Tag: house democrats
Diesel Fuel Hits Record High As Holiday Drivers Cope With Gas Spike

Diesel Fuel Hits Record High As Holiday Drivers Cope With Gas Spike

The average cost of diesel fuel set a new record on Friday, hitting a whopping $5.85 per gallon, according to AAA’s fuel tracker—a 30 percent increase from the same time last year.

The timing of the diesel spike could not be worse for the GOP, which is directly responsible for the price increase as the party did not stop Trump from launching an ill-advised war that he now cannot seem to get out of.

The midterm elections are less than two months away, with mail-in ballots hitting mailboxes as early as today in states across the country.

And a surge in diesel prices will almost certainly trickle down to higher prices in the rest of the economy. That’s because diesel powers the trucks, boats, and trains that transport goods across the country. Diesel is also used in farming machinery to harvest crops, meaning a spike in diesel prices will also likely impact grocery prices.

Given that the cost of living is the issue voters say will determine how they vote in the election, that leaves Republicans in a terrible spot.

“This impacts you, even if you don’t fill up with diesel,” Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee wrote in a post on X of the new diesel price record. “Higher diesel prices > higher fuel costs for truckers > higher shipping costs for businesses > higher prices on store shelves > higher costs for you.”

Indeed, GOP operatives told Politico that they are resigned to the fact that prices will not come down in time to save them in the midterms, with handicappers saying Republicans are almost certain to lose their House majority—and their control of the Senate is in serious peril, too.

“In the spring, I was like, look, I think we need gas prices coming down starting in August, like in a significant way. I think voters need some time to kind of get over their frustrations, and I think we’ve run out of time,” an unnamed “Republican operative working on several races across the country” told Politico.

Compounding Republicans’ problems is that record-setting diesel prices hit their base hard, which could depress GOP turnout or even cause some Republican voters to defect to the Democrats. That would turn what was already expected to be a bad night for Republicans into a catastrophic one.

It’s why states like Iowa, Ohio, and even Kansas—which all have major agricultural sectors that are heavily impacted by spiking diesel prices—are on the map for possible Democratic Senate pickups, even though they backed Trump by double-digit margins in 2024.

Worse still for Republicans is that regular gasoline prices are also elevated, with the average price of a gallon of gas at $4.15. That’s a record high for Labor Day, when millions of Americans take car trips for holiday getaways.

That, too, will leave bad tastes in the mouths of voters, who are reminded of Trump’s role in raising their cost of living every time they drive past a gas station or fill up their tanks.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Hakeem Jeffries

Report: Kushner Met With Jeffries As White House Braces For Democratic Congress

As President Donald Trump continues to claim he will only lose the 2026 midterms if they are rigged against him, Republicans are by contrast starting to distance themselves from him politically, as if anticipating defeat. Now a new report in The New York Times offers another clue into the GOP reading the writing on the wall — namely, a private meeting between Trump’s son-in-law and the Democrat poised to be House Speaker if Democrats retake that legislative chamber.

“Representative Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, met privately in recent weeks with Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and top outside adviser, and discussed potential areas of common ground, according to five people with knowledge of the meeting,” reported The New York Times' Maggie Haberman and Annie Karni on Sunday. “The rare engagement was held in a private space in New York City, offered up by a mutual friend of the two men, according to two people with knowledge of the meeting and a third who was briefed on it. They and others were granted anonymity to discuss a meeting about which they were not authorized to speak publicly.”

Haberman and Karni added, “Through aides, neither man would comment on the session, which was described by one person with knowledge of it as a broad conversation on a range of topics. Still, its timing underscored that those around Mr. Trump were well aware of the likelihood of a Democratic-led House, and trying to foster as much of a working relationship as possible before any change. Mr. Jeffries is in line to be the speaker, were Democrats to win the majority.”

Jeffries and Kushner reportedly discussed a wide range of issues including the cost of living, housing and immigration. Both apparently believe that Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, is the MAGA insider most amenable to compromising with the other party.

“Throughout this Congress, Republicans have adopted a my-way-or-the-highway approach to governing that has failed the American people,” Jeffries told the Times in a statement that did not explicitly confirm the Kushner meeting.

