Tag: iran negotiations
Iran War: Ceasefire Deadlines May Come And Go, But TACO Is Forever

Iran War: Ceasefire Deadlines May Come And Go, But TACO Is Forever

Wednesday is the big day when President Donald Trump’s two-week shambles of a ceasefire deal with Iran was supposed to expire. And as you can expect, the administration moved with all due haste to ensure that this needless war gets resolved.

Okay, that’s a lie—and we all know it. Instead, Trump dragged his feet, issuing threats that he wouldn’t extend the ceasefire and declaring on social media that “Iran has Violated the Cease Fire numerous times!”

Then, after puffing out his chest all day, he decided late Tuesday to extend that ceasefire indefinitely for reasons only known to him.

Turns out Trump didn’t need our lead negotiator, the absolutely hapless and congenitally unlikeable Vice President JD Vance, to have anything to do with this triumph of peacemaking. Yes, Vance was apparently no longer allowed to go to Islamabad for peace talks with Iran.

Yep, Vance’s wings got clipped. Do you think people figured out how incredibly off-putting he is and thought things might just get worse if we sent him?

Things disintegrated for ol’ JD pretty quickly Tuesday. At first, the Washington Post reported that the U.S. delegation was delayed because it had to stick around for “additional policy meetings.”

Imagine pretending that there’s any policy or strategy at work here whatsoever, much less one that requires additional meetings. But within the hour, we learned that Vance’s trip was entirely off—ostensibly because Tehran hadn’t responded to any U.S. offers.

We also really had no idea what the status of the Iranian delegation actually was. The New York Times had reported that senior Iranian officials were already planning to travel to Islamabad to attend talks with Vance. But that was followed by The Associated Press reporting that Iran hadn’t decided whether it would attend at all.

Meanwhile, even as Trump was saying that it was “highly unlikely” that the ceasefire would be extended, he was apparently negotiating to extend the ceasefire. Or he extended it unilaterally, based on vibes. Either way, Vance was once again ghosted from the whole process.

It’s good that Trump didn’t wait until the very last minute here, given that there didn’t even seem to be an agreement about when, exactly, the ceasefire would have expired. Trump said that the deadline was Wednesday evening Eastern time, but a Pakistani official said that it would expire Wednesday morning at 4:50 local time, which is 7:50 PM on Tuesday Eastern Time.

Sure glad we worked through that minor misunderstanding!

Meanwhile, Vance is either cooling his heels, flushed with relief that he didn’t have to go. Or he’s getting over the adrenaline rush of pumping himself up, telling himself that once they turn him loose, it’s over for those suckers.

Oh, wait. Remember the last time we sent Vance to negotiate, he lasted a marathon 21 hours before throwing up his hands and going home?

To be fair to Vance, it isn’t like Trump really seems to have a negotiation strategy—it’s just threats and ever-shifting demands. Vance should feel lucky to be sent to his room on this one while Trump pulled a TACO yet again.

:Lucky break, JD.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


Ranting On Truth Social, Trump Insists 'I'm Winning The War, By A LOT'

Ranting On Truth Social, Trump Insists 'I'm Winning The War, By A LOT'

President Donald Trump spent Monday afternoon contradicting his own claims about an Iran peace deal, declaring he is “winning” a war and faces no pressure — just one day after saying a deal would be signed by Monday night.

On Sunday, the president reportedly told Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo that he expected a deal with Iran “will be signed” by Monday night. But on Monday, Trump lashed out at Democrats (“TRAITORS ALL“), and insisted that “If a Deal happens under ‘TRUMP,’ it will guarantee Peace, Security, and Safety, not only for Israel and the Middle East, but for Europe, America, and everywhere else.” No mention of a deal being signed imminently.

In fact, Trump appeared to suggest he was in no rush to sign a deal.

“I read the Fake News saying that I am under ‘pressure’ to make a Deal. THIS IS NOT TRUE! I am under no pressure whatsoever, although, it will all happen, relatively quickly!”

He also insisted that he is not going to let Democrats “rush the United States into making a Deal that is not as good as it could have been.”

