Tag: national guard
Trump Is Trying To Make Us Forget The Epstein Scandal -- So Don't

Trump Is Trying To Make Us Forget The Epstein Scandal -- So Don't

"Never again will the immense power of the state be weaponized to persecute political opponents," Donald Trump declared at his 2025 inauguration. Hold that thought.

Trump is now using the immense power of the state to distract from a scandal that could bring him down. That is, his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, a fiend who sexually trafficked girls young enough to be in junior high.

Watch how Trump uses the power of the state to change the subject. Note how his weaponizing of government to go after foes — or just attract attention — escalates into sheer spectacle.

It's no longer just insulting celebrities. No, he needs the big guns to force attention away from deeper questions about his close dealings with Epstein. He needs to send the National Guard into cities that didn't want them, bomb boats that may or may not be carrying drug smugglers and send immigrants who may or may not be undocumented to third-country dungeons.

News channels have jumped all over FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's mafioso threats against news media that don't do Trump's bidding. He apparently intimidated ABC/Walt Disney into firing Jimmy Kimmel after the late-night comedian made comments at odds with state-sanctioned opinion. Carr used to make fiery defenses of free speech.

This is a serious story, but critics shouldn't let Trump lead them astray from the story that undoubtedly terrifies him: his relationship with the predator who provided rich men with underage sexual partners.

Ignore Carr. He is a toady, a hollow man barren of principle. And did Attorney General Pam Bondi claim that the state could investigate businesses that refused to print memorial vigil posters for Charlie Kirk? Yes, but not gonna happen.

The burning question isn't whether Trump knew Epstein, liked Epstein or even partied with him. We know he did all those things, but those activities are not necessarily criminal.

The question is whether he participated in the sexual abuse of minors. Proof that Trump availed himself of Epstein's young adolescents has yet to be produced. But evidence that he may have is piling up.

Many questions could be answered in the release of all the Epstein files. Trump used to call for that, but when the possibility drew near, he invented a new story: The files are part of a Democratic hoax.

That didn't get much traction. Recent polls show at least 80 percent of the public — including independents and many Republicans — wants all the documents released.

Another hint that Trump may have been deeply involved is his treatment of Ghislaine Maxwell, who recruited and groomed Epstein's victims. Convicted of the sex trafficking of minors, among the most serious federal crimes, Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison. Why was she summarily moved to a low-security facility that offered Pilates?

Upon Maxwell's arrest in 2020, Trump responded, "I wish her well, frankly." He clearly wants her on his side.

How can Trump explain the affectionate birthday letter he sent to Epstein? It contained typewritten text, a drawn outline of a naked woman and the signature "Donald" written in a way that resembled pubic hair. The letter was reported by The Wall Street Journal, a conservative Murdoch-controlled publication that treads carefully.

We can expect Trump's diversions to become ever more flamboyant as information dribbles out about Epstein's clientele. There's no accounting for the elastic moral standards of Trump's most slavish devotees, but even some of them might have trouble with the sexual abuse of 14 year-olds.

Countering the immense power of the state to distract the public is not easy. But we must. We should ask what ought to concern us more, comedians or sex traffickers of young teens. You choose.

Froma Harrop is an award winning journalist who covers politics, economics and culture. She has worked on the Reuters business desk, edited economics reports for The New York Times News Service and served on the Providence Journal editorial board.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Our Inner Cities Deserve Respect -- And Anti-Crime Policies That Work

Our Inner Cities Deserve Respect -- And Anti-Crime Policies That Work

“Of course, Baltimore,” said Donald Trump when ticking off the list of cities that required federal forces to quell the hordes of violent urban criminals who live in the president’s head, if not in reality.

It’s clear he never bought into the nickname coined to counter the city’s negative image. No “Charm City” for a man who fails to see any positives in a place he recently called a “hellhole,” and not for the first time.

Right now, the administration’s attention has turned to Chicago, likely the next target of his plan to interfere with law enforcement operations — and whatever else he can get away with — in cities led by Democrats.

