Tag: fox news lies
Hannity Goes Quiet On Iran War As Trump's 'Massive Attack' Evaporates

Hannity Goes Quiet On Iran War As Trump's 'Massive Attack' Evaporates

Fox News host Sean Hannity all but stopped talking about Iran on his primetime show in recent weeks, after President Donald Trump called off further escalations in his six-month-long war. It’s a remarkable shift for Hannity, who is the network figure closest to the president and whose repeated calls for U.S. military action against Iran apparently helped sway Trump’s final decision to launch hostilities in February.

Hannity declared at the top of his July 23 broadcast that the “gloves” were “about to come off” and the U.S. would soon be “launching a massive attack on Iran,” citing comments Trump made to Axios that day.

“We're talking about bridges, power plants, airports, roadways, checkpoints, Kharg Island, the nuclear site at Pickaxe Mountain, everything now on the table,” Hannity exclaimed. Introducing correspondent Kevin Corke for a report, the host commended: “Kevin, remember the scene in Gladiator? ‘At my command, unleash hell.’ That's what it sounds like to me.”

"Before Epic Fury, I was warning Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, because there were reports that a jet, probably with a lot of money on it, [was] waiting to take him to Vladimir Putin's Russia,” he later added. “I would advise the heads of the IRGC similarly, maybe they want to get on a jet themselves and do it pretty quickly. Just a guess. What do I know? I'm just a little old talk show host. I'm, you know, just guessing.”

“Good guess,” Corke replied.

It was not a good guess: Two days later, Trump reportedly “set aside” the escalation plans due to fears about diminished U.S. munitions stockpiles and the potential for a widening war.

Hannity’s war is such a debacle he’s stopped talking about it

Hannity’s only extensive discussion of the Iran war on his Fox show since that July 23 broadcast came during an interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu he aired on July 28, according to a review of the Nexis database. Since then, he’s offered nothing more than a few stray comments.

There’s been plenty of news about the Iran war for Hannity to discuss since then — it just all makes him look bad.

The following week, Trump again threatened a massive attack before again backing down on August 1, this time publicly citing concerns from Persian Gulf states and claiming to have the “perimeters of a deal” with Iran that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

But no deal has since materialized, and while Trump and Iranian leaders trade public demands for war reparations, Iranian and Omani negotiators are closing in on an agreement that would impose transit fees for passage through the strait, leading the Gulf states to reportedly conclude “that Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz will become permanent, disrupting their oil and gas exports and global energy supplies indefinitely” — and that further escalations to the war would be worse.

Meanwhile, experts reportedly fear China or Russia could seek to take advantage of the depletion of U.S. missile supplies caused by the war.

Amidst this omnishambles for U.S. strategic interests, Hannity has been all but silent about the war he encouraged Trump to launch.

One explanation for Hannity’s reticence to defend Trump’s war could be that he is beginning to fear its potential blowback for the GOP’s midterm hopes. GOP strategist Matt Towery warned that the war is creating a headwind for the party in a Monday interview on Hannity’s radio show (where the host has discussed the war somewhat more frequently than he has on Fox).

“This thing has got to conclude because every week we go by that the president says well, we're going to bomb the hell out of them and destroy them, and then two weeks — two days later, we hear well, we're in talks, and then the Iranians pulled the rug out from under him — it weakens the president in the eyes of his supporters,” Towery told Hannity’s radio listeners on Monday. “And so it's time to put up or go home, in my opinion. That's just my advice.”

“The president … has to be able to put Iran aside and say, ‘look, we dealt with it’ one way or another,” Towery later added. “If we go into these midterms with Iran still hanging over everybody's head, I don't think — there'd be a lot of states that would be lost and unnecessarily so because the president's record has been obscured by all this.”

It’s also possible that the situation has become so bleak, and the president’s leadership so shaky, that even Hannity is having trouble defending it. After all, Hannity sold the war to his viewers — and to Trump — on the grounds that it would be a quick and easy response to an existential threat, with no regard for the likelihood that Iran would respond by closing the Strait of Hormuz.

