Tag: public health
Trump And Kennedy Render America Defenseless Against A Deadly Virus, Again

Trump And Kennedy Render America Defenseless Against A Deadly Virus, Again

When ominous reports of a highly lethal and potentially communicable illness reach our airwaves, Americans now must rely on foreign authorities to reassure us — or to warn us.

The hantavirus is at our doorstep, but the Trump administration, and specifically its top health official Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have dismantled the federal scientific infrastructure that traditionally protected the nation from such threats and substituted literally nothing in its place. While we may escape the direst consequences of their vandalism for the moment, there is no guarantee that far worse is not coming, and soon.

The ruinous public health impact of Donald Trump's return to the White House was just as predictable as his rush to enrich himself and his family by every corrupt means. We knew what he is because we saw what he was. His historic failure to competently manage the COVID-19 pandemic mostly occurred in plain sight, as he tried to ignore and then downplay a deadly onslaught of which he had been duly warned.

With his presidential messaging warped by egomania, Trump promised that the spreading pandemic would swiftly and "miraculously" fade away. He knew that was a lie but resisted a sound public testing program because he didn't want "bad numbers" as the election season began. He failed to provide critically needed hospital supplies as doctors and nurses died. And he undercut the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidance on safety protocols while promoting quack cures, comic-book science, and loony ideas like "injecting" bleach.

Trump's mindless, chaotic response led to many thousands of unnecessary deaths, for which he somehow mostly escaped blame, while right-wing media demonized veteran public health officials. And all that insanity occurred while responsible federal officials were still in office — meaning before Kennedy got the chance to pursue his impulse to destroy the public health edifice that required decades to build.

That course of destruction accelerated as soon as Trump and Kennedy took over last year, although the dismantling had begun during the first Trump administration. Within weeks after his second inauguration, the president signed an executive order terminating United States membership in the World Health Organization, a token of his pig-ignorant attitude about the global vectors of diseases that know no borders. At the same time, he ended U.S. observance of International Health Regulations that govern cross-border investigations of disease outbreaks like COVID-19, Ebola and now hantavirus.

Trump's malign commands are not only leading to the deaths of millions of innocent people in other countries, suddenly deprived of essential medicines and care, but now are jeopardizing American access to vital, timely, lifesaving information. Whatever capable officials are still left in our government can no longer see the WHO surveillance databases or communicate with its working groups of doctors and scientists — who played a major part in our defense against Ebola during the Biden administration.

Meanwhile, Trump's sycophant Kennedy has directed an even more damaging reign of ruin on the systems that protect us within our own borders. Apparently motivated by an urge for vengeance on the CDC, which thwarted his anti-vaccine propaganda, Kennedy ousted nearly a third of the agency's employees. Among the functions most harmed by his stupid waves of firing and rehiring was the renowned Epidemic Intelligence Service, whose medical detectives are trained to investigate and assess infectious outbreaks like hantavirus (or, to take another topical example, the measles epidemic conjured by Kennedy's anti-vax imbecility).

According to Dr. Celine Gounder, everyone who worked for the CDC's Vessel Sanitation Program, which monitors cruise ship health conditions, cashiered all its full-time civilian workers in early 2025. (Most of them were later rehired.) Only an idiot would imagine that the government should save money by ruining such precious public services.

The demoralizing impact of Trump and Kennedy on American public health will take a toll that has scarcely been felt yet.

"I hope it's fine," said the president when asked about the hantavirus on Sunday. This time it probably will be. But his halting answer was an eerie echo of what he said in January 2020 — before he and his stooges demolished the best public health system in the world.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.


Stressed Out? You've Endured A Year Of Spiraling American Health

Stressed Out? You've Endured A Year Of Spiraling American Health

Two snapshots of a health care system in precipitous decline: First, the latest Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll shows Americans’ number one pocketbook concern is now the cost of health insurance and out-of-pocket health care expenses. Fully two-thirds of the public are more worried today about health care costs than food, housing, utilities or gasoline.

Second, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reports that 1.2 million households dropped health insurance coverage during the 2026 sign-up season, a direct result of the Republican Congress ending the enhanced premium subsidies for Obamacare plan purchasers. The missing 1.2 million came from just 30 states that use the federal exchange.

When the other 20 states report (many have extended the sign-up season to the end of this month), that number will likely reach the 2.2 million that the Congressional Budget Office predicted would drop coverage. The KFF poll found 67 percent of voters now oppose ending the expanded subsidies, including 89 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of independents. Democratic Party attempts to restore the subsidies led to a 43-day government shutdown in October and November.

