Tag: illinois
JB Pritzker

Lawless Order: Chicago On The Verge Of Federal Occupation

I awoke this morning in a city on the verge of occupation.

On Monday afternoon, U.S. District Court Judge April Perry, a Biden appointee, refused to do what a Trump-appointed judge did in Oregon: Issue a temporary restraining order preventing the federalized National Guard from occupying a peaceful city. This would be a direct violation of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 and a move Gov. J.B. Pritzker, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Police Chief Larry Snelling and state Attorney General Kwame Raoul say is unwanted, unnecessary and unconstitutional.

Judge Perry gave the lawbreaking regime in Washington two days to respond. This gives Trump and his minions the time they need to bring in 700 troops from the Texas and Illinois national guards, a move they’ve been looking to justify for months through constant provocations. Their campaign has led to the arrest of hundreds of local residents, a significant share of whom are U.S. citizens. Over the weekend, it included several politicians attempting to protect their constituents by reminding them of their rights.

The military-style campaign, carried out by masked and otherwise unidentified agents from multiple federal law enforcement agencies, included the unprecedented and now infamous assault on an apartment building in the historic South Shore neighborhood, which lies adjacent to Jackson Park, home of the soon-to-open Obama Presidential Center. About 300 federal agents stormed the five-story building and its fewer than 100 residents in the middle of the night by rappelling onto the rooftop from helicopters, throwing flash-bang grenades, kicking down doors, ransacking apartments and detaining adults and children with zip-ties. Many were U.S. citizens or in the U.S. legally.

“They just treated us like we were nothing,” one local resident told ABC7 Chicago. She was handcuffed, had a gun pointed in her face and held until 3 a.m. before being released. The raid, carried out without warrants, resulted in 37 arrests.

At least some of those detained were children, including four U.S. citizens, according to news accounts. One neighbor told television reporters she saw agents zip-tie the kids. “They was terrified. The kids was crying. People was screaming. They looked very distraught. I was out there crying when I seen the little girl come around the corner, because they was bringing the kids down, too, had them zip-tied to each other.” At least one agent laughed when local residents protested the children’s mistreatment. “He said, ‘Fuck them kids,’” she said.

“Imagine an armed stranger forcibly removing you from your bed, zip-tying your hands, separating you from your family, and detaining you in a dark van for hours,” Pritzker said in the aftermath of the raid. “This didn’t happen in a country with an authoritarian regime — it happened here in Chicago,” he said.

Judge Perry refused to act because she needed time to read the voluminous court filings, according to today’s Chicago Tribune. Though “very troubled” by the Trump regime’s actions, she gave the Department of Justice until midnight Wednesday to respond.

Invasion imminent

The newspaper reports those troops will be moving into the city as soon as today since Gov. Pritzker and local officials have no options beyond the courts for enforcing the law. While a case could be made for using local law enforcement to police the illegal actions of individual federal agents, that would be exactly the type of provocation Trump regime is looking for to escalate its assault on the city.

The militarized presence is not limited to the few neighborhoods making the news. When my wife and I returned to Chicago late Sunday after two weeks away, we were greeted by at least one military helicopter flying low over our mostly white neighborhood along Chicago’s North Side lakefront. A friend reports the federal government also sent military helicopters flying over his mixed, middle-income neighborhood over the weekend. They used searchlights to pan streets, lawns and alleys, no doubt scaring the bejesus out of the local rat population.

The regime’s actions make clear this has nothing to do with immigration enforcement. Their goal is to terrorize the local population, whom, through its votes and elected leaders, have chosen to stand in opposition to the illegal and immoral actions of the Trump regime.

The Trumpists are simultaneously consciously attempting to destroy the local economy. It illegally cancelled an already-approved $2 billion contract for mass transit expansion. The president’s constant lies about the state of crime in this city (“a hellhole” and “the murder capital of the world”) is a deliberate attempt to smear the reputation of the Midwest’s top tourist attraction, especially for foreign visitors.

Early estimates showed foreign tourism was down sharply this summer after returning to pre-Covid levels last year. The drop in Canadian tourists — the single largest group — was an estimated 25 percent, which isn’t surprising given they’ve taken to booing the Star Spangled Banner during sporting events in Canada.

According to the state’s complaint filed yesterday in Judge Perry’s court, the Trump’s regime assault on Chicago is creating “economic harm, depressing business activities and tourism that not only hurt Illinoisans but also hurt Illinois’s tax revenue.” The economies of thriving Hispanic neighborhoods have been especially harmed by the constant presence of ICE agents. Street traffic has been reduced to Covid-lockdown levels since everyone with brown skin is at risk of being detained and possibly arrested for failing to present proper credentials during ICE’s indiscriminate sweeps.

The core of the lawsuit charges the federal government with overstepping its authority and violating the constitution. The “deployment of federalized military forces to protect federal personal and property from ‘violent demonstrations’ that ‘are occurring or are likely to occur’ represents the exact type of intrusion on State power that is at the heart of the Tenth Amendment,” the complaint says. “The deployment of federalized National Guard, including from another state, infringes on Illinois’s sovereignty and right to self-governance. It will cause only more unrest.”

