Tag: save america act
What Republicans Really Mean When They Accuse Democrats Of 'Election Cheating'

What Republicans Really Mean When They Accuse Democrats Of 'Election Cheating'

The Republicans are determined to pass it. It's their Hail Mary pass for the midterms. If you can't win an election fair and square, then suppress the votes. Disenfranchise those who aren't likely to vote for you. Create a phony problem that you then have to solve. It's an outrage. And it's happening in real time.

"The cheating is rampant in our elections," President Donald Trump told Congress last month. That's a lie. It isn't. The liberal Brennan Center reached the same conclusion as the conservative Heritage Foundation. Noncitizen voting is ridiculously rare. The Brennan Center found exactly 30 instances of noncitizens voting out of 23.5 million votes it reviewed in the 2016 election. The Heritage Foundation found 24 instances of noncitizens voting in U.S. elections between 2003 and 2023.

Results from the states confirm these numbers. A sample from Reuters: Florida has prosecuted two people for voting as noncitizens since 2022, out of 13.5 million registered voters. In Kansas, a 2018 court case found that 39 noncitizens registered to vote between 1999 and 2013, out of roughly 1.8 million registered voters. Nevada found that three noncitizens voted in the 2016 election, out of more than 1 million ballots cast.

"You gotta win the midterms," Trump told House Republicans in January, "because if we don't win the midterms, they'll find a reason to impeach me." And how do you do that when the country is turning against the president? The answer Trump gave last week was simple. Pass the SAVE Act. "It'll guarantee the midterms ... If you send it up there, you will win the midterms and you will win every election for a long time."

By disenfranchising women voters, young people and poor Americans. By making it more difficult for people to vote, you make it easier for Republicans to win. It is shameful.

Here's how it works, or rather doesn't work. The bill requires documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. A real ID isn't even enough; only five states — Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Vermont and Washington — even offer a special "enhanced" driver's license that indicates citizenship and those cost extra. For everyone else, you'd need a U.S. passport or a birth certificate paired with a photo ID to register to vote.

But wait. Who has a valid passport? About 146 million Americans don't. And the birth certificate won't work for the 84% of married women who change their last name and so would also need a copy of their marriage license, in addition to the birth certificate and photo ID, just to register, or re-register to vote. That's some 69 million American women whose birth certificate no longer matches their legal names.

Under the SAVE Act, any of them who need to register, re-register, or update their address would have to show up in person at an election office — which only six percent of voters currently do — with three separate documents: a birth certificate, a photo ID and a marriage certificate to bridge the gap between the two. Those who fail to do so or who are swept up in the bill's mandatory voter-roll purges could lose the right to vote.

What are Republicans so afraid of? How can they tie up the Senate on this? Have they no shame?

They are afraid of women voters. They are afraid of new voters. They are afraid that the more people vote, the worse they will do. They are doing nothing less than undermining the democratic process. It is simply indefensible.

Susan Estrich is a celebrated feminist legal scholar, the first female president of the Harvard Law Review, and the first woman to run a U.S. presidential campaign. She has written eight books.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Trump Called Out For Hypocrisy After Voting By Mail In Florida Special Election

Trump Called Out For Hypocrisy After Voting By Mail In Florida Special Election

During President Donald Trump’s reliably bizarre Cabinet meeting on Thursday, he tried to preempt criticism of his own use of mail-in voting for a special election in Florida, after years of railing against the practice as fraudulent.

“You know why?” Trump said when asked. “Because I'm president of the United States and because of the fact that I'm president of the United States, I did a mail-in ballot for elections that took place in Florida, because I felt I should be here instead of being in the beautiful sunshine taking in Palm Beach.”

“But you were in Palm Beach, sir, the last few weekends,” the reporter replied.

No word yet on whether that reporter was exiled to right-wing Siberia.

Trump noted there are mail-in ballot exceptions for disabled voters and military members stationed abroad, but did not explain which “exception” applied to First Lady Melania Trump and their son, Barron, both of whom also voted by mail in Florida’s March 24 special election.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Senate Republicans Know Why Trump's SAVE Act Would Backfire On Them

Senate Republicans Know Why Trump's SAVE Act Would Backfire On Them

Here’s a delicious irony: Republicans know the SAVE Act would be a disaster for their party, but they can’t get President Donald Trump to see it.