Those two news items prompted me, in this last post before a three-week break, to take a brief look at where the overall health of the nation and health care policy stand a little over one year into the second Trump administration. I begin by resuscitating a question raised by another Republican president nearly 46 years ago: Are we better off today than we were a year ago?

As sports announcers like to say, let’s go to the video tape.

Compared to one year ago, we have:

  • Falling health insurance coverage and a rising uninsured rate.
  • Declining health care affordability.
  • Less vaccine access.
  • Large measles outbreaks.
  • States eliminating water fluoridation.
  • Less money for public health departments.
  • Less money for Medicaid.
  • Less money for NIH research, and ideological controls placed over its content.
  • Less money for substance abuse treatment.
  • Less money for HIV prevention.
  • Less money for global health.

Among the social and economic determinants of health (which have a greater impact on the general population than health care system interventions), we face:

  • Rising unemployment.
  • Rising inflation (especially for health care and groceries).
  • Fewer food stamps.
  • Less affordable housing.
  • Declining consumer confidence.

Less in the pipeline, too

Every arena for improving public health last year suffered major cuts in federal support or detrimental policy reversals or both. Looking ahead, every public and private institution that must deal with the health consequences of a less generous social safety net faces the prospect of years of additional cuts in federal support due to the massive corporate and higher-earner tax breaks passed last year.

They will also have to deal with another “social determinant of health”: A level of social stress and political division that we’ve not seen since the Vietnam War. It is a direct result of the Trump regime’s violent and illegal assaults on America’s immigrant communities, conducted without regard for the citizenship, residency status or civil rights of those assaulted.

The toll so far: Nearly three dozen dead, including Renee Good and Alex Pretti through summary execution. Within immigrant communities, there now exists widespread fear, reduced school attendance, lost jobs and declining economic activity.

Mounting social stress extends well beyond those directly attacked by the poorly trained goons deployed by the Department of Homeland Insecurity. For a majority of Americans, there is growing recognition that we are on the cusp of losing our birthright as U.S. citizens — the right to the constitutional democracy that was founded 250 years ago and has long been a beacon to freedom-seeking peoples everywhere.

Instead, we’ve been forced to watch helplessly (and without effective push back by the minority party) as the executive branch daily flouts the rule of law; an obsequious, dysfunctional Congress that conducts no oversight; a politicized Supreme Court that enables flagrantly unconstitutional executive behavior; and an ongoing attack on free and fair elections by a Department of Justice that acts like the president’s personal law firm. All of this is either overlooked or temporized by a press run by oligarchs, who now control most of the mainstream media that reaches the broad mass of Americans.

The long-term health consequences of these dramatic changes in our daily lives cannot be predicted with certainty. But the one thing health researchers have repeatedly shown is that people under chronic stress are more prone to chronic disease. The Trump regime’s actions are, quite literally, ruining your health.

A Nation Under Extreme Stress

One need look no farther than public opinion polls to know that huge swaths of the U.S. population feels it is under tremendous stress. A Gallup Poll taken in mid-2025 showed over 18 percent of Americans report they have been either diagnosed or treated for depression in the past year, close to the highest level ever. The rate for young people under 30 is 27 percent — the highest ever.

Why wouldn’t young people feel depressed when the oligarch-controlled social media feeds streaming through their smart phones confirm daily that they are living live in a country on the brink of civil war; where an oppressed majority’s beliefs and values are daily being attacked by a regime that makes no attempt to govern on behalf of all the people; where those who express their anger and frustration through constitutionally protected speech and protest are branded as “domestic terrorists,” with their names, license plates and addresses recorded by masked government employees toting pistols and stun guns?

Should we be surprised that the Fall 2025 edition of the long-running Harvard Kennedy School Youth Poll found that nearly two-thirds of young adults (under 29) describe the U.S. today as “a democracy either in trouble (45 percent) or one that has already failed (19 percent).” Just four percent of Democrats and Independents would describe the U.S. as “a healthy democracy.” The number rises to only 12 percent among self-identified Republicans.

I wanted to end this review on a positive note, and the latest report on U.S. life expectancy from the National Center for Health Statistics, an arm of the CDC, provided the opportunity. It showed life expectancy rose seven months to 79.0 years in 2024, finally reaching and slightly surpassing its pre-COVID peak (although we’re still two to three years behind other advanced industrial countries). Analysts attributed the increase to reduced opioid overdose deaths and the waning effect of the pandemic.

