Tag: trump administration
Labor Movement Enraged By ICE Arrest Of California SEIU Chief

Labor Movement Enraged By ICE Arrest Of California SEIU Chief

Unions across the United States have been rallying against the detainment of California labor leader David Huerta, who was arrested at an immigration protest on June 6 and released Monday afternoon on a $50,000 bond.

UPDATE: David Huerta was just released from custody!

[image or embed]

— SEIU California (@seiuca.bsky.social) June 9, 2025 at 10:50 PM

Huerta, president of Service Employees International Union California was injured during the arrest and charged on Monday for purportedly impeding Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.

The Trump administration triggered protests by rounding up immigrants in the Los Angeles area in an effort to increase its deportation numbers.

“What happened to me is not about me; This is about something much bigger. This is about how we as a community stand together and resist the injustice that’s happening,” Huerta wrote in a statement on June 6. “Hard-working people, and members of our family and our community, are being treated like criminals. We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of justice.”

The Trump administration’s decision to arrest and charge Huerta is serving as a rallying point for labor unions, immigrants, and minority communities that are being targeted.

“They have woke us up,” Tia Orr, executive director of SEIU California, told the Los Angeles Times.

With more than 750,000 members, SEIU California called for Huerta’s immediate release during a rally in downtown Los Angeles Monday. Similar rallies also occurred in Washington, D.C., Seattle, Boston, and Chicago.

Other unions lent their voices to the cause, too.

“The nearly 15 million working people of the AFL-CIO and our affiliated unions demand the immediate release of California Federation of Labor Unions Vice President and SEIU California and SEIU-USWW President David Huerta,” the AFL-CIO wrote in a release on June 7.

Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, accused ICE agents of violating Huerta’s First Amendment rights by arresting him in the first place.

“AFSCME stands in unwavering solidarity with our union brother David Huerta. We demand his immediate release, and we will not be silent until justice is done,” Saunders wrote in a statement on June 8.

The arrest was also condemned by lawmakers like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who, in a statement released Sunday, said that the arrest of Huerta was “unacceptable.”

“This is the United States of America and we will not be intimidated by a wannabe dictator in the executive branch,” Jeffries wrote in a statement on June 8.

President Donald Trump spent much of the weekend attempting to escalate the situation in Los Angeles, particularly by deploying National Guard troops to the area over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.

Trump and his border czar Tom Homan also promoted the idea of arresting Democratic leaders for opposing the Trump administration’s mass deportations.

In addition to vocal opposition from multiple unions and political leaders, other Democrats have criticized the escalating conflict created by the Trump team.

“Governors are the Commanders in Chief of their National Guard and the federal government activating them in their own borders without consulting or working with a state’s governor is ineffective and dangerous,” 22 Democratic governors wrote in a statement released on Monday.

“Further,” they continued, “threatening to send the U.S. Marines into American neighborhoods undermines the mission of our service members, erodes public trust, and shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

MAGA Media Parrot Republican Lies About Medicaid Cuts

MAGA Media Parrot Republican Lies About Medicaid Cuts

Trump administration officials and Republican lawmakers are getting help from their MAGA media allies to deny the effects of their “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which passed the GOP-controlled House last month and is expected to kick millions of Americans off their Medicaid coverage while cutting taxes for the rich. Journalists and experts are calling out these Republicans for their lies that their bill won’t cut Medicaid.

Following this criticism, the administration is reportedly shifting its argument to falsely claim that the only people who will lose Medicaid coverage will be those who don’t deserve it, specifically “people who are here illegally” and “capable and able-bodied men who refuse to work.” This too, is a lie.

The vast majority (92 percent) of people on Medicaid already work or engage in caregiving or have disabilities or other statuses that would exempt them from a work requirement. The remaining eight percent of the population is overwhelmingly made up of women, not the hypothetical “capable and able-bodied men who refuse to work.” And furthermore, federal Medicaid funding already cannot be used to pay for coverage of undocumented immigrants; states that currently provide analogous health care coverage to undocumented immigrants do so with their own tax dollars.