Trump, always spoiling for a fight, is ready to take on a federal judge’s ruling of overreach in Los Angeles, not to mention Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (who fits the profile).

However, the president would never leave out his go-to for all things dysfunctional in a blue city led by a Black mayor, in Baltimore’s case Brandon Scott. That’s the same man some Republicans blamed when a cargo ship crashed into the city’s Francis Scott Key Bridge, casting Baltimore’s mayor and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore as both incompetent and all-powerful.

Then again, it’s easy to spew nonsensical contradictions, along with every inner-city and racist trope, when you don’t see citizens who live in certain parts of certain cities as human beings.

You only had to listen to Trump’s answer to an invitation by Moore to walk the city’s streets, to actually learn something about the places and the people he so glibly and destructively malign. He only sees teenage “thugs” to be put behind bars, charged as adults and thrown into prisons, places where you don’t have to attend school but where you learn plenty.

“I’m not walking in Baltimore right now. Baltimore is a hellhole,” Trump said. “This guy, I don’t even think he knows it.” Yes, “this guy,” not “Governor Moore,” the better to disrespect a state leader who happens to be Black.

To be fair to the president, he is not alone in the judgments he makes from afar.

As someone who grew up in West Baltimore, I am well aware of the city’s reputation.

Even people who should know better seem both surprised and disappointed when, instead of sharing tales of being a child lookout for drug dealers, in a scenario straight out of The Wire, I talk about my less dramatic reality of backyard birthday parties, trips to the library, and doing chores for neighbors.

That’s not to say the neighborhood of my youth was crime-free. And that was before a drug epidemic rendered too many familiar row houses vacant shells I see on visits to relatives.

Unfortunately, I have seen more than one childhood friend caught up in addiction or one mistake that landed them in the system instead of a counseling or treatment center the well-heeled on the other side of town always seemed to have access to.

But I never forgot the people they were or could be still if they had the support, programs, and, yes, luck that blessed me.

People get a lot wrong when judging inner cities across America.

Its residents crave attention from law enforcement and their government. They pay their salaries, and they are outraged when everything from medics to 911 seems to lack a sense of urgency when responding to their emergencies.

In my experience, they just want to be treated fairly and respectfully, to be on the other end of that mission “to protect and serve.” They would welcome after-school programs and community violence-prevention strategies more than troops, tanks, and National Guard members from Tennessee and Mississippi who may see them as perps rather than people trying to live safe and productive lives.

And they have learned to be very suspicious of politicians who say things they obviously don’t mean. Donald Trump isn’t serious about “law and order,” not when one of his first acts as president was pardoning criminals who attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021 and injured more than 100 law enforcement officers.

If the Trump administration and its compliant allies in a GOP-controlled Congress really wanted to help rather than dominate the Americans in the cities he dismisses, they would just support the policies that have been proven to bring crime rates down.

But then they would have to admit they could learn a thing or two from those Democratic Black mayors.

Johnson does not downplay Chicago’s gun violence, which, while decreasing, still left 58 people shot over the holiday weekend. He said at a news conference that many of those guns on the city’s streets are trafficked to Illinois from nearby states, including GOP-led Indiana. “Chicago will continue to have a violence problem as long as red states continue to have a gun problem,” Johnson said.

“If the president was absolutely certain,” he said on NPR, that “driving violence down in the city of Chicago and cities across America was his actual goal, he would not have taken over $800 million away from violence prevention efforts.”

In an interview on NPR, Baltimore’s Scott talked about what has brought down violence in his city, one that as of July had seen 84 homicides, the fewest recorded in more than 50 years, one of many hopeful statistics Trump refuses to acknowledge or believe.

“We actually go to those who are most likely to be the victim or perpetrator of gun violence. They get a letter directly from me. We knock on their door and say, ‘We know who you are. We know what you do. Change your life. We’ll help you do it. But if you don’t, we’re going to remove you via law enforcement,” Scott said.

“Those who have taken us up on change in their life — over 90 percent of them have not reinjured, revictimized, or recidivated in crime.”