The polarizing legislation behind the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act would require people to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship—like a passport or birth certificate—when registering to vote in federal elections. Trump and his acolytes claim this would stop noncitizen voting, which is already vanishingly rare. Critics point out the obvious: It would make voting harder for a lot of eligible voters.

Normally, that’s the point. Voter suppression has long been a feature of GOP strategy, not a bug. But that thinking is outdated, as lower-propensity voters are increasingly Republican.

Which makes this GOP-backed bill not just an affront to democracy, but politically self-destructive.

One key provision would require a birth certificate that matches a voter’s current name. It’s driven in part by the GOP’s fixation on trans people, who make up a tiny sliver of the electorate. But the real impact would fall on married women who changed their last names, and they are disproportionately a Republican-leaning group.

In 2024, 52 percent of married women voted for Trump, but only 38 percent of unmarried women backed him, making for a yawning 14-point gap in support. And the women most likely to have changed their names are the same ones more likely to vote Republican.

A 2023 Pew study found that 86 percent of married conservative women took their husband’s last name, compared to 70 percent of liberal women. Education reinforces the pattern: The more educated a woman is, the less likely she is to change her name—and the more likely she is to vote Democratic.

Current passports could solve the documentation issue, but about half of Americans don’t have one. And the same patterns hold: Higher income and higher education make passport ownership more likely, and both of those factors correlate with Democratic voters.

So once again, the burden falls hardest on Trump’s base.

The states where Trump performed best in 2024 tend to have the lowest passport ownership rates. A 2023 YouGov survey found that 52 percent of Trump voters lacked a valid passport, compared to 45 percent of Biden voters. There’s also a gender gap: 55 percent of women don’t have passports, versus 49 percent of men. Among evangelicals—a core GOP constituency—only 38 percent have passports. Urban and suburban residents are far more likely to have them than rural voters.

Women could ostensibly use a marriage certificate to bridge the name-change gap. But that assumes they have one readily available. Many don’t—especially older women who changed their names decades ago and are less likely to still have those documents on hand.

And replacing them isn’t simple. It costs money, takes time, and often requires in-person trips to government offices.

Those barriers hit hardest in rural areas, where government offices are fewer and distances between them longer, and transportation can be a real obstacle. The very voters most likely to face these hurdles—older, rural women—are also a core part of Trump’s base.

That’s how voter suppression actually works: not through one big barrier, but through a series of smaller hassles. Each step increases the odds that someone decides it’s not worth it and drops out. Those pressures hit hardest among lower-income, older, and rural voters—the same voters the GOP now relies on.

That’s the shift Republicans haven’t fully adjusted to.

For decades, lower-income and less-educated voters leaned Democratic, and Republicans built strategies around keeping them from the polls. Trump flipped that coalition and turned out voters who historically sat out elections.

And now this bill risks pushing those same voters back out.

Many Republicans understand that, even if they won’t say it out loud. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, for example, has shown no interest in blowing up the filibuster to pass the SAVE Act, even as Trump pressures him not to cave and end the ongoing government shutdown unless Democrats agree to support the vote-suppressing legislation.

It’s easier to let Democrats take the blame for killing the bill than to tell Trump he’s wrong.

Markos Moulitsas is founder and editor of the blogging website Daily Kos and author of three books.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Why The Save America Act Could Be Political Suicide For Republicans

Why The Save America Act Could Be Political Suicide For Republicans

It's common sense, Republicans say. You have to show ID to buy a beer, board a plane, or land a job as a snow shoveler. Why not require proof of identity from those who seek to exercise our most sacred civic right, casting a vote?

According to the polls, the GOP has won the argument. Most Americans favor a voter ID law.

What Republicans are currently pressing for, the SAVE America Act, however, is not a voter ID law, a requirement that registered voters prove who they are when they go to the polls. SAVE is a "prove you're a citizen" law.

Why is the GOP pushing SAVE America? Republican voters will be hit hardest. Clearly, neither President Donald Trump nor the Republican Party knows what's good for them.

