Tag: rfk jr
Facing Our True History May Be Inconvenient Or Uncomfortable, But It Can Be Liberating

Facing Our True History May Be Inconvenient Or Uncomfortable, But It Can Be Liberating

Closed eyes and minds seem to be a requirement for positions of leadership, as though merely acknowledging facts makes you un-American.

That’s the opposite of the truth.

During a recent visit to Montgomery, Alabama, I experienced the whiplash of competing histories. A state that still insists on pairing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. with Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee for its official holiday and that honors secessionists on capital grounds is also home to civil rights history presented in precise and moving detail.

I wondered as I experienced the collections in the Equal Justice Initiative’s Legacy Sites, why are some people so afraid of the truths revealed and shared in the Legacy Museum, the National Memorial for Peace and Justice and Freedom Monument Sculpture Park?

Moving personal stories, narratives written and shared by men, women, and children who suffered violence and every indignity, yet dared to live and love, are part of the soil and the soul of our nation. Not all survived the journey, but they, too, are honored in what can only be described as sacred spaces.

Exploring the recently opened Montgomery Square, it’s thrilling to learn more about 1955-65 — from the Montgomery Bus Boycott to the marches that led to the passage of the Voting Rights Act — “the decade that changed the world.” Names and faces that might be unfamiliar to most are honored for their bravery and resilience.

All of these Americans made the country better. They deserve to be seen and heard; their perseverance could be key to solutions in a country that appears deadlocked and divided.

I wished that Sen. Tommy Tuberville, the Republican hoping to be the next governor of Alabama, were at my side. If the schoolchildren of every race who surrounded me could take — and take in — the exhibits, certainly Tuberville is man enough to do the same.

After all, it’s his state, his people, and his capital city.

Bryan Stevenson, founder and executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative, a human rights organization based in Montgomery, led the creation of the sites. He put the lessons the museums hold in perspective as he spoke to my conference group.

Stevenson might be best known for his work reforming America’s criminal justice system, winning legal challenges and, as his bio says, “eliminating excessive and unfair sentencing, exonerating innocent death row prisoners, confronting abuse of the incarcerated and the mentally ill, and aiding children prosecuted as adults.”

Stevenson said it was necessary to create a false narrative of white supremacy to justify the evil of generations of slavery so the perpetrators and enablers could conveniently consider themselves Christian and moral and decent.

That’s one legacy that has continued — or as Stevenson said, “The South won the narrative war.”

Tuberville himself has equated the descendants of enslaved people to “criminals.”

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has brought his pastor, Doug Wilson, into the Pentagon to deliver what amount to religious sermons that obliterate the separation of church and state. Wilson co-authored “Southern Slavery, As It Was,” which described slavery in the South as “a relationship based on mutual affection and confidence.”

We are a country that passes laws to charge children as adults, as deserving of being locked up in a prison of grown men. Some of these children are Stevenson’s clients, their stories heartbreaking if you see them as human beings rather than “predators.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can be confirmed and supported as Health and Human Services secretary after saying in the past that “every Black kid is now just standard put on Adderall, on SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and those kids are going to have a chance to go somewhere and get re-parented.” So, stripping children away from their parents is still an option?

Of course, Kennedy denied his own inconvenient truth in an exchange with Democratic Rep. Terri A. Sewell of Alabama during a recent congressional hearing.

And when asked by Democratic Rep. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania about the administration ending research that could lower the maternal mortality rates for Black women, who disproportionately suffer and die in this greatest country in the world, Kennedy could barely say the word “Black,” but he did bark “DEI” at every attempt Lee made to get him to at least acknowledge that a disparity shaped by history exists.

These are the kinds of sentiments — believed by those in charge of budgets and rules and who should get the benefit of the doubt — that make Stevenson’s work necessary.

“Narrative work has become a priority.” We are all impacted by “the burden of our history of racial inequality.” He considers the Legacy Sites as “places of truth-telling,” and storytelling as something that “gets people closer.”

“I have no interest in punishing America; my interest is liberation.”

The truth was never inconvenient for Americans who want to seek justice — and move forward.

Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Charlotte Observer, as national correspondent for Politics Daily, and is a senior facilitator with The OpEd Project. She is host of the CQ Roll Call “Equal Time with Mary C. Curtis” podcast. Follow her on X @mcurtisnc3.

Reprinted with permission from Roll Call

Will Measles Surge And Ethical Conflicts Stop This Anti-Vaxxer Becoming Surgeon General?

Will Measles Surge And Ethical Conflicts Stop This Anti-Vaxxer Becoming Surgeon General?

