Tag: maga republicans
Collins Re-Election Bid Stumbles Over 'Oath Keeper' On Campaign Staff

Collins Re-Election Bid Stumbles Over 'Oath Keeper' On Campaign Staff

One of the most vulnerable Republicans in the current midterm cycle is seeing their reelection campaign crumble, as The Daily Beast reports that it has been beset by "one headache after another."

Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, is seeking reelection this year and is considered one of the GOP incumbents most susceptible to a Democratic flip. This comes after years of the lawmaker souring her reputation with voters by claiming frequently to be "concerned" about President Donald Trump's agenda, but still voting in support of it most of the time.

In a Wednesday report, The Daily Beast detailed the ways in which Collins' campaign "can’t catch a break." Even after heavy allegations forced her previous Democratic opponent to drop out of the race, a series of mounting political headaches has left her with anything but an easy path to victory.

"Instead, it’s been one headache after another," the report detailed. "Billionaire donors with ties to Jeffrey Epstein; a campaign begging supporters for gas money to fuel her re-election tour after she voted to uphold the conflict in Iran; and Donald Trump launching a trade war with neighboring Canada."

On the heels of all that "baggage," the report further detailed the latest scandal engulfing Collins: "a former Oath Keeper" found to be on her staff.

"In June, Collins, 73, announced county commissioner Wayne Erkkinen as her town chair in Greenville, which puts him in charge of grassroots campaigns and voter outreach as Collins fights to hold on to her Senate seat at November’s midterm elections," The Daily Beast explained. "The problem? Erkkinen, 81, was previously identified by the Anti-Defamation League as a member of the Oath Keepers, the far right extremist group that played a major role in the January 6 attack at the Capitol, with some later convicted of seditious conspiracy.

It continued: "The group’s leaked membership rolls included more than 38,000 names and Erkkinen was among them. He told [The Daily Beast] he joined the group in 2010 thinking it was for law enforcement and military veterans like him, who had sworn to defend the Constitution. He also said he quit the group 'years ago'—before the storming of the Capitol—because he didn’t want to be part of something violent."

“It wasn’t what I thought it would be,” Erkkinen said.

Collins' campaign has countered the issue, arguing that it "can’t be expected to keep tabs on every grassroots volunteer on its books," while the report noted that it has given her opponents "fresh ammunition to argue that the Senator is supported by Donald Trump’s 'most extreme backers.'" It also raises further alarms about "the company [her campaign] keeps," after reports emerged that it had accepted contributions from wealthy donors connected to Epstein.

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet


Trump

Pause From Doomscrolling -- And Be Hopeful As MAGA And Trump Swirl The Toilet

I’m content to doom scroll with anyone who wants to go there. This country is obviously in a lot of trouble, as this corrupt, self-dealing, unchecked president is barely half-way through a term that’s unleashed murderous xenophobia, war, and—a key subject of this ‘Stack—terrible economic policy.

But I’m not immune to hope, which I keep seeing in a variety of places. In a word, that terrible policy record has not gone unnoticed by the majority of the American people/electorate. Ergo, Trump’s approval rating is tanking. Here’s a good summary.


Yes, he’ll always have MAGA, but the New York Times tells us that, at least in terms of media interest, they too may be lagging.

For the record, I wouldn’t make too much of this. Given the strength of their psychological bond (discussed below), I would never count on MAGA turning on Trump. But, electorally speaking, MAGA’s too small to do much by itself. At least in a national sense, and increasingly at the state level too, it needs the numbers from the larger swing coalition that’s largely motivated by affordability concerns and is happy to cycle through incumbents until someone actually helps them.

Bottom line, even with Trump off the ballot, the Rs have a midterm problem. And, if that holds, it’s just plain good news for America.

Then there’s the fact that some spineless Rs, like Sen. Cornyn, now that they’re out of the running, are standing up to some of Trump’s most egregious actions and nominations. FTR, I have zero sympathy for these lame ducks. They repeatedly betrayed their oaths to enforce the Constitution, until doing so become costless. And Cornyn, e.g., has an awful record: anti-choice, tax cuts for the rich, terrible SCOTUS votes, etc.