A victory for Trump’s crackdown on the global fentanyl trade by blowing boats out of the water off in the Pacific Ocean and Gulf of Mexico? Hardly. The report covers 2024, the year before he resumed residency in the Oval Office. We’ll have to wait until next year to learn how much damage his actions and those of his minions have done to Americans’ health.

Merrill Goozner, the former editor of Modern Healthcare, writes about health care and politics at GoozNews.substack.com, where this column first appeared. Please consider subscribing to support his work.

Reprinted with permission from Gooz News

RFK JR

Impeach Bobby? House Democrat Vows Removal Of 'Dangerous' RFK Jr

Democratic Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan announced Thursday that she plans to introduce articles of impeachment against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., citing his unscientific medical practices as a threat to public health.

“RFK Jr. is making our country less safe and making healthcare less affordable and accessible for Michiganders. His contempt for science, the constant spreading of conspiracy theories, and his complete disregard for the thousands of research hours spent by America’s top doctors and experts is unprecedented, reckless, and dangerous,” she said in a statement.

Stevens added that she believes that Kennedy has violated his oath of office and that she intends to “lead the charge to remove him.”

Similar to that of the president, articles of impeachment must pass the House, followed by a Senate trial. If convicted in the Senate, an official can then be removed from office.

Stevens has accused Kennedy of dereliction of duty, citing cuts to vital research, promotion of medical falsehoods and conspiracies, lying about his views during his confirmation hearing, and failing to administer the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which are under his control.

The impeachment charge follows President Donald Trump’s widely derided presentation on Monday, where Kennedy appeared alongside Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Administrator Mehmet Oz. Together, they falsely claimed that autism can be linked to vaccines and the use of acetaminophen.

In response, scientists and doctors from around the world have lashed out at the Trump administration, highlighting the dangers of their unscientific medical claims—particularly among vulnerable children.

But despite the public outcry, the autism quackery embraced by Trump, Kennedy, and Oz has received support from key GOP figures.

“God bless President Trump and RFK Jr. for asking the questions and starting to use their positions, their platform, to give parents informed consent,” Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin said.

The autism debacle is just the latest in a string of failure and embarrassment from health agencies on Kennedy’s watch. His decision to censor CDC reports and muzzle experts contributed to an unprecedented measles outbreak in Texas earlier this year.

Kennedy has repeatedly pushed unscientific fears about COVID-19 vaccines and beefed up the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices with compliant followers who have limited access to vaccines.

In his confirmation hearings, Kennedy said that he would uphold existing vaccine standards, but in office he has done the opposite. He’s also pushing to limit access to abortion pills while trying to pressure international scientists against publishing objective research on the effectiveness of vaccines.

Americans have died as a result of Kennedy’s malpractice, which has been enabled by Trump. If successful, Stevens’ impeachment plan could put a stop to it all.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Does 'MAHA' Report Mean That Kennedy Will Oppose Corporate Power?

Does 'MAHA' Report Mean That Kennedy Will Oppose Corporate Power?

Last week’s Make American Healthy Again Commission report on childhood health was clearly the product of the left side of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s brain. Other than its vaccine section, it echoed arguments that progressive physician-scientists and public interest groups have been making for decades:

  • Overconsumption of ultra-processed, nutritionally inadequate food exposes kids to harmful additives and contributes mightily to the obesity and diabetes epidemic among children.
  • Kids’ cumulative exposures to environmental toxins are a major cause of the disturbing growth in autism, allergies and other developmental disorders.
  • The lack of physical activity associated with constant use of electronic devices leads to sleep deprivation, stress, hyperactivity and other mental health conditions.
  • The drug industry profits enormously from selling pills to treat the effects (not the causes) of all of these conditions. And,
  • The government agencies charged with protecting kids from dangerous chemicals have been captured by manufacturers, who fund most of the research that goes into determining whether or not their products are safe.

These public health concerns are areas where the left and the MAHA movement led by RFK Jr. happen to be in agreement. The still unanswered question is what will they do about it.


Commission members endorsing the report included nearly every relevant cabinet secretary. But it also included Russell Vought (head of the Office of Management and Budget), Stephen Miller (anti-immigration czar and Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy), and Kevin Hassett (Director of the National Economic Council). They promised to offer a plan by mid-August that would “get to the truth of why we are getting sick” while “spurring pro-growth policies and innovations.”