He added, “In every conversation that we have with the Trump administration, we will continue to make it explicitly clear that the affordability crisis is not a hoax, and nothing short of transformational policy change is acceptable. We are fighting for an affordable America. The question is whether Republicans will join us.”

The Times added that nothing from the meeting is yet official.

“Should Democrats win the House, Mr. Jeffries would have to balance the need to keep the government funded with Democratic calls to defy Mr. Trump at every turn, and possible pleas to impeach him for a third time,” the Times wrote.

The reporters added, “Mr. Jeffries and Mr. Trump have danced around questions about what their relationship could look like next year should Democrats take control.”

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

Mining Bosses Bought Their Own Stock Days Before Trump Shrank Utah Preserve

Mining Bosses Bought Their Own Stock Days Before Trump Shrank Utah Preserve

This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist's weekly newsletter here.

Congressional Democrats have opened an investigation into the mining company Energy Fuels after its CEO and chairman bought thousands of shares of the company’s stock just days before President Donald Trump downsized the neighboring Bears Ears National Monument in southeastern Utah.

The Denver-based company operates White Mesa Mill, the last conventional uranium processing site in the nation, which sat about a mile from the Bears Ears boundary before Trump slashed the monument by 90 percent last month.

On July 7, 2026, CEO Ross Bhappu bought 74,000 shares of Energy Fuels, the largest insider purchase of stock in the company’s history, according to a news release issued by Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee. The trade bumped Bhappu’s ownership to 41 percent. Board chair Bruce Hansen acquired 4,000 shares the following day.

Less than a week later, Trump removed 1.24 million acres from Bears Ears National Monuments — making the land available again for mining. The day after Trump’s move, the Bears Ears Commission, a coalition of five tribal nations, issued a statement saying, “The decision weakens protections for a living cultural landscape and sacred ancestral homeland that has been cared for by Indigenous peoples since time immemorial and is a major setback to one of the nation’s most extraordinary models of collaborative management of public lands between Tribal Nations and federal agencies.”

Rep. Jared Huffman, a Democrat from California and the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee, and Maxine Dexter, the ranking Democrat from Oregon on the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, announced Monday that they had opened an investigation into the company.

“We understand that monument boundaries were redrawn in a way that could benefit Energy Fuels,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter to Bhappu.

A spokesperson for Energy Fuels said company leadership was aware of the letter and takes it seriously.

“The Company is unaware of any evidence supporting claims of wrongdoing in the referenced letter and strongly rejects any suggestion that the Company or its executives engaged in any improper conduct,” the spokesperson wrote in a statement Wednesday. “The White Mesa Mill has never been located in the Bears Ears National Monument, Energy Fuels holds no properties, mining claims, or economic interests in the monument, and we have not actively advocated for any changes to the monument with the current Administration.”

The lawmakers are demanding communication between Energy Fuels executives and federal officials, along with the company’s lobbying contracts. The company said in its statement that it follows federal, state, and local regulations to protect communities and the environment.

“The White Mesa Mill is one of the most highly regulated mineral processing facilities in the United States,” the company spokesperson wrote, “and plays a critical role in strengthening domestic supply chains.”

Documents show Energy Fuels pressured the first Trump administration to shrink Bears Ears in a way that would benefit the company in 2017, just months before Trump reduced the monument originally established in December 2016 by President Barack Obama. President Joe Biden restored the monument’s boundaries in October 2021.

Energy Fuels’ White Mesa Mill lies less than a mile east of Bears Ears’ former boundary, and the monument’s sandstone deposits include both uranium and vanadium. The company announced late last month that it had broken ground on an expansion of the mill to produce heavy rare earth materials used in data centers along with the automotive, energy, and robotics industries.

At the same time, the second Trump administration has been making a concerted push to encourage more domestic mining of critical minerals. The Department of Defense issued a $725 million loan to Energy Fuels on June 18 to support developing rare earth elements. In an investor presentation filed in July with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Energy Fuels noted “strong government support” as one of its competitive advantages. Then, last week, president Trump announced a $3 billion investment in the mining of critical minerals and the development of battery projects.