Republican officials denied Medicaid cuts will result in enrollment losses

  • House Speaker Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) said on NBC’s Meet the Press that “4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so.” Johnson was defending the work requirements the GOP legislation is adding to Medicaid. [NBC News, 6/1/25]
  • Trump Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought on CNN’s State of the Union: “No one will lose coverage as a result of this bill.” Vought also defended the new Medicaid work requirements, stating: “We have able-bodied working adults that don’t have a work requirement that they would have in TANF or even SNAP. And those are something that’s very important to institute. That’s what this bill does.” [Politico, 6/1/25]
  • Trump Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said in a Politico interview, “We’re not cutting Medicaid.” Later in the interview, Oz agreed when interviewer Dasha Burns said that work requirements are “the biggest part of” how Republicans “want to kind of cut and cull” Medicaid. [Politico, 6/1/25]
  • Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) on CNBC’s Squawk Box: “There’s a lot of confusion that Democrats have lied about. They went out there, Joe, and said that we’re cutting Medicaid benefits.” [CNBC, Squawk Box, 6/2/25]
  • Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) told a constituent that “we are all going to die” in response to complaints about the GOP bill stripping Americans of Medicaid coverage. This comment followed her claim that only people ineligible for Medicaid would lose coverage. [NPR, 5/31/25]

Right-wing media amplify Republican lies that bill won't lead to losses in Medicaid coverage

  • Breitbart: “Speaker Johnson: ‘No Medicaid cuts in the big beautiful bill.’” [Breitbart, 6/1/25]
  • The Post Millennial posted clips of Johnson claiming “we’re not cutting Medicaid,” defending Medicaid work requirements, and framing those requirements as “strengthening the program.” [Twitter/X, 6/1/25, 6/1/25]
  • Daily Caller: “‘We’re not cutting Medicaid’: Dr. Oz seems to confirm Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ will not cut program.” [Daily Caller, 5/30/25]
  • Pro-Trump CNBC host Joe Kernen joined Mullin in denying that Republicans are cutting Medicaid, stating: “No one believes that.” [CNBC, Squawk Box, 6/2/25; Mediaite, 12/5/24]
  • Fox Business host Dagen McDowell: “Anybody on the left, Josh Hawley, anybody crying about Medicaid cuts, there are no cuts. Shut up.” [Fox Business, The Big Money Show, 6/2/25]
  • Newsmax chyron: “Dems lie about Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill.'” Newsmax host Carl Higbie aired clips of Democrats calling out Republican cuts to Medicaid and said, “They are not exactly telling the truth.” His guest, Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), said, “Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security are not getting touched,” after Higbie said: “So no cuts there.” [Newsmax, Carl Higbie Frontline, 5/29/25]
  • Newsmax host Marc Lotter cited a Trump post claiming there will be “NO CUTS” to Medicaid when asking a guest, “Do you think, finally, Americans can actually separate the fact from fiction here?” Lotter added: “Democrats use this same rhetoric every time they oppose Republicans.” [Newsmax, Wake Up America, 6/3/25]

Media and issue experts call out Republicans for lies about the bill cutting Medicaid coverage

  • Rolling Stone: “Mike Johnson and Russ Vought continue to lie about Medicaid cuts.” The Rolling Stone article noted that Vought vastly exaggerated the rate of “improper” Medicaid payments, and falsely claimed that undocumented immigrants are “on the program.” Rolling Stone then cited multiple estimates showing millions of people losing Medicaid coverage if the GOP bill becomes law. A second Rolling Stone article on this topic declared, “Republicans are flat-out lying about their Medicaid cuts.” [Rolling Stone, 6/1/25, 6/2/25]
  • Washington Post economics columnist Catherine Rampell mocked the Republican dissembling about Medicaid coverage losses from their bill. Rampell wrote: “OP response to credible estimates that ~8m people will lose insurance due to Medicaid cuts: 1) no one will lose coverage 2) only the freeloaders and bums will lose coverage (not deserving people like you!) 3) look we're all going to die anyway.” [Twitter/X, 6/1/25]
  • Public Notice’s Aaron Rupar: “Vought blatantly lies about Medicaid cuts on CNN, claiming ‘no one will lose coverage as a result of this bill.’” [Twitter/X, 6/1/25]
  • Rupar: “Mike Johnson blatantly lies on Meet the Press: ‘You can underscore what I'm about to tell you -- there are no Medicaid cuts in the big beautiful bill.’” [Twitter/X, 6/1/25]
  • Rupar: “CNBC allows Markwayne Mullin to lie with impunity that Republicans aren't cutting Medicaid benefits (they are cutting Medicaid benefits).” [Twitter/X, 6/2/25]
  • Chamber of Progress director of economic analysis Tahra Hoops: “This is incredibly false. Millions would lose their coverage under this bill, there is no other result should this pass.” [Twitter/X, 6/1/25]
  • KFF executive vice president for health policy Larry Levitt: “You can’t argue that cuts to Medicaid of over $700 billion over a decade won’t result in people losing coverage.” [Twitter/X, 6/1/25]
  • The Atlantic contributing writer James Surowiecki: “If no one will lose Medicaid coverage as a result of the budget bill, then Republicans are telling extraordinary lies about the spending cuts in the bill.” [Twitter/X, 6/2/25]
  • Bloomberg columnist Matthew Yglesias: “The CBO says that approximately 7,600,000 people will lose coverage as a result of the bill’s Medicaid cuts.” Yglesias was responding to a clip of Vought denying losses of Medicaid coverage in his CNN interview. [Twitter/X, 6/1/25]

