Tag: town halls
At GOP Town Halls, Furious Voters Condemn Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'

At GOP Town Halls, Furious Voters Condemn Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Forget Elon Musk—congressional Republicans are facing new fury from voters, this time for voting in support of President Donald Trump’s "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act,” which proposes slashes the social safety net to pay for tax cuts for the rich.

Two Republicans brave enough to hold town halls—Reps. Mike Flood of Nebraska and Ashley Hinson of Iowa—were both met by angry voters who questioned their support for a bill that would strip away health insurance, food aid, and more from millions of Americans.

Hinson was booed by the audience in her deeply Republican district after she said that she was "proud" to vote for the bill.

"This is a generational investment …” Hinson said, trailing off as the boos drowned her out.

And when Hinson claimed that judges who rule against Trump are engaged in "egregious abuses,” she was met by chants from the audience calling her a "fraud.”

Meanwhile, Flood also faced angry voters in his heavily Republican district, with Flood unable to defend certain provisions in the bill, including a last-minute addition that would make it harder for federal judges to enforce contempt rulings.

“This provision was unknown to me when I voted for the bill,” Flood said, admitting that he didn’t read the bill, which GOP leadership put up for debate in the middle of the night just minutes after releasing the amended text.

Given that House Republicans passed the dogshit bill right before Memorial Day weekend, few other GOP lawmakers have had time to hold town halls to see if this anger is widespread.

But polling shows that voters do not support cutting Medicaid and food stamps to fund tax cuts for the rich. So these displays of rage could be just the beginning for GOP lawmakers—most of whom have been hiding from their constituents by either holding heavily scripted events or eschewing town halls altogether.

Now House Republicans are trying to blunt the backlash by lying about what the legislation does. After the bill passed, the National Republican Congressional Committee, which seeks to elect Republicans to the House, issued a memo falsely claiming that it wouldn’t cut Medicaid.

“The One Big, Beautiful Bill is more than a messaging opportunity; it’s a midterm roadmap. Republicans must drive this contrast, simplify our message, and target Democrats every day. This is about fraud vs families. This is about taxes vs take-home pay. This is about securing the border vs subsidizing chaos. This is about putting working families first, not last,” the memo said.

Of course, independent analyses show that millions of Americans will lose Medicaid coverage and Affordable Care Act subsidies. And the lowest income brackets will actually see their take-home pay decline thanks to the bill, should Trump sign it into law.

Indeed, House Democrats are already gearing up to use this vote to hammer Republicans in the 2026 midterms.

“As the economy is tanking, consumer confidence is at historic lows, and millions are struggling to make ends meet, House Republicans decided to ignore it all… and advance an astonishingly detrimental bill – the GOP Tax Scam – that raises costs on working families while benefiting the wealthiest few,” the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee wrote in a memo.

“It’s a vote that every single vulnerable House Republican will come to regret next year,” it said.

Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are now having their turn to amend the legislation, and they’re doing their usual performance of claiming that they won't back the bill because it adds to the deficit.

“In the House, President Trump can threaten a primary. Those guys want to keep their seats, I understand the pressure. He can’t pressure me that way," Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who says he won’t vote for the bill because it increases the deficit, told Punchbowl News.

But given how cowardly Republicans continue to prove themselves to be, there’s no doubt that they’ll fall in line with Dear Leader.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Activists Turn Up The Heat On Congressional Republicans

Activists Turn Up The Heat On Congressional Republicans

Reprinted with permission fromAlterNet.

Recess week, when members of Congress return to work in their home states and districts, is generally a placid affair—a chance for a ribbon cutting or school visit photo-op, plus a sparsely attended town hall meeting. As Long Island, NY Representative Steve Israel explained in a New York Timesop-ed, “for the first nine years of my time in Congress, my town halls could barely fill a closet.”

That is, until the Trump era arrived, galvanizing a new generation of activists and bringing others back to life who thought their protesting days were behind them. According to a coalition of advocacy groups, including MoveOn.org and the Working Families Party, an estimated 40,000 people attended town hall meetings in 300 cities and 49 states around the country last week.

Many of them got heated. As Nelini Stamp, national membership director of the Working Families Party, said in a news release at the start of the week, “Members of Congress are going to hear our voices this week, whether they want to or not. Americans are taking our democracy into their own hands. If members of Congress won’t hold town hall meetings, we will hold our own meetings, and we’ll speak out loud enough that they can hear us, wherever they are.”

Numerous groups around the country—many inspired by Indivisible, a guide for ordinary citizens interested in influencing members of Congress, which uses Tea Party methods for progressive aims— packed libraries, churches, and community centers in their states and districts. Members of newly formed activist groups called their representatives’ offices, some for the first time, demanding a town hall.

Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) was booed by angry constituents demanding he investigate Trump with the same vigor he pursued Hillary Clinton’s emails. They were furious about his support for Trump’s immigration executive order, and more locally, his attempts to roll back Obama’s funding for Bears Ears National Monument in southern Utah.

When an elected official wouldn’t hold a town hall, constituents got creative. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who told Florida station CBS4-Miami that he wouldn’t hold a town hall because people would “heckle and scream at me in front of cameras,” was treated to missing person posters with his face on them, plastered on walls throughout Florida and on Twitter.

In Denver, Colorado, 1,000 constituents of Republican Senator Cory Gardner showed up for a town hall that was missing a key member: Gardner. A similar scene played out in Fort Collins, Colorado, where constituents directed their questions to an empty chair, set out like the glass of wine for the prophet Elijah on Passover. The senator never showed, but local media did, and Gardner’s absence was louder than any angry constituent.

Frequently, the pressure worked, even, or especially, in the deepest of red states, like Arkansas.

As Shannon Simons, an organizer of Ozark Indivisible, an anti-Trump, pro-Affordable Care Act group based in northwest Arkansas, explained to AlterNet, “We are committed to keeping protections under the ACA. Repealing it would bankrupt Arkansas. We want a strong Arkansas. We also want to get our Tea Party members of Congress out of office.”

This includes Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), who Simons says “did not give us the opportunity to even drop in at his office without an appointment before we protested.” Ozark Indivisible’s pressure worked, however, and Simons described the resulting meeting as “democracy in action.”

Kati McFarland, a student at the University of Arkansas, told Senator Cotton that without coverage through the Affordable Care Act, “I will die. That is not hyperbole. I will die.” Cotton offered a vague promise: “If you lose your coverage today, you can still have it.”

One woman expressed her fears that she and her daughter might be deported or split up due to her family’s mixed immigration status. Others questioned the financial and moral consequences of building and financing a border wall. Multiple constituents expressed their displeasure, with chants of “do your job” and “tax returns.”

Lest anyone claim that these angry constituents are paid protestors or carpet-bagging liberal activists, Simons reminds us, “There are a lot more people who reject 45 [Trump is the 45th U.S. president] in red states than people think. Our voices have been drowned out by the conservatives and our stories have not been told because we are a smaller group. So many of us kept our opinions to ourselves because many people have feared reprisals. The Indivisible movement has provided us connections with like-minded people, and 45’s election gave us the will to speak up.”

Ilana Novick is an AlterNet contributing writer and production editor.

IMAGE: Screenshot / YouTube

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World