Tag: rfk jr
RFK Jr. Loses Lawsuit (Again) Over 'Cavorting With Neo-Nazis In Berlin'

RFK Jr. Loses Lawsuit (Again) Over 'Cavorting With Neo-Nazis In Berlin'

Years ago, during the COVID-19 pandemic, current Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. cavorted with neo-Nazis in Berlin. A Daily Kos community member, whose real name is David (which he himself revealed), summarized a local news article about the event, headlined his write-up “Anti-Vaxxer RFK JR. joins neo-Nazis in massive Berlin ‘Anti-Corona’ Protest,” and moved on with his day.

In 2021, a furious RFK Jr. sued Daily Kos to unmask David’s identity. Four-plus years later, after bouncing between New York and California courts, amicus briefs from The New York Times and 10 other organizations, and endless appeals, our case is still working its way through the courts. Somewhere along the way and after considerable expenses, RFK Jr.’s team figured out David’s identity and sued him directly. Those original suits went nowhere: He filed in New Hampshire—while David lives in Maine—then blew an appeal deadline (his lawyers blamed bad Wi-Fi, no joke).

My most recent comprehensive update on the case is here.

(For the record, I’ve flat-out called RFK Jr. a Nazi. He’s never sued me or Daily Kos for that—just fixated on the lower-profile diarist. It’s been bizarre.)

At this point, two cases remained. The first is ours, still on appeal, aimed at securing a New York precedent to shield media outlets from frivolous suits like this. The second—the case against David—should finally be dead now, after a Maine judge granted summary judgment earlier this month. And the reasoning is hilarious.

Summary judgment means that the facts can’t be in dispute and that the judge can rule as a matter of law. The fatal problem for RFK Jr.? He refused to deny that he cavorted with neo-Nazis.

From the decision, RFK Jr. alleged that David claimed he:

  1. Helped cause the Samoa Measles Outbreak;
  2. Opposed all vaccines;
  3. Expressed “dangerous vaccine conspiracies” that caused the death of 234,000 Americans;
  4. Wanted to cause the death of all black people;
  5. Said Covid19 was designed to save Jewish people; and
  6. Knowingly joined, supported, and associated with a neo-Nazi party in Berlin.

The judge dismantled those claims one by one. Here’s an example, given the outrageousness of the claim: 

iv. Plaintiff “wanted to cause the death of black people”Defendant has never written or said this statement [...] On January 4, 2022, Defendant posted on X, without comment, a link to an article, authored by thegrio.com, titled "Anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is harming black people—and his family legacy—with his vaccine misinformation campaign.” [...] Plaintiff does not offer sworn evidence to the contrary.

To make it crystal clear, a reposted tweet from a respected publication on how RFK Jr. is reportedly harming Black people turned into a legal claim that RFK Jr. “wanted to cause the death of all black people.” He really is a piece of shit.

Let’s do another one:

v. Plaintiff “said Covid19 was designed to save Jews”Defendant has never written or said this statement. [...] On July 16, 2023, Defendant posted on X, without comment, a link to an article, authored by the Washington Post, titled “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggests covid was designed to spare Jews, Chinese People.” [...] Complaint supports Defendant’s assertion that he repeated the third-party content without embellishment. Plaintiff denies Defendant posted the link without embellishment, but cites no admissible record evidence to support the denial.

Again, RFK Jr.’s lawyers took a simple link to a Washington Post article and created an alternate reality in which David claimed COVID was “designed to save Jews.” RFK Jr.’s lawyers should be disbarred for wasting the court’s time with these egregious lies.

But the kicker is the Nazi-rally bit, the whole reason this fiasco started.

Defendant establishes as true, and Plaintiff admits, that Plaintiff joined the protest rally in Berlin as a speaker. [...] Plaintiff argues that Defendant’s statement [that it was organized by neo-Nazis] supports a defamatory inference that Plaintiff joined a neo-Nazi party or movement as a member. Although a defamatory inference may be actionable, the statement that Plaintiff joined the protest, which is true, does not reasonably give rise to an inference that Plaintiff joined the organizations sponsoring the protest.

In other words, RFK Jr. and his lawyers didn’t argue that the rally wasn’t organized by Nazis, just that he didn’t join the Nazi party as a member. Cool beans, bro. Except David never said RFK Jr. was a Nazi, just that he joined Nazis at their rally—and that turned out to be factually true. RFK Jr. didn’t even bother to dispute that part.

So chalk one up for the First Amendment.

And thank you—to our community and to Public Citizen—for funding this defense, and to David for standing strong throughout it all. He went up against RFK Jr. and emerged victorious. That couldn’t have been easy.

