Type to search

Trump Is Obsessed With His Twitter Following — Too Bad Most Of His Followers Are Fake

Media Politics Top News White House

Trump Is Obsessed With His Twitter Following — Too Bad Most Of His Followers Are Fake

Share
Trump Twitter

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

President Donald Trump loves to brag about his Twitter following. As more revelations brewed around the Trump campaign’s possible involvement with Russia, Trump tweeted on June 17 about his overall social media following: 100 million strong, or so he claims, and Twitter of course being his favorite method of communication

A quick glance at Trump’s actual number of Twitter followers tells a different story, however; while president brags of about 34 million followers, the truth is far different. According to an analysis by Socialbakers in June for CNN Tech, one analytics tool estimates that 11.6 million of Trump’s 32 million Twitter followers are either dormant or accounts run by bots.

“The analysis run by Twitter Audit, which estimates how many of an account’s following is made up of real people, gave Trump a 40 percent audit score and found that about 20 million of his followers are fake. Status People, another site that rates the authenticity of Twitter followers, found that 5 percent of Trump’s followers are fake and another 91 percent are inactive.

That Trump seemingly has more fake followers than real ones can be attributed to the existence of bots, an umbrella term referring to accounts with no profile picture and no tweets. A quick scroll through the most recent followers on the @realDonaldTrump account shows a number of accounts with Twitter’s default profile picture and no tweets, that seemed to have joined Twitter very recently.

Amassing bot followers is fairly easy. One only has to pay a certain amount of money, and voila, one has an instant bump in following count. A New York Times article by Nick Bilton describes the social media bot industry as a “giant pyramid scheme” often used by big-name brands, A-list celebrities and regular people seeking a “social media ego boost.”

Of course, Trump is not the only famous figure to have fake followers or bots. Politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama also have bots following their verified Twitter accounts. The rub is that Trump’s account seems to have a larger number of bots and presumably fake accounts than any other politicians on Twitter—in comparison, Barack Obama received a 90 percent audit score from Twitter Audit, Hillary Clinton was given a 52 percent audit score and Sen. Bernie Sanders garnered an 89 percent score.

According to the Washington Post, academic research in 2016 found that bots supporting Trump “massively outperformed the bots supporting Clinton” by a 5 to 1 margin days before Election Day. The research paper found that 81.9 percent of “highly automated” accounts carried some form of pro-Trump messaging.

The fact that so many of Trump’s followers are ghost accounts made solely to amplify the president’s message should undermine his own unabashed boastfulness that he’s speaking to 100 million people each time he goes on one of his uncensored and often deleterious tweetstorms. But if the president has one quality that is painfully obvious, it is his penchant for attention and his constant hunger for validation; it’s his whole brand. Those millions of Twitter followers and hundreds of thousands of likes and retweets serve as Trump’s affirmation, a co-sign from the public that he is indeed popular and powerful. After all, Trump has built his entire career, including his rise to the presidency, on popularity and a brazen wielding of power whenever it suits him.

If Trump is aware of the bots and fake accounts he has spawned, he’s done a fairly good job at hiding it. Of course, even if Trump were aware of his pooling of bots, he would decry these reports with his favorite phrase: “fake news.” For a man whose ego is so fragile that he would even fabricate his own inauguration audience numbers, Trump needs those tens of millions of followers so much that he’ll even throw out a number like 100 million just to assert his dominance without even a simple fact check.

Celisa Calacal is a junior writing fellow for AlterNet. She is a senior journalism major and legal studies minor at Ithaca College in Ithaca, New York. Previously she worked at ThinkProgress and served as an editor for Ithaca College’s student newspaper. Follow her at @celisa_mia.

Tags:

8 Comments

  1. FireBaron July 25, 2017

    Kind of like the crowds at his inauguration. They really don’t exist.

    Reply
    1. dpaano July 25, 2017

      Those were also bots!

      1. Independent1 July 26, 2017

        Yes, a lot of them were paid to attend the inauguration.

        Donald Trump reportedly using paid seat fillers at his empty inauguration

        http://www.palmerreport.com/news/donald-trump-reportedly-using-paid-seat-fillers-empty-inauguration/853/

        1. dpaano July 31, 2017

          And, from what I’ve read, he also pays people to attend his rallies! This might just be false news, but it sounds about right to me!

  2. plc97477 July 25, 2017

    You would think that a guy who is mostly fake, from his hair to his relationships, would recognize fake news easier. Oh well there is none so blind as those who will not see.

    Reply
  3. yabbed July 25, 2017

    Well, of course we are all amused by the crazy man’s tweets. He’s a wing nut.

    Reply
  4. rhetoric_phobic July 25, 2017

    Many of his imaginary supporters in comment sections are Russian bots or cyborgs (a combination of automation and humans trolls) WaPo has regulars when there is any negative trump story. 😀

    Reply
    1. stcroixcarp July 25, 2017

      Why you hate bots? Cyborgs is half breed trash, bot’s the real thing!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.