President Donald Trump — his eye on crumbling approval ratings and the growing likelihood that he’ll face a Democratic House after the mid-term elections — is reportedly souring on the Make America Healthy Again show.

He has postponed appointing someone to run the flailing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where the sands seem to be shifting. Its interim director Jay Bhattacharya, who also oversees the shrinking National Institutes of Health, on Wednesday morning told what’s left of the CDC staff, “I think it is vital that every kid in this country get the measles vaccine. Absolutely vital.”

In the wake of her confirmation hearing last month, various media reports claimed Casey Means’ nomination to become the nation’s next Surgeon General is in trouble. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), a pediatrician, backs vaccines and she didn’t. Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AL), the GOP’s designated fence sitters, said they still have questions. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who is retiring, told the Associated Press he’s leaning against voting for Means should her nomination reach the full Senate.

Yet, given anti-vax sentiment within MAHA and the group’s role in grass roots GOP politics, it’s way too soon to count Means out.

Who is Casey Means? She made her fortune as co-owner of Levels, which sells an app for continuous glucose and blood monitoring. The firm’s subscription plans (costs range from $288 to $1,999 annually) are marketed primarily to the worried well to “help you fuel better and feel more balanced.” (That cheeky description comes directly from the company website.)

Two years ago, the FDA approved the over-the-counter sale of a glucose monitor that Levels promotes for its corporate partner, Dexcom. That company used a regulatory process for approving medical devices that doesn’t require submission of clinical trial data proving that it leads to better outcomes.

Dexcom also does business with Means’ brother Calley, a top health care adviser to the Trump administration. He is co-owner of Truemed, which encourages consumers to use health savings accounts to buy supplements, fitness equipment, red light therapy and saunas from its manufacturing partners.

A year ago, just two months before Casey Means was nominated for surgeon general, the Means siblings appeared at a supplements industry trade show. Their message, according to an Associated Press account of the Natural Products Expo: The goals of the Make America Healthy Again movement will help your bottom lines.

The head of MAHA’s political action committee, which pushes for anti-science policies in state legislatures and nationally, told the same conference: “It blows my mind that I'm going to watch the Republicans carry the supplement industry and the holistic health industry and chiropractors and the acupuncturists into the promised land.”

The supplements and wellness industries do not need another Moses, although they could get one in Means. Those fast-growing, largely unregulated businesses took up residence in the land of milk and honey when the late Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Republican from Utah, shepherded the 1994 Dietary Supplement and Health Education Act through Congress. That law officially exempted supplements from meeting FDA efficacy requirements, and limited safety oversight to manufacturing purity, not prevention of physical harm. Even the good manufacturing practices guidelines allowed under the bill are non-binding.

No wonder the supplements industry grew from 4,000 products when the DSHEA passed to about 90,000 today. It has become a $70 billion-a-year industry in the U.S. — twice the size of the European Union, which has about the same number of people.

Today, grocery stores dedicate entire aisles to supplement sales, as do a few large retail chains like GNC (General Nutrition Corp., now owned by the Harbin Pharmaceutical Group of China). Analysts estimate the industry will grow by 50% over the next five years.

Conflicts-of-interest disqualify thee, but not me

In most accounts of her career, Means lambasts the medical profession for being in bed with the pharmaceutical industry. She dropped out of her medical residency in otolaryngology (ear, nose and throat doctors), claiming the field was rife with conflicts of interest.

She says (with some justification) that many of its practitioners prefer seeing more patients needing their skills than focusing on prevention. Like Kennedy, her champion, she repeatedly attacks the drug industry, vaccine makers and mainstream medicine for their conflicts of interest.

Yet the MAHA movement and the Trump regime ignored her conflicts of interest (and her brother’s) before appointing them to high government positions. Casey Means’ financial disclosure, released last September, showed that over the past five years she received “newsletter sponsorship and partnership fees (of) $12,000 from herbal remedies firm Apothekary; $27,431 from algae supplements company ENERGYbits; $16,461 from fiber supplements company Florasophy; $27,000 from probiotics company Pendulum Therapeutics; $46,000 from supplements company Pique; $536 from prenatal vitamin company WeNatal; and $16,104 from basil seed supplements company Basil Seed Works. Means received a total of more than $130,000 in sponsorship fees from supplement company Amazentis, including a $55,000 book tour sponsorship.”

Mehmet Oz, who runs CMS for the Trump regime, and top adviser Calley Means have also profited from their ties to the supplements industry.

The false promises of most supplements

The supplements industry is a case study in how to use marginal, company-sponsored science, heavy advertising and political muscle to peddle useless products to the American people. As more than one industry critic has pointed out, the industry is responsible for Americans having the most expensive urine in the world.