It makes perfect sense, to nurture people with hopes and dreams who need guidance and a pathway to success. But first you have to see those kids, and yes, many are kids like I once was, as human beings worth investing time and money in, as young people worth saving.

Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Charlotte Observer, as national correspondent for Politics Daily, and is a senior facilitator with The OpEd Project. She is host of the CQ Roll Call “Equal Time with Mary C. Curtis” podcast. Follow her on X @mcurtisnc3.

Reprinted with permission from RollCall.

Chicago is “a war zone”

Trump-Fox Feedback Loop Is Prelude To Troops Occupying Chicago

Chicago has likely seen fewer shootings this year than in any other in nearly six decades, and was not even among the top 20 U.S. cities by homicide rate in 2024. But according to President Donald Trump, the city is “THE MURDER CAPITAL OF THE WORLD!”

Trump’s false Tuesday morning declaration after watching overheating commentary from Fox News’ Fox & Friends, which cited shootings over the weekend as evidence Chicago is a “war zone” and its elected leaders are sending the message that they “like the violence."

The president’s favorite TV show is helping to ease the country onto a glide path toward Trump’s authoritarian goal of putting troops on the ground in more U.S. cities.

Shooting and murders in Chicago have plummeted to near-record lows

Crime data analyst Jeff Asher reported Tuesday that while the scale of shootings and murders in Chicago represents a terrible toll inflicted on far too many city residents, “the available evidence suggests that Chicago has seen fewer shootings so far this year than any year since the mid-1960s.”

“The 1,264 people shot in Chicago through August 30 this year signifies far, far too many lives impacted by gun violence, but that figure is down 37 percent through this point last year and down nearly 60 percent from this point in 2021,” he wrote.

"Chicago is on pace for just over 400 murders in 2025 which could be the fewest murders there since 1965,” he continued. “Obviously, there’s a lot of time left in the year, but Chicago will almost certainly have way fewer murders in 2025 than it did in any year between 1966 and the early 2000s.”

Murders and shootings rend the fabric of communities, and the fact that they seem to have fallen to the lowest level in Chicago since the president was in college does not mean that the work of reducing crime is done. The data does, however, provide context for whether the state is facing an emergency that requires federal intervention.

But Trump’s worldview isn’t shaped by the thoughtful analysis of statistics — he cares about what he sees on his television.

Trump is responding to Fox & Friends lie that Chicago is “a war zone”

On Tuesday morning, Fox & Friends’ co-hosts were telling viewers that Chicago is in crisis and denouncing its elected leaders for saying that they oppose Trump surging federal forces into the city against their will.

“VIOLENCE GRIPS CHICAGO AS DEMS REJECT TRUMP’S HELP” was the chyron Fox & Friends aired at the top of the 7 a.m. segment.

“We’ve talked a lot about the crime in Chicago,” Ainsley Earhart said. “Fifty-six were shot over the Labor Day weekend. Eight people died in Chicago as a result of those shootings.” Fox & Friends aired a graphic displaying those figures while she spoke.

Earhardt contrasted those numbers with a video of Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson saying at a rally on Monday, “No federal troops in the city of Chicago.”

“These leaders spend more time targeting the president of the United States than caring about the issues that matter to their community,” Lawrence Jones replied. He claimed that the weekend’s level of violence is “happening almost every other week in Chicago,” adding, “I think it is a war zone there.”

Co-host Griff Jenkins claimed that Johnson’s comments “have got to be offensive to the families and loved ones” of victims, adding that Democrats were “defending, essentially, the criminals by trying to resist federal assistance to bring it under control.”

Jenkins then aired a clip of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker saying in an interview that “no one in the administration” had reached out to him about federal intervention, which he said suggested they were planning “an invasion with U.S. troops."

“It's not an invasion,” Earhardt responded. “The reason that Donald Trump has to get involved is because the leaders of these blue states can't keep crime off their streets. They can't do anything about it. They are not trying to do anything about it. The message we hear is: We like the violence.”

Again, this is how the president’s favorite program is responding to crime in Chicago at a time when the city is seeing the lowest levels of shootings and murders in decades.