I suspect we will learn first hand the truth of that latter statement in the next few days as more Chicagoans are subjected to the presence of heavily armed soldiers patrolling their previously peaceful streets.

Merrill Goozner, the former editor of Modern Healthcare, writes about health care and politics at GoozNews.substack.com, where this column first appeared. Please consider subscribing to support his work.

Reprinted with permission from Gooz News

Failed Coup Plotter Trump Refuses To Sign Anti-Coup Pledge In Illinois

Failed Coup Plotter Trump Refuses To Sign Anti-Coup Pledge In Illinois

When Donald Trump and his campaign registered for the Illinois state primary this year, they refused to sign a voluntary loyalty oath stating that Trump wouldn't advocate for overthrowing the government.

The Biden campaign pounced on the news, which was broken by WBEZ/Chicago Sun-Times on Saturday, the anniversary of January 6.

“For the entirety of our nation’s history, presidents have put their hand on the Bible and sworn to protect and uphold the constitution of the United States – and Donald Trump can’t bring himself to sign a piece of paper saying he won’t attempt a coup to overthrow our government," said Biden campaign communications director Michael Tyler. "We know he’s deadly serious because three years ago today he tried and failed to do exactly that.”

The news played right into President Joe Biden's speech last Friday emphasizing the existential threat Trump poses to American democracy.

Trump reportedly signed the Illinois pledge in 2016 and 2020. But instead of opting to rectify the situation by agreeing to sign it following the news, the Trump campaign chose to focus on the oath of office Trump would take after a potential win in November.

“President Trump will once again take the oath of office on January 20th, 2025, and will swear ‘to faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,’” said Trump spokesman Steven Cheung.

It's worth noting, however, that oath of office didn't stop Trump from inciting the riot at the Capitol, nor did it compel him to take swift action to rein in the violence once it had begun. Not only did he wait more than three hours to ask the insurrectionists to leave the Capitol, Trump actually shrugged off the fact that his vice president had to be evacuated, responding, "So what?" according to newly released information.

Trump's refusal to sign the anti-insurrection pledge underscores the fact that he continues to foreshadow an abrupt break from democracy as we know it if he prevails in November. Trump recently suggested on Fox News that he would be a dictator "on Day One" of a second Trump term.

We should take him both seriously and literally. Several months before the January 6 coup attempt he hosted at the Capitol, Trump similarly refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he lost the 2020 election.

“Well, we’re going to have to see what happens,” Trump responded in September 2020 after being asked whether he’d commit to a peaceful transition.

Now, as then, Trump is telling Americans exactly what he plans to do. The only difference this time is that Trump will never look back if he seizes power. He will not worry about protocols or tradition or that outdated scrap of paper known as the U.S. Constitution. Trump and his allies will get straight to work on dismantling the foundations of the republic so they can reshape it in Trump's image.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Six Killed By Sniper At July 4 Parade In Chicago Suburb

Six Killed By Sniper At July 4 Parade In Chicago Suburb

Highland Park (United States) (AFP) - A gunman armed with a high-powered rifle shot dead at least six people at a parade to mark US Independence Day in a wealthy Chicago suburb on Monday -- the latest in a series of shocking mass shootings, this time on a holiday celebrating all things American.

Emergency officials in Highland Park, Illinois said around two dozen people, including children, were wounded with some in critical condition, and a massive police manhunt was underway for the shooter, who was still on the loose.

Police said they had apprehended a 22-year-old suspect named Robert E Crimo III, warning that he was considered armed and "very dangerous." A Chicago musician of the same age and with the same name goes by the stage name "Awake the Rapper" online.

Firing into the holiday crowd from a nearby rooftop, the gunman triggered scenes of chaos as panicked onlookers ran for their lives, leaving behind a parade route strewn with chairs, abandoned balloons and personal belongings.

"Everyone thought it was fireworks," one parade-goer, identified only as Zoe, told CNN.

"My dad thought it was part of the show, and I'm like, 'Dad, no... something is wrong.' And I grabbed him. And I looked back at him, and then it was just a sea of panic, and people just falling and falling."

As they ran, she said that some 20 feet behind her, "I saw a girl shot and killed... saw her die."

Zoe said they first hid behind a dumpster before police pulled them into the basement of a sporting goods store with other parade spectators, several of whom were injured, including a man who appeared to have been shot in the ear and a girl who was shot in the leg.

When they were finally able to leave, she told CNN, the parade route resembled "a battle zone. And it's disgusting."

Police officials said the shooting began at 10:14 am, when the parade was approximately three-quarters of the way through.

"It sounds like spectators were targeted... So, very random, very intentional and very sad," said Lake County Major Crime Task Force spokesman Christopher Covelli.

Lake County coroner Jennifer Banek said five of the six people killed, all adults, had died at the scene. The sixth was taken to hospital but succumbed to wounds there.

Fire chief Joe Schrage said among the wounded was at least one child, in critical condition.

Dr Brigham Temple of Highland Park Hospital, where most of the victims were taken, said that it was treating 25 people with gunshot wounds aged eight to 85.

