Tag: secretary of state
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Besides Food Dyes, What Endangers Children's Health? Bobby's Hypocrisy

Nobody should have trusted Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to "make America healthy again," especially after he sold the slogan to President Donald Trump for a cabinet position. But the events of recent days have exposed the cynicism and contradictions behind that sonorous pledge.

On May 22, the Make America Healthy Again Commission, named by Trump and chaired by Kennedy, delivered an ambitious report on children's health, which warned that our kids are "the sickest in the world" and loudly blamed ultraprocessed foods, environmental poisons, prescription drugs and lack of exercise for their condition. While the report offered few specific solutions to the problems identified, Kennedy promised that policy recommendations would be forthcoming in the next 100 days.

Unsurprisingly, the lengthy MAHA report promoted the HHS secretary's obsessive opposition to vaccines, despite their proven track record in saving millions of lives of both children and adults — and the recent horrific incidents of unnecessary deaths from measles in communities with low vaccination rates. Despite that troubling feature, other aspects of the report — in particular its focus on encouraging consumption of whole foods and reducing the food industry's most destructive production and marketing processes — won praise from respected scientists who otherwise harbor grave doubts about Kennedy (and Trump).

While the nation awaits Kennedy's vague initiatives on child health, however, the Trump administration is moving rapidly to thwart whatever progress might result from banning a toxic food dye or two. The Environmental Protection Agency, with the full support of the president, under the leadership of a far-right former congressman from New York, has set out to prove that its title is a misnomer. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has announced that his agency will drop much of its historic effort to prevent dangerous pollution of air and water.

What Zeldin really aims to protect are the commercial interests of coal, oil and other dirty industries. Boasting that he will oversee "the biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history," the EPA chief plans to roll back dozens of regulations designed to prevent particulate matter, smog, nitrogen oxides, lead and mercury from entering the bloodstreams of Americans and inflicting deadly effects on their brains, lungs and hearts, causing disease and premature deaths.

While he mulls the most efficient means to destroy the regulatory structures that have reduced pollution over the past 50 years, Zeldin is offering special favors to polluting firms on request. His agency has set up a dedicated email account where industrial polluters can request a "presidential exemption" from regulations that are meant to curtail their dumping of poisons under the Clean Air and Clean Water acts. In practice this will mean increased exposure for vulnerable Americans, especially children, to the same toxic chemicals decried by the MAHA report.

Let's recall at this point how Trump, during his campaign last fall, urged the oil industry to give his campaign "a billion dollars" to ensure his victory — so that he could provide policy favors and pliant officials like the execrable Zeldin.

Among the glaring ironies, as noted in Scientific American, is that Kennedy himself suffered a bout of mercury poisoning years ago from contaminated canned tuna. Eight years ago, when he was still working as an environmental lawyer, he railed against the first Trump administration's attempt to roll back mercury regulations of coal-burning power plants. And even during his HHS confirmation hearings, he touted his record fighting polluters. "The same chemicals that kill fish make people sick," he warned last January.

Kennedy was right, but now he is silent about the ruinous policies pursued by Zeldin, who sits beside him on the MAHA Commission. He complains constantly about fluoride in state and local water supplies, but mercury is a far more potent menace to children's physical health and intellectual development. At its core, Make America Healthy Again is a deception — and it is Kennedy's hypocrisy that now endangers children's health.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism(St. Martin's Press, 2024).

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Maggie Hassan

Habeas Corpus And The Cabinet Of Clowns

She did not even know what habeas corpus is. It should come as no surprise, judging from her actions.

At a hearing, she was asked by Sen. Maggie Hassan, a New Hampshire Democrat:

Senator Hassan: "Secretary Noem, what is habeas corpus?"

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem: "Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country and suspend their right to — "

Hassan: "No. Let me stop you, ma'am. Excuse me, that's incorrect."