My point, however, is that he’s just the typical establishment R that proliferated before Trump took over, and as soon as that constraint was lifted, he snapped back to his old self. And I doubt he’s alone. That’s not particularly comforting, I grant you, but it signals that Trumpian damage—his “ownership of the party”—though it will absolutely postdate Trump, is not permanent.

Will the Ds be the beneficiaries of this discontent with Trump and the Rs? Certainly in the narrow midterm sense of the incumbent party doing badly, especially when the country’s dominant mood is this negative, and, at least as far as winning back the House is concerned, polling and betting markets suggest those odds are favorable.

But there’s a big difference between benefitting from anti-incumbency and lasting, foundational support. That requires delivering. And here’s where I think some of the Democratic Socialist (DSA) candidates have an interesting edge (“some” is doing important lifting here—the DSA candidates more focused on tearing down the establishment than helping constituents could prove to be electorally problematic in many districts).

Polls show voters expressing more favorable views re socialism. As I’ve written before, there are many reasons for that, largely born of a sense that establishment Ds have failed to deliver or to hold Israel to account for its actions in Gaza. In essence, people are looking for a new political force that looks like it might genuinely fight on their behalf, while reinstituting basic human rights that have long been violated. That certainly defines Mayor Mamdani’s success, and the fact that he’s starting to deliver further seals the deal.

There was a time when Trump and MAGA played this role (the fight-for-you part, not the human rights part, of course), but that was never going to work. Trump’s a fraud who never intended to deliver on his affordability promises. I’ll admit to being surprised that he’s so energetically turned that dial the wrong way—his policies are currently adding at least a point to inflation!—but as his polling shows, a lot of people looking for economic relief realize they bet on the wrong pony.

But second, MAGA and DSA motivations are fundamentally different. MAGA is, at root, a psychological movement, motivated by retribution against a world that’s always looked down on them. This is why Trump is such an effective standard bearer for them. He links to them though a titanium-strength chain of genuine empathy, because he too resents the fact that he’s always been viewed as a carnival-barking fool by elites.

DSA—and I’d put the labor-oriented Ds of old in the same bucket—is at root motivated by economic justice. Their theory of the case is not anti-market, which is why I don’t think the commie spitballs will stick. It’s that the benefits of market outcomes are not reaching enough of the folks who generated those outcomes. The bakers aren’t getting a fair slice of the pie they’re helping to bake (technically, this shows up as imbalanced factor shares—labor share down, profit share up).

Bottom line, this is all pretty simple. A decisive group of swing voters that tend to determine many electoral outcomes these days is looking for economic help from whomever they believe will deliver it. Trump has failed to do so, so they’re looking elsewhere. Half the battle for the Ds is convincing them they can make a positive difference in their lives. The other half is doing so.

MAGA Masochism: When Voters Realize Their Own Party Hates Them

MAGA Masochism: When Voters Realize Their Own Party Hates Them

Why would anyone choose to belong to a political movement that openly despises them?

Here we have two stories on that same theme.

“Reid Rasner, an openly gay Republican running for Wyoming’s sole House seat, is spending the final stretch of the campaign on a project he didn’t expect: suing members of his own party for defamation,” reports Dave Weigel in Semafor. “On Friday morning, Rasner will settle one case against an Iowa man who called him a ‘pedophile’ under several of his campaign’s Facebook posts. Rasner is pursuing another case against a former GOP Wyoming state senator who he alleges led a whisper campaign accusing him of sexual misconduct.”

It is genuinely brave to be openly gay in Wyoming and especially within the Wyoming Republican Party. But saying this?

“I’ve never experienced anything like this in my entire life. … This just isn’t the Wyoming I knew or thought I knew. The state needs to come to terms with the hate and ignorance that’s fueled death threats and violence against me, all because of my sexuality,” Rasner said.

Rasner is 42. He was 14 when Matthew Shepard was brutally murdered in Wyoming because he was gay. Wyoming is arguably the most conservative state in the country, and it remains one of only a tiny handful of states without a hate-crime law, despite Shepard’s murder.

Rasner is wrong. This is exactly the Wyoming anyone paying attention would expect.

The second story comes from Texas.“Benny Melendez voted for President Donald Trump in 2024. But since Trump returned to the White House, it has been increasingly difficult for Melendez to run his small construction company in south Texas,” reports Politico. “He says immigration officers have detained workers at his job sites and while driving his company trucks. Since the beginning of 2025, more than 10 of those workers have been deported.”

Melendez now says he’s leaving the Republican Party and will vote for Democrat James Talarico in this year’s Texas Senate race.

“How can we continue voting for someone that is targeting our community?” Melendez told Politico. “There’s no way possible we’re going to support that. No way.”

Except … there was.

Trump has been targeting Latinos since the launch of his first presidential campaign, in 2015, which he kicked off by attacking Mexicans.“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems,” Trump said. “They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime. They’re rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they’re telling us what we’re getting.”

And it wasn’t just Mexicans he targeted. He also attacked people from “all over South and Latin America” and “probably from the Middle East.”

None of this was hidden. It wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t buried in some obscure policy paper. It was the central message of Trump’s political movement from the very beginning.

So yes, Benny, it’s good that you’ve finally figured out Trump intends to cause the harm he promised to cause. Better late than never. That’s still a better outcome than for Rasner, who apparently intends to remain in a party whose members are accusing him of being a pedophile because he’s gay.

I probably shouldn’t sound so bitter. People can change their minds, and democracy depends on voters doing exactly that.

But it is frustrating to watch people act shocked when a movement built around grievance, exclusion, and scapegoating eventually turns on them, too. Republicans didn’t hide who they were. They built their ascent to power on it.

Maybe this time, enough people are finally willing to believe them.

Markos Moulitsas is founder and editor of the blogging website Daily Kos and author of three books.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Rejecting MAGA's 'Patriotism Of Fools' -- And Loving America Despite Trump

Rejecting MAGA's 'Patriotism Of Fools' -- And Loving America Despite Trump

The approach of July 4 is making my heart hurt. Love of this country is deep-dyed in my soul, but pondering how or even whether to celebrate the semiquincentennial provokes a riot of mixed feelings.

The right — and not just the MAGA right — responds to any queasiness about this particular anniversary with knee-jerk vituperation. Matthew Hennessey, writing in the Wall Street Journal, offered a typical example of this Pavlovian response this week when he accused Robert De Niro of "hating America." What had the actor done to deserve this verdict? Well, he attempted to provide "counter-programming" to what Hennessey described as the "star-spangled UFC spectacle" on the White House lawn.

So, if De Niro and others found the transformation of the stately White House into a Vegas gladiatorial contest demeaning to our country, they are failing a test. I guess if you "star spangle" something, no matter how vulgar, and people fail to celebrate it, then they hate America? That is the Trumpian way. He routinely accuses his critics, judges who rule against him and even members of the Supreme Court of hating or attempting to destroy America. It's the patriotism of fools — slap Trump's face on whatever you want and label anyone who objects an America hater.

De Niro explained why love of country is sticking in some of our throats right now, and Hennessey quoted a couple passages that clearly triggered him:

"Because our country isn't so lovable right now. I hate to say it, but loving our country is starting to sound like an abused spouse saying they love their abuser. I can't love a country that starts stupid and inhumane wars, killing thousands of innocents and indirectly causing the deaths and suffering of millions more. I can't love a country that takes health care away from millions of people and uses that money to enrich their pals in the Trump-Epstein class. I can't love a country that sends out masked militias to shoot citizens in the streets, torture our neighbors and separate families."

He continued:

"I can't love a country that's led by a racist, misogynist, xenophobic tyrant. And let me just say it: I can't love a country that's led by Donald Trump and his sycophant Congress. For most of my life of course I did love my country. The United States of America welcomed my immigrant ancestors. It gave me, my family and my fellow citizens such rich opportunities and extraordinary freedoms. I want to love my country again. I want my country back."

I have no idea where De Niro stands on many political issues. I may disagree with him on some policy matters. But his despair about the current iteration of America resonates with me and with millions of other Americans. For Hennessey to decry De Niro's protest while implicitly celebrating the degrading spectacle the president put on for his birthday on the White House lawn is upside down. It is our very reverence for the country that makes us recoil from the tawdry circus Trump hosted.

I'll see De Niro's plaint and raise him. It's difficult to love America when we reelected a man who threatens our neighbors, fawns over dictators, attempts to overturn an election, terrorizes and tortures immigrants, trashes the Constitution, says the greatest threat to our country is the "enemy within," enjoys the murder of critics like Rob Reiner, pillages the treasury to enrich himself and his family, sics prosecutors on his critics while pardoning his allies, attempts to use government power to co-opt or silence the press, defunds lifesaving foreign aid while offering asylum only to white South Africans, commits multiple murders in the Caribbean, cannot complete an English sentence, and starts wars he cannot finish because he's a vainglorious idiot too enraptured by his own myths to take advice.

It is painful to look at our flag with mixed feelings, but how can we not when the MAGA crowd has so conspicuously appropriated it as their symbol? Ironic, isn't it, that the very people who used poles with American flags attached as spears against policemen at the Capitol on January 6 have the gall to drape themselves in it today? But they have, and we all know it. Displaying the flag now almost seems to require an explanation. Maybe a flag is needed underneath saying, "Pro-America, anti-MAGA." I loved the idea I heard recently for a T-shirt featuring the face of Pope Leo. The tagline would be "American. We Don't All Suck."

Here's where I depart from De Niro, though. We may despise what the Republican Party has done to America in the past decade and even mourn for what's been lost, but we can still love the country. It's like a dysfunctional relative. You may hate what they do, but you still love them and you'll never stop trying to help.

Even in the midst of this debacle, there remains much to love about America. Its gift to the world of the ideas in the Declaration of Independence is first on the ledger. Its physical beauty goes without saying. Consider also that right now, roughly 62% of American adults disapprove of Trump. Sixty-two percent of 270 million American adults is more than 167 million people — a population big enough that, if it were its own country, it would be the ninth biggest in the world. Fifty-nine percent of American adults believe he is a "potentially dangerous dictator whose power should be limited before he destroys American democracy." That's reality sinking in.

Despite the backsliding, we remain the nation with the greatest scope for free expression in the world. No other country protects free speech, religious freedom or free association as vigorously as the United States. That is under threat, but we are seeing that people now know it. A majority in a recent Public Religion Research Institute survey agreed with the statement, "Today we are in real danger of losing important democratic rights and freedoms we have had in this country." Whether they will act on that fear remains to be seen.

We remain one of the most charitable nations on Earth (Indonesia is No. 1, in case you were wondering).

Despite what the Trump administration has done, Americans overwhelmingly welcome and accept people of all backgrounds as full and equal citizens — and not because "elites" forced this upon us. We continue to prefer pluralism to sectarianism. A recent survey by the PRRI found that 77% of Americans want this to be a nation made up of people from all over the globe, while a mere 20% long for a nation (that never was) made up of only those of Western European origin. We don't want religious homogeneity, either; 64% prefer that America be a nation of people belonging to a variety of religious faiths, while only 34% want a nation primarily of Christians.

Our federal system serves as a bulwark against centralized power, and, very critically in our time, makes it difficult to steal elections. Besides, as the world's oldest continually functioning democracy, elections are deeply baked into our DNA. It's worth remembering what happened to Viktor Orban. When the people can vote — even if their leader has attempted to thwart democracy in hundreds of ways — the people still rule.

America has demonstrated a capacity for self-correction in the past. Suffrage was gradually expanded from white property owners to all white men and then to black men and finally women. Slavery was obliterated by the Civil War. The greed and peculation of the Gilded Age gave way to the progressive era. McCarthy's reckless bullying was rebuked by Congress. Nixon's crimes were followed by government reforms.

It's possible that we have crested as a nation and are now in permanent decline. As Shakespeare said, "There is a tide in the affairs of men/ Which, taken at the flood/ leads on to fortune/ Omitted, all the voyage of their life/ Is bound in shallows and in miseries."

Perhaps we're past it. But when you consider our strengths and our virtues, giving up on loving this country and working to steer it toward a better future would be a tragic dereliction.

Mona Charen is policy editor of The Bulwark and host of the "Beg to Differ" podcast. Her new book, Hard Right: The GOP's Drift Toward Extremism, is available now.

Reprinted with permission from Creators

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World