates: What 'Yard Line' Has US Reached In Trump's Iran War?

As Donald Trump’s war against Iran stagnated into a stalemate and strategic defeat, hawkish Fox News personalities who urged the president to attack in the first place have repeatedly used a football metaphor to emphasize how close the U.S. was to some nebulous victory.

Trump and his Fox allies began predicting an imminent end to the Iran war just days after the start of the U.S. bombing campaign. But four weeks into the war, the Iranian regime was intact and its closure of the Strait of Hormuz threatened global trade in energy and fertilizer, rattling even some of the president’s allies.

Fox contributor Marc Thiessen, a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush, and Fox senior strategic analyst Jack Keane, a retired Army general — both avid Iran hawks whose commentary on the subject reportedly influenced Trump’s thinking — responded by stressing that the U.S. was “on the 20-yard line” and “in a red zone.”

“After three weeks of operations, we’ve got them at the 20-yard line, but you’ve got to get into the end zone to score,” Thiessen said during a March 26 interview on Fox & Friends. “The question is how do we finish those last 20 yards? The last 20 yards are the hardest. What’s left — all the easy targets have been hit. What’s left is the hardened targets, the hidden targets, the deeply buried stuff. We are dismantling that. We have a plan to do that.”

Thiessen repeatedly claimed over the following months that the U.S. remained at the “20-yard line” but could score whenever it mustered the will to do so, before conceding last month that he was “willing to live with” stopping in that position because Trump had gone “80 yards better than any president before him.” His Fox colleagues and their guests, meanwhile, more hopefully claimed that the U.S. was even closer to victory — and abruptly dropped the metaphor over the summer as the war settled into a quagmire.

March 27. “I try to describe it in a football analogy,” Keane explained on Fox & Friends. “You know, we’re in the red zone here, we’re on the 20-yard line, trying to get to the goal line, and the opposition is putting as much impediments in because they can see how close we are to attaining our objectives.”
April 1. The late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), discussing a speech in which Trump said the war was “nearing completion,” told Fox’s Sean Hannity: “We’re inside the 10-yard line, and he’s telling Iran how this movie ends.”
April 21. “I still agree with the general though — Gen. Jack Keane — is, we’re on the 5-yard line right now,” Fox & Friends co-host Lawrence Jones said on the show.
April 22. Jones again cited Keane the following day, saying, “We’re on the 5-yard line right now.” His co-host Ainsley Earhardt responded: “We’ve continuously heard that we’re on the 5-yard line. We’ve got to finish, we’ve got to make that touchdown, and we’ve got to bleed them dry, and that’s what President Trump is doing.”
May 11. “There is no doubt in my mind, taking out the ayatollah, a lot of their leadership, has put us in a better position,” said Jones. “Are we on the 5-yard line? Of course, but the president had to take this action.”
June 9. Thiessen, responding on America Reports to Iran downing a U.S. helicopter, said Trump should “finish Operation Epic Fury, which was stopped at about the 20-yard line, take it into the finish line, announce that you've achieved your objectives. Then once they have been disarmed of all that capability, open up the strait by force and over time hand it off to an international coalition, and then arm the Iranian people to take down this regime.”
June 10. On Special Report the following night, Thiessen defended Trump’s frequent claims that a deal with Iran was imminent by saying, “He doesn’t need a deal. … He was at the 5-yard line, we have to hit the targets.”
June 11. The Five co-host Dana Perino commented, “It feels like we’ve been in this doom loop on the 1-yard line for three months, and I hope that that is true.”
July 8. Jones said on Fox & Friends that “from a military standpoint, we’re still on the 5-yard line.”
July 21. Thiessen, asked on Special Report how the war could end, said: “We stopped the fighting and the ceasefire on the 20-yard line, we take it into the end zone. We have about 14 days of combat where we have to take out all the targets that we have available. We took out 85% of their defense industrial base, we take out 95% of it, we set back all their programs, and we further entomb the nuclear dust. Then we stop major combat operations, we impose the blockade, we open up the Strait of Hormuz, and then we go and we help the Iranian people overthrow the regime.”
July 25, July 29, July 30. Thiessen reiterated his July 21 remarks claiming the U.S. campaign was “on the 20-yard line” before the ceasefire on multiple Fox shows.
August 4. On The Story, Thiessen credited Trump with “huge accomplishments” in Iran but added: “We have to acknowledge that when we had the ceasefire in April, we stopped at the 20-yard line. … If it turns out that we are only going to go to the 20-yard line, I'm willing to live with that. You know, it's 80 yards better than any president before him and it's a huge accomplishment, but we have this opportunity here to irreversibly change the course of the Middle East sitting right here for the president to seize.”

The war reached the six-month mark on August 28, having “deteriorated into a quagmire of the president’s own making with no clear goals, no obvious strategy and no end in sight,” while senior U.S. military leaders warn that “prolonging large-scale operations against Iran is unsustainable and risks weakening their ability to confront threats elsewhere, including the U.S. homeland.”

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World