It might also be awkward for Hannity to explain to his audience why the war seems no closer to being finished in August than it did when he told his radio audience on March 30, “It's going to be on the verge of wrapping up no later than three weeks from today is my prediction.”

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Reflecting Fool: How Jesse Watters Pushed Trump's Bogus 'Vandalism' Case

Reflecting Fool: How Jesse Watters Pushed Trump's Bogus 'Vandalism' Case

When Fox News host turned U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro dropped a high-profile case and acknowledged the alleged vandalism of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool had not occurred, she left her former colleague Jesse Watters out to dry. Watters had repeatedly portrayed the supposed vandals as America-hating leftists bent on destroying the country, devoting several segments to the story in increasingly explicit terms.

President Donald Trump has strenuously and repeatedly blamed “Deranged Vandals” for damaging the pool after he ordered its renovation and repainting earlier this year — even as reporting from as early as May pointed to problems with the work of the installer, who received a lucrative no-bid contract. The president claimed the purported culprits should face “years in jail.”

But on Friday, Pirro’s office moved to dismiss charges against David Hearn — a former Olympic canoeist arrested after sticking his hands in the pool and the only person to face a felony charge over the damage — along with three misdemeanor cases, citing new evidence “showing that the damage was the result of a botched installation and not vandalism.”

The motion to dismiss stresses that the Department of Interior provided the initial reports that were the basis for Hearn’s indictment — but only later “provided additional documents” showing the damage “was the result of flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings (“AIC”), and the rush to complete the project prior to events associated with the America 250 celebration in the weeks surrounding Independence Day 2026.”

(Trump subsequently posted that he disagreed “100%” with Pirro, and on Monday he publicly maligned her in the Oval Office; he is now reportedly considering removing her in response, because in this administration, telling the truth when it contradicts the president is a fireable offense.)

While Hearn’s indictment — and the case’s apparent demise — may seem like a sideshow, it presents an important window into how this administration and its propaganda apparatus operate. Federal prosecutors have tried but often failed to carry out Trump’s demands that his real or imagined foes face legal punishment, and those political prosecutions often rely on support from the president’s media allies.

No one in MAGA media had carried more water for the baseless claims about the Reflecting Pool than Watters, who is uniquely positioned to serve as a vessel for such propaganda campaigns: He hosts or co-hosts two of Fox’s premiere programs and is a hardcore Trumpist who lacks both ideological moorings and basic moral scruples. Watters previously plumbed the depths of the internet fever swamps to peddle deranged conspiracy theories about the home invasion and assault of Paul Pelosi, the husband of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).

The Fox host initially celebrated Trump’s effort to repaint the pool as part of a grand struggle over our national identity during a June 12 discussion on The Five — after algae turned the pool green and damage to its surface became apparent, but before Hearn’s arrest.

Watters argued that the left was “purposely subverting the greatness of America, the bedrock of Western civilization,” by allowing the pool and other national icons to “go into disrepair.” By contrast, he argued that Trump was attempting to preserve “a physical and visual reminder of our greatness and our connection to our European heritage.”

When Trump began claiming that vandals were responsible for damage to the pool and Pirro charged Hearn, Watters fit that allegation into his preexisting narrative and assailed “Democrats” and “the left” for what they had supposedly done. But on Friday night, after Pirro’s office moved to dismiss the charges, he did not mention on his show that his account was all wet.

Watters pushes Trump, Department of Interior pool “vandals” story

Watters began promoting Trump’s allegations that the pool had been vandalized on June 22, while still leaving space for the possibility that the damage had been caused by faulty installation.

“On the Reflecting Pool, Trump said that they have evidence of someone slicing and dicing the bottom of the pool and that evidence will be shown in court,” he told resident Democratic panelist Jessica Tarlov on The Five. “And that we have made five arrests. Five individuals are under investigation and I'm waiting to see the video evidence of it. Or they botched the redo. OK. Either way, this is all you got on this guy?”