Meanwhile, as CBS News reports, Iran “said Monday that it has no plans to attend peace talks in Pakistan with President Trump’s top three negotiators, including Vice President JD Vance, as Tehran balks at what it considers ‘unreasonable and unrealistic demands’ by the White House.”

In his posts, the president compared the length of his war in Iran with World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Iraq War, in an effort to suggest his war is being executed in a judicious manner and insisting that he is “winning.”

Trump claimed that his war is being “perfectly executed, on the scale of Venezuela, just a bigger, more complex operation.” And he claimed, “I am properly and judiciously using our Military to solve problems left to us by others of far less understanding or competence.”

“I’m winning a War, BY A LOT, things are going very well,” he insisted, stating that “our Military has been amazing,” while lashing out at “the Fake News, like The Failing New York Times, the absolutely horrendous and disgusting Wall Street Journal, or the now almost defunct, fortunately, Washington Post, you would actually think we are losing the War,” he said.

While claiming that the “enemy is confused, because they get these same Media ‘reports,'” Trump hailed what he claimed was successful “Regime Change.”

“The Anti-America Fake News Media is rooting for Iran to win, but it’s not going to happen, because I’m in charge! Just like these unpatriotic people used every ounce of their limited strength to fight me in the Election, they continue to do so with Iran. The result will be the same — It already is!”

Critics slammed the president’s comments.

“This is a war he started to: – distract from the Epstein files – make money from manipulating markets – boost profits for his oil donors – as an excuse to give his family lucrative military contracts,” wrote organizer and healthcare advocate Melanie D’Arrigo. “His tantrums always need context.”

Jonah Allon, deputy communications director for New York Governor Kathy Hochul, wrote, “amazing this whole counter-messaging effort is happening now.” He said, “there was never going to be a communications strategy that could have sold this hideously unpopular war, but one really is struck by the sloth and lack of coordination since trump announced the strikes in late february.”


No Deal: Why Trump's Negotiations With Iran Are So Unlikely To Succeed

No Deal: Why Trump's Negotiations With Iran Are So Unlikely To Succeed

With the Iran ceasefire scheduled to end in two days, Vice President JD Vance has returned to Islamabad with his sidekicks Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff to resume the abortive peace negotiations that have so far failed. While everyone should wish for success, we have little reason to anticipate news of anything more than an extended truce from the Pakistani capital. We must hope that if and when these talks fail, the president will refrain from his hideous plan to obliterate Iranian civilization and stand warned against such war crimes.

The outlook remains dim, however. Even if Donald Trump had actually written The Art of the Deal (he didn’t write a word of that bestseller, his first big fraud), it would be foolish to expect that the president or his hapless envoys can deliver a viable agreement with the Iranians anytime soon. Taken together, they lack all of the qualities required to achieve the complex diplomatic resolution required in this crisis – like the agreement that Trump so cavalierly discarded in 2017.

During the days after he first won the presidency, I consoled my distraught family with a prediction that Trump’s combination of arrogance, ignorance, impatience and incompetence would likely blunt his impulses to ruin the country and the world. That insight – based on many years of observing him in New York – proved accurate in many ways, but in this second term we’re seeing the downside of the president’s personal weaknesses, and those of the figures around him. Having gotten us into another bloody and very costly mess in the Middle East, neither he nor his underlings have a clue how to get us out of it.

The problem isn’t only that Trump and his team of morons neglected to fashion any plan for their sudden urge to attack a faraway country with a million men under arms, a big weapons arsenal, and a long history of ideological resilience. That was a historic and particularly stupid mistake, characteristic of Trump’s shallow intellect – but now, after inflicting massive damage on Iran, the world and our own economy, he and his government are evidently stuck in the quagmire they created.

The manifest incompetence that has so often hindered Trump, often to our great benefit, is now on full display as he flounders in attempting to secure a negotiated peace. He is unable to firmly decide what terms he is seeking, what is up for discussion, and even who will be doing the talking. He berated our European allies, went to war without building a coalition, then demanded their assistance to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and finally said that nobody needed their help. That childish pout is his usual approach to all global issues, but is even more wrong now.