He said "four or five" children were among them, and that 16 people were later discharged.

Police said the shooter was using a "high-powered rifle," and "firearm evidence" had been located on the rooftop of a nearby business.

"All indications is he was discreet, he was very difficult to see," said Covelli.

From Celebration To Mourning

The shooting cast a pall over America's most patriotic holiday, in which towns and cities across the country hold parades such as the one in Highland Park while citizens -- many dressed in variations on the US flag -- hold barbecues and other celebrations.

"On a day that we came together to celebrate community and freedom, we're instead mourning the tragic loss of life and struggling with the terror that was brought upon us," Highland Park's mayor Nancy Rotering said.

President Joe Biden voiced his shock and vowed to keep fighting "the epidemic of gun violence" sweeping the country.

"I'm not going to give up," he said.

Last week, Biden signed the first significant federal bill on gun safety in decades, just days after the Supreme Court ruled that Americans have a fundamental right to carry a handgun in public.

The shooting is part of a particularly grim wave in the gun violence crisis in the United States, where approximately 40,000 deaths a year are caused by firearms, according to the Gun Violence Archive website.

The deeply divisive debate over gun control was reignited by two massacres in May that saw 10 Black supermarket shoppers gunned down in upstate New York and 21 people, mostly young children, slain at an elementary school in Texas.

According to the Gun Violence Archive, there have been 309 mass shootings carried out in the US so far in 2022 -- including at least three others on July 4, though without any fatalities.

Capitol building

Once Again, Gerrymandering Threatens To Throttle Democracy

It's a redistricting year in the blue state of Illinois, which means that Republicans are getting less consideration than a missionary on the Las Vegas Strip. Democrats have been winning in the Land of Lincoln for a long while, controlling the state House for all but two of the past 38 years. But they see no harm in running up the score.

Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker campaigned on a vow to take reapportionment away from politicians and turn it over to an independent commission. But that didn't happen, and when the General Assembly sent him district maps that exemplified partisan gerrymandering, he signed them into law.

"Make no mistake, these maps were drawn solely for the Democrats to maintain their political power in the state of Illinois," House Minority Leader Jim Durkin said. Democrats outnumber Republicans 73-45 in the state House, and those numbers are likely to grow more lopsided.

Similar things are going on in New York, where Democrats have plotted new district lines with the goal of cutting the GOP's eight members of Congress to four or even three of the 26 seats the state will have. That's less than 16 percent of the seats in a state where 38 percent of voters went for Donald Trump. New York's Republican Party chair Nick Langworthy said the redistricting "is a political sham built on a foundation of lies and hypocrisy."

Shams are the norm in this process, where lawmakers celebrate the glories of democracy while scheming to make elections an empty formality. Democrats in blue states are more than willing to ignore their good-government allies to cement their control in state legislatures — and to keep Nancy Pelosi in the speaker's chair.

After losing out on Maryland's last congressional map, Republicans took the fight to the Supreme Court, arguing that partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional. (The court disagreed.) So you might think that Republicans would be determined to put an end to partisan reapportionment. But hypocrisy is a two-way street.

Today, the GOP has control of the governor's office and the legislature in 23 states, compared to 15 such "trifectas" for Democrats. Such dominance is never more valuable than in a redistricting year, giving those in power the chance to supersize their advantage for a full decade.

Political scientists Alex Keena, Michael Latner, Anthony McGann and Charles Anthony Smith wrote in The Washington Post, "We found that, after 2011, 45 state legislative maps had been drawn with extreme partisan gerrymandering. Of these, 43 favor Republicans, while only two help Democrats. Because of these gerrymandered maps, Republicans held onto power after losing the statewide popular vote in Virginia in 2017, and in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin in 2018."

That explains why Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has no interest in a Democratic bill that would make it impossible to tilt the playing field. The For the People Act would require states to hand over redistricting to independent commissions. With that reform, incumbents would no longer get to tailor their constituencies to achieve permanent tenure.

It would not prevent either party from winning most legislative or congressional seats in a particular state. Such bodies already draw maps in several states, including Arizona, where the GOP has held a majority in both houses of the legislature since 2003, and California, where Democrats have done the same since 1997.

In most places, the issue is not which party will dominate. It's just by how much.

Besides, no one objects when a party getting a majority of the votes wins a majority of seats. Objections are in order, though, when the party getting a minority of the votes wins a majority of seats. Last year, Democratic candidates for Congress got 43 percent of the votes cast in South Carolina — but only one of the seven House seats, or 14 percent.

A federal solution is needed because at the state level, no party in power wants to cede control of redistricting. Democrats say they can't afford to unilaterally disarm in the battle for power, and Republicans show no interest in mutual renunciation of gerrymandering.

But in the long run, a fairer system would be a good thing for both parties. It would give each more opportunities to compete and more incentive to stay in tune with the preferences of those they represent.

It would be best of all for the voters, many of whom have been effectively rendered powerless. Democracy is supposed to rest on the consent of the governed, not the governors.

Follow Steve Chapman on Twitter @SteveChapman13 or at https://www.facebook.com/stevechapman13. To find out more about Steve Chapman and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World