It's not just incorrect. It's completely backward. Habeas corpus is not the president's right to be able to remove people from this country at will. He doesn't have that right. Habeas corpus ensures that. Without it, people could be detained at will because the king or the fuhrer or the president doesn't like them.

Habeas corpus developed in the English courts in the 1600s in opposition to the divine right of the king to incarcerate. A petition for habeas corpus was the way you enforced the rule of law. It reflects a principle enshrined in the Magna Carta that "No man shall be arrested or imprisoned ... except by the lawful judgment of his peers and by the law of the land."

"Habeas corpus" technically means that "you have the body," you being the warden or the executive, unlawfully, in violation of my constitutional rights. Because you have the wrong man. Because there is a court order protecting me. Because you have no legal authority to deport me. All of the detainees who are challenging their unlawful detention and deportations are relying on habeas corpus petitions to federal courts.

In the first Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress made clear that the federal courts have jurisdiction to consider habeas petitions from federal prisoners. After the Civil War, Congress expanded that jurisdiction to include state prisoners held in violation of federal law or the Constitution. As Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in 1830, the "great object" of the writ of habeas corpus "is the liberation of those who may be imprisoned without sufficient cause." The "writ of habeas corpus," the Supreme Court has recognized, "is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action."

This is what Trump adviser Stephen Miller, whose influence in the Muskless White House cannot be overestimated, wants to get rid of. He is, according to news reports, actively floating the idea.

Unfortunately for Miller, and fortunately for the rule of law, the Constitution has something to say about this. Article 1, which deals with the power of Congress, provides that "The Privileges of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Most recently, it was suspended by the Act of Congress in 1941 after the attack on Pearl Harbor; before that, it was suspended three other times including during the Civil War. At that point, President Abraham Lincoln, whose actions Noem cited as a precedent for suspension of the right, tried to suspend the right when Congress was out of session; his actions were challenged and rejected by the Court. Two years later, Congress authorized the suspension.

But Kristi Noem didn't seem to know any of this when she testified that the president had the right to deport anyone he wanted to, without their having a right to go to court to protest. Asked by Sen. Andy Kim of New Jersey how many times habeas corpus had been suspended or where the authority to do so came from, she said she didn't know. She didn't even know which Article the Suspension Clause is found in, that is Article 1, which is about the power of Congress, not the president.

The woman in charge of detaining college students and deporting gay hairdressers and separating families and sending people to third countries in the Third World should know better. Noem claims she isn't a constitutional lawyer. You don't need to be a constitutional lawyer to know what habeas corpus is, any more than you need to be a medical doctor to know you shouldn't take your grandchildren swimming in bacteria-infected fecal water. What is with this ignorant Cabinet of clowns?

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Viral Fury: Fourth Grader Puts RFK Jr. On Blast Over 'War On Autism'

Viral Fury: Fourth Grader Puts RFK Jr. On Blast Over 'War On Autism'

Advocacy groups are outraged over Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s war on Americans with autism.

They say Kennedy uses the disorder as a political tool and pushes damaging stereotypes that spread misinformation.

“The U.S. Secretary of Health, RFK Jr., made false comments about autism, like people with autism are broken, that autism is caused by vaccines, and that people with autism will never have jobs or families,” said Teddy, a fourth grader from New Jersey whose statement at a school board meeting went viral earlier this month.

“I have autism and I’m not broken,” Teddy said. “And I hope that nobody in Princeton Public Schools believes RFK Jr.'s lies.”

The New Jersey schoolkid and autism awareness groups felt the need to speak out after Kennedy’s vile comments last month about U.S. autism rates, where he repeated his false claim that autism is an epidemic that “destroys families.”

Kennedy also mischaracterized autism as a “preventable disease” and falsely asserted that 25% of autistic people are non-functioning—ridiculous notions that experts say are inaccurate.

“His comments were incorrect, but more to the point, they were eugenic,” Colin Killick, executive director of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, told the Boston Globe. “Talking about autistic people as themselves being destroyed but also having destroyed their families is a horrific argument.”