“Liberals would never vandalize public works — did you see BLM, the statues, the graffiti?” Watters continued.

“You guys make a job out of destroying cities,” he went on to say. “Look at Penn Station. It's a horrible place to be. And you're pointing a finger at a pool he's trying to make better. Come on, Jessica.”

“Did the contractors boot it? We don't know,” Watters added that night on his own program. “But the president says people are pouring chemicals into the Reflecting Pool, carving up the bottom with knives. Not only is the National Guard standing watch, but concerned citizens are keeping an eye out for sabotage.”

“The Park Police arrested a former Olympic canoer,” he added, referring to Hearn. “Records show he's an Obama donor who's been arrested by Park Police before. The Olympian Democrat donor was charged with a misdemeanor, destruction of government property, and he told the AP he is just a concerned citizen. While this curious and concerned citizen is now being repped by one of the most famous Democrat lawyers in the country. I think we know what is going on here.”

The following night, Watters led his primetime show with “the tapes” he said had been provided by the Department of Interior that he claimed provide “a look at individuals suspected of vandalizing the Reflecting Pool.”

“Now we haven't been able to verify the video, but take a look,” he said, before airing and describing it.

“Maybe the contractors screwed up the pool, and they're fixing it, but we have a hunch there was also foul play,” he added. “We could be wrong, but we're seeing preliminary reports alleging vandalism.”

He later referenced Hearn, “the canoer who says he did nothing wrong,” calling him “a longtime Democrat donor, gave money to Obama and ActBlue, arrested by Park Police once before, back in ‘96, and now he has a GoFundMe and a lawyer who just happened to have prosecuted Trump in the first impeachment.”

While Watters carefully hedged his discussion, he left no question about which theory he believed. “Now, while the left is out there taking a knife to America, literally, the rest of the world can't get enough of it,” he said as he transitioned to a discussion of tourists praising the country as they visited it for the first time.

That pool is America's mirror,” he went on to say. “We look in it and we love what we see — we're looking at ourselves, our history, our heritage — and the left hates everything they see. They want it broken and murky. They don't want it to reflect the greatness of the nation. They don't believe America was ever great, and they don't believe we can make America great again.”

“We shouldn't need foreigners to remind America who we are, and vandals will never be able to damage the American identity,” he concluded.

Watters then brought on actor Kelsey Grammer, who suggested that the purported Reflecting Pool vandalism shows that “a virus that has infected some — a very small number of people, I think, who just want to tear things down. They have been consumed by hatred, and, of course, hatred ends up basically destroying you.”

Two days later, Watters went off the deep end.

“The Democrats are ripping up the Reflecting Pool,” he claimed on The Five. “Now, a couple days ago, a lot of people at this table pooh-poohed the idea that you guys would vandalize the pool, but now we have hard evidence reported by The New York Times and the Park Police, because I've looked at all the reports.”

He went on to say that Hearn “got caught pulling up while he videotaped himself ripping up the bottom.”

That night, Watters suggested on his own show that the vandalism had now been proven based on a single anonymous source who spoke to him.

“A senior official confirming someone cut the liner along the bottom of the pool and took the sealant with it,” he said. “We don't know who did it, but we have a pretty good idea where to start looking,” he added, pointing viewers back to the “exclusive” video the Department of Interior had provided to Jesse Watters Primetime.

The host went on to claim that “Primetime is collecting police reports like baseball cards” and touted his “look at some preliminary documents.”

Watters and Trump’s “favorite attack dog” Pirro team up to promote pool charge

A week later, after Pirro’s office initially secured its indictment against Hearn, Watters’ former co-host on The Five went on his show for a curtain call.

“Fox News Alert: I hope Democrats enjoyed their little pool party, because Judge Jeanine just shut it down,” Watters said to introduce the segment. Trump “was fed up watching his new Reflecting Pool get savaged, so he sent his favorite attack dog to bite back — and she came armed with an indictment.”