RFK Jr. is a dangerous loon who cavorts with neo-Nazis, and he can go fuck himself.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

RFK JR

Impeach Bobby? House Democrat Vows Removal Of 'Dangerous' RFK Jr

Democratic Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan announced Thursday that she plans to introduce articles of impeachment against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., citing his unscientific medical practices as a threat to public health.

“RFK Jr. is making our country less safe and making healthcare less affordable and accessible for Michiganders. His contempt for science, the constant spreading of conspiracy theories, and his complete disregard for the thousands of research hours spent by America’s top doctors and experts is unprecedented, reckless, and dangerous,” she said in a statement.

Stevens added that she believes that Kennedy has violated his oath of office and that she intends to “lead the charge to remove him.”

Similar to that of the president, articles of impeachment must pass the House, followed by a Senate trial. If convicted in the Senate, an official can then be removed from office.

Stevens has accused Kennedy of dereliction of duty, citing cuts to vital research, promotion of medical falsehoods and conspiracies, lying about his views during his confirmation hearing, and failing to administer the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which are under his control.

The impeachment charge follows President Donald Trump’s widely derided presentation on Monday, where Kennedy appeared alongside Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Administrator Mehmet Oz. Together, they falsely claimed that autism can be linked to vaccines and the use of acetaminophen.

In response, scientists and doctors from around the world have lashed out at the Trump administration, highlighting the dangers of their unscientific medical claims—particularly among vulnerable children.

But despite the public outcry, the autism quackery embraced by Trump, Kennedy, and Oz has received support from key GOP figures.

“God bless President Trump and RFK Jr. for asking the questions and starting to use their positions, their platform, to give parents informed consent,” Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin said.

The autism debacle is just the latest in a string of failure and embarrassment from health agencies on Kennedy’s watch. His decision to censor CDC reports and muzzle experts contributed to an unprecedented measles outbreak in Texas earlier this year.

Kennedy has repeatedly pushed unscientific fears about COVID-19 vaccines and beefed up the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices with compliant followers who have limited access to vaccines.

In his confirmation hearings, Kennedy said that he would uphold existing vaccine standards, but in office he has done the opposite. He’s also pushing to limit access to abortion pills while trying to pressure international scientists against publishing objective research on the effectiveness of vaccines.

Americans have died as a result of Kennedy’s malpractice, which has been enabled by Trump. If successful, Stevens’ impeachment plan could put a stop to it all.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Is Kennedy Profiting From White House Attack On Tylenol? Is Trump?

Is Kennedy Profiting From White House Attack On Tylenol? Is Trump?

On Monday, Donald Trump issued an ignorant warning to pregnant women whose doctors prescribe Tylenol, a brand name for acetaminophen. "Don't take Tylenol. Don't take it," he said. "Fight like hell not to take it." And when in pain, "Tough it out."

The idea that Tylenol use in pregnancy may cause autism has been shot down by researchers studying millions of children. Trump's contention that this over-the-counter painkiller can cause the disorder did serve one purpose. It gave him gobs of attention over what would have been an otherwise unremarkable White House event.

Come Tuesday, Donald Trump is at the United Nations again setting off big headlines as he delivered one of his grievance-linked tirades before the General Assembly. Used to the president's unhinged performances, the attendees quickly moved on. If ever there was a time to "tough it out" while in pain, Trump delivered it to his U.N. audience.

But the attack on Tylenol is dangerous. Medical authorities hold that expectant mothers should treat fever and pain, and Tylenol is one of the safest remedies to do so. Not doing so poses risks to both the mother and fetus, including preterm births.

Trump knew to cover his rear end by adding that women should take Tylenol in cases of "extremely high fever." But what is a pregnant woman to do if she has a fever that the president recommends she "tough out" but she is not sure whether the fever is "extremely" high or just a bit high?

Alternatively, she could listen to doctors. But thousands of Americans died from COVID because they listened to MAGA rather than medical experts who urged them to get vaccinated. And back then, the Department of Health was staffed by serious scientists — and not the collection of quacks Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has replaced many of them with.

Trump has breathed new life into the prospects for trial lawyers who chase after companies for fat settlements. (The lawyers collect up to 40 percent of the award.) They already lost a 2023 class-action lawsuit claiming that Tylenol taken during pregnancy causes autism and ADHD.

A federal judge threw out the case, writing that the lawyers "permitted cherry-picking, allowed a results-driven analysis, and obscured the complexities, inconsistencies, and weaknesses in the underlying data."

About 20 law firms participated in the suit.

Kennedy remains in on the take. He will continue receiving contingency fees from Wisner Baum for referring cases. He gets 10 percent of the award whether the plaintiff wins or settles.

Wisner Baum is currently suing Merck, maker of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil, for allegedly not warning consumers of its risks. Kennedy insists he is not currently receiving referral fees on the case, but critics say he could still collect because the agreement exists.