Independent estimates predict millions of Americans will lose their Medicaid coverage if the bill passes

  • Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Republicans’ tax bill would cut $1.1 trillion from Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act, and SNAP to fund tax cuts for people earning more than $500,000 annually. [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 5/16/25]
  • Politico: The Congressional Budget Office estimated that “the Medicaid portions of the GOP megabill would lead to 10.3 million people losing coverage under the health safety net program and 7.6 million people going uninsured.” According to Politico, this was a partial estimate released by Republicans. [Politico, 5/13/25]
  • CBPP: “Roughly 15 million people could lose coverage and become uninsured under House Republican plan.” The CBPP added the expected 7.6 million uninsured from the Medicaid cuts alone to estimates of coverage losses from the House GOP bill’s failure to extend premium tax credits and other cuts to the Affordable Care Act. [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 5/29/25]
  • KFF: Forty states and the District of Columbia could see at least 13% of their Medicaid recipients kicked off their insurance, with rates of loss as high as 32%. This is a high-end estimate of state-by-state Medicaid coverage losses from KFF. [KFF, 5/16/25]
  • Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: New work requirements alone could put “9.7 million to 14.4 million people at risk of losing Medicaid coverage in 2034.” CBPP explained, “Evidence shows that much of the coverage loss due to work requirements would occur among people who work or should qualify for an exemption but nevertheless would lose coverage due to red tape.” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 5/13/25]
  • Economic Policy Institute: “Work requirements effectively function like a cut to programs.” EPI explained that “while work requirements do not reliably increase employment, they do significantly increase the administrative burden and costs of applying for safety net programs. This increased administrative burden, in turn, reduces access and take-up.” EPI further explained, “In many cases, the sheer amount of additional administrative burdens levied on adults seeking benefits, and on case workers screening to ensure that work requirements are met, is a major driver in the decline in participation.” [Economic Policy Institute, 1/24/25]

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

Larry Summers

Former Harvard President Scorches Trump's 'Act Of Extortion'

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers said Tuesday the Trump administration's move to target Harvard University is an "entirely extralegal act of extortion against an American institution."

The Trump administration instructed federal departments Tuesday to terminate contracts valued at approximately $100 million with Harvard University, escalating tensions between the White House and the prestigious institution.

This move follows the government's prior withdrawal of over $2.6 billion in research funding from Harvard, amid disputes over the university’s resistance to implementing certain policy changes requested by the administration.

During an appearance on CNN Tuesday, Summers, who served as Harvard's president from 2001 to 2006, said the move is similar to "what was done to any number of law firms, just like what was done to government agencies that had appropriated funds."

He added there there are certain policies of Harvard that he has criticized, but said that "simply cutting off all funding for cancer research" does not make sense.

"That's not some gift Harvard got," he added.

Summers, who served in former President Bill Clinton's cabinet, said Harvard is "the tip of the iceberg in terms of what they're attacking."

"The homeland secretary made clear that Harvard was an example for everyone else," he noted.

"I frankly never thought that I would say it about anything in American government. But this is a step towards tyranny. It's a step towards an authoritarian government," the former secretary warned.

"It's the kind of thing that has happened in many other parts of the world. It's the kind of thing that the founding fathers worried about when they drafted the Constitution," he added.