A voter ID law — something most states, especially red ones, currently have — passes the common-sense test for most Americans because it requires a form of identity nine out of 10 people have, or can obtain fairly easily, like a driver's license or non-driver's state identification card. Some states even take non-photo IDs. Voter ID laws have been promoted by Republicans primarily because they limit or eliminate mail-in voting, which they wrongly assume benefits Democrats.

The SAVE America Act goes much further than voter ID. In an attempt to improve Republican candidates' chances under the guise of protecting voting integrity, it tries to disenfranchise Democratic voters.

Ironically, it will have the opposite effect.

Voter ID attempts to verify who you are. SAVE America requires you to show proof of citizenship in the form of a passport or a birth certificate with your current name on it. (Noncitizens can get a driver's license.) Far more Democrats have proof of citizenship than Republicans.

Fewer than half of U.S. citizens hold a passport. For these elites, the SAVE America Act would be a breeze. Sixty-four percent of Americans with a household income above $100,000 have a passport, while only 21 percent of those earning under $50,000 do. Upper-middle-class white voters lean Democratic; poorer whites lean Republican.

Roughly half of 2024 Trump voters have passports, compared to two-thirds of Kamala Harris voters. The 13 states with the lowest passport rates all voted Republican in 2024. Congressional districts with low passport ownership are overwhelmingly GOP-held, rural and/or Southern. Rural voters (a GOP stronghold) face longer drives to election offices for in-person verification. Older voters, military personnel, tribal citizens and working-class Americans — Republican-leaning demographic groups — are less likely to have the required documents.

A substantial number of voters don't have a physical copy of their birth certificate. Research by the Brennan Center "indicates that more than nine percent of American citizens of voting age, or 21.3 million people, don't have proof of citizenship readily available. There are myriad reasons for this — the documents might be in the home of another family member or in a safety deposit box. And at least 3.8 million don't have these documents at all, often because they were lost, destroyed, or stolen."

Poor voters — who tend to vote Republican — live more disorganized, mobile lives. They're less likely to know where their birth certificate is or how to obtain a new one, or be motivated to find out America would effectively repeal women's suffrage. "84 percent of women who marry change their surname, meaning as many as 69 million American women do not have a birth certificate with their legal name on it and thereby could not use their birth certificate to prove citizenship," notes the Center for American Progress. "The SAVE Act makes no mention of being able to show a marriage certificate or change-of-name documentation."

Women who change their names — twice as likely to be Republican — would have to present themselves at their county board of elections office, which is only open during business hours, when most people work.

There, local election workers — overwhelmed by a sudden surge of applicants — would have to sort through each individual's marriage and divorce decrees and other miscellany to determine whether Mrs. Jane Doe, née Jane Smith, is eligible to vote. Given that SAVE America mandates a fine and prison time for an election official who wrongly allows someone to vote, even someone who is a citizen but without the right documents, the path of least resistance for a beleaguered, poorly paid local election clerk would be to reject rather than approve name-change voters, including trans people.

After decades of easing voting with same-day registration, automatic registration with driver's license renewals, early and mail-in voting, SAVE America would make voting much harder. Many people will choose not to vote rather than jump through so many bureaucratic hoops for the right to choose between a center-left and center-right party, neither of which delivers for them. Here is the purpose of SAVE America — to radically reduce the number of voters.

Most of whom, hilariously, are Republican.

It's bizarre that the right is fighting for SAVE America. Democratic worries about discouraging working-class voters are sweet but run counter to their interests. As the 2024 election proved, poor and lower-middle-class voters are no longer theirs to lose. If Democrats were smart, they'd be the party pushing the SAVE America Act — or getting out of its way.

The GOP wants SAVE America because they haven't internalized the class shifts in the American electorate. Republicans have become the party of the working poor (even if they don't care about them), while Democrats are now the party of coastal elites (though they pretend to champion Joe and Jane Sixpack).

If passed, and signed into law, the SAVE America Act is likely to backfire for its Republican sponsors in the same way that Trump's advice to MAGA followers not to use write-in ballots contributed to his loss in 2020.

Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist ,and graphic novelist, is the author of the brand-new What's Left: Radical Solutions for Radical Problems. He co-hosts the left-vs-right DMZ America podcast with fellow cartoonist Scott Stantis and The TMI Show with political analyst Manila Chan. Subscribe: tedrall.Substack.com.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World