After a brief debate over who missed the other more, Watters told Pirro: “A lot of people, when this first happened with the pool, didn't believe the president that there was vandalism. That's not the case.”

“Yes, it is not the case at all,” Pirro replied. “In fact, I was at the Reflecting Pool yesterday. There not only is a vandalism that is reflected in today's indictment, but there is a cutting of the liner of the pool, at the base of the pool for several yards across the pool.”

“And someone was intent on doing incredible damage to the pool, but what we've seen after are other people who want to do continuing damage,” she continued. “And one of the biggest problems, and one of the ugliest things that I think is out there are people trying to destroy monuments and statues — you know, part of our history.”

"We saw a lot of this start around the BLM riots — we never really saw people tear down statues in this country before,” Watters claimed. He later asked Pirro: “Why do you think that's taken hold, where they want to destroy these big, beautiful monuments, they want to deface the Reflecting Pool and topple Columbus?”

“Well, I think that people, they resent this country,” she replied. “They don't respect the country. We celebrate the country and the freedoms — they hate it. They hate the leader right now, and they are exercising, as far as I'm concerned, political violence.”

“This is not about free speech,” she concluded. “This is not anything that is justified, and we've got to make sure they understand. They are going to be made accountable, and in D.C. they will be.”

“I’m sure they will be,” Watters replied.

But as Pirro’s office now acknowledges, the case didn’t hold water.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

How Often Did MAGA Media Proclaim 'Mission Accomplished' In Iran? Too Often

How Often Did MAGA Media Proclaim 'Mission Accomplished' In Iran? Too Often

Within days of President Donald Trump’s unprovoked attack on Iran in late February, right-wing media figures began predicting a short, easy conflict that would be over quickly. Major conservative pundits unilaterally declared in early March that the war was a “wrap-up mission at this point,” a “done deal,” and “winding down.” Instead, the war is about to enter its sixth month with no clear end in sight, with the potential for escalation seemingly everywhere.

Where right-wing media promised a cakewalk, the Trump administration has delivered a quagmire, as recent developments make clear. The U.S. military resumed striking targets in Iran in the middle of July, following the breakdown of a largely illusory ceasefire. Iranian authorities told The Associated Press that the recent wave of strikes have killed 50 and injured over 500. Over the weekend, the Pentagon announced the deaths of three U.S. service members, and The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration is now on the verge of “all-out war with Iran after more troops are killed.” And according to The New York Times, the Defense Department has been withholding the full number of U.S. troops who have been wounded in the conflict.

CNBC reported that a maritime risk firm characterized the current state of the Strait of Hormuz as a “worst-case scenario,” with the key waterway nominally open but still a primary point of conflict between the two countries.

These grim assessments stand in stark contrast to the predictions Iran hawks made in the days after the U.S. and Israeli militaries began their joint campaign on February 28 — the pundits listed below may as well have unfurled a “Mission Accomplished” banner for all of their premature declarations of victory.

In early March, right-wing media figures predicted imminent end to Iran war

Although some in right-wing media expressed early skepticism of the war, there was no shortage of hacks (and hawks) who got on board immediately.

On March 3, Fox News’ Laura Ingraham set a tone that others would soon match. “We've already knocked out so much of their capability,” Ingraham said. “It looks like this is just a wrap-up mission at this point.”

Two days later, her colleague Greg Gutfeld speculated on The Five that “maybe there's just nobody who can declare surrender because they're dead. I don't know, but I don't see how this thing can continue much longer.”

The Five returned to the topic the next day. “Do not lie about the war,” host Jesse Watters shouted at his liberal colleague Jessica Tarlov. “You know the war is going well.”

Fox News contributor Tyrus Murdoch added: “I’m willing to say this is a done deal.”

Some prime-time hosts at right-wing network Newsmax took the same line.

“I think we're at the end of serious U.S. involvement in Iran,” said host Rob Finnerty on March 9.

The same night on the same network, Greg Kelly said, “This time next week, we may be able to declare victory and warn Iran, don't do it again. But it could be over.” Kelly’s comments were illustrated by a graphic that read “I Predict: War Over Soon.”