In response to a question from host Erin Burnett, Summers said Harvard can indeed run down its $53 billion endowment. "But if it does, it will be running down the ability to provide scholarships to students. It will be running down the ability to hire new professors."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

a library corner with a book

Under This Bully, Not Even Libraries Are Safe

There’s no escaping Donald Trump. And I don’t necessarily mean that in a bad way. Let’s face it, everyone needs an escape now and then — from work, kids, chores. And we all find that peace in different ways and different spaces: walking in nature, listening to music, snuggling up in a library corner with a book.

Even those who feel kindly toward our president must occasionally find him and his gift of being in your face 24/7 exhausting and relish a chance to recharge. I’m certain that Americans who aren’t in his fan club crave a rest, if only to find the energy to fight another day.

No safe space is free from the grip of the Trump administration, which is gobbling up more territory with each passing day.

The attack on libraries hits especially hard for a book nerd let loose with a library card at the age of 3. Baltimore’s Enoch Pratt Free Library was certainly my happy space and a needed escape when a large family in a modest rowhouse provided a little too much stimulation. And, oh, the surprises I found there: lectures, films and books I stumbled on that sated my curiosity on every topic, from science to politics.

What a quaint notion today, as some parents, with the support of an administration more interested in surveillance than freedom, snatch the very books that might excite a young imagination off shelves, the better to control the uncontrollable — a thirst for knowledge about people and places that don’t end at a neighborhood boundary.

My parents never put limits on what I read. If I was able to read it, I had their blessing. We would discuss complex notions and unfamiliar themes, with all of us learning things about the world and ourselves. It was so thrilling that I followed their example as best as I could with my own son, and he has a houseful of books to show for it.

This administration’s effort to silence those who would extol their wonders has hit communities and our nation’s military academies. Search the library shelves at the Naval Academy for a book that will transport you to someplace you’ve only dreamed about? Unless that book is on an approved list (Maya Angelou out, Mein Kampf in), you’d better buy your own, and fast, before publishing houses feel the wrath of Trump.

It has even hit the Library of Congress in Washington, a point of pride for the nation since it was founded in 1800. Its collection, with millions of books, films and video, audio recordings, photographs, newspapers, maps and manuscripts, is the largest in the world.

It’s not a lending library in the usual sense but rather a resource and a repository of rare and important items in our nation’s history. It’s the main research arm of Congress and the home of the U.S. Copyright Office.

When Dr. Carla Hayden was sworn in as the 14th librarian of Congress in 2016, she brought a wealth of acclaim and experience to the position, including years as CEO of my beloved Enoch Pratt Free Library. Those on both sides of the aisle praised the innovation and modernization that Hayden brought to the Library of Congress and the ways she made it more accessible for all Americans.

She was fired by the Trump administration in an email in which the esteemed Hayden, a woman and an African American, was called “Carla.” The disrespect might have been the point for an administration that denigrates Black Americans of distinction.

But it will take more than petty retaliation to defeat books.

A few years ago, I brought a class I was teaching to the Library of Congress, where the teens were in awe of the beauty of the main reading room in the Thomas Jefferson Building and excited when they learned how they could obtain their own library cards.

They instinctively knew the truth of what author Percival Everett said, that “the most subversive thing any of us can do is read.” When he expressed his displeasure with book bans, I found myself nodding along with an auditorium full of fellow book nerds.

Yes, it’s still my escape. Members of my book club, Zora’s Daughters, had taken a road trip May 15 to the University of North Carolina at Greensboro to hear Everett discuss his life, career and Pulitzer Prize-winning book James, with a central character inspired by but far from the enslaved “Jim” of Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.

No doubt it would be on Trump’s list of banned books since it depicts a Black man as a flesh-and-blood human being whose life, along with the lives of family and friends, depends on his intelligence and empathy.

“It used to be we all wanted our children to be more educated than we are,” said Everett.

I realized he was talking about people like my parents, and I felt grateful.

Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Charlotte Observer, as national correspondent for Politics Daily, and is a senior facilitator with The OpEd Project. She is host of the CQ Roll Call "Equal Time with Mary C. Curtis" podcast. Follow her on X @mcurtisnc3.

Reprinted with permission from Roll Call.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World