Their lobbyists have successfully fought every legislative attempt to impose either efficacy or safety requirements on supplements — the standard applied to drugs. Supplement makers are not required to submit placebo-controlled clinical trials to the government. Yet many in their advertising make carefully worded statements about health benefits that to the average consumer sound like it has been scientifically proven, something that the FDA is supposed to prevent.

Prevagen — widely advertised as improving “brain health” — is the poster child for this improper marketing and failed regulatory oversight. The FDA began raising safety concerns as early as 2007 and sent its first warning letters to Quincy Bioscience, its maker, in 2012. The Federal Trade Commission and New York State filed suit in 2017 to stop Prevagen’s alleged illegal marketing. It took seven years of litigation before a federal court finally issued an injunction against the company to stop making the claim that Prevagen improved brain function.

Despite that 2024 ruling, late night television is still filled with Prevagen ads aimed at seniors and the worried well wanting to stave off dementia. Today, instead of the company making the claim, they use older adults testifying that the product helped them.

In defending her nomination, administration spokespersons have touted Means’ stellar academic credentials. Means is a 2014 graduate of Stanford Medical School. She received advanced training in otolaryngology, her specialty, at Oregon Health & Science University.

But she dropped out in 2018 to launch her wellness career after seeing how little organized medicine did to prevent the need for surgery. She launched Levels a year later with $12 million in venture capital funding. By 2024, she was deeply involved with Kennedy’s presidential campaign and co-wrote with her brother a New York Times 2024 best-selling book called Good Energy: The Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health.

Jumping in front of the MAHA parade

As the New Yorker reported in its book review, the publicity blitz for the book included appearances on the Joe Rogan podcast and Tucker Carlson show on Fox. She told Carlson her sacred texts included the Bible and Ayn Rand, clearly an attempt to endear herself to the Christian Nationalist and Libertarian wings of the 2024 Trump coalition.

She allied herself with Kennedy, too, although many in the MAHA movement remained skeptical of her blind ambition. “Nicole Shanahan, who was Kennedy’s running mate during his 2024 Presidential bid, posted on X that ‘there is something very artificial and aggressive about them (referring to both Casey and Calley Means), almost like they were bred and raised Manchurian assets’,” the review noted.

Her ties to Kennedy, himself a late convert to Trumpism, led to her nomination to become the nation’s 22nd Surgeon General. At 38, she would be the second youngest person to hold that post after Dr. Vivek Murthy during President Obama’s first term.

Like some previous Surgeons General, she would come to the office without the government or professional experience that would qualify her to supervise the 6,000-plus uniformed physicians and other public health professionals who serve in government agencies. But unlike most previous Surgeons General, she has eschewed becoming a practicing physician, choosing instead to engage in entrepreneurship, part-time teaching, political advocacy and politics.

Often called the nation’s doctor, Surgeons General usually make their mark by focusing on a single public health problem. Many have been steeped in controversy.

In 1964, Luther Terry ignored tobacco industry opposition to issue the first official warning that cigarette smoking causes cancer. During the Reagan presidency’s AIDS crisis, which the White House ignored for nearly his entire two terms in office, C. Everett Koop mailed a brochure to every American household explaining the viral (not moral) causes of the disease and how to prevent it. In the 1990s, Joycelyn Elders focused on sex education and adolescent sexual health, making her a target for conservative culture warriors.

Means, during her prolonged nomination process (it was put on hiatus last year during her pregnancy), has sought to make the fight against chronic illness the centerpiece of her tenure — a worthy endeavor that would require taking on (at the least) the processed food, chemical, and agriculture industries. During her opening testimony at her confirmation hearing last month, she blamed Americans’ “ultra-processed diet, industrial chemical exposure, lack of physical activity, chronic stress and loneliness, and overmedicalization” for making the U.S. “the most chronically ill high-income nation in the world.”

She wouldn’t be the first to express those concerns. Richard Carmona under George W. Bush and Regina Benjamin under Barack Obama also targeted chronic disease, which they blamed on rising obesity, unhealthy diets and a lack of exercise. Nor is there much controversy in that stance. Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent socialist who caucuses with Democrats, praised that aspect of her presentation during the hearing.

A vaccine two-step in the offing?

But her nomination is in trouble for one reason and one reason only: Casey Means refuses to separate herself from the Robert F. Kennedy Jr.-led war on vaccines.

At last month’s hearing, she refused to directly endorse the childhood MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, rubella) despite a multi-state measles outbreak, triggered by the declining vaccination rate, that has sickened thousands and taken at least two children’s lives. Instead, she called for parents to discuss the issue with their doctors.