As his predecessor Barack Obama understood when his State Department began work on the first Iran nuclear agreement, an international coalition was vital to success. So it would be now if only Trump had the wit and the will to build one.

What Obama also had that Trump disdains is an experienced team of negotiators. The idea that Steve Witkoff, his real estate crony and crypto corruption partner, or Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and nepo billionaire, possess any of the requisite knowledge or skills to achieve a peace agreement is simply ludicrous. The same goes for Vance, whose brief stint in the Senate qualifies him for nothing, let alone a sensitive diplomatic mission. The sight of this gang spending a “marathon” 21 hours in Islamabad and then departing in pique when the talks broke down demonstrated how naïve and foolish they were. The final stage of Obama’s nuclear deal went on for months.

Of course, we know that Trump lacks the capacity to stay with the process long enough to achieve a worthwhile outcome. The Iranians, as our friend Lucian Truscott IV observes today, no doubt believe they can just wait him out.

Finally, Trump lacks the integrity to conclude a lasting peace agreement. He has proved more than once to the Iranians that he is untrustworthy, after ordering the bombing attacks that actually killed not only their Supreme Leader but his negotiators as well. They know that to him, a treaty that they signed after years of intense bargaining, with the force of law in the United States, meant nothing. Neither did the honor of our country.

The only deal that Trump or any of these men can be expected to uphold is one that enriches them personally. That is the “art of the deal” that this president has been pursuing since the day he returned to the Oval Office.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism (St. Martin's Press, 2024). The paperback version, with a new Afterword, is now available wherever books are sold.

Negotiators Start Writing A Deal On Iran’s Nuclear Program

Negotiators Start Writing A Deal On Iran’s Nuclear Program

By Paul Richter, Tribune Washington Bureau

VIENNA — Negotiators from six world powers and Iran on Friday began composing the text of a comprehensive agreement on Tehran’s nuclear program, but remained far apart on key issues as they closed out a sixth round of talks.

With one month to go to their deadline, Western and Iranian negotiators each accused the other of failing to offer realistic terms for their long-awaited deal.

Nevertheless, diplomats said they did make limited progress at the weeklong session in the Austrian capital, Vienna, and insisted they are still focused on completing the deal by the July 20 deadline.

The agreement would limit Iran’s nuclear program to prevent it from gaining a weapons capability. In exchange, the six world powers — the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany — would lift the tough international sanctions that have crippled Iran’s economy.

Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s foreign minister, joked that the preliminary text has “more parentheses than words,” referring to sections that remain in dispute.

Still, he said there had been progress, because “we have started putting everything on paper … in rather black-and white form.”

Although the countries can extend the negotiating deadline under an interim deal they signed in November, July 20 “would be the best date for reaching an agreement,” he said.

Diplomats acknowledged that the two sides appear to be holding back on making their best offers until the deadline is closer, a traditional negotiating strategy.

Their next meeting is scheduled to begin July 2 and is expected to continue until the deadline.

Zarif, at a news conference with Iranian reporters, said he had been assured by President Barack Obama and other senior U.S. officials that the administration is eager to make a deal. But he said their offer didn’t suggest they were serious.

“There is a need for that stance to be further manifested,” he said.

A senior Obama administration official made a similar statement about the Iranians, saying Tehran has an opportunity to reach a deal if it demonstrates that it is serious about keeping its nuclear program peaceful.

“What is still unclear is if Iran is really ready,” said the official, who declined to be identified citing diplomatic sensitivity.

The official said there had been no discussion yet of extra time for the negotiations. That is a sensitive question because an extension of the deadline could require an adjustment to the terms of the interim deal reached in November.

Some U.S. lawmakers, fearful that the administration might strike too lenient a deal, could block such an extension, sinking the diplomatic effort.

The U.S. official suggested that if the two sides can resolve the toughest issues, they might need only a brief extension to finalize a deal.

“If we get close and need a few more days, I don’t think anybody will mind,” the official said.

Photo: Atta Kenare via AFP

Interested in world news? Sign up for our daily newsletter!

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World