Finnerty doubled down the next night. “The war in Iran appears to be winding down,” he said. “I think it is.”

Also on March 10, Fox News’ Sean Hannity weighed in during his Premiere Radio Networks radio show. “I am a firm believer that this is going to end very quickly,” Hannity said.

As the month drew to a close, Hannity again saw the conflict’s end in sight, telling his radio audience, “It's going to be on the verge of wrapping up no later than three weeks from today is my prediction.”

That was on March 30.

Conservative pundits claimed in March that Trump had won the war

Sometimes right-wing talking heads went even further, not just claiming that the war would end soon but declaring that Trump was already the victor.

On March 5, Ingraham stated flatly: “Trump has already won in Iran.”

In response to a press briefing by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on March 13, Heritage Foundation senior counselor James Carafano said, “The reality is the U.S. has already won this war, period. Mic drop. End of statement.”

Although Kelly’s “War Over Soon” prediction hadn’t come to pass, on March 16 the Newsmax host tried to speak that reality into existence. “I think we kind of just won the war,” Kelly said, adding: “I think we got this.”

Carafano echoed Kelly on March 23, arguing that “it does make sense for the U.S. to say, ‘Hey let's wind this down.’ Look, from America's perspective, dude, we’ve already won."

It’s now been at least three and a half months since these pundits made their various rosy predictions. Contrary to their Pollyannish analysis, the war appears to be expanding, as Iran continues to bomb U.S. military bases in the region and the Houthi militants in Yemen impose a blockade on Saudi Arabia to mirror Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

In light of these developments, a recent Fox News guest offered a different timeline, drawing inspiration from operations the U.S. military conducted after the 1991 Gulf War.

“I do expect that we're going to be there a long time,” said Robert Spalding, a retired Air Force general. “You know Operation Northern and Southern Watch went on for, you know, almost 20 years, I think.”

“I think this is going to be something similar,” Spalding continued. “We're going to have to stay there.”

Research contributions from Helena Hind, Isabella Corrao & Jane Lee

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Fox Praises Trump For Defending Election Integrity, While He Keeps Undermining It

Fox Praises Trump For Defending Election Integrity, While He Keeps Undermining It

In the week before President Donald Trump’s July 16 prime-time address, during which he pushed conspiracy theories that China interfered in his 2020 election defeat, Fox News has portrayed Trump as a leader on election security. However, his second administration has repeatedly taken actions to weaken the nation’s election security, including dismantling much of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, disbanding multiple task forces to combat foreign influence on elections, and failing to work with local and state officials to secure elections.Fox claims Trump will help secure America’s elections
Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer previewing Trump’s address: “He made election integrity a main pillar for his second term agenda.” [Fox News, America’s Newsroom, 7/15/26]

Fox claims Trump will help secure America’s elections

  • Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer previewing Trump’s address: “He made election integrity a main pillar for his second term agenda.” [Fox News, America’s Newsroom, 7/15/26]
  • Fox contributor Johnny Jones: “Election integrity is what President Trump is working on finding and establishing.” [Fox News, The Five, 7/10/26]
  • Fox contributor Ben Domenech: “It’s a “wise move” for Trump to “make a case” for legislation related to elections because “they are popular when you look at them in a polling situation.” Domenech claimed that Americans “tried to have major changes happen in this country when it comes to election integrity. They do not believe those changes have been made. The president is arguing in favor of them.” [Fox News, Special Report, 7/14/26]
  • Fox anchor Trace Gallagher defended Trump from criticism about “the GOP midterm election integrity.” Gallagher aired a clip of former CIA Director John Brennan saying that “Donald Trump is going to do everything in his power, and beyond that, to be able to affect the outcome of the election.” [Fox News, Fox News @ Night, 7/13/26]