“You’re the nation’s doctor,” Sen. Cassidy, chairman of the Senate committee, said. “Would you encourage her to have her child vaccinated?”

“I’m not an individual’s doctor,” she replied. “Every individual needs to talk to their doctor before putting a medication in their body.”

When Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) pressed her to confirm that the flu vaccine saved lives, she demurred.

“This is an easy one, doctor, this is an easy one,” Kaine said.

“I support the CDC guidance on the flu vaccine, and I will always be working with the CDC and ACIP,” she replied.

That would be the same ACIP that was hand-picked by Kennedy; that has scaled back its childhood vaccination recommendations without offering scientific justification; and which a New York federal court last week ruled was illegally appointed.

Means also refused to rule out vaccines as a cause of autism, instead calling for more research because science is never settled. But at the present moment, the scientific literature not only overwhelmingly rejects that thesis, but the first major study suggesting there was such a link, which was published in the prestigious Lancet, has been retracted for data fraud with its primary author banished from the practice of medicine in Great Britain, his home country.

Is Dr. Means unqualified to become the next Surgeon General? You betcha. Will she? Betting markets reportedly put her chances at less than 50 percent, with a sharp drop after last month’s hearing. Given the GOP’s latest election losses, including in Trump’s hometown of Palm Beach, they’re probably even lower today.

I’m usually in the Yogi Berra camp when it comes to predictions, but I’ll go out on a limb here. I predict Means will make private assurances to the reluctant four-some in the GOP-controlled Senate and win confirmation to become the least qualified Surgeon General since the post was established in 1871.

The 38-year-old wellness influencer and entrepreneur, who doesn’t practice medicine, even in her spare time, is nothing if not ambitious. All she has to do is follow Bhattacharya’s lead and do an about face on some aspect of vaccine policy. The big guy and the GOP-controlled Senate — desperate for some good news on the electoral front — will notice.

Merrill Goozner, the former editor of Modern Healthcare, writes about health care and politics at GoozNews.substack.com, where this column first appeared. Please consider subscribing to support his work.

Reprinted with permission from Gooz News

Bad Advice: What Kennedy's New MAHA Food Guidelines Ignore

Bad Advice: What Kennedy's New MAHA Food Guidelines Ignore

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants Americans to eat more red meat and guzzle more whole milk. Stone age advice from the stone age nutrition expert.

I suspect financially pressed consumers will take their cues not from the national nutrition guidelines that Kennedy released today, but from the supermarket, where ground beef prices have risen 59.1 percent in the past decade, nearly twice as fast as the overall consumer price index. As for the occasional rib eye? Fuhgeddaboudit.

Milk is a more complicated story. Over the past half century, per capita milk consumption plunged more than 40 percent. Children are a shrinking share of the population, plus there has been a proliferation of soda pop, energy drinks, and other fluid alternatives lining grocery store shelves.

But that doesn’t mean Americans aren’t getting their fair share of milk solids. Total per capita consumption actually rose since the 1970s as more cheese and yogurt entered U.S. diets, accompanied by high levels of of salt and sugar, respectively. A switch to more liquid milk — whole, low-fat or non-fat — would be a healthier alternative, although it, too, has seen large price spikes in recent years discouraging consumption, especially for brands that advertise that they are produced by pasture-raised and antibiotic-free cows.

Kennedy delayed releasing the guidelines, which are updated every five years, until today because he dismissed the report issued last March by a 20-person scientific advisory panel, which he accused of being industry-dominated. The new guidelines rejected some of their advice, notably its long-standing calls to limit saturated fats and alcohol in the diet, and favor plant-based foods.

Clearly, the conflicts of interest on the previous committee didn’t include the Cattlemen’s Association or the numerous alcohol and bar trade groups that will benefit from the new guidelines, which recommend eating more protein and rejected specific limits on alcohol consumption. They did advise limiting sugar and salt — longstanding recommendations — and, for the first time, called for avoiding processed foods. It was only this latter recommendation that drew praise from experts, who have long lamented over-consumption of the nutritionally disastrous packaged foods that are produced in the industrial kitchens of the nation’s food manufacturing industry.

“The American Medical Association applauds the administration’s new dietary guidelines for spotlighting the highly processed foods, sugar-sweetened beverages, and excess sodium that fuel heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and other chronic illnesses,” AMA president Bobby Mukkamala said in a statement. “The guidelines affirm that food is medicine and offer clear direction patients and physicians can use to improve health.”