That, too, is something the left has been offering for decades. There is no reason why American corporatized farms have to pursue mono-crop agriculture that relies on heavy doses of pesticides, herbicides and chemical fertilizers. Smaller, family-owned farms can earn just as good a living by including more nutritious foods for local use in their crop mix.

For decades, the left has also bemoaned the lack of regulation over the thousands of chemicals used by industry that are being dumped into the air and water without being tested for their potential effects on humans. Progressives have long argued that scientists funded by government or truly independent non-profit research institutes should be the sole determinants of what chemicals can be unleashed on the public.

An agenda for change

If RFK Jr. at the Health and Human Services Department, Martin Makary at the Food and Drug Administration, Jayanta Bhattacharya at the National Institutes of Health, and Lee Zeldin at the Environmental Protection Agency (all signatories to the report) want items for their action agenda, here’s one place they could look. Last January, the 25-member Consortium for Children’s Environmental Health issued a call, published by the New England Journal of Medicine, for a new law governing the regulation of chemicals used by industry.

Here’s some facts drawn from that article:

  • Fewer than 20 percent of the estimated 350,000 chemicals, chemical mixtures, and plastics used by industry, most produced from gas, oil and coal, have been tested for toxicity, “and fewer still for toxic effects in infants and children.
  • “Over the last half century, rhe incidence of childhood cancers has increased by 35 percent. Male reproductive birth defects have doubled in frequency. Neurodevelopmental disorders now affect 1 in 6 children, and autism spectrum disorder is diagnosed in 1 in 36. Pediatric asthma has tripled in prevalence. Pediatric obesity has nearly quadrupled in prevalence and has driven a sharp increase in type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents.
  • “Even brief, low-level exposures to toxic chemicals during early vulnerable periods are linked to increased risk of disease and disability in children that can persist across the life course.
  • “Diseases caused by toxic chemical exposures in childhood can lead to massive economic losses, including health care expenditures and lifelong productivity losses resulting from reduced cognitive function, physical disabilities, and premature death. The chemical industry largely externalizes these costs and imposes them on governments and taxpayers.”

The Toxic Substances Control Act, passed in 1977, failed to give the Environmental Protection Agency the authority to prevent dangerous chemicals from being introduced into the environment or food supply. It assumes all manufactured chemicals are safe and puts the onus on government to prove otherwise.

The EPA was never given the resources to conduct the necessary research. And now, under the Trump regime, the entire research department is being eliminated.

Even before Elon Musk wielded a meat-axe at the EPA and other agencies, most research about potential toxicities from chemicals came from industry-funded scientists. The same held true for the FDA when it looks at studies of food additives, most of which, not surprisingly, claim no harms are caused from their use. I participated in a 2007 study documenting this bias entitled, “Relationship between Funding Source and Conclusion among Nutrition-Related Scientific Articles,” which was cited in the MAHA Commission report.

The Consortium for Children’s Environmental Health action agenda included these items:

  • The U.S. should pass a new law that no new or existing chemical or chemical-based product be allowed to enter or remain on the market if their manufacturer hasn’t proved through independent testing that they are not toxic.
  • All toxicity testing must be undertaken in laboratories that are free from financial conflicts of interest. Manufacturers should be required to bear the cost of independent testing, but not be allowed to conduct it themselves.
  • Chemical manufacturers must conduct postmarketing surveillance to determine long-term adverse effects, especially in pediatric populations.
  • The U.S. should join in international efforts to create a treaty aimed at protecting children here and around the world from the proliferation of toxic chemicals in foods, products and the environment. An international panel of independent physicians and scientists should adopt regulations that all treaty signatories adhere to, which will create a level playing field for industry.

“Pollution by synthetic chemicals and plastics is a major planetary challenge that is worsening rapidly, “ the Consortium’s authors concluded. “Continued, unchecked increases in production of fossil-carbon–based chemicals endangers the world’s children and threatens humanity’s capacity for reproduction… Inaction on chemicals is no longer an option.”

Had the MAHA report eschewed vaccine skepticism, it might have been greeted with less skepticism in the media. Will they take actions this summer that actually limit the ability of Trump’s corporate campaign contributors to spew toxics into the air and water and adulterate the food supply?

Yesterday, RFK Jr. announced the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is withdrawing its recommendation that pregnant women and children get vaccinated for COVID. That suggests his priorities lie elsewhere.

Reprinted with permission from Gooz News.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World