But the Trump administration has repeatedly undermined election security

  • CNN detailed how the Trump administration dismantled much of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency infrastructure that combats election threats. CNN reported that these Trump administration efforts have included firing 130 CISA staffers, “including 10 regional security specialists who worked with local and state election officials.” The acting agency director also “put all election-security and counter-disinformation work on hold pending an internal review” in early 2025. Former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem “also ordered CISA in February and March to cancel more than $9 million in annual contracts with the Center for Internet Security, a non-profit group. Many of the cuts imposed by DHS targeted the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, or EI-ISAC, which brought together more than 1,300 election and law enforcement officials around the country to help monitor and share information about threats to voting.” [CNN, 4/9/25]
  • CNN also reported that the Trump administration “disbanded the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force,” which “was among several agencies that warned that Russia, Iran and other countries were conducting operations meant ‘to undermine public confidence in the integrity of U.S. elections and stoke divisions among Americans.’” CNN described it as “a key FBI task force charged with investigating foreign efforts to influence elections.” CNN additionally reported that the administration “also left in the wind the fate of another FBI task force that investigated threats against election workers and polling places.” [CNN, 4/9/25]
  • CNN: “Secret US cyber operations shielded 2024 election from foreign trolls, but now the Trump admin has gutted protections.” CNN reported that “a year into a second Trump administration, many of the government centers previously tasked with repelling foreign influence operations have been disbanded or downsized — and local election officials are preparing to face a continued onslaught of foreign influence operations largely on their own.” The article continued: “The administration has shut down foreign-influence-focused centers at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI and the State Department that helped warn the public that China, Russia and Iran’s spy services were targeting Americans with election-related disinformation. The Department of Homeland Security has also slashed its election security teams, which pass intelligence to local election offices and help them defend against cyber threats.” [CNN, 1/28/26]
  • NBC News reported that multiple state officials say the Trump administration has canceled election security briefings. A February article reported that several secretaries of state “said intelligence briefings from the federal government were invaluable during the first Trump administration,” but the administration stopped those briefings. The article noted that a February invitation by the Trump administration to participate in a call with the FBI about midterm election preparations was “the first time they have heard from anyone in this Trump administration about election security in months — or ever.” [NBC News, 2/9/26]
  • Nextgov: Trump’s 2027 budget proposal “would notably eliminate CISA’s election security program entirely, including cutting funding for information-sharing support to state and local officials and removing dedicated election security advisors across the country.” Nextgov reported that Trump’s budget proposal “would also end CISA’s support for the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, or EI-ISAC, a key hub for sharing threat intelligence, cyber alerts and incident response resources with state and local election officials.” According to the article, these actions “would scale back one of the federal government’s main avenues for coordinating with state and local election officials on election cybersecurity risks like ransomware attacks, phishing campaigns and efforts by foreign adversaries to probe election systems and conduct influence operations.” [Nextgov, 4/7/26]
  • NOTUS: “The Justice Department Hasn’t Taken Its Usual Steps to Protect the 2026 Election.” NOTUS reported that “five months out from the midterm elections that will determine control of Congress, his Justice Department has canceled election-integrity training sessions for prosecutors and FBI agents, deleted a 281-page guide to prosecuting election offenses, fired most of the lawyers in its Public Integrity Section and failed to replace the director of its Election Crimes Branch.” Additionally, “the DOJ has not taken the usual steps to establish a ‘command center’ to monitor and address the typical emergencies that pop up around Election Day, three sources with knowledge of the situation told NOTUS. A command center team would address things like voter intimidation and targeted disinformation meant to hinder a fair process. These actions — and inactions — have alarmed current and former prosecutors, who say the Justice Department is not prepared to deal with threats to election integrity in the November elections.” [NOTUS, 6/8/26]
  • Last week, Trump fired Democratic members of the Election Assistance Commission. On July 10, The Associated Press reported: “The White House on Friday confirmed the executive action against members of the Election Assistance Commission, which distributes federal grants to states, oversees the testing of voting systems and maintains the national voter registration form.” According to the AP, “It’s the latest instance of the Republican president trying to exert White House influence over how U.S. elections are conducted.” [The Associated Press, 7/10/26]
Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World