The recommendation to limit highly processed foods is “the one good thing” about the new guidelines, Marion Nestle, a nutrition expert at New York University, told StatNews. The recommendation is “clear, straightforward (and) supported by science.”

But Nestle attacked the guidelines’ promotion of increased consumption of protein. “These guidelines recommend heavily meat-based diets — protein is a euphemism for meat,” she said. “Eating protein from plant sources is healthier than eating it from animal sources.” None on the changes to the old guidelines included references to scientific studies justifying the administration’s decisions.

Among the more controversial changes will be the change in recommendations regarding alcohol consumption. Previous guidelines called for limiting daily consumption to one drink for women and two drinks for men.

Kennedy also dropped language linking alcohol use to cancer, which has been well-documented in the scientific literature. It is “a win for Big Alcohol,” Mike Marshall, the chief executive of the Alcohol Policy Alliance, told the New York Times. “The thing the industry fears most are consumers educated about the link between cancer and alcohol.”

Big Food’s role

The nutrition guidelines, while addressed to the general public, generally have a larger impact on food manufacturers and processors, who are the ultimate arbiters of what goes into the American diet. But there’s no evidence yet that the Trump administration plans to take that route to enforce any of the new guidelines, which are purely voluntary.

There is a historical precedent for taking regulatory action. It involves disclosure. Since1993 the industry has been required to put nutrition facts labels on packaged foods. This is probably the biggest win for the nutrition advocacy community, which includes the Center for Science in the Public Interest, where (full disclosure) I ran the Integrity in Science project from 2004 to 2009.

If consumers look closely, they can now find accurate information about each package’s fat, salt, sugar and carbohydrate content. A recent survey found four in five grocery shoppers read the nutrition fact boxes, although only one in six find the information trustworthy. Large majorities want more data about the processing of food, its potential allergens, and the sustainability of the ingredients in the package.

Unfortunately, the fact boxes miss the fastest growing component of U.S. food consumption: Restaurant meals, which are significantly less healthy than home-cooked meals. Over the past half century, restaurants nearly doubled their share of households’ “grocery and restaurant” spend (it would be higher now than the 2017-18 date in the chart below) and now account for fully a third of annual caloric intake, according to a 2024 survey by the U.S. Agriculture Department’s Economic Research Service.

The survey also revealed that restaurant foods — half of which were consumed at fast-food restaurants — contained far more sodium and refined grains than foods consumed at home, where consumption of those two elements is already 50% higher than the previous guidelines’ recommendations. Restaurants, like homes, serve far fewer vegetables, fruits and non-animal proteins than recommended by the dietary guidelines.

Not that consumers would know. Food labeling at restaurants only began in 2018 and only affects chain restaurants with 20 or more locations. Disclosure is limited to calorie counts for standard menu items. Additional nutrition details — such as total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrates, sugars, fiber, and protein — is only provided if a customer asks for it in writing.

I’ll leave the last word on today’s guidelines release to Elizabeth Kucinich, the wife of the former Ohio Congressman who is a fierce advocate for better nutrition. Her substack post castigated the new guidelines. This excerpt is long, but is worth reading:

The guidelines promote increased consumption of meat and dairy while remaining almost entirely silent on how those foods are produced, what they contain, and whether our land, water, animals, and bodies can bear the cost. Nutrition is treated as an abstraction, divorced from agricultural reality.
This is not a minor oversight. It is the central failure of the document.
In the United States today, the overwhelming majority of meat, eggs, and dairy come from highly intensive industrial systems. These systems rely on confinement, routine drug use, chemically saturated feed, and enormous waste burdens. Animals are routinely administered antibiotics, hormones, beta agonists, coccidiostats, and other pharmaceutical agents, many of which accumulate in animal tissues and enter the human food supply.
What is also missing from the guidelines is any acknowledgment that most U.S. meat production depends on a chemically intensive feed system built on genetically engineered corn and soy. These crops are routinely treated with glyphosate and other herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides. Residues move through the feed supply and into animal tissues, manure, soil, air, and water. Recommending increased consumption of animal foods without acknowledging this reality divorces nutrition guidance from the actual conditions under which American food is produced.
This omission places the guidelines in direct tension with the stated goals of the Make America Healthy Again agenda. You cannot reduce chronic disease, chemical exposure, or environmental harm while promoting dietary patterns that rely on genetically engineered feed, pervasive herbicide use, and pharmaceutical dependent animal production systems. Health policy that ignores these realities is not reform. It is avoidance.

Merrill Goozner, the former editor of Modern Healthcare, writes about health care and politics at GoozNews.substack.com, where this column first appeared. Please consider subscribing to support his work.

Reprinted with permission from Gooz News

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World