“There’s an unscrupulous industry of alternative medicine providers who exploit families by charging them tens of thousands of dollars to ‘recover’ people with autism,” Ari Ne’eman, who is autistic and an assistant professor of health policy and management at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, told NBC News. “The way that industry works is by terrifying families.”

David Mandell, a University of Pennsylvania psychiatry professor and director of the Penn Center for Mental Health, told PBS News that Kennedy’s “fixed, myopic view” stems from needing to interface with parents of autistic children and scientists who work in the field.

Julie DeFilippo, a social worker with an autistic son, told the Boston Globe that “as a parent of an autistic kid, I get hundreds of moments of joy every day. That’s the easy part—being at home and supporting him.”

Kennedy’s characterization of autism as a preventable tragedy also appears connected to his notorious anti-vaccine crusade. In a recent interview with Dr. Phil McGraw, he repeated the vigorously debunked claim of a link between autism and vaccines.

“Many of the parents have reported that their kid, that their child, developed autism immediately after [childhood vaccinations],” Kennedy told the psychologist-turned-TV star.

Kennedy has used his position as America’s chief public health official to launch what he claims is a scientific study into the cause of autism, to be led by an anti-vaccine activist with heinous ideas about treatments for the condition that include experimenting with chemical castration drugs.

“I have seen a lot of people treat [Autism Spectrum Disorder] as some sort of disease that needs to be ‘cured,’ which is very offensive towards people like me,” John Trainor, a high school student, told the Boston Globe. ”We are normal people who have a much harder time socially.”

Kennedy has also announced plans to create an autism database, using the private medical information of millions of Americans, promising Trump in a surreal Cabinet meeting in April that he’d be able to identify the cause of autism by September.

Kennedy announced on May 7 that he intends to direct the National Institutes of Health to use Medicare and Medicaid insurance claims related to autism diagnoses to build his database.

Critics point out that Kennedy’s plan amounts to an autism registry, and experts add that Kennedy’s promises are unrealistic.

"If you just ask me, as a scientist, is it possible to get the answer that quickly? I don't see any possible way,” Dr. Peter Marks, a former top vaccine scientist for the FDA, said on Face the Nation last month.

Kennedy’s talk about investigating autism is extra hypocritical considering the Trump administration’s slashing of funds for scientific research and haphazard dismantling of America’s public health institutions.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Kristi Noem

Slain Woman's Family Blasts Kristi Noem For 'Insult To Her Memory'

Parents of a 24-year-old woman who was murdered in Springfield, Illinois, in 2023 have slammed Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for relocating her Illinois speech to the location where their daughter was killed, saying Noem is using the victim to "advance a cruel and heartless political agenda."

"Our daughter Emma radiated love and light everywhere she went and for all people. Even as a child, she was a friend to everyone and someone who spoke up for the less fortunate. She dedicated her life - her career and her free time - to causes of social justice and equity," wrote the parents of Emma Shafer in a statement released Wednesday, as reported by NBC Chicago.

"To see her used by Secretary Noem and others to advance a cruel and heartless political agenda is not just deeply painful to us — it is an insult to her memory," the statement added.

Earlier on Wednesday, Noem visited Springfield, where she criticized the state's Democratic leaders for their sanctuary policies that she said shield undocumented immigrants. In her remarks delivered close to the location of Shafer's murder, the secretary said Shafer's murderer was in the United States illegally at the time of the incident.

Noem stood alongside government officials and what she referred to as "angel families"— families she claimed had loved ones affected by crimes committed by individuals residing illegally in the U.S.

Shafer's parents chose not to attend the secretary's news conference and were reportedly holding a protest blocks away from Noem's news conference.

"Noem's words are in direct conflict with who Emma was as a person. Emma built up community and stood with all members, including immigrants," they said in their statement.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World