Autism is a serious concern. It is a brain development disorder that affects social interactions and is marked by repetitive and other unusual behaviors. It is unclear whether the "autism epidemic" reflects more screening for the condition or involves other factors including age of the mother, genetics and environment. No link has been found to vaccines.

More on Trump's bizarre statements about Tylenol and pregnancy: "There's no downside. Don't take it. You'll be uncomfortable. It won't be as easy, maybe. But don't take it if you're pregnant. Don't take Tylenol, and don't give it to the baby after the baby is born."

OK, women under the influence of MAGA. You've been challenged to undergo unnecessary suffering in service to the fumes wafting through Trump's brain. Or perhaps there's an ulterior motive in his promotion of these BS health claims. The link may not be autism but money.



Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at fharrop@gmail.com. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

RFK Jr MAHA

Kennedy's MAHA Movement Reveals Itself As Corporate Front

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again commission on children’s health reached its ignominious conclusion Tuesday by issuing a final report that failed to mention the biggest threats to childhood ill-health in the U.S.

The final 73-page report, which was accompanied by a 20-page strategy memo, made no mention of:

  • Gun violence, the number one killer of American children under 18;
  • Smoking, a lifelong habit most take up when teenagers; or
  • Global warming, the greatest long-term threat facing the youngest generation.

Mentioning these issues would have required the report call attention to the biggest roadblocks standing in the way of addressing each of these issues. They are, respectively, the Gun Lobby, Big Tobacco and Big Oil & Gas.

Those industries are fervent supporters of the U.S.’s authoritarian headman, Donald Trump. His only consistent political position — one that he requires all his lackeys adhere to — is steadfast support for the nation’s richest and most powerful corporations and individuals, especially those that have given him huge campaign contributions.

Even when it came to addressing the issues that Kennedy claims to care most about, his need to please Trump by giving special interests a pass denuded the final report of any meaningful measures. Those issues include the prevalence of ultra-processed food; chemical food additives; environmental toxins; and excessive use of psychotropic drugs and vaccines. Other than vaccines (last week, his denigration of vaccines led even a few Republican physician-Senators to question his honesty), those are issues that most Americans and unbiased researchers would also like to see addressed.

Yet the final report failed to outline any concrete steps that the Health and Human Services Department, the Agriculture Department or the Environmental Protection Agency plan to take. “A lot of this is nice (but) it’s a report about intentions, not about actions,” New York University professor of nutrition emeritus Marion Nestle told the PBS NewsHour. “How on earth are they going to do these things (when) the word regulation is only mentioned once?”

Many of the deregulatory and budget cutting actions taken by the Trump regime since taking office work directly against the goals outlined in the report. For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency’s research department has been gutted, all but eliminating the agency’s ability to scientifically determine which environmental toxins are causing significant harm to children’s health.

The budget for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (colloquially food stamps) has been cut sharply, which will reduce food assistance to almost three million children. Rather than taking steps at the federal level to limit the ability of low-income beneficiaries to purchase sugar-laden beverages or salt-heavy snack foods (instead, they plan to offer technical assistance to states that want to do that), the Trump regime is making more children go hungry. Common sense suggests allowing three million kids to go hungry will destroy the health of far more children than allowing parents of kids on food stamps to continue buying soda pop.

The strategy report called on the Department of Education to “help states” reinstitute the presidential fitness test. The DoE is currently being dismantled by the Trump regime.

Also, it claimed HHS’ Administration for Children and Families will “promote greater physical activity” in after-school and summer programs. Meanwhile, Trump’s budget cutters slashed $7 billion to support those programs in June, only to restore a mere $1 billion a month later after widespread protests from educators in both red and blue states.

Perhaps the most curious oversight in yesterday’s strategy report was its turnaround on the chemicals, dyes and other additives in ultra-processed foods (UPFs), a major bête noire for Kennedy and a long-time concern of mainstream nutritionists. The main report’s 7-page section on UPFs contained 75 footnotes. Yet the strategy memo contained just a single action item of little significance: “USDA, HHS, and FDA will continue efforts to develop a U.S. government-wide definition for ‘Ultra-processed Food’ to support potential future research and policy activity.”

“What this says to me is that the first report was written by MAHA,” Jerold Mande, an adjunct professor of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and a former senior policy official for nutrition in the Bush, Clinton, and Obama administrations, told Time magazine. “The second one, the White House let industry lobbyists write it.”

Merrill Goozner, the former editor of Modern Healthcare, writes about health care and politics at GoozNews.substack.com, where this column first appeared. Please consider subscribing to support his work.

Reprinted with permission from Gooznews

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World