While some minerals, like lithium and nickel, are used to produce clean-energy products and uranium is used for the production of nuclear energy, the Trump administration describes its rush for domestic production as a matter of national security. The coalition of five tribal nations and environmental advocates, meanwhile, have asserted the White Mesa Mill is not a good neighbor. The company faces accusations that it secretly transported radioactive material through tribal lands and that the material it stores poses a risk to water quality and public health in water-strapped southeast Utah.

“Energy Fuels cannot credibly claim to be a responsible operator while the nation’s last uranium mill functions like an unregulated, bargain-bin waste dump on the doorstep of an Indigenous community,” Democratic lawmakers wrote in their letter to the company CEO. “Instead of respecting the Tribes for whom Bears Ears is sacred, you appear to be enriching yourself from their devastation.”

Correction: This story originally misstated the year that the Bears Ears National Monument was established.

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/indigenous/mining-executives-bought-stock-in-their-own-firm-days-before-trump-shrank-bears-ears/. This coverage is made possible through a partnership between Grist and The Salt Lake Tribune, a nonprofit newsroom in Utah.

Watch AOC And Democrats Strip The Bark Off RFK Jr. In House Hearing

Watch AOC And Democrats Strip The Bark Off RFK Jr. In House Hearing

House Democrats dragged Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a hearing on Tuesday in which he attempted to defend President Donald Trump’s latest budget proposal. While last week’s hearings focused on RFK Jr.’s failures to protect public health, this round focused on his complicity in the corruption of the administration’s health care policies.

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York led the charge, highlighting the contradiction between Kennedy’s rhetoric and his recent policy decisions—specificially, sending billions to major health insurers he has previously accused of fraud.

“United [Healthcare], CVS, Aetna—they’re defrauding the American public to the tune of $80 billion a year,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “And so I was surprised to see, about two weeks ago, you had decided to give them another $13 billion, and it was used through the mechanism of the MA [Medicare Advantage] reimbursement rates, but I want to know, why did you do that?”

After Kennedy acknowledged concerns about the industry, he offered up a meandering response, which Ocasio-Cortez politely threw back in his face.

“The industry is saying that they’re increasing these costs, but the industry is defrauding the public. So we know they’re lying,” she responded. “They’re lowering their reimbursement rates, they’re increasing denial. So we know that these folks are lying. We know that they’re bad actors. And if I’m hearing you correctly, we are giving them more money because they’re saying that they need it?”

Things didn’t get easier when Rep. Greg Landsman, Democrat of Ohio, pressed the health secretary on the nearly $1 trillion in health care cuts the Trump administration has used to give tax breaks to the wealthy.

“You had mentioned the rural-hospital piece—$50 billion, largest investment—but there’s a reason why the Senate Republicans asked for a $50 billion rural-hospital investment,” Landsman said. “[It’s] because of the nearly trillion-dollar cut to Medicaid.”

“There’s no cut in Medicaid,” Kennedy replied. “Look at the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] report from this week.”

“Then just do the math with me,” Landsman responded. “That means that they added $3.5 trillion to the deficit. You gotta find a trillion dollars. You either added a trillion dollars to the deficit, or you cut Medicaid by a trillion dollars.”

Finally, Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss of Massachusetts took off the kid gloves, focusing on the Food and Drug Administration’s National Priority Voucher Program—an initiative widely criticized for being vulnerable to corruption. Auchincloss pointed to the recent controversy involving podcaster Joe Rogan, who boasted about texting the president in order to get the FDA to fast-track research for the psychedelic ibogaine.

“Secretary, this flies in the face of your stated commitment to putting science over politics,” Auchincloss said. “We are literally seeing politics put over science.”

“Do you want to grandstand, or do you want an answer?” Kennedy interrupted.

“I want safety and efficacy to be the standards by which psychedelics are approved, not the president’s attempt to shore up support from his base for a disastrous war in Iran,” Auchincloss shot back.
Like all of Trump’s unqualified cabinet members, Kennedy’s glaring inadequacies continue to haunt Americans.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World