Trump often responds in real time to the shows he is watching from the White House and elsewhere — a phenomenon I’ve described as the Fox-Trump feedback loop — and that’s exactly what he did on Tuesday morning.

Roughly 40 minutes after the Fox & Friends segment, Trump posted to Truth Social:

At least 54 people were shot in Chicago over the weekend, 8 people were killed. The last two weekends were similar. Chicago is the worst and most dangerous city in the World, by far. Pritzker needs help badly, he just doesn’t know it yet. I will solve the crime problem fast, just like I did in DC. Chicago will be safe again, and soon. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Trump is trying to justify an authoritarian invasion of Chicago

Trump’s claim that Chicago is the “most dangerous city in the World, by far” is absurd. In fact, the city isn’t even among the top 20 cities with the highest reported homicide rates in the United States, according to an Axios analysis of 2024 FBI crime figures, while “eight of the top 10 cities with the highest murder rates and populations of at least 100,000 were in red states."

But Trump, according to many of his former top aides, is a fascist, and the president has repeatedly displayed his eagerness to put National Guard and even active-duty military on the streets of blue cities in blue states.

He lied about conditions in Los Angeles to justify a deployment there (which a federal judge on Tuesday said violated the law) and lied about crime in Washington, D.C., to do the same thing in the nation’s capital.

With Trump’s propagandists at Fox and elsewhere chomping at the bit for the president to order “full military occupation” of other “problematic cities,” Chicago may be next.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

Judge Blasts Troop Deployment As Trump Rants About 'Murder Capital'  Chicago

Judge Blasts Troop Deployment As Trump Rants About 'Murder Capital'  Chicago

President Donald Trump escalated efforts to broaden his “emergency” crime takeover of Washington, D.C. by threatening to send federal troops to Chicago, falsely branding the city the “Murder Capital of the World” in a Tuesday morning tirade. The remarks came just before a federal judge ruled that Trump’s deployment of federal troops to Los Angeles was illegal and violated the Posse Comitatus Act, by effectively turning the military into a “national police force with the president as its chief.”

Decrying that eight people were killed in Chicago over the weekend, Trump falsely claimed, “Chicago is the worst and most dangerous city in the World, by far.”

He insisted that Illinois Democratic Governor JB Pritzker “needs help badly, he just doesn’t know it yet. I will solve the crime problem fast, just like I did in DC. Chicago will be safe again, and soon.”

The president followed up those remarks by falsely declaring, in all-caps, “Chicago is the murder capital of the world!”

Other cities in the U.S. have a higher murder rate than Chicago’s 24 per 100,000 people, including Memphis, St. Louis, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., Birmingham, and Philadelphia. Worldwide, currently, Colima, Mexico has been dubbed the “murder capital of the world,” with a rate nearly eight times higher than Chicago’s.

Just after Trump’s apparent bid to pave the way for a possible D.C.-style deployment into Chicago, a federal judge blasted the President.

“A federal judge ruled Tuesday that President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth violated federal law by using the US military to help carry out law enforcement activities in and around Los Angeles this summer,” CNN reported. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer “concluded that Trump’s use of thousands of federalized California National Guard members and US Marines to provide protection to federal agents during an aggressive immigration crackdown in the Los Angeles area ran afoul of the Posse Comitatus Act, a 19th Century law that generally prohibits the use of troops for domestic law enforcement purposes.”

Politico’s Kyle Cheney, one of the first to report on Judge Breyer’s ruling, wrote that “Trump billed his deployment of troops to Los Angeles, starting in early June, as a way of bolstering immigration enforcement efforts amid protests in the city against the president’s deportation agenda. Though Trump has now withdrawn all but 300 of those troops, he is mulling sending troops to other major cities, such as Chicago.”

Responding to the Judge’s ruling, Fox News co-host Jessica Tarlov noted, “Get ready for this to happen when Trump deploys the Guard to Chicago.”

CNN’s Edward-Isaac Dovere observed, “this is a court win for Newsom that could have a wider effect as Trump looks at more